These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

AFK Cloaking™: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals

First post First post
Author
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#8841 - 2017-03-03 22:26:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Teckos Pech
CCP Quant suggestions 0.0 ratting is making alot of ISK.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Linus Gorp
Ministry of Propaganda and Morale
#8842 - 2017-03-04 07:52:26 UTC

Fixed link

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#8843 - 2017-03-04 08:28:25 UTC


Derp...thanks.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Mike Voidstar
Voidstar Free Flight Foundation
#8844 - 2017-03-04 14:20:59 UTC
It's clear that bounties bring in most of the ISK,

This is obvious as bounties are one of the few ways ISK is actually created.

I don't doubt that the biggest slice of that does come from Null, but it does not indicate how much. It could be the sheer mass of people running high sec missions are a significant portion as well.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#8845 - 2017-03-04 18:32:32 UTC
Mike Voidstar wrote:
It's clear that bounties bring in most of the ISK,

This is obvious as bounties are one of the few ways ISK is actually created.

I don't doubt that the biggest slice of that does come from Null, but it does not indicate how much. It could be the sheer mass of people running high sec missions are a significant portion as well.


I've run both, and you make far, far more ISK via anomalies.

The highest number killed in the Citadel is in Motsu, 1,159. 2,140 in Korsiki in the Forge. 984 in Domain.

Now, lets look at Fountain: 1,100

Esoteria: 2,500

Perrigen Falls: 1,760

NS rats also tend to have nice fat bounties compared to even a Lvl 4 mission. And in some of the better regions you'll see multiple systems with lots of rats killed. For example, Deklein:

More than 7,560 rats killed (I only counted some of the rat kills). Even if the average bounty is 500,000 that is almost 3.8 billion ISK from one region. Extrapolating to a month, that is over 113,4 billion a month.

You could be right Mike, but I'm just not seeing it.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Naye Nathaniel
COBRA INC
Seventh Sanctum.
#8846 - 2017-03-04 18:40:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Naye Nathaniel
Teckos Pech wrote:
Mike Voidstar wrote:
It's clear that bounties bring in most of the ISK,

This is obvious as bounties are one of the few ways ISK is actually created.

I don't doubt that the biggest slice of that does come from Null, but it does not indicate how much. It could be the sheer mass of people running high sec missions are a significant portion as well.


I've run both, and you make far, far more ISK via anomalies.

The highest number killed in the Citadel is in Motsu, 1,159. 2,140 in Korsiki in the Forge. 984 in Domain.

Now, lets look at Fountain: 1,100

Esoteria: 2,500

Perrigen Falls: 1,760

NS rats also tend to have nice fat bounties compared to even a Lvl 4 mission. And in some of the better regions you'll see multiple systems with lots of rats killed. For example, Deklein:

More than 7,560 rats killed (I only counted some of the rat kills). Even if the average bounty is 500,000 that is almost 3.8 billion ISK from one region. Extrapolating to a month, that is over 113,4 billion a month.

You could be right Mike, but I'm just not seeing it.


What you want to prove?
That SOV nullsec is profitable and ppl run anomalies with Supers/Carriers etc? Everyone knows it;
They hold the space, they have right for it - there were enough risk to get reward and they clame it;

AFK cloaker is not a RISK its only reward (ISK reward and stopping your enemies earning ISK reward);
I were in few big alliances, rules were always 1 -

U are forbidden to do anomalies, mining, explo with a neutral in system so it won't fck KB;

So why you are suppose to do that? go to a system, hang cloaked and forget that u even have a toon there?
It's not normal - and even 100 systems intel won't stop you if you know what to do;

Oh yeah I know - because you are too afraid to just get a team and attack it frontaly...
So you still want to have access to this part of "game";
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#8847 - 2017-03-04 18:46:44 UTC
Naye Nathaniel wrote:
What you want to prove?
That SOV nullsec is profitable and ppl run anomalies with Supers/Carriers etc? Everyone knows it;
They hold the space, they have right for it - there were enough risk to get reward and they clame it;

