These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE New Citizens Q&A

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Carrier Ratting Skills and Equipment

Author
Lulu Lunette
Savage Moon Society
#21 - 2017-01-25 20:19:41 UTC
Keno Skir wrote:
You should do what you gotta do mate, but the vets here do have your best interests at heart.

The choice to warn you against the silly idea, or to encourage it and profit from your death is one we at NCQ&A have to make a lot. You must understand that the people who want you to do well in EvE are the ones saying "you're too new to fly carriers". The ones you need to watch out for are the ones who tell you it's a brilliant idea, since most likely they are also working on killing your new shiny at the same time as talk to you.

For the wasteman who told the regular helpers to "get bent" (Lulu), you haven't been here long enough to critique the work of actual regulars. If you had sat through the HUNDREDS of posts about what a **** game EvE is because whatever shiny got wrecked, only to discover the user had bought their way into a capital and imagined it would be death proof, you would not be so quick to condemn the extremely valid advice being dispensed by people who actually know what they're talking about.

Capitals REQUIRE experience in-game to be used with any degree of safety. If someone does not have this experience it can be assumed they bought the skills / character and SHOULD NOT be encouraged.

Think about it for just a sec Lulu, if we don't aim to help the guy we would tell him "yeah mate no problem all you need is this, this and this to IV, happy ratting". This advice would cause him to lose all his ISK and quit the game most likely same as all the others.

We're merely asserting that he should gain experience in game and not on the forums, and trying to prevent yet another rage quit as a result of upshipping WAY too fast.

Enjoy your carrier OP genuinely, none the less you ARE going to lose it due to inexperience with EvE and i hope you don't rage quit for long Pirate


With respect,

I can see who else is doing some assuming! We don't know the real SP or extent of his real experience - but apparently asking about carriers is a no-no. I didn't see that sticky! Your post is most fair though and yeah, for me to tell everyone to get bent is a silly and broad generalization.

I am definitely aware that I haven't been here long enough for my posts to weigh enough or mean anything (new money) but there's also plenty of old money posters that really should just take their jaded **** somewhere else. I'm just here to whistleblow .. again. Ugh

I hope OP ain't a troll lol - (I'm sure he's more than aware of how vulnerable and expensive a Carrier is.. it's been a while since i've looked but there are Carrier guides everywhere that focus on one bit or another. If there was a recent, well written/structured video I'd certainly share it here.

@lunettelulu7

mkint
#22 - 2017-01-26 03:27:32 UTC
Keno Skir wrote:
You should do what you gotta do mate, but the vets here do have your best interests at heart.

I'm not. I'm just a jerk. Big smile

I get frustrated when people start thinking "I spent the most $ so I should be the only one who can win! As long as I have more $ than you, no matter what happens, I still win!" The honor tanking guy deserved every last bit of grief he got between the moment he RMTd huge piles of isk and gear to the moment he got every last isk forcibly taken away from him. He was a turd.

I get flabbergasted when people who have legitimately played the game for a long period get to a point where they can make a huge investment but didn't bother to lay any of the ground work for that investment. A potential carrier pilot gets there legitimately, but sounds like he's never trained any other skills whatsoever, and like he has never been in any kind of a fight? That's ridiculous. You're playing the wrong game. You don't get to be a good carrier pilot by being a long time miner. Start over.

Both of those sound plausible based on the content of the OP, especially considering this section is NEW Citizens. There is no such thing as a rookie that SHOULD be flying a carrier. Even most vets would be better off avoiding them.

Maxim 6. If violence wasn’t your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.

Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
Aideron Robotics.
#23 - 2017-01-26 05:23:03 UTC
Lulu Lunette wrote:
You didn't post in the wrong channel. And to you regulars, this isn't GD. If you really can't just answer the question or post something constructive.. well basically just get bent.


but they are giving constructive answers. Shocked

Just Add Water

ergherhdfgh
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#24 - 2017-01-26 11:51:33 UTC
Gregorius Goldstein wrote:

I just wanted to point out that the game design of EVE kind of encourages “newbie carrier pilots”.

Could you please add more detail to this statement?

My experience of Eve is the exact opposite of what you are saying here.

