These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Low-sec Hopes and Changes

Author
Salvos Rhoska
#321 - 2017-03-19 12:54:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
This is basic mechanics.


Are not all changes to the game, mechanics changes?

No..


So what differentiates a sound/graphics/ui change, from a "mechanics" change?
Are they both not enacted in the same way, by adding, omitting and/or rewriting the code of EVE?

EVE is not perfect, nor complete.
It is an evolving system.
Just as players adapt in EVE, so too must EVE adapt to players.

We have shown, as a player base, that we will bend and break everything as far as possible.

EVE has, demonstrably, changed many many times.
Whether that is because of players exploiting change, or CCP enacting it, is a chicken/egg question.
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#322 - 2017-03-19 17:15:43 UTC
Vokan Narkar wrote:
lowsec is fine only problem is cyno and drops...

obviously cyno cannot be removed but dropping 5 carriers on procurer come on...


This is not a game problem but a player base problem. People would rather hell-dunk than have a fight.
Sameli Adelora
Celestial Industrial Supplies
Templis Strategic Division
#323 - 2017-03-20 01:55:13 UTC
I have been spending time in low sec doing FW. I am not very good but I got tired of being (at least being called) a carebear so I decided to give it a try. I have read so many post about people talking about how boring mining is because all you do is sit there and occasionally change targets and to a point all of those people are right.
So I go over to the Black Rise, have 20 or so ships and all the fitings and its off to Low Sec and a new and exciting life. Except the majority of the FW targets you find are farmers that only fit their ships with warp stabs. And to make matters worse if you try to kill them they complain and say that the area is just for people farming LPs and if I want pvp I should go to WHs because if I don't I suck. Well in my second sentence I said I suck so I can't disagree.
But this is a major problem with Low Sec. That it is just a farming area. A bunch of ice belts renamed as FW plexes full of people that think they should be able to play AFK.
This is painful to say, but if you want Low Sec to improve then there needs to be a Low Sec version of Code.
Salvos Rhoska
#324 - 2017-03-20 07:27:40 UTC
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Vokan Narkar wrote:
lowsec is fine only problem is cyno and drops...

obviously cyno cannot be removed but dropping 5 carriers on procurer come on...


This is not a game problem but a player base problem. People would rather hell-dunk than have a fight.


Remove cynos. Player base behavior will change to adapt.
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#325 - 2017-03-20 07:37:56 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Vokan Narkar wrote:
lowsec is fine only problem is cyno and drops...

obviously cyno cannot be removed but dropping 5 carriers on procurer come on...


This is not a game problem but a player base problem. People would rather hell-dunk than have a fight.


Remove cynos. Player base behavior will change to adapt.


no, they will leave lowsec

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Salvos Rhoska
#326 - 2017-03-20 07:52:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Lan Wang wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Vokan Narkar wrote:
lowsec is fine only problem is cyno and drops...

obviously cyno cannot be removed but dropping 5 carriers on procurer come on...


This is not a game problem but a player base problem. People would rather hell-dunk than have a fight.


Remove cynos. Player base behavior will change to adapt.


no, they will leave lowsec


Some will leave LS.
Some will adapt.
Others will enter LS.

The wheel of EVE will grind onward.
Jax Bederen
Dark Horse RM
#327 - 2017-03-20 07:56:43 UTC
Well, they can start by removing me having to press the scan button over and over like a good little monkey. Seriously it's such a archaic mechanic. i'd like to feel a bit more high tech in a space ship. Ping.....ping.....ping....Captain!...my finger hurts.
Toxin Nostromo
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#328 - 2017-03-20 08:21:30 UTC
I’ve spent most of my time in Eve in lowsec. Mainly because it provides easy logistics without kissing the ring.

Once upon a time I actually mined in lowsec with a couple barges (2007). I lived down a pipeline that saw maybe 2-3 jumps a day. Then the hauler bots came and increased traffic and piracy, then I moved.

I Setup a POS out in the middle of nowhere no stations for 5 jumps or so, and had my own little space carved out. Did my own thing with a couple of friends, solo PVP was a thing and it was fun. Anyone sticks around too long you’d run them off, give them hell until they had enough and would leave. In fact there was another POS in the system with a small gang, we fought off and on for a couple weeks till they had enough and they left. It was great content!

