These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Suggestion for CSM-inspired requirement to post on forums
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#61 - 2017-01-29 19:33:00 UTC
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Borat Guereen wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:

You said:

Anonymity always helps the powerful more than it helps the little guys.



Yes I did and I stand by that as a general belief. You have the right to disagree, of course.

My propositions are not to remove anonimity for the little guys,
they are

1/ if you have an alt that is well known in the community, you should post on the forums with that alt, much like CCP asks CSM candidates to run with their best known alts. If you are a little guy, you do not have well known alt, so this does not apply to little guys.

2/ Offer a minor economic advantage in-game to players that chose to link alts from multiple accounts publicly together, while retaining the capability to keep alts insulated if tehy so chose. Again, it is a choice that everyone can make, and nothing again that would forcefully remove anonymity from the little guys, especialy as it would mostly be a choice for players that have more than one account only.


What is your criteria of 'well known'?



what's his criteria for little guy?

as some one else stated earlier i would count R&K as a small group. and then we go back to the 'well known' is it well known by everyone in eve or do well know characters inside communities count? i mean there are A LOT of small groups and solo players that are well known in the FW community the WH community the HS community. These people would be made to run with their best know alts if they went for CSM so do thay also give up the right to post with an alt?


what about the little guy in the large groups?


you still haven't really explained why anyone in eve should not be able to freely voice their ideas and opinions w/o fear of repercussions.

what if some one well know in the veldspare trade knew about a trick in getting veldspar that was unbalanced and gave an advantage to those who know about it. He wants to post a suggestion to fix this exploit but is afraid it would alienate him from his business partners and cost him everything if they found out he let the secret slip


What I like is how the criteria keeps moving around.

Large groups, small groups...totally undefined and can be used in a variety of contexts that can be contradictory.

Now it is "well known" which again could be used in contradictory ways in different contexts.

This is just a load of crap....typical of what we get from politicians...who are, by definition IMO, scumbags.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online
Van Doe
#62 - 2017-01-29 19:42:36 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
[quote=Van Doe]
Come on really?
You can easily counter Bilderberg by aluminum armor plate.
If they really would be anonymous how could it be you know about them?


Sarcasm.

[quote]

Sorry i got Triggert unjustified

I'm not trolling, I create content for everyone to enjoy. afk cloaky in a system near you while posting in this forum.