These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Burn Jita - Safety for Alphas on the way?

Author
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#21 - 2017-02-27 12:11:26 UTC
Ariztotle wrote:
The issue isnt with Burn Jita itself, its with the use of free Alpha alts to carry out the ganking during it


so you are saying people should have to pay to gank, like an omega privilege?

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#22 - 2017-02-27 12:16:34 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Ariztotle wrote:
The issue isnt with Burn Jita itself, its with the use of free Alpha alts to carry out the ganking during it


so you are saying people should have to pay to gank, like an omega privilege?

TBH if anything should have to be paid for it's mining. People should at least have to pay to commit to the game before we subject them to that horror Lol

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin

Jagd Wilde
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#23 - 2017-02-28 02:15:22 UTC
Yea I agree, every highsec activity should be off limits for Alpha clones. If you can't be bothered to help support EVE then you don't deserve the benefits of high sec. If you want to try EVE for free, go to low or null and have at it.


This includes mining, exploration, hauling, anything and everything.

What rights should anyone have if they refuse to pay like the rest of us?

Get subbed or get rekt.

Big smile

Every alt I own has a red safety, this has brought my friends much laughter.

Zarek Kree
Lunatic Legion Holdings
#24 - 2017-02-28 04:29:41 UTC
Jagd Wilde wrote:
Yea I agree, every highsec activity should be off limits for Alpha clones. If you can't be bothered to help support EVE then you don't deserve the benefits of high sec. If you want to try EVE for free, go to low or null and have at it.


This includes mining, exploration, hauling, anything and everything.

What rights should anyone have if they refuse to pay like the rest of us?

Get subbed or get rekt.

Big smile



The people who are least capable of surviving in lowsec or nullsec are new players. Highsec is for those who still need training wheels - and there's nothing wrong with that.

Given the limits on alpha clones, I find it hard to see how they're somehow taking benefits that they don't deserve. The point is to give them enough time playing the game to decide to become a paying customer.
Armalite NARVAL
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2017-02-28 04:41:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Armalite NARVAL
Jagd Wilde wrote:
Yea I agree, every highsec activity should be off limits for Alpha clones. If you can't be bothered to help support EVE then you don't deserve the benefits of high sec. If you want to try EVE for free, go to low or null and have at it.


This includes mining, exploration, hauling, anything and everything.

What rights should anyone have if they refuse to pay like the rest of us?

Get subbed or get rekt.

Big smile


Yeah Burn F******g Alphas !!
...or not.

"Deserve it...." sic...Roll

Are you seriously think about all this alpha thing.

CCP dont give free acces to EVE for long years.
Only a 7 day trial.
Discover Eve in 7 days.
Yeah, sure !

And then they go for this alpha acces.
Why ?
Hmmm... maybe to resplenish the player pool, maybe to give the game a new impulse...

Many alphas will try EVE and go away.

Others try a bit and go for Omega because it's juste frustrating to be limited, and 20 buck per month for hours of gametime it's not a such big deal.

But throw newbies in nullsec to play or, like the OP suggest implicitly, limit the possibility to engage in red dot activities and a bunch of Alphas just quit.

Because it's not fun.
Because the Alpha limitations are already pain in the ass.

Goons try to exploit a game mechanic ?
Woauuu ! Big news !
It's what Goons do.
I guess Eve and his community will survive.Big smile

And being a di*k with Alphas it's juste a pathetic attitude.

I try this game and take time to understand how things run before to rush like an idiot with my wallet in hands.
It's free ? Good, i take !

And why i will go for Omega before having all my Alpha skills maxed ?
Why throw my money away before find cool people to play with ?

I support many games througt the time and i can understand this "Pay like others" attitude but seriously think twice before shitt*g on Alphas because in the mass of noobs and others kids may be your futurs corp pals.
Mike Adoulin
Happys Happy Hamster Hunting Club
#26 - 2017-02-28 13:42:31 UTC
Zarek Kree wrote:


The people who are least capable of surviving in lowsec or nullsec are new players. Highsec is for those who still need training wheels - and there's nothing wrong with that.




While I agree that hisec should be considered training wheels and not the horribad ISK faucet that it actually is, noobs can actually do better in null/low then in hisec.

Original Goonz and Brave Newbies have proved this many, many times.

Hell, back when I first started playing it took me 3 months before I even flew into hisec...and man, I absolutely HATED it.

Everything in EVE is a trap.

And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)

You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.

Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.

Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#27 - 2017-02-28 19:20:46 UTC
Mike Adoulin wrote:
Zarek Kree wrote:


The people who are least capable of surviving in lowsec or nullsec are new players. Highsec is for those who still need training wheels - and there's nothing wrong with that.