AFK cloaker is not a RISK its only reward (ISK reward and stopping your enemies earning ISK reward);
I were in few big alliances, rules were always 1 -

U are forbidden to do anomalies, mining, explo with a neutral in system so it won't fck KB;

So why you are suppose to do that? go to a system, hang cloaked and forget that u even have a toon there?
It's not normal - and even 100 systems intel won't stop you if you know what to do;

Oh yeah I know - because you are too afraid to just get a team and attack it frontaly...
So you still want to have access to this part of "game";


Dropping multi billion isk BOPS into hostile space where you're surrounded by hundreds of players looking to shoot you immediately isn't risky? Interesting.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#8848 - 2017-03-04 18:48:45 UTC
Naye Nathaniel wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Mike Voidstar wrote:
It's clear that bounties bring in most of the ISK,

This is obvious as bounties are one of the few ways ISK is actually created.

I don't doubt that the biggest slice of that does come from Null, but it does not indicate how much. It could be the sheer mass of people running high sec missions are a significant portion as well.


I've run both, and you make far, far more ISK via anomalies.

The highest number killed in the Citadel is in Motsu, 1,159. 2,140 in Korsiki in the Forge. 984 in Domain.

Now, lets look at Fountain: 1,100

Esoteria: 2,500

Perrigen Falls: 1,760

NS rats also tend to have nice fat bounties compared to even a Lvl 4 mission. And in some of the better regions you'll see multiple systems with lots of rats killed. For example, Deklein:

More than 7,560 rats killed (I only counted some of the rat kills). Even if the average bounty is 500,000 that is almost 3.8 billion ISK from one region. Extrapolating to a month, that is over 113,4 billion a month.

You could be right Mike, but I'm just not seeing it.


What you want to prove?
That SOV nullsec is profitable and ppl run anomalies with Supers/Carriers etc? Everyone knows it;
They hold the space, they have right for it - there were enough risk to get reward and they clame it;

AFK cloaker is not a RISK its only reward (ISK reward and stopping your enemies earning ISK reward);
I were in few big alliances, rules were always 1 -

U are forbidden to do anomalies, mining, explo with a neutral in system so it won't fck KB;

So why you are suppose to do that? go to a system, hang cloaked and forget that u even have a toon there?
It's not normal - and even 100 systems intel won't stop you if you know what to do;


What ISK does an AFK cloaker make? ISK from ratting? No. ISK from missions? No. Building? No. PI? No. Market orders in Jita? No. Reactions? No. So, no risk while sitting cloaked at a safe, but you also make no ISK. In fact, opportunity cost says that such an activity is costing the player ISK. Sure I could log in 3 accounts and all three characters could go cloak in a separate system. Thing is, now I can't use those alts to make ISK. That is a cost.

Maybe...maybe he'll be bribed out of system. But if your alliance is doing that you aren't very good.

And maybe you should ditch that crap alliance. Find one that will let you rat, mine, etc. in a fleet.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Naye Nathaniel
COBRA INC
Seventh Sanctum.
#8849 - 2017-03-04 18:50:08 UTC
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
Naye Nathaniel wrote:
What you want to prove?
That SOV nullsec is profitable and ppl run anomalies with Supers/Carriers etc? Everyone knows it;
They hold the space, they have right for it - there were enough risk to get reward and they clame it;

AFK cloaker is not a RISK its only reward (ISK reward and stopping your enemies earning ISK reward);
I were in few big alliances, rules were always 1 -

U are forbidden to do anomalies, mining, explo with a neutral in system so it won't fck KB;

So why you are suppose to do that? go to a system, hang cloaked and forget that u even have a toon there?
It's not normal - and even 100 systems intel won't stop you if you know what to do;

Oh yeah I know - because you are too afraid to just get a team and attack it frontaly...
So you still want to have access to this part of "game";


Dropping multi billion isk BOPS into hostile space where you're surrounded by hundreds of players looking to shoot you immediately isn't risky? Interesting.



