These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Burn Jita - Safety for Alphas on the way?

Author
Sitting Bull Lakota
Poppins and Company
#41 - 2017-03-04 09:32:07 UTC
Ninteen Seventy-Nine wrote:
Zarek Kree wrote:

Once again, this has nothing to do with CCP's decision to allow alpha accounts. The exact same thing happened under the trial account system. Nothing is being "exploited" that wasn't being done before. If anything, alphas have greater limitations than trial account alts did.


Who cares what was happening before, what are you even talking about?

-Ganking is good for eve, piracy is good for eve. But those functions are intended to exist inside of a framework of consequences for "unlawful" actions.

-the specific matter of people recycling accounts to avoid those consequences is a direct violation of the eula

It doesn't matter what limitations existed in the past or do today. What is clear is that said limitations are not sufficient in avoid systematic exploitation of those mechanics.

Safeties green for alphas in highsec is the only way to prevent this behavior.

Why is this behavior* necessary to prevent?
How do you know these accounts are being recycled to avoid sec loss consequences?

Is there any real harm from free2players ganking?
You can't log in more than one at a time. You can't fly the quintessential gankalyst, only a close approximation as an alpha. You don't have the skills for the same raw dps of the gankalyst. The tedium of training up gank alphas to their max effectiveness has been enough to prevent widespread use of them. And again, because you can only take one out at a time, they necessitate coordination and a lot of teamwork which are both elements of EvE that we as a community should strive to expose new players to.

That teamwork and the pleasure of seeing your group take down a large target is the stuff that keeps people logging back in.
If anything, we should encourage more suicide ganking by alphas.


*Ganking not EULA violation.
Ninteen Seventy-Nine
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#42 - 2017-03-05 14:04:33 UTC
Sitting Bull Lakota wrote:

Why is this behavior* necessary to prevent?

Why do anything... ever? Why god, why?
Sorry,
Why* god*, why*?
Sitting Bull Lakota wrote:

How do you know these accounts are being recycled to avoid sec loss consequences?

How do you not?

Seriously, you think every non-blinky highsec ganker is either a legit new player to the game or that they just got done buying tags and ratting their status back up so they could go nail an autopiloting shuttle? Lol

Sitting Bull Lakota wrote:

Is there any real harm from free2players ganking?
You can't log in more than one at a time. You can't fly the quintessential gankalyst, only a close approximation as an alpha. You don't have the skills for the same raw dps of the gankalyst. ]The tedium of training up gank alphas to their max effectiveness has been enough to prevent widespread use of them. And again, because you can only take one out at a time, they necessitate coordination and a lot of teamwork which are both elements of EvE that we as a community should strive to expose new players to.


Is there harm from ganking? Of course not, not on it's face any way.
It's like you didn't even read my posts and just hit reply.

But, like any activity in eve, it's only harmless when it exists as intended within the rules of the game. When an activity exists within the mechanics of the game, but is done in a way that circumvents intended consequences or outcomes for that activity, that is what is called exploiting a game mechanic.

Piracy and ganking are as good for eve as every other activity and all of them insofar as they are intended..
Which is to say...the sec hit losses and and infamy gained in such activities are every bit as important and a part to this game as the gank itself.

Nothing you proceed to highlight in the affront to logic that follows can even be considered a deterrent, let alone a sufficient one.
Your just listing things, poorly at that.
(1. only log 1 in 2. cant fly max fit 3. cant fly max fit 4. cant fly max fit 5.only log 1 in)

It's trivial to line up the handful of skills needed to train an alt, when you plan ahead you can have all of this at the ready in the station your new alpha spawns in. It's trivial to log one and log in the next. How do I know this? Because I know people rolling alpha clones, both legitimately new players and old players.

I'm not sure what tedium you're referring to. No one cares about max effectiveness not sure why your going on about that except your grasping at straws to make this seem like some arduous labor to roll a char and train it for a catalyst/vexor..

The entire point is that 70% effective for cheap in a short period of time is more than sufficient.

Sitting Bull Lakota wrote:

And again, because you can only take one out at a time, they necessitate coordination and a lot of teamwork which are both elements of EvE that we as a community should strive to expose new players to.

That teamwork and the pleasure of seeing your group take down a large target is the stuff that keeps people logging back in.
If anything, we should encourage more suicide ganking by alphas.

*Ganking not EULA violation.


Oh lol I just had to have a 2nd look at this.

Yeah, incredible amounts of coordination and teamwork to join the same public channel and warp to the same station you did with your last 6 characters. Such amazing. Much necessitates. Wow.

The teamwork and pleasure of seeing your group take down a target is... pretty much every aspect of this game. It's not somehow unique to this activity. Which is also to say the same thing can be accomplished not only in lowsec, nullsec and anywhere else, but also with a multitude of other activities.

We don't insist on alphas being able to run level 4's as some sacred cow activity that must be open to them. It's not like these players can't find pvp in any one of a gazillion other forms.

Ganking isn't a eula violation? Who said that it was?
Did you just add that at the end for theatrical effect or... did you actually have the point you acknowledged at the start of your post flee from your mind by the end of your post?

All I know is that last bit is so disingenuous it makes me want to send your people blankets for the winter.

"The unending paradox is that we do learn through pain."

Zarek Kree
Lunatic Legion Holdings
#43 - 2017-03-05 15:06:45 UTC
Ninteen Seventy-Nine wrote:
But, like any activity in eve, it's only harmless when it exists as intended within the rules of the game. When an activity exists within the mechanics of the game, but is done in a way that circumvents intended consequences or outcomes for that activity, that is what is called exploiting a game mechanic.



I'll ask again: How is what's going on now with alpha clones any different than what was happening for the previous 10+ years with trial accounts? There are far more limitations now on ganking alts than there used to be under the trial account system.
StonerPhReaK
Herb Men
#44 - 2017-03-05 18:40:47 UTC
Zarek Kree wrote:
Ninteen Seventy-Nine wrote:
But, like any activity in eve, it's only harmless when it exists as intended within the rules of the game. When an activity exists within the mechanics of the game, but is done in a way that circumvents intended consequences or outcomes for that activity, that is what is called exploiting a game mechanic.



I'll ask again: How is what's going on now with alpha clones any different than what was happening for the previous 10+ years with trial accounts? There are far more limitations now on ganking alts than there used to be under the trial account system.


You cant reason with someone who already has there mind made up as much as 79. No amount of numbers, logic, or rational can sway the set mind of said types of individuals. Even with concrete evidence they will just find another excuse/reason why they are right and the masses of others are insane.

"there is no fool like an intellectual ... a kind of clever stupidity, bred out of a line of logic in the head, nothing to do with experience." Doris Lessing

Signatures wer cooler when we couldn't remove them completely.

Ninteen Seventy-Nine
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#45 - 2017-03-06 00:33:58 UTC
StonerPhReaK wrote:
Zarek Kree wrote:
Ninteen Seventy-Nine wrote:
But, like any activity in eve, it's only harmless when it exists as intended within the rules of the game. When an activity exists within the mechanics of the game, but is done in a way that circumvents intended consequences or outcomes for that activity, that is what is called exploiting a game mechanic.



I'll ask again: How is what's going on now with alpha clones any different than what was happening for the previous 10+ years with trial accounts? There are far more limitations now on ganking alts than there used to be under the trial account system.


You cant reason with someone who already has there mind made up as much as 79. No amount of numbers, logic, or rational can sway the set mind of said types of individuals. Even with concrete evidence they will just find another excuse/reason why they are right and the masses of others are insane.

"there is no fool like an intellectual ... a kind of clever stupidity, bred out of a line of logic in the head, nothing to do with experience." Doris Lessing


I'm glad to address your questions even if you won't bother addressing mine.
You can say there is no arguing with someone like me. But perhaps you should effort it once before writing me off?

The answer to your question is, there has always been a problem with a particular subset of players using a readily available volume of accounts to avoid intended gameplay.