While I agree that hisec should be considered training wheels and not the horribad ISK faucet that it actually is, noobs can actually do better in null/low then in hisec.

Original Goonz and Brave Newbies have proved this many, many times.

Hell, back when I first started playing it took me 3 months before I even flew into hisec...and man, I absolutely HATED it.

Respectfully I disagree. while newbies 'can' do well out in nulsec they have more ability to thrive in one of the empire space areas because there is much more content from a PvE perspective they can tackle on thier own so if the group they are joining can still provide the PvP content based out of highsec or lowsec than empire space is probably better for newbros. It's also eaiser for them to experiemnt with ship fitting cause markets

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin

Jagd Wilde
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#28 - 2017-02-28 21:35:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Jagd Wilde
Zarek Kree wrote:

The point is to give them enough time playing the game to decide to become a paying customer.



Highsec is not safer for new players than living in null with a good group of players, EVE is an MMO after all. If you think otherwise then you have never left highsec, and you are part of the problem.

Allowing Alpha alts to learn EVE the wrong way, highsec, does not help them. It only makes them targets and prevents them from learning correctly.

Like it or not, Alpha's have been here long enough that if they were going to help sub numbers significantly, we would have thousands of new subs. What I have seen is thousands of free accounts leeching off CCP's good will. I speak to players all the time that have had Alpha ONLY account(s) for months now and can't give a valid reason why they haven't subbed yet.

If you don't believe me, try it yourself, get out and speak to these Alpha clones. Start convo-ing everyone who started since the patch, you will find the Alphas pretty quick. Go for the 2-3 month old chars. Ask them why they are not subbed yet.

Open your eyes.


Smile

Every alt I own has a red safety, this has brought my friends much laughter.

Jagd Wilde
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#29 - 2017-02-28 21:38:53 UTC
Armalite NARVAL wrote:
A lot of tears.


You need to calm down miner.

Get subbed or get rekt.


Every alt I own has a red safety, this has brought my friends much laughter.

Zarek Kree
Lunatic Legion Holdings
#30 - 2017-03-01 03:08:17 UTC
Jagd Wilde wrote:
Zarek Kree wrote:

The point is to give them enough time playing the game to decide to become a paying customer.



Highsec is not safer for new players than living in null with a good group of players, EVE is an MMO after all. If you think otherwise then you have never left highsec, and you are part of the problem.



I think you're getting a little too emotional. Good people can simply disagree. At the point when you start declaring those who disagree with you to be "part of the problem", the intellectual credibility of your argument becomes suspect.

Null is only safer than highsec if you have a strong corp and social support structure. But, most new players don't even have a clue what a corp is or how they work. Most people hear about EVE, go to the website, download the client and start playing. Unless you join at the behest of an experienced player who then mentors you, new players lack the social contacts to immediately join a nullsec corp. The BNs and PHs of the game can't take every new alpha that signs up. That would leave most alphas alone in null trying to figure out the game. You CAN learn to swim in the middle of the ocean while sharks circle you if people are there to teach you and beat the sharks away. But who's going to do that for every rando who wanders in to try the game?

Even if I agreed with your philosophy of dumping alphas into nullsec (which I don't), it's simply not workable in any realistic way. Not to mention it does nothing to entice new players to continue playing the game.

Nobody knows what the sub numbers are other than CCP. Your anecdotal experience talking to random people may or may not be reflective of reality. If CCP isn't getting the subs they're hoping for, then I'm sure they'll tweak the system. But doing SOMETHING is better than watching the sub numbers continue to trickle away year after year. But they correctly recognize that attracting new players to the game isn't the problem - keeping them is. Alpha alts are as good a solution to the problem as any I've heard - and much better than just dumping them all into nullsec.
Jagd Wilde
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#31 - 2017-03-01 04:12:12 UTC
Zarek Kree wrote:
Jagd Wilde wrote:
Zarek Kree wrote:

The point is to give them enough time playing the game to decide to become a paying customer.



Highsec is not safer for new players than living in null with a good group of players, EVE is an MMO after all. If you think otherwise then you have never left highsec, and you are part of the problem.



I think you're getting a little too emotional. Good people can simply disagree. At the point when you start declaring those who disagree with you to be "part of the problem", the intellectual credibility of your argument becomes suspect.

Null is only safer than highsec if you have a strong corp and social support structure. But, most new players don't even have a clue what a corp is or how they work. Most people hear about EVE, go to the website, download the client and start playing. Unless you join at the behest of an experienced player who then mentors you, new players lack the social contacts to immediately join a nullsec corp. The BNs and PHs of the game can't take every new alpha that signs up. That would leave most alphas alone in null trying to figure out the game. You CAN learn to swim in the middle of the ocean while sharks circle you if people are there to teach you and beat the sharks away. But who's going to do that for every rando who wanders in to try the game?