Then faction war came and there’s very few places that doesn’t have faction war bringing heavy traffic to the places that doesn’t have it. All those places are overrun by growing corporation/alliances that are either pirates or building up for taking some sov space. Leaving the very few places hard to do the Combat sites and forget about any industrial work.

With all the hot dropping, bait, falcon alts, etc no one wants to bring a challenge, the time it takes to find that isn’t worth the investment. I don’t find small hull 10 second battles fun. Currently at least, so solo/small PVP is out for lowsec atm.

I would like to see Lowsec changes designed around solo/small parties. Also, a separation of PVE and PVP. When I PVP, I am PVP fit and don’t have to perform PVE content. However, if you PVE you have to PVP in a PVE fit. So most just check d-scan and warp off. No PVP is had, no PVE is had, loose for everyone. If a small party want’s PVE or PVP challenges I don’t see a compelling reason for the need to join an alliance when your perfectly happy with the current diversity, friends and direction of the corporation you’re in. Nor pay monthly to play by someone else’s “vision” or rules. Lowsec was the happy medium back then for that and could be again.

Faction War space needs to be reduced greatly. Faster for people to find fights and more epic battles. While opening up space for more activity, carnage, industrial and local politics. Never happen, but no one said it had to be realistic.

See my Eve Youtube Channel here! Toxin Nostromo Eve Youtube Channel

Salvos Rhoska
#329 - 2017-03-20 08:59:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Lets be real for a moment.

You dont "need" cynos (or caps for that matter) in LS to gatecamp, to PvP, nor for LS combat PvE content, nor to mine.
Faction/T2/3 cruisers, bcs and bs are sufficient, or with an alt/friend. Even frigates and non-JF haulers.
Caps in LS are overkill, and cynos unnecessary.
If cynos/caps are removed from LS, you also dont need them to defend against NS neighbors dropping.

Tbh if you have interest in cyno content, and cap content, you would be better off in Null anyways, even as is now.
(Vast empty sectors of NPC Null if you dont want the hastle/competition of Sov, or Player Null, if you do.)

The content there is more lucrative and suitable for caps.
The geography AND bubbles there making cynos actually relevant.

(Seriously, much of NPC Null is almost entirely empty, with very little traffic, most of which is explorers.).
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#330 - 2017-03-20 09:28:40 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
You dont "need" cynos (or caps for that matter) in LS to gatecamp, nor for LS combat PvE content, nor to mine.
Pirate/T2/3 cruisers, bcs and bs are sufficient, or with an alt/friend. Caps are overkill.
If cynos/caps are removed from LS, you also dont need them to defend against NS neighbors dropping.

Tbh if you have interest in cyno content, and cap content, you would be better off in Null anyways.
(Vast empty sectors of NPC Null if you dont want the hastle/competition of Sov, or Player Null, if you do.)


thats a completely selfish and arrogant reply. the answer to this is, we already have it so removing it is a bad idea when it p***es on pretty much every lowsec group in eve by removing a core mechanic, you also dont need capitals to do havens or any other pve content in null so i fail to see any merit in your logic here.

"Tbh if you have interest in cyno content, and cap content, you would be better off in Null anyways." explain please because the mass amount of capital users in lowsec disagree with you here.

"(Vast empty sectors of NPC Null if you dont want the hastle/competition of Sov, or Player Null, if you do.)" - cant see a capital being much use in an empty system in the backend of null unless its to rat with which again you dont need a capital to rat havens...

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Salvos Rhoska
#331 - 2017-03-20 09:51:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Lan Wang wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
You dont "need" cynos (or caps for that matter) in LS to gatecamp, nor for LS combat PvE content, nor to mine.
Pirate/T2/3 cruisers, bcs and bs are sufficient, or with an alt/friend. Caps are overkill.
If cynos/caps are removed from LS, you also dont need them to defend against NS neighbors dropping.

Tbh if you have interest in cyno content, and cap content, you would be better off in Null anyways.
(Vast empty sectors of NPC Null if you dont want the hastle/competition of Sov, or Player Null, if you do.)


thats a completely selfish and arrogant reply. the answer to this is, we already have it so removing it is a bad idea when it p***es on pretty much every lowsec group in eve by removing a core mechanic, you also dont need capitals to do havens or any other pve content in null so i fail to see any merit in your logic here.

"Tbh if you have interest in cyno content, and cap content, you would be better off in Null anyways." explain please because the mass amount of capital users in lowsec disagree with you here.

