These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

For CCP:

Author
goudaMob
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2017-02-08 00:39:16 UTC
Please do not expand anymore space. Please do not add more systems.
Please cut the amount of systems already in game, by half.

Thank you.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#2 - 2017-02-08 00:41:43 UTC
goudaMob wrote:
Please do not expand anymore space. Please do not add more systems.
Please cut the amount of systems already in game, by half.
Thank you.

Including low-sec.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

goudaMob
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2017-02-08 00:47:16 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
goudaMob wrote:
Please do not expand anymore space. Please do not add more systems.
Please cut the amount of systems already in game, by half.
Thank you.

Including low-sec.


Most specifically low sec.
Akaro Tripar
Doomheim
#4 - 2017-02-08 00:48:02 UTC
Make low sec to high sec and let concord respond in under 1 sec everywhere.....
goudaMob
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2017-02-08 00:49:33 UTC
Akaro Tripar wrote:
Make low sec to high sec and let concord respond in under 1 sec everywhere.....


Make everything Null Sec, get rid of concord, and gate guns.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#6 - 2017-02-08 00:59:02 UTC
goudaMob wrote:
Make everything Null Sec, get rid of concord, and gate guns.

I was actually thinking they should double or triple the number of guns, maybe even add some ECM scrammers and sensor dampening fields...
Twisted

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Sweet Adamas
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2017-02-08 01:00:34 UTC
Is there any slight chance that you might just be a pirate/gate camper who has trouble finding targets


Would you also like all missions moved to lowsec?
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#8 - 2017-02-08 01:12:56 UTC
Sweet Adamas wrote:
Is there any slight chance that you might just be a pirate/gate camper who has trouble finding targets
Would you also like all missions moved to lowsec?

Whatever gave you that impression...? Roll

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#9 - 2017-02-08 07:40:31 UTC
Having Concord patrol low sec would definitely get more players going into it. Basically just have the current high sec game mechanics expanded to include low sec. Don't need to have the system security difference between low and high sec, just make it all Empire space and keep null sec as Alliance space.



DMC
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#10 - 2017-02-08 07:47:22 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Having Concord patrol low sec would definitely get more players going into it. Basically just have the current high sec game mechanics expanded to include low sec. Don't need to have the system security difference between low and high sec, just make it all Empire space and keep null sec as Alliance space.

Interesting idea. Any changes to what kind of capitals could operate in low-sec?

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#11 - 2017-02-08 08:00:21 UTC
goudaMob wrote:
Please do not expand anymore space. Please do not add more systems.
Please cut the amount of systems already in game, by half.

Thank you.

Just use only half. Your problem solved?
Aves Asio
#12 - 2017-02-08 08:05:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Aves Asio
goudaMob wrote:
Make everything Null Sec, get rid of concord, and gate guns.


How would i sell you tags thenSmile
Hello Meow Kitty
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#13 - 2017-02-08 10:25:20 UTC
I say remove nullsec, problems since day one solved.Big smile
Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2017-02-08 10:30:57 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Having Concord patrol low sec would definitely get more players going into it. Basically just have the current high sec game mechanics expanded to include low sec. Don't need to have the system security difference between low and high sec, just make it all Empire space and keep null sec as Alliance space.



DMC


this is just a stealth lvl 5 missions in highsec post

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

renwahh
Jovian Vengeance
#15 - 2017-02-08 10:31:05 UTC
I say move to features and ideas.

Oh while were there bring back the jove and kick everyones butt
Wolfgang Jannesen
Scrapyard Artificer's
#16 - 2017-02-08 13:25:29 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Having Concord patrol low sec would definitely get more players going into it. Basically just have the current high sec game mechanics expanded to include low sec. Don't need to have the system security difference between low and high sec, just make it all Empire space and keep null sec as Alliance space.



DMC


Let's make space boring as hell, basically.
Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2017-02-08 13:35:19 UTC
Wolfgang Jannesen wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Having Concord patrol low sec would definitely get more players going into it. Basically just have the current high sec game mechanics expanded to include low sec. Don't need to have the system security difference between low and high sec, just make it all Empire space and keep null sec as Alliance space.



DMC


Let's make space boring as hell, basically.


will someone think of the solo pve players...

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Mr Mieyli
Doomheim
#18 - 2017-02-08 13:41:51 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
will someone think of the solo pve players...


Nah they do more than enough of that themselves.

This post brought to you by CCP's alpha forum alt initiative. Playing the eve forums has never come cheaper.

Wolfgang Jannesen
Scrapyard Artificer's
#19 - 2017-02-08 13:43:57 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Wolfgang Jannesen wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Having Concord patrol low sec would definitely get more players going into it. Basically just have the current high sec game mechanics expanded to include low sec. Don't need to have the system security difference between low and high sec, just make it all Empire space and keep null sec as Alliance space.



DMC


Let's make space boring as hell, basically.


will someone think of the solo pve players...


I'm a fan of lowsec for roams, Providence for ratting, but there's a distinct difference between the two in terms of sovereignty and pilots. Making it all one big highsec bordering on null isn't very exciting
morion
Lighting Build
#20 - 2017-02-08 13:46:08 UTC
i"m sensing a logistics parade you will fun with for years.
123Next pageLast page