Haha really? ;) AFK Cloakers are not ******* morrons, they always "wait for" a ez target; (as they only be at keyboard 3 times per day haha)
Roger out; as more bullshit is comming!
Linus Gorp
Ministry of Propaganda and Morale
#8850 - 2017-03-04 19:01:07 UTC
Naye Nathaniel wrote:

I were in few big alliances, rules were always 1 -

U are forbidden to do anomalies, mining, explo with a neutral in system so it won't fck KB;

Exhibit A, ladies and gentlemen. Trash player repetitively joining trash tier alliances and then crying about being trash.

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#8851 - 2017-03-04 19:20:53 UTC
Naye Nathaniel wrote:
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
Naye Nathaniel wrote:
What you want to prove?
That SOV nullsec is profitable and ppl run anomalies with Supers/Carriers etc? Everyone knows it;
They hold the space, they have right for it - there were enough risk to get reward and they clame it;

AFK cloaker is not a RISK its only reward (ISK reward and stopping your enemies earning ISK reward);
I were in few big alliances, rules were always 1 -

U are forbidden to do anomalies, mining, explo with a neutral in system so it won't fck KB;

So why you are suppose to do that? go to a system, hang cloaked and forget that u even have a toon there?
It's not normal - and even 100 systems intel won't stop you if you know what to do;

Oh yeah I know - because you are too afraid to just get a team and attack it frontaly...
So you still want to have access to this part of "game";


Dropping multi billion isk BOPS into hostile space where you're surrounded by hundreds of players looking to shoot you immediately isn't risky? Interesting.



Haha really? ;) AFK Cloakers are not ******* morrons, they always "wait for" a ez target; (as they only be at keyboard 3 times per day haha)
Roger out; as more bullshit is comming!


So don't be an easy target, but a hard scary target. Do that long enough they'll move on to better hunting grounds.

Point is you do not have a right to "rat in peace". You have to fight for it...and yes that means dealing with AFK cloaky campers. If you want to bore them to death by logging off or doing missions, that is your call. Another option is to fleet up and rat in PvP ships. 10 ishtars is not an easy target. If they drop some BLOPs on you and you kill just 1, they'd pretty much have to wipe your entire fleet out to break even. Chances are, as you note, they are morons so they'll move on.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#8852 - 2017-03-05 00:44:28 UTC
Naye Nathaniel wrote:
Haha really? ;) AFK Cloakers are not ******* morrons, they always "wait for" a ez target; (as they only be at keyboard 3 times per day haha)
Roger out; as more bullshit is comming!


Since you're in sov null, I assume you're always in a standing defense fleet and on comms 24/7, right? How are you an easy target?

If you get hotdropped and can't immediately have your corp or alliance counter, you deserve to die. Why the hell would you ever assume you're safe? Especially in null. Don't you fly like one of your corpmates might awox you any time? Like a WH might open and a fleet jumps in immediately? Like someone logged off in system and will log in to kill you at a moment's notice?

Maybe null isn't for you. HS sounds about right.
Merin Ryskin
Peregrine Industries
#8853 - 2017-03-05 08:03:05 UTC
Naye Nathaniel wrote:
What you want to prove?
That SOV nullsec is profitable and ppl run anomalies with Supers/Carriers etc? Everyone knows it;
They hold the space, they have right for it - there were enough risk to get reward and they clame it;


Nope, you don't have a right to anything in EVE unless you are actively defending it. If you have the ability to protect your capital ships from any threats while you farm those anomalies then you get the ISK. If you can't protect them and get hot dropped then the only ISK you're entitled to is the insurance payout on your dead ship.

Quote:
AFK cloaker is not a RISK its only reward (ISK reward and stopping your enemies earning ISK reward);


AFK cloaking is only zero-risk if you never decloak, in which case you never accomplish anything. If you decloak to engage a target then you face the normal risks of PvP.