"(Vast empty sectors of NPC Null if you dont want the hastle/competition of Sov, or Player Null, if you do.)" - cant see a capital being much use in an empty system in the backend of null unless its to rat with which again you dont need a capital to rat havens...


Jesus Christ, Mr. Meat-Puppet.
Drop the shilling for a minute.

Caps are huge overkill for LS content, and you dont need cynos in LS to avoid bubbles (cos there are none).
When cynos/caps are removed from LS, you also wont need cynos/caps to defend against NS drops/caps.

This frees LS to run sub-cap fleets to their hearts content, without cyno drops or caps, which is clearly what LS wants for itself.

Cynos have three purposes:
1)-Bypassing gate camps
2)-Dropping overwhelming force
3)-Avoiding bubbles

In LS:
-1) Means NS bypassing LS gate camps
-2) Means NS dropping into LS with impunity.
-3) No bubbles in LS

Furthermore, LS players jumping or cynoing into NS have to deal with bubbles and legal smartbombs.
The same is not true of NS players jumping/cynoing into LS.

LS gets proper fked in that deal, all around.



If you want cyno/cap content, go to NS.
Where caps are tiered to the content, and bubbles/geography actually make cynos relevant.
If you dont want the hastle/competition of Sov, go to the vast empty expanses of NPC Null.

There is no rational or logical reason for cynos or caps in LS.

You dont need them to gatecamp, you dont need them to PvP, you dont need them to bypass bubbles, you dont need them to run any LS content.

LS wants sub-cap/non-cyno PvP and PvE.

If you want cynos and cap content, gtfo of LS, to NS, where they belong.

Is it comfy to overkill with caps in LS, and drop into it with NS alts with impunity, bypassing gates, no bubbles and no legal smartbombs?

9/10 of this thread want LS to be sub-cap.
Why dont you?
Afraid to adapt?
Afraid of equal playing field in NS?
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#332 - 2017-03-20 10:53:34 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
LS wants sub-cap/non-cyno PvP.

If you want cynos and cap content, gtfo of LS, to NS, where they belong.

Is it comfy to overkill with caps in LS, and drop into it with NS alts with impunity?
9/10 of this thread want LS to be sub-cap.
Why dont you?
Afraid to adapt?
Afraid of equal playing field in NS?


"afraid of equal playing field in NS?" what does that even mean, there is no equal playing field anywhere in eve, you obviously assume i haven't lived in nullsec.

"why dont i?" because i like flying caps in space that isnt a 10% tidi slugfest, is that good enough for you?, im sure all the other lowsec groups who specialise in caps and black ops will agree.

"9/10 of this thread" lol this thread is not a reliable source to assume that all of lowsec wants capitals removed. your idea will kill lowsec. simple

"LS wants sub-cap/non-cyno PvP." say who? you and like 3 other people over the hundreds if not thousands of capital pilots in lowsec, ok

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Salvos Rhoska
#333 - 2017-03-20 11:03:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Lan Wang wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
LS wants sub-cap/non-cyno PvP.

If you want cynos and cap content, gtfo of LS, to NS, where they belong.

Is it comfy to overkill with caps in LS, and drop into it with NS alts with impunity?
9/10 of this thread want LS to be sub-cap.
Why dont you?
Afraid to adapt?
Afraid of equal playing field in NS?


"afraid of equal playing field in NS?" what does that even mean, there is no equal playing field anywhere in eve, you obviously assume i haven't lived in nullsec.

"why dont i?" because i like flying caps in space that isnt a 10% tidi slugfest, is that good enough for you?, im sure all the other lowsec groups who specialise in caps and black ops will agree.

"9/10 of this thread" lol this thread is not a reliable source to assume that all of lowsec wants capitals removed. your idea will kill lowsec. simple

"LS wants sub-cap/non-cyno PvP." say who? you and like 3 other people over the hundreds if not thousands of capital pilots in lowsec, ok

1) Im not assuming anything. Idgaf where you live on what alt. Nobody does. Where you live is not relevant to topic.

2) You like flying caps in space that has no bubbles or smartbombs.. You probably also enjoy bypassing LS gates between NS and LS, and within LS.? How comfy.

3) How incredibly selfish and arrogant YOU are.

4) NPC Null fights are rarely, if ever, TIDI. Wtf are you even arguing?

