Crime & Punishment

I vote for Toxic.

Hisec warfare has turned into a borefest, except for those hub huggers degenerates (stealing your words Ralph) for which the Watchlist removal didn't change anything.

Changes that can enliven Wardeccing (or any gameplay) is welcome in my book. Stagnation is death, changes force you to get out of your comfort zone and renew gaming interest.

+1

All I see hear is tears....

Here, and there's no tears just you trying to bring a good guy down by not making much sense. You are a bad example of a troll, just go back to camping the vmg Merc forum post and jita already like a good little boy.

I haven't voted in a couple of years now and for various reasons I won't do so this season either.

I probably could be motivated to vote for Ralph, though I most likely would do him no service by doing so.

Toxic is a bro.

I'll be voting for him, and so should you. I'll also vote for the candidates he endorses. Let's hope we can change the CSM for the better.

Boss says you're the guy, others I respect say you're the guy. Ok, you're the guy. You got my vote.

My whole issue with EVE is that Highsec IS stagnate.

Dynamics and flux in Highsec has largely diminished over the years I've been playing. I haven't been active as of late. But that because the lack of change. I understand a lot of people dislike change if it upsets the way they play directly. We were all upset with the buddy list. However taking a wider view on the situation and seeing that Highsec is nothing more the a bloated horse floating down stream, in my opinion is easily seen.

You can see the dynamics for merc corps by the amount that around. CCP has repeatedly made it harder for small 10ish man corps to wardec and have content. While at the same time pushing the Large Wardeccing Highsec Alliance, Saying that isn't case is full blow lie. Multiple people, have said this.

And there should always been smaller fish. If the system keeps moving in the way it does, it'll be completely impossible to make a low income wardec corp.

(Not EVE is dying, Null sec is fluid and always changing, we all obviously know that Null is what keep EVE running)

However asides from randomly rolling a scout out, and scrounge around the corners of highsec hoping to find a corp/alice you are wardeced is pitifully ineffective. All highsec corps are very nomadic, the smartest ones, can pack up POS'es in about a day and be off in some other region before you even have time to truly react to the activation of the dec.

You can pre-scout a target, but again if they are smart, they will move. Which due to how scattered most Highsec Alliances and corps are, good luck trying to find a home system. That's assuming they have a home system, as asides from mining ops, having a system to use as a logistical home base is largely pointless.

Missioners are easy to catch as long as you have an idea of what missions they are running, largely deccing SOE runners and check lagi and Osmon is a way to make it easier, but again smart mission runners will just run another agent away from where they might've been caught. The logic deduction to understanding why a dec lands on you is pretty easy, if you're in a popular lvl4 mission system and you get decced while running mission the conclusion isn't that hard to make.

The game hasn't changed in a long time, and the only few changes that have happened are backwash from Null. Buddy list, Citadels and so on.

I really think it's time for CCP is start rethinking how Highsec behaves, and change the way it functions in order to make the Highsec playerbase interested again. Changing its dynamics both in veterans and the newbro's. Highsec is NPE and making it so the Newbro's understand how Highsec work needs huge reworks is revitalize the start of it games. If your core and start of the game decays it'll stop people from getting to a place they might enjoy.

Hello Mr Toxic Yaken,

My friends and I from Highsec will be voting for a candidate who is proposing a better Justice system for Highsec to protect the weak and innocent and reduce and deter criminal behaviours.

Nevertheless good luck to you in your campaign.

Highsec and EVE in general is supposed to have a ever present danger effect. Demanding that the game protect those to lazy to protect themselves goes against the concept of EVE online. This in evident by past marketing campaigns made by CCP themselves.

That and Highsec is perfectly safe if you put in the effort to make it so. It's the easiest it's been since the game started.


But I'm guess the only reason you came here was to get people to respond to you?

Highsec doesn't need to be made safer by CCP, it needs to be made safer by the players.

The only kind of change like that I would support would be shifting from relying on more player driven justice over that of NPC justice. I'd love to see players being able to be the ones defending eachother and getting revenge in a way that's actually fun. I have no intention to support changes that make it harder to be a criminal just for the sake of making it safer for everyone else.

I hope you can find someone you feel represents your interests this year.

Toxic