Also, as stated before, if the presence of an AFK cloaker prevents your alliance from making ISK then your alliance sucks and doesn't deserve to hold their space.

Quote:
I were in few big alliances, rules were always 1 -
U are forbidden to do anomalies, mining, explo with a neutral in system so it won't fck KB;


And now we see the real issue here. This isn't about being able to hunt people, or risk vs. reward, it's about garbage alliances that need to be booted back to highsec. The solution is not to change anything about AFK cloaking, it's for bad alliances to stop sucking at EVE, grow some balls, and stop being so obsessed with killboards.

Quote:
Oh yeah I know - because you are too afraid to just get a team and attack it frontaly...


Welcome to EVE. Corp theft/infiltration, ambushes, etc, are all a deliberate part of the game. Dirty tricks are just as important as frontal assaults, and whining about the fact that your enemies hit you where you're weakest is only demonstrating your lack of understanding of the game.
Mike Voidstar
Voidstar Free Flight Foundation
#8854 - 2017-03-06 20:47:12 UTC
It's a funny argument, saying you never accomplish anything through afk camping while cloaked. You are, in fact, projecting force, cultivating apathy, and setting up local pilots for a kill. When you check in for targets you are gathering direct intelligence. These are all valuable functions that your opponents should have the right to disrupt.

But they don't, because cloak.

Meanwhile you ridicule those who wish to confront you, because they don't choose to waste the requisite man hours on top of that already spent just to stay prepared for the threat you may represent. Somehow their desire to play the game in an intelligent fashion while performing non predatory PvP activities makes them lose the right to hunt you actively, because cloak.
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#8855 - 2017-03-06 22:00:20 UTC
Mike Voidstar wrote:
It's a funny argument, saying you never accomplish anything through afk camping while cloaked. You are, in fact, projecting force, cultivating apathy, and setting up local pilots for a kill. When you check in for targets you are gathering direct intelligence. These are all valuable functions that your opponents should have the right to disrupt.

But they don't, because cloak.

Meanwhile you ridicule those who wish to confront you, because they don't choose to waste the requisite man hours on top of that already spent just to stay prepared for the threat you may represent. Somehow their desire to play the game in an intelligent fashion while performing non predatory PvP activities makes them lose the right to hunt you actively, because cloak.


Do your ratting in groups while on comms and in fleet in PvP fit ships. Problem solved. No disruption to anyone.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#8856 - 2017-03-06 22:15:30 UTC
Mike Voidstar wrote:
It's a funny argument, saying you never accomplish anything through afk camping while cloaked. You are, in fact, projecting force, cultivating apathy, and setting up local pilots for a kill. When you check in for targets you are gathering direct intelligence. These are all valuable functions that your opponents should have the right to disrupt.

But they don't, because cloak.

Meanwhile you ridicule those who wish to confront you, because they don't choose to waste the requisite man hours on top of that already spent just to stay prepared for the threat you may represent. Somehow their desire to play the game in an intelligent fashion while performing non predatory PvP activities makes them lose the right to hunt you actively, because cloak.


I didn't say it was valueless, just that one does not earn ISK AFK cloaking, in fact one forgoes ISK by AFK cloaking.

As for wasting time, that is entirely your problem.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Merin Ryskin
Peregrine Industries
#8857 - 2017-03-07 10:48:25 UTC
Mike Voidstar wrote:
You are, in fact, projecting force, cultivating apathy, and setting up local pilots for a kill. When you check in for targets you are gathering direct intelligence. These are all valuable functions that your opponents should have the right to disrupt.


You have the right to disrupt them. You can have players in combat ships that can respond to any attempt by the AFK player to attack, you can join an alliance that isn't so terrified of having losses on their killboard that they impose a "no PvE with AFK cloakers in system" rule, you can refuse to let them win the game of psychological warfare and ignore their presence, you can move to a different system and let them gather intelligence on empty space, etc. In fact, if your alliance doesn't suck, an AFK cloaker is going to accomplish very little and go home frustrated at your disruption efforts.