Even if I agreed with your philosophy of dumping alphas into nullsec (which I don't), it's simply not workable in any realistic way. Not to mention it does nothing to entice new players to continue playing the game.

Nobody knows what the sub numbers are other than CCP. Your anecdotal experience talking to random people may or may not be reflective of reality. If CCP isn't getting the subs they're hoping for, then I'm sure they'll tweak the system. But doing SOMETHING is better than watching the sub numbers continue to trickle away year after year. But they correctly recognize that attracting new players to the game isn't the problem - keeping them is. Alpha alts are as good a solution to the problem as any I've heard - and much better than just dumping them all into nullsec.




So you seem triggered , and I believe that's an emotional reaction, so pot meet kettle and all.

I did say "part of the problem", you're the one who took it personal.

The effort shows in your post.

Get subbed or get rekt.

ONLY null/low/wh would entice players to sub up, and only in null/low/wh will an Alpha get the proper in-game education. I say that based on my belief that no good advice is ever given out by "high sec only" denizens. Blind leading the blind and all. If this is where you take offence, it's probably something you and I will never get past.

You act as if people need training wheels to play this game, if they do they need to find an easier game. EVE requires the ability to learn, situational awareness, and friends. AFK mining in an Alpha venture requires none of that.

Anecdotal or not, my time spent gathering information from Alpha players (in highsec yes) has been informative. How do you get your information? "Gut instinct" doesn't seem quantifiable.

I know this sounds like I'm talking about you, but that's your issue not mine. ;)

Every alt I own has a red safety, this has brought my friends much laughter.

Zarek Kree
Lunatic Legion Holdings
#32 - 2017-03-01 05:05:28 UTC
Jagd Wilde wrote:
So you seem triggered , and I believe that's an emotional reaction, so pot meet kettle and all.

I did say "part of the problem", you're the one who took it personal.

The effort shows in your post.

Get subbed or get rekt.



LOL...Okay dude. Just trying to have a civil discussion. Have a good night.
Neuntausend
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#33 - 2017-03-02 02:32:01 UTC
I'm still not sold on the idea that most of the Burn Jita participants were Alphas. But let's assume they were.

This year, we had this little gimmick where we would create characters for the occasion, all using the same naming scheme to look more menacing, and the same avatar for a blowjob joke. So, people did create new characters for this and - sure - quite a few of those were probably on Alpha accounts. (I didn't make one, too much effort)

So what? We did things like that before Alphas were even a thing. Heck, you could do this on the old 21 day trial. Were there no Alphas, and no trial, then we would just create our funky new gimmick-characters in a free slot on one of our main accounts, or just use our already existing charactes, which would come with the advantage of being able to multibox a scout or bumper or looter or something to murder undock-killmail-whores (wouldn't want to have a Burn Jita without the latter). The result would be pretty much the same. Pod update fees are not a thing anymore, so it doesn't matter if my 150M main gets podded, and it's not like destroying the sec status on our main characters will hurt most of us. We don't need the sec status in null, but we gain it anyway by ratting. Many goons are at +5 anyway when the time for Burn Jita comes around, and they will be at +5 again just a few weeks later without having to do anything they wouldn't do anyway.

Burn Jita would play out exactly the same way with or without Alphas. So there is no argument for locking safety for Alphas. There is however a big argument against it: Alphas would be excluded from one of the major aspects of the game, and even worse: They would be excluded from one of the few ingame activities that they can really excel in, despite their skillpoint limitations.
Ninteen Seventy-Nine
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#34 - 2017-03-02 18:24:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Ninteen Seventy-Nine
Using multiple accounts to circumvent the game designed punishments for unlawful behavior is a violation of the EULA.

Everyone knew it would be exploited, but CCP is too desperate for new players to care about the integrity of the game.

Pirates should be proud, and fly eternal shiny and chrome blinky and -10.

Nothing wrong with highsec ganking, but the alpha clone abuse is blatant EULA violation.
And NO you probably won't get anything but CCP Fozzie looking the other way and pretending it isn't a problem.

Fact is even though some are cheating by recycling alts, CCP cares far more about them signing up an account so they can go show their investors the new numbers than about impropriety and difficult game management decisions.

"The unending paradox is that we do learn through pain."

Ninteen Seventy-Nine
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#35 - 2017-03-02 18:31:38 UTC
Neuntausend wrote:
I'm still not sold on the idea that most of the Burn Jita participants were Alphas. But let's assume they were.


Let's not.

Let's just acknowledge that people are using the alpha clones improperly. Period.