The prevalence is certainly relevant. However, some delta vs past points of the game are not only laughable (you know as well as I only CCP can release those numbers and they've chosen not to thus far) they are irrelevant.

The fact there remains a significant portion of people taking advantage of this, present as in past, should be reason enough to address the problem.

The more difficult line of logic that then follows is... what exactly is it that is so essential to the eve experience that pvp cannot be expected to be achieved by alpha through dozens of other legitimate activities, aside from specifically targeting and firing on someone in highsec with whom they have no standings or timer related hostilities?

"The unending paradox is that we do learn through pain."

Zarek Kree
Lunatic Legion Holdings
#46 - 2017-03-06 02:41:57 UTC
I don't recall hearing anyone previously demanding that trial accounts be locked to green in highsec. This notion that people are supposedly abusing non-paying accounts seems to be a new "problem" that just happened to coincide with the introduction of alpha clones. The fact that people (like yourself) are suddenly perceiving an abuse issue suggests that it's simply a reaction to something new and and different. Demonstrate that people widely regarded this as a problem before alpha clones and I might be willing to support the idea of preventative measures. Otherwise, it simply smacks of hysteria over something new. I'm willing to bet that CCP views it the same way.

The question isn't why SHOULD alpha clones be allowed to suicide gank, but rather why SHOULDN'T they? If you read that Crossing Zebras article I linked earlier, he brings up the fact that one of the things that makes EVE unique is the ability to do everything on a new player account that you can on a paying account. There are no basic gameplay styles that you're prohibited from pursuing. You can rat, PvP, build, invent, mission, explore, scam and also gank. They simply limit your ability to pursue a gameplay style as efficiently as you can on an Omega clone. To that end, you can't gank as effectively as an alpha.

The default should always be to allow a gameplay style. That has always been CCP's policy and I suspect it will continue to be their policy. Abuses that violate the EULA have always been handled on an individual basis. Feel free to call for greater enforcement, but you don't deal with enforcement problems by calling for more regulations.
Black Pedro
Mine.
#47 - 2017-03-06 08:45:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Black Pedro
Ninteen Seventy-Nine wrote:
The more difficult line of logic that then follows is... what exactly is it that is so essential to the eve experience that pvp cannot be expected to be achieved by alpha through dozens of other legitimate activities, aside from specifically targeting and firing on someone in highsec with whom they have no standings or timer related hostilities?
Piracy? The ability to take other people's stuff because you can or want to is a core plank of the game. Nothing and nowhere is safe.

"Be the Villain" is the quintessential idea of the game. Players are the bad guys, not hapless NPCs. Why shouldn't alphas be able to get their pirate on and play the game as a criminal? The single-login alpha rule seems to have worked to prevent all kinds of abuses, including that of players multiboxing ganking characters.

This idea that it is somehow breaking the rules to have a dedicated criminal character is laughable. Since the beginning, almost 15 years ago, players have had multiple character slots and have been perfectly able to make a dastardly pirate to prey on the unsuspecting, and a high security status Goodie Two-Shoes who runs missions for the Empires or who serves in their fleets, thus isolating the "consequences" of one character from the other.

Could no-cost ganking characters have caused a problem? I guess, but there is no evidence it has. There was a spike in CONCORD kills last month comparable to previous Burn Jita/Amarr events, but January and December were perfectly typical months as has March so far. Highsec has been made so safe they are near useless on their own, and they are inferior to Omega ganking characters is every way that there is no reason for a real pirate to use them.

Looks like CCP made the right call in not locking their safeties to red.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#48 - 2017-03-06 20:19:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
OP, to be totally blunt, even as a player who played as an AG before getting fed up with hisec and heading back to 0.0 I do not agree with removing the ability to shoot people in hisec and go criminal, it is part of the game and Alphas should be able to shoot whoever they want as per Omega's.

Do I care that some people can abuse it, no, people run multiple accounts without this, just look at the Kusions as an example.

I can also tell you that this was talked about in the AG channel a couple of times when CCP first announced Alpha's and not a single person supported blocking Alpha's from going criminal in hisec.

So the answer is no, no and no.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Previous page123