These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

API Key Question

First post
Author
Amojin
Doomheim
#1 - 2017-03-04 13:45:04 UTC
I've noticed that a great many corps in game require a full api key in order to join. I understand their paranoia, but isn't it a bit much, and yes, one of my favorite terms, again, META-gaming, to have access to more than the character you're actively considering?

I question why you should have the right to see all of my toons, on the account. This is not going to really provide you with any 'security,' is it, since I can just create multiple accounts? I'm not sure what right you have to see my mails, my current location in space, and have access to my 'wallet' status, either.

As usual, I feel I must be missing part of the picture. Is there any legitimate, gaming reason for a corp to have a full api key, or is it just an invasion of privacy, and actually far more risk to me to give it to them, than it is to them for me to not do so?
Wander Prian
Nosferatu Security Foundation
#2 - 2017-03-04 14:04:19 UTC
Spies, corp-thieves and awoxers can be screened out (not all, but the most) as well as it being a show of trust from your side as well. At the end of the day, it's their corp, so they dictate the rules.

Wormholer for life.

Wolfgang Jannesen
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2017-03-04 14:21:28 UTC
There are a lot of reasons, after the infamous BoB vs Goonswarm wars especially API checking became almost universal.

If you've got something to hide, well, find a Corp that doesn't care.
Amojin
Doomheim
#4 - 2017-03-04 14:29:23 UTC
Wolfgang Jannesen wrote:
There are a lot of reasons, after the infamous BoB vs Goonswarm wars especially API checking became almost universal.

If you've got something to hide, well, find a Corp that doesn't care.


So far, I note that both of you have made recourse to the argument of authority, i.e., power, and neither have actually answered my question. This seems to be an absolutely clear-cut case of metagaming, then, in that you are going beyond the game, and actually demanding information about the player, for in-game use?

As for your argument about hiding, I hear it all the time, but let me ask you something by way of example. When you mail a letter, do you put it in an envelope, or do you send everything by postcard? Do you give anyone who asks, permission to read all your emails? Afterall, you have nothing to hide, right?

When a person expects other people, in real life, which this is a case of when you take the game this far, to actually query an entire account with out of game tools, we call that concept 'privacy.' It used to be a universally accepted right, and 'authority' was not abused as an excuse to violate it.

These types of answers coming so fast is alarming; you've really been so conditioned to lay down and show your neck to 'power?'
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#5 - 2017-03-04 14:31:02 UTC
Amojin wrote:
I understand their paranoia, but isn't it a bit much, and yes, one of my favorite terms, again, META-gaming, to have access to more than the character you're actively considering?


No it's not a bit much. If you have nothing to lose because your corp is a broken shell, then they won't ask for API. However if a corp has billions or even trillions in assets which can easily - EASILY - be stolen because CCP can't code group security to save their lives, then it's not paranoia at all. It's self preservation. Even a full background check (which is not limited only to API) will not eliminate corporate theft and awoxing, however it's a screening process.

If you don't like it, don't join that corp. Stick to broke-a-- noobs who have nothing worth stealing. Or better yet make your own corp, and never bother doing a background check. Call me in 3 years and we'll see how it went for you.
Amojin
Doomheim
#6 - 2017-03-04 14:36:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Amojin
Ptraci wrote:
Amojin wrote:
I understand their paranoia, but isn't it a bit much, and yes, one of my favorite terms, again, META-gaming, to have access to more than the character you're actively considering?


No it's not a bit much. If you have nothing to lose because your corp is a broken shell, then they won't ask for API. However if a corp has billions or even trillions in assets which can easily - EASILY - be stolen because CCP can't code group security to save their lives, then it's not paranoia at all. It's self preservation. Even a full background check (which is not limited only to API) will not eliminate corporate theft and awoxing, however it's a screening process.

If you don't like it, don't join that corp. Stick to broke-a-- noobs who have nothing worth stealing. Or better yet make your own corp, and never bother doing a background check. Call me in 3 years and we'll see how it went for you.


And now recourse to 'fear.' Because somebody MIGHT rip you off, you therefor feel entitled to preemptively violate the rights of all. This is an unacceptable evil. I've played around with these corporate settings, and it seems replete with DACs, both in roles, and on office containers. Furthermore there are in-game security log containers. It would seem that the options for you to secure things without recourse to violating the real human player's privacy, well, the game is full of them!

What, precisely are you saying can't be done with all these options to configure security around?
Lord Harrowmont
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2017-03-04 14:52:50 UTC
Amojin wrote:
I've noticed that a great many corps in game require a full api key in order to join. I understand their paranoia, but isn't it a bit much, and yes, one of my favorite terms, again, META-gaming, to have access to more than the character you're actively considering?

I question why you should have the right to see all of my toons, on the account. This is not going to really provide you with any 'security,' is it, since I can just create multiple accounts? I'm not sure what right you have to see my mails, my current location in space, and have access to my 'wallet' status, either.

As usual, I feel I must be missing part of the picture. Is there any legitimate, gaming reason for a corp to have a full api key, or is it just an invasion of privacy, and actually far more risk to me to give it to them, than it is to them for me to not do so?


To be fair with you, I don't think I would want to join a corp without API checks. It's more of a vetting process to weed out the bad players. If you don't have anything to hide I don't see the problem tbf.
Lord Harrowmont
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2017-03-04 14:55:42 UTC
And on your point about your "privacy". There is none, especially online. I work as a programmer and trust me all your info is online. What you watched, what your habits are, what your quirks are, where you live, your address, literally everything at a finger tips away. Unless you use a proxy.. and even then..
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#9 - 2017-03-04 14:56:09 UTC
Amojin wrote:


And now recourse to 'fear.' Because somebody MIGHT rip you off, you therefor feel entitled to preemptively violate the rights of all.


It's not violation if you have consent. I have a duty to protect the assets of my corp. Therefore I request an API. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO COMPLY. But you won't join my corp if you don't. There are other corps. Go cry to them.
Amojin
Doomheim
#10 - 2017-03-04 15:00:20 UTC
Ptraci wrote:
Amojin wrote:


And now recourse to 'fear.' Because somebody MIGHT rip you off, you therefor feel entitled to preemptively violate the rights of all.


It's not violation if you have consent. I have a duty to protect the assets of my corp. Therefore I request an API. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO COMPLY. But you won't join my corp if you don't. There are other corps. Go cry to them.


I see. That's the same answer everyone in power always tries to hide behind. So, just to re-iterate, I'm not safe, anywhere in space, hi-sec wardeccing and ganking is fine, it's all part of the risk 'of the game.' Any evil act is acceptable, in game, because it creates 'content.' So much as this I have read and condensed here into a more or less simple statement of how players view EVE.

But, in the case of YOUR stuff, NO risk is acceptable, you'll violate basic, commonly established tenets of proper human interaction, abolish privacy, to protect yourself from the very risks you all say are part of the game? Your corporation is part of the game, too... But, not really, or more so, or what?

How do you justify away this hypocrisy?
Wander Prian
Nosferatu Security Foundation
#11 - 2017-03-04 15:01:44 UTC
Amojin wrote:
Ptraci wrote:
Amojin wrote:
I understand their paranoia, but isn't it a bit much, and yes, one of my favorite terms, again, META-gaming, to have access to more than the character you're actively considering?


No it's not a bit much. If you have nothing to lose because your corp is a broken shell, then they won't ask for API. However if a corp has billions or even trillions in assets which can easily - EASILY - be stolen because CCP can't code group security to save their lives, then it's not paranoia at all. It's self preservation. Even a full background check (which is not limited only to API) will not eliminate corporate theft and awoxing, however it's a screening process.

If you don't like it, don't join that corp. Stick to broke-a-- noobs who have nothing worth stealing. Or better yet make your own corp, and never bother doing a background check. Call me in 3 years and we'll see how it went for you.


And now recourse to 'fear.' Because somebody MIGHT rip you off, you therefor feel entitled to preemptively violate the rights of all. This is an unacceptable evil. I've played around with these corporate settings, and it seems replete with DACs, both in roles, and on office containers. Furthermore there are in-game security log containers. It would seem that the options for you to secure things without recourse to violating the real human player's privacy, well, the game is full of them!

What, precisely are you saying can't be done with all these options to configure security around?


For example, before citadels, wormholers lived in a POS that you usually shared with others. There was assets worth billions that you had access to. Having a full-API -requirement cut down on thievery drastically.

Wormholer for life.

Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#12 - 2017-03-04 15:04:32 UTC
Amojin wrote:


I see. That's the same answer everyone in power always tries to hide behind.

...


How do you justify away this hypocrisy?


OK you're just trolling. Buh bye.
Amojin
Doomheim
#13 - 2017-03-04 15:05:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Amojin
Wander Prian wrote:
For example, before citadels, wormholers lived in a POS that you usually shared with others. There was assets worth billions that you had access to. Having a full-API -requirement cut down on thievery drastically.


I'm not questioning the efficiency of the act. Cheating usually IS efficient, that's why it's done. I'm questioning the ethics of it, and why it's ok for big corporations to not take the same risks, in game, that they got on these forums and tell the little players: 'It's an in-game mechanic. Deal with it in-game. It's fine, it creates content.'

Wel... Does this sound like a bit of a contradiction?
Wander Prian
Nosferatu Security Foundation
#14 - 2017-03-04 15:05:27 UTC
Also, this is a game, not real life. Your "privacy" extends as far as CCP not revealing your personal information. Don't be an idiot and put sensitive information into a in-game mail.

Wormholer for life.

Amojin
Doomheim
#15 - 2017-03-04 15:06:42 UTC
Ptraci wrote:
Amojin wrote:


I see. That's the same answer everyone in power always tries to hide behind.

...


How do you justify away this hypocrisy?


OK you're just trolling. Buh bye.


If you can't win the argument insult the other side, I know. IRL, the magic word is 'racist.' Online, it's 'troll.'

You have a nice day.
Lord Harrowmont
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#16 - 2017-03-04 15:08:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Lord Harrowmont
SAGE THREAD
Amojin
Doomheim
#17 - 2017-03-04 15:11:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Amojin
Wander Prian wrote:
Also, this is a game, not real life. Your "privacy" extends as far as CCP not revealing your personal information. Don't be an idiot and put sensitive information into a in-game mail.


When you step outside the game, you are in real life. A Full-API key gives you information about the player, that you then use, in game. So, follow what you, yourself, just said, and deal with the game, the WHOLE game, INSIDE the game?

'Well, sure, when it comes to stomping little folks, but when my big corp and my assets might be at risk? Hell no, are you crazy? Racist!' -- the responses so far, condensed into a meaningful statement of intent.
Wander Prian
Nosferatu Security Foundation
#18 - 2017-03-04 15:25:19 UTC
Amojin wrote:
Wander Prian wrote:
Also, this is a game, not real life. Your "privacy" extends as far as CCP not revealing your personal information. Don't be an idiot and put sensitive information into a in-game mail.


When you step outside the game, you are in real life. A Full-API key gives you information about the player, that you then use, in game. So, follow what you, yourself, just said, and deal with the game, the WHOLE game, INSIDE the game?

'Well, sure, when it comes to stomping little folks, but when my big corp and my assetts might be at risk? Hell no, are you crazy? Racist!' -- the responses so far, condensed into a meaningful statement of intent.

API only gives information about the characters. I cannot see your personal information. Everything is kept within the game.

Wormholer for life.

Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
#19 - 2017-03-04 15:28:57 UTC
Amojin wrote:
Ptraci wrote:
Amojin wrote:


And now recourse to 'fear.' Because somebody MIGHT rip you off, you therefor feel entitled to preemptively violate the rights of all.


It's not violation if you have consent. I have a duty to protect the assets of my corp. Therefore I request an API. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO COMPLY. But you won't join my corp if you don't. There are other corps. Go cry to them.


I see. That's the same answer everyone in power always tries to hide behind. So, just to re-iterate, I'm not safe, anywhere in space, hi-sec wardeccing and ganking is fine, it's all part of the risk 'of the game.' Any evil act is acceptable, in game, because it creates 'content.' So much as this I have read and condensed here into a more or less simple statement of how players view EVE.

But, in the case of YOUR stuff, NO risk is acceptable, you'll violate basic, commonly established tenets of proper human interaction, abolish privacy, to protect yourself from the very risks you all say are part of the game? Your corporation is part of the game, too... But, not really, or more so, or what?

How do you justify away this hypocrisy?

Just make your own corp / alliance and you're free to live after your own rules.

And yes, EVE can be cut throat and does a decent job at training paranoia. It's part of the game.

Remove standings and insurance.

Amojin
Doomheim
#20 - 2017-03-04 15:31:31 UTC
Wander Prian wrote:
[API only gives information about the characters. I cannot see your personal information. Everything is kept within the game.


A full api gives you information about all my toons. You know basically everything about my characters, at that point. You can see how much money I have, what and where my stuff is, on all of them.

I remember the thread where Cade was telling me that getting perfect intel was impossible, in game. I agree, it's always a risk. But the more you have, it seems, the less you care about the 'rules,' eh? An full-api key gives you absolutely perfect intelligence, if you want to do anything to me, or one of my other toons, as well.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but if I wanted to be a spy or whatever, I would use the in-game communications, as this would be appropriate. You're all trying to blunt the point instead of actually just admitting, 'Yes, it gives us the total upper hand. Unlike in a gank in game, unlike any 'content' generated by evil actions, we're so desperate to protect our in-game riches that we'll use every tool we can, even ones that require us to meta-game against everyone. We can't even decide whether or not to trust our in game employees based on their in game actions!'
123Next pageLast page