At my first reading of that statement, my knee jerk reaction was that you've totally got the wrong idea of Eve and are imposing concepts learned in other MMOs onto Eve. I'm willing to consider that maybe I've missed something but I am very curious what makes you say this.

Want to talk? Join Cara's channel in game: House Forelli

ergherhdfgh
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#25 - 2017-01-26 12:16:25 UTC  |  Edited by: ergherhdfgh
Keno Skir wrote:


Capitals REQUIRE experience in-game to be used with any degree of safety. If someone does not have this experience it can be assumed they bought the skills / character and SHOULD NOT be encouraged.
QFT
One of my corp mates, back when he was new, decided that he wanted to fly a Rorqual. I told him that he should just chill and learn the game and that there was nothing fun about fly a Rorqual. ( this was back before the recent changes when Rorqual pilots just sat inside PoS bubbles ). He ignored my advice and started a second account and focused on getting into a Rorqual as quickly as possible.

He purchased a Rorqual before he could even fly one and was pretty much watching the second tick away until the skill finished to board and undock in the ship. On his first cyno jump, trying to get his new cap ship home, he bounced off of a station in low sec and lost his Rorqual. He had literally spent only minutes in the cockpit of the ship before it became a loss mail.

He could not easily afford the loss of that ship. It took him a long time to save up for it and it was a huge set back for him. Worse yet even if he had not lost the ship he could not have even used it much as where we live there were free system wide full mining boosts available near.y 23 / 7. So it was a pointless ship for him to have and a pointless loss. The ship brought him no enjoyable gameplay and it's loss set him back greatly. Much risk for very little benefit.

Fast forward a couple years and that Rorqual alt of his doesn't seem to get much use. His main which flys mostly small and medium ships in PvP and medium and large ships to make isk is what still gets used the most for him.

IMHO the kind of people that want to get into cap ships as quickly as possible are playing Eve as if it were another WoW clone and trying to get "level capped" and get "decked out" to get to "end game content" as quickly as possible. I used to play WoW and in that game everything before level cap and being decked out in raiding gear was just to get you to that point. The "real game play" in that game only existed at level cap and with a decent gearscore.

Eve is a completely different game. You can participate in a meaningful way in pretty much all game activities from day 1. 10 years later you will still be flying a lot of the same ships that you flew in your first months of playing the game. Cap ships are not some OP legendary weapon that helps you pwn or anything like that. They are big, fat, slow, expensive ships that everyone is trying to get on the kill mail of. They have a specific purpose in large fleet engagements but are fairly useless everywhere else.

If you want to learn your lessons the hard way then by all means ignore all the advice of the experienced players here and continue your pursuit of getting decked out in purpules.

Want to talk? Join Cara's channel in game: House Forelli

Gregorius Goldstein
Queens of the Drone Age
#26 - 2017-01-26 15:17:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Gregorius Goldstein
ergherhdfgh wrote:
Gregorius Goldstein wrote:

I just wanted to point out that the game design of EVE kind of encourages “newbie carrier pilots”.

Could you please add more detail to this statement?

My experience of Eve is the exact opposite of what you are saying here.

At my first reading of that statement, my knee jerk reaction was that you've totally got the wrong idea of Eve and are imposing concepts learned in other MMOs onto Eve. I'm willing to consider that maybe I've missed something but I am very curious what makes you say this.


TL;dr: OK, bad wording on my part. EVE encourages Pay-to-Win carrier pilots and the hilarious drama it causes.

There is no bound to character, bound to account, bound on equip or bound on pick up loot in EVE, most games I know have this concept to some extent. Usually you can’t buy “endgame” stuff with ingame currency and you can’t buy ingame currency with real money from the company running the game either. In a lot of games the best equipment drops from raids and endbosses, is quite rare and binds to the player picking it up. Or at least to the first account using the item. And is it absolutely not common that you can buy skills and “higlevel” characters for ingame and by proxy real money either. That’s because most games try to pretend there was no “pay to win” option and the best stuff can only be reached by the best players.

EVE is different. If you are willing to risk your money you are welcome to do so. You are not forced to grind raids until stuff drops, