Player Features and Ideas Discussion

He didn't even had any valid arguments on why it's stupid according to him either. The only thing i have seen as argument from one of them is that it gets harder to do gank. Yeah, but i mean, you have to work for everything in EVE, so why shouldn't criminals works for what they do, lol?

Not only that, but ANY criminals in high sec should work harder than any law abiding players in high sec, because they are breaking the rules of high sec.

What out of control ganking teams?



That is over 300 million every time you hit -10, that is simply affordable.

Why don't you just shoot them rather than beg CCP to destroy an entire playstyle?

CCP could always increase the drop-rate of tags to something that they find fair or increase ways of obtaining them. Market control of these tags is an intended dynamic thought about by the OP.

Dont whine about dropping a 20bil freighter though that is carrying a citadel or something and not being able to afford tags.
The limited requirement of mission running when tags are to expensive is meant to reduce the rate of current ganks on freighters and other juicy targets every 15min of the day.

Well I did give Kusion a really hard time in Uedama - twitch.tv/agsperry/videos/all/. I took like 95% (check zkill) of all his isk in a three day period and then he took a few months off after that.

These gankers also seem to be coming together in Jita V - Moon 17 and working as a large fleet to focusing exclusively on freighters. You can still see poddington and others going after miners occasionally but there is a good amount of them sitting idle in station when to many of them are online. (No need to lose any more ships than you have too.)

I wish I had a concrete answer for you but Kusion taking a few months off will definitely lower that statistic.

Trying to prove the nature of ganking with one statistic that deals with CONCORD kills is not exactly ethical statistics. We all know that when alphas were introduced, the player base increased largely and alphas were getting wiped out in herds. Player numbers have also been steadily decreasing over the years. That statistic does not say anything about ganking and how it's trending.

I have provided my proof many times. Stop ignoring the trillions in isk lost on zkill ganker reports. Kushion's 10 trillion destroyed vs. 31bil lost satisfies me many times over.

Why not? The number of people that Concord kill has a direct relationship with how much suicide ganking is going on. They kill all of the active aggressors involved in a suicide gank, and those kills are recorded.

The suicide ganking figures are probably lower than the graph suggests, a percentage of the people that Concord kill are people making silly mistakes.

Citation needed for alphas getting wiped out in herds.

That is irrelevant to the graph, it doesn't display that data, and Baltec1 isn't making any sort of claim about player numbers, he is saying that suicide ganking has been trending down for a while and that the 6 month rolling average of Concord kills has hit an historic low suggests that his claim is true.

If you want to add PCU numbers to it, the data is freely available via Eve-offline.net. Go for it.

It records a statistic over a time period, and that statistic has a relationship with suicide ganking. The fact that the 6 month rolling average is considerably lower than it was 4 years ago is a trend, a downwards one that demonstrates Concord are killing less people than they did 4 years ago, which suggests that there are less suicide ganks happening now than there were then.

One thing that is obvious on the graph is Burn X events, massive spikes of Concord kills and a sizeable bump in the 6 month average.

So many things wrong with your post that I'm not even going to reply to it.

I'm not going to repeat myself and me explaining statistics to you don't not benefit the OP in any way.

*crickets*