5) Lolwat? How will removal of cyno/caps from LS kill LS?
I specifically showed that LS doesnt need either cynos or caps.
YOU are the one killing LS.
LS wants non-cyno/sub-cap fights!

6) HTFU and move to Null, either Player or NPC, where caps and cynos are justified.

7) Are you trying to argue the majority of LS players are cap/cyno capable, or even interested in those?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

8) GTFO to NS where you, cynos and caps belong, instead of of this nonsense excuse for seal-clubbing, when its demonstrably, mathematically and structurally clear that caps/cynos in LS are advantageous to NS far more than LS itself.

9) Your arguments belie your selfish motives, and your fear.

You are afraid of NS, and of a non-cyno/sub-cap LS. You want to keep LS as a cyno/cap playground though neither cynos nor caps are justified nor needed there, especially as entering from NS, whilst the majority of players want LS to be a sub-cap/non-cyno sector without NS exploitation.

10) Post-change, just go to NS for your cyno/cap content. Its already there and where it belongs. Or fly in LS with sub-caps and no cynos.
Simple as that.
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#334 - 2017-03-20 11:57:40 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
******** stuff


shut up salvos and get off your high horse.

"You are afraid of NS, and of a non-cyno/sub-cap LS. You want to keep LS as a cyno/cap playground though neither cynos nor caps are justified nor needed there, especially as entering from NS, whilst the majority of players want LS to be a sub-cap/non-cyno sector without NS exploitation" - how did you guess? this is the most ******** thing ive ever actually heard.

"2) You like flying caps in space that has no bubbles or smartbombs.. You probably also enjoy bypassing LS gates between NS and LS, and within LS.? How comfy." when were smartbombs removed from lowsec? i was in tama just yesterday smartbombing What?. who cares about bubbles, you can tackle a cap without a bubble did you forget about hics?, and if i wanted to cyno in null id fly nullifed to a citadel, not hard is it?

5) no, thats just your assumption based on this thread which again is not a reliable source.

6) they are justified in lowsec and appears ccp agrees, otherwise they wouldnt be here.

8) i havent actually used a capital in months, my killboard shows that

7) are you assuming they are not?, every lowsec group ive come across has titans, supers and caps and are not scared to use them.

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

sero Hita
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#335 - 2017-03-20 11:59:33 UTC  |  Edited by: sero Hita
Salvos Rhoska wrote:

LS wants non-cyno/sub-cap fights!

7) Are you trying to argue the majority of LS players are cap/cyno capable, or even interested in those?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Well, Salvos IMO these statements are wrong. and Tbh. I don't care about your idealistic view of how you think lowsec should be and what rules need to apply there, and what types of gameplay you think should only happen in null. That is just your opinion. It is not important if you think there is no reason for Caps in lowsec (You seem to ignore disregard structure grinds). As the arguments that you use to come to this conclusion are highly subjective, disguised as your typical reductive logic.

There is no text in the Eula that states: All game Mechanics must be estimated appropriate by Salvos Rhoska, and fit to his view of EVE. So you claiming that Caps don´t belong in low, as they for you have no reason to be there, does not mean that they actually have no reason to be there, and that we all should accept your view so tone down the hostility in your replies.

Caps are here, and are driving content. Cap engagements are an important part of Lowsec for the high SP people who live in low and want to dominate a certain part of lowsec. It is a valid tool of power, that project nicely due to the cynos. It is a sandbox and people should be able to play how they like everywhere. If it where up to me, Caps would also be allowed in Highsec with all the hilarity that would follow. Cynos and Caps gives more options in low, so how can you be against that?

"I'm all for pvp, don't get me wrong. I've ganked in Empire, blobed in low sec. Got T-shirts from every which-where.. But to be forced into a pvp confrontation that I didn't want is wrong ccp." RealFlisker

Salvos Rhoska
#336 - 2017-03-20 12:14:48 UTC
Cynos and caps gtfo of LS to NS, where they are rational and belong.

LS will do very well without cynos or caps, and sub-caps is what LS wants, deserves and is a appropriate to its content and mechanics.

Especially without NS cyno/caps dropping with impunity on LS, whereas LS drops to NS suffer from bubbles and smartbombs.

Go play cynos/caps where they belong.
In NS.
sero Hita
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#337 - 2017-03-20 13:07:51 UTC  |  Edited by: sero Hita
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Cynos and caps gtfo of LS to NS, where they are rational and belong.