Most, all, 32%... none of that really matters. The fact is the feature is being exploited CCP just doesn't want to acknowledge or do anything about it.

The only solution is alpha safeties in highsec.

It sucks for the legitimate alpha clones engaged in highsec ganks/piracy without exploiting the alpha clone feature and recycling accounts. But those people will just have to turn to lowsec, 0.0 and wormhole space for their gank needs unless they want to upgrade to omega.


"The unending paradox is that we do learn through pain."

Zarek Kree
Lunatic Legion Holdings
#36 - 2017-03-02 18:45:55 UTC
Ninteen Seventy-Nine wrote:
Using multiple accounts to circumvent the game designed punishments for unlawful behavior is a violation of the EULA.

Everyone knew it would be exploited, but CCP is too desperate for new players to care about the integrity of the game.

Pirates should be proud, and fly eternal shiny and chrome blinky and -10.

Nothing wrong with highsec ganking, but the alpha clone abuse is blatant EULA violation.
And NO you probably won't get anything but CCP Rise looking the other way and pretending it isn't a problem.

Fact is even though some are cheating by recycling alts, CCP cares far more about them signing up an account so they can go show their investors the new numbers than about impropriety and difficult game management decisions.



Once again, this has nothing to do with CCP's decision to allow alpha accounts. The exact same thing happened under the trial account system. Nothing is being "exploited" that wasn't being done before. If anything, alphas have greater limitations than trial account alts did.
Ninteen Seventy-Nine
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#37 - 2017-03-02 18:52:37 UTC
Zarek Kree wrote:

Once again, this has nothing to do with CCP's decision to allow alpha accounts. The exact same thing happened under the trial account system. Nothing is being "exploited" that wasn't being done before. If anything, alphas have greater limitations than trial account alts did.


Who cares what was happening before, what are you even talking about?

-Ganking is good for eve, piracy is good for eve. But those functions are intended to exist inside of a framework of consequences for "unlawful" actions.

-the specific matter of people recycling accounts to avoid those consequences is a direct violation of the eula

It doesn't matter what limitations existed in the past or do today. What is clear is that said limitations are not sufficient in avoid systematic exploitation of those mechanics.

Safeties green for alphas in highsec is the only way to prevent this behavior.

"The unending paradox is that we do learn through pain."

Zarek Kree
Lunatic Legion Holdings
#38 - 2017-03-02 19:10:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Zarek Kree
Ninteen Seventy-Nine wrote:
Zarek Kree wrote:

Once again, this has nothing to do with CCP's decision to allow alpha accounts. The exact same thing happened under the trial account system. Nothing is being "exploited" that wasn't being done before. If anything, alphas have greater limitations than trial account alts did.


Who cares what was happening before, what are you even talking about?

-Ganking is good for eve, piracy is good for eve. But those functions are intended to exist inside of a framework of consequences for "unlawful" actions.

-the specific matter of people recycling accounts to avoid those consequences is a direct violation of the eula

It doesn't matter what limitations existed in the past or do today. What is clear is that said limitations are not sufficient in avoid systematic exploitation of those mechanics.

Safeties green for alphas in highsec is the only way to prevent this behavior.



So then your issue isn't with alphas, but with CCP's policy toward unpaid accounts. A policy that has been consistent for many, many years. You're free to argue that unpaid accounts shouldn't be able to gank in highsec (although I don't agree), but this isn't a new argument. The forums are full of it going back at least a decade (maybe all the way back to 2003, but I don't know what the mechanics were back then).

So the question is, what do you think has changed that should compel CCP to change their interpretation of the EULA?

By the way, Crossing Zebras did a good article debunking the popular misconception that alpha alts are more prone to abuse than the trial account system. Their conclusion was the same as mine - if anything alpha clones actually limit the potential for abuse more than the old system.
Noobshot Elongur
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#39 - 2017-03-03 17:47:11 UTC
Ariztotle wrote:
So CCP said a while back that suicide ganking with Alphas shouldnt be much of a problem and they were keeping the option turning Safetys On for Alphas if there was a lot of abuse or ganking got out of hand.

Does the fact that the Goons are now doing this on a fairly large scale by using disposable cost-free and consequence-free Alpha alts in the latest Burn Jita mean this is now likely going to happen?



Awwwwww, did someone lose a freighter?
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#40 - 2017-03-03 18:45:37 UTC
Ariztotle wrote:
The issue isnt with Burn Jita itself, its with the use of free Alpha alts to carry out the ganking during it

What is the issue?

There were far more Omegas involved in burn Jita than there were alphas. Alphas aren't prevented from ganking and from the numbers involved in Burn Jita it certainly doesn't look like it was a problem there either.
Previous page123Next page