The real problem here is not that AFK cloaking is impossible to counter, it's that you are demanding a button you can press that makes the AFK cloaker go away. And that is a problem with lazy low-skill players and terrible alliances, not AFK cloaking.

Quote:
Meanwhile you ridicule those who wish to confront you, because they don't choose to waste the requisite man hours on top of that already spent just to stay prepared for the threat you may represent.


Welcome to EVE, if you want to actively defend the things you build you're going to have to spend time on it. If your alliance doesn't want to spend the man hours to maintain an active defense of their system then you don't really control it, and should probably go back to highsec. We need less of the ridiculous "we rented a system, set half of EVE blue, and now we get to solo carebear in 100% safety forever" attitude, not more.

Quote:
Somehow their desire to play the game in an intelligent fashion while performing non predatory PvP activities makes them lose the right to hunt you actively, because cloak.


First of all, your whining about "predatory PvP" demonstrates a hilarious lack of understanding of what EVE is. Predatory PvP is the entire point of the game. It's survival of the fittest, and CCP does not coddle pathetic prey that can't defend themselves against even the laziest of predators.

That said, I find it amusing that you whine about "predatory PvP" while demanding the ability to hunt down and destroy a cloaked ship that is not an active threat to you. Deterring it from attacking you is not sufficient, you need that killmail for your alliance's killboard stats.
Mike Voidstar
Voidstar Free Flight Foundation
#8858 - 2017-03-07 20:36:32 UTC
So, with a single neutral in space under a cloak the recommended response to 'counter' it is to get on comms with an alliance, keep a standing combat fleet, and remain constantly vigilant at all times, ready to evade as soon as something appears on grid (at which point it's too late, but whatever).


However, with a dozen (or a hundred, or a thousand) ships actively hunting you the recommended response by the cloaked ships is....go afk, completely safe in the knowledge that you are immune to any force brought to bear. No comms, no fleet, no need for vigilance of any kind.


I don't care about a killmail at all. I don't care if he goes away. However, if he is going to be there, projecting threat and gathering Intel then he should be at risk. Even someone in a station has a known point in space he must exit from, and much more limited options on activity he can perform.
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#8859 - 2017-03-07 20:53:09 UTC
Mike Voidstar wrote:
So, with a single neutral in space under a cloak the recommended response to 'counter' it is to get on comms with an alliance, keep a standing combat fleet, and remain constantly vigilant at all times, ready to evade as soon as something appears on grid (at which point it's too late, but whatever).


However, with a dozen (or a hundred, or a thousand) ships actively hunting you the recommended response by the cloaked ships is....go afk, completely safe in the knowledge that you are immune to any force brought to bear. No comms, no fleet, no need for vigilance of any kind.


I don't care about a killmail at all. I don't care if he goes away. However, if he is going to be there, projecting threat and gathering Intel then he should be at risk. Even someone in a station has a known point in space he must exit from, and much more limited options on activity he can perform.


If you're told to stop playing when your space is being camped like that, you need to f ind a better group to play with. And why on earth aren't you on comms and in a standing fleet 24/7? With respect, find a better alliance.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#8860 - 2017-03-07 20:56:20 UTC
Mike Voidstar wrote:
So, with a single neutral in space under a cloak the recommended response to 'counter' it is to get on comms with an alliance, keep a standing combat fleet, and remain constantly vigilant at all times, ready to evade as soon as something appears on grid (at which point it's too late, but whatever).


However, with a dozen (or a hundred, or a thousand) ships actively hunting you the recommended response by the cloaked ships is....go afk, completely safe in the knowledge that you are immune to any force brought to bear. No comms, no fleet, no need for vigilance of any kind.


I don't care about a killmail at all. I don't care if he goes away. However, if he is going to be there, projecting threat and gathering Intel then he should be at risk. Even someone in a station has a known point in space he must exit from, and much more limited options on activity he can perform.


No. Try again Mike. Stop failing deliberately to make a bogus point.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online