LS will do very well without cynos or caps, and sub-caps is what LS wants, deserves and is a appropriate to its content and mechanics.

Especially without NS cyno/caps dropping with impunity on LS, whereas LS drops to NS suffer from bubbles and smartbombs.

Go play cynos/caps where they belong.
In NS.


Hun hun, you blindly repeating pseudo truths you invented yourself does not make it true. Coming from a middlesized lowsec alliance I can say, I have never heard anyone suggest caps as the main problem in lowsec. This is a non-problem invented by you. The main problem in this thread is people not being from the bigger entities living in lowsec trying to nerf it. You have to listen to the people(Lan wang and the aideron guy in this thread) who live there what the problem is IMO.

Lowsec would do fine without caps, and cynos but would also do fine with them. Again non-problem

I even come from an lowsec alliance who just had to move to a new area, due to project-waffle box(Lowsec megacoalition, where lan wang is from) told us that they would hotdrop us to hell with caps, if our group would grew any bigger. We did grow and they did hotdrop even our frig-gangs. So having caps made them able to get the strategical victory and force us away. That is what Caps are.. just another layer on the power pyramid, making those with the ressources able to control non-sovereignity space. Working as intended.

"I'm all for pvp, don't get me wrong. I've ganked in Empire, blobed in low sec. Got T-shirts from every which-where.. But to be forced into a pvp confrontation that I didn't want is wrong ccp." RealFlisker

Vokan Narkar
Doomheim
#338 - 2017-03-20 13:45:31 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Vokan Narkar wrote:
lowsec is fine only problem is cyno and drops...

obviously cyno cannot be removed but dropping 5 carriers on procurer come on...


This is not a game problem but a player base problem. People would rather hell-dunk than have a fight.


Remove cynos. Player base behavior will change to adapt.


no, they will leave lowsec

Only those dropping caps in every opportunity will leave and it will be a good thing.

I live(d) in one ls region few months and it looks like this.

Corporations living there are afraid to fight each other in ls unless they have an mutual agreement that they won't use a cyno (friendly enemies concept). Because everytime you start bigger fight the other side will light a cyno and drop capitals to overrun you. Even if none of the sides has actually capitals, they might have agreement with one of the ns groups dropping ls noobs - they do it for free as long there are targets worth the killboard. And let say you have one capital pilot and you try to drop on their drop. What happens is they will escalate...

So ls as it is now is a farm zone and gank zone. Peoples are ganking with t3+cyno drops or stratios/astero if they are solo most of the time. The few rare fleet fights usually end up with a capital drop, POCO/BOS bashing always end up with a capital drop because even those who have no defending capatibility can just simply call to the Initiative or other dropping groups and tell them hey guys in this sector there is 15 peoples in battleships bashing POCO, do you want to drop them? And they will want to do it.

Majority of the players dropping capitals in ls doesn't even live in ls. They live in neighboaring ns and sending a solo t3 gankers around all the ls because they are bored in ns or idk what.

It sounds to me that you are one of those roaming around in tengu dropping sin on procurers you gank. Am I wrong?

Anyway - even I though removal of cyno is not doable in lowsec from a mechanical/gameplay point of view. I take back, if the cyno in ls would be changed so only JF can jump into it or perhaps it would be restricted to 0.1 it could work.

And it would be easy to see if it kills LS or not - simply temporarily try it out in single LS region for a month or two and see how it goes. I bet the life in there increases.
Salvos Rhoska
#339 - 2017-03-20 13:46:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
sero Hita wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Cynos and caps gtfo of LS to NS, where they are rational and belong.

LS will do very well without cynos or caps, and sub-caps is what LS wants, deserves and is a appropriate to its content and mechanics.

Especially without NS cyno/caps dropping with impunity on LS, whereas LS drops to NS suffer from bubbles and smartbombs.

Go play cynos/caps where they belong.
In NS.


Lowsec would do fine without caps, and cynos

Good job.

You agreed LS will do fine without cynos/caps, and then gave an example of how an LS mega-coalition forced you to displace with CAPS (which almost certainly had NS based reinforcement and interests).

You singlehandedly obliterated your own position that cynos and caps should not be removed from LS.

Do you not comprehend, that as long as cynos/caps are allowed in LS, it means LS is permeable by NS?
Its not LS entities you are dealing with, its with NS fronts.

