These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Would TQ people accept paid attribute remaps like Eve China system?

Author
Neuntausend
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#21 - 2017-02-05 18:22:25 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
Neuntausend wrote:
Does it really matter who pays for your ingame bonuses, though? It's not like PLEX and AUR can actually be acquired from ingame activities. They all come straight out of somebodys wallet.

The point is that you can in fact acquire everything for free if you're willing to earn enough ISK to purchase it. There will always be players with more RL money than time, so at least EVE has a system to encourage a form of wealth redistribution.

...or you can just skip that crap and buy yourself to the top.

This is the line of argumentation that true cut-purse P2W microtransactions games often come up with: "but you can get it in the game without paying, so it's alright". Yeah, you can get it. By opening an RNG box that drops maybe twice a day after hours of grinding with a chance of 1% to actually find what you need inside. Or you can just cough up 5 bucks and buy it.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#22 - 2017-02-05 18:23:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Arthur Aihaken
Coming from someone in Goonswarm, this is rich... You guys bought, bullied and otherwise bribed your way to the top for many years. I won't even comment on the other aspects of the game that you've unduly influenced for years...

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Neuntausend
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2017-02-05 18:32:39 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
Coming from someone in Goonswarm, this is rich... You guys bought, bullied and otherwise bribed your way to the top for many years. I won't even comment on the other aspects of the game that you've unduly influenced for years...

Of course we will use any possibilities offered to us. If I were to buy a PLEX and sell it on the market to reach one of my goals quicker, that merely means that I have adapted to the existing system. It does not mean I like or approve of it.

Now, I don't know what you think I or any of my corp- and alliance-mates have done, but if you have any proof showing that we bribed and bought our way to the top by means not already covered by CCP rules, I ask you to kindly put them forward.

What bullying has to do with any of this, I do not know.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#24 - 2017-02-05 18:51:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Arthur Aihaken
I'm not really interested in devolving this thread into a "Goon this" or "Goon that" argument, suffice it to say you have entirely earned the reputaion that has befallen you.
.....

There's nothing wrong with microtransactions for vanity items (SKINs, clothing) or various character aspects (resculpting, renaming or remaps). I would go one further that CCP should make unique ships, modules and ammunition available for PLEX and Aurum exclusively. I'm tired of the "pay-to-win" argument because "winning" takes on different meaning for everyone, and if you're prepared to spend enough money for a certain goal you can already achieve this.

I'd rather see some really cool paid content introduced. Being able to buy a Drifter characte and ship would be totally worth it - even if a permanent suspect status was attached to it.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Neuntausend
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2017-02-05 19:25:09 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
I'm not really interested in devolving this thread into a "Goon this" or "Goon that" argument, suffice it to say you have entirely earned the reputaion that has befallen you.
.....

Then don't start it. I am not the one who decided to make this personal. ;)

Arthur Aihaken wrote:
There's nothing wrong with microtransactions for vanity items (SKINs, clothing) ...

So far, I am with you.

Quote:
... or various character aspects (resculpting, renaming or remaps). I would go one further that CCP should make unique ships, modules and ammunition available for PLEX and Aurum exclusively. I'm tired of the "pay-to-win" argument because "winning" takes on different meaning for everyone, and if you're prepared to spend enough money for a certain goal you can already achieve this.

I'd rather see some really cool paid content introduced. Being able to buy a Drifter characte and ship would be totally worth it - even if a permanent suspect status was attached to it.

And this is where I disagree. If you cannot see how introducing items that do not come from the player-run industry into a game that prides itself with having a real market, then you need to play the game more and start seeing the bigger picture.

Anything game relevant you can buy for money, be it material or status is bad and only serves to throw off the balance and pull money out of your pocket. Why should the guy who has plenty of money to spend be allowed to train faster or get better ships faster than the guy who doesn't? Imagine a game of checkers. One player pulls out 10 bucks and adds another piece to the field, or makes another turn right away. Does that sound like a good game to you?

And I am aware that we already have those options to a degree. That's bad, and certainly not an argument to make it even worse.

Even name change is critical. Eve is a game where your choices matter and may have consequences. For example, you are now known to me as Arthur Aihaken, the guy who tried to drag my friends through the mire, and then quickly pulled out when asked to back it up. And you cannot just rename your character to wash off that stain. And that's a good thing - it forces players to think about their decisions.
Linus Gorp
Ministry of Propaganda and Morale
#26 - 2017-02-05 22:05:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Linus Gorp
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
I'd rather see some really cool paid content introduced. Being able to buy a Drifter characte and ship would be totally worth it - even if a permanent suspect status was attached to it.

Absolutely the LAST thing we need is some sort of freemium model in EVE.
Paying a subscription and then paying extra for additional content?

http://0.media.dorkly.cvcdn.com/41/53/69c05d3aef6aa58977e6061e714dc90c.jpg

One of EVEs biggest selling points has always been that we do not pay extra for expansions. If that would become the case, or they start gating content behind a paywall (subscription excluded, of course), I'd quit this game for good and never look back.

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.

Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#27 - 2017-02-05 22:08:17 UTC
EVE has already gone down the slippery slope - there's really no turning back. One can argue whether or not EVE is pay2win, but with a F2P option it's fairly apparent that it now is. Want to get better at EVE, train more skills - fly better ships? Subscribe and become an Omega. Want to augment your new Omega character? Purchase skill injectors. Want to pilot multiple ships at once? Buy another subscription and augment that character too. Want a cool limited edition CONCORD frigate, cruiser or battleship? Just buy some EVE FanFest and EVE Vegas tickets (no attendance necessary).

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Neuntausend
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#28 - 2017-02-05 22:19:18 UTC
I am not quite certain what your stance on this topic is. In one post you sound like you are all for it, in the next you sound like you agree that it is bad.
Linus Gorp
Ministry of Propaganda and Morale
#29 - 2017-02-05 23:38:01 UTC
It's not really free to play, that's just what the marketing guys are writing everywhere.
It's an unlimited trial that's sufficient to a certain degree.

A proficient alpha character can also totally **** the average nullsec f1 monkey, since it's not really skills or ship equipment that matter, but actual piloting skills. Something that can't be bought with money.

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.

Previous page12