LS doesnt need cynos/caps as the peak of the power pyramid.
NS will beat you in that everytime.

If cynos/caps are removed from LS, not only will NS not be able to field/drop its cap fleets there either directly or via fronts, but it means LS will become a sub-cap region with mechanics suitable for a non-NS empire region.

There is no sense in cynos/caps in LS.
LS doesnt need them for PvE content.
LS doesnt need them for gatecamping.
LS doesnt need them for PvP.

Cynos and caps belong in NS, in unrestricted space.
Cynos are for bypassing gatecamps (bad for LS)
Cynos are for dropping overwhelming force (really bad for LS as a NS neighbor)
Cynos are for bypassing bubbles (REALLY bad for LS, as they have no bubbles to begin with).

Consider the following:
-Fleet X from NS, cynoing into LS with caps, has no fear of smartbombs or bubbles.
-Fleet Y from LS, cynoing into NS with caps, have to deal with smartbombs and bubbles.
Add to that the weight of organisation, power and wealth of NS vs LS
Add to that the permeation of LS by NS fronts.

Its ludicrous.

NS has used these mechanics to make LS its little b***h.


Cynos/caps should operate in NS, where there are no restrictions on engagement, and those rules are equal.

Therafter LS will be a non-cyno/subcap fleet sector, conducive to controlling its own gates, its own PvP, sufficient to clearing its own content, and WITHOUT brute force cap influence from NS (same as from HS.).

There is no rational reason for cynos/caps in LS.
NS is where they belong, either in Player or NPC Null.


Cynos/caps gtfo of LS.

There are 817 LS systems.
There are 3524 NS systems.

You dont need LS, and LS doesnt need you.
Fk off to NS where you belong.
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#340 - 2017-03-20 14:32:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Lan Wang
Vokan Narkar wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Vokan Narkar wrote:
lowsec is fine only problem is cyno and drops...

obviously cyno cannot be removed but dropping 5 carriers on procurer come on...


This is not a game problem but a player base problem. People would rather hell-dunk than have a fight.


Remove cynos. Player base behavior will change to adapt.


no, they will leave lowsec

Only those dropping caps in every opportunity will leave and it will be a good thing.

I live(d) in one ls region few months and it looks like this.

Corporations living there are afraid to fight each other in ls unless they have an mutual agreement that they won't use a cyno (friendly enemies concept). Because everytime you start bigger fight the other side will light a cyno and drop capitals to overrun you. Even if none of the sides has actually capitals, they might have agreement with one of the ns groups dropping ls noobs - they do it for free as long there are targets worth the killboard. And let say you have one capital pilot and you try to drop on their drop. What happens is they will escalate...

So ls as it is now is a farm zone and gank zone. Peoples are ganking with t3+cyno drops or stratios/astero if they are solo most of the time. The few rare fleet fights usually end up with a capital drop, POCO/BOS bashing always end up with a capital drop because even those who have no defending capatibility can just simply call to the Initiative or other dropping groups and tell them hey guys in this sector there is 15 peoples in battleships bashing POCO, do you want to drop them? And they will want to do it.

Majority of the players dropping capitals in ls doesn't even live in ls. They live in neighboaring ns and sending a solo t3 gankers around all the ls because they are bored in ns or idk what.

It sounds to me that you are one of those roaming around in tengu dropping sin on procurers you gank. Am I wrong?

Anyway - even I though removal of cyno is not doable in lowsec from a mechanical/gameplay point of view. I take back, if the cyno in ls would be changed so only JF can jump into it or perhaps it would be restricted to 0.1 it could work.

And it would be easy to see if it kills LS or not - simply temporarily try it out in single LS region for a month or two and see how it goes. I bet the life in there increases.


"It sounds to me that you are one of those roaming around in tengu dropping sin on procurers you gank. Am I wrong?" - yes you are wrong.

"Majority of the players dropping capitals in ls doesn't even live in ls. They live in neighboaring ns and sending a solo t3 gankers around all the ls because they are bored in ns or idk what." - wut? so shadow cartel, EE, waffles, snuff, project mayhem, LSH, DHSJ etc etc are nullsec now?

Corporations living there are afraid to fight each other in ls unless they have an mutual agreement that they won't use a cyno - top tip, put up a cyno inhib...

call to the Initiative or other dropping groups - or any lowsec group, take your pick everyone will show up for content, its not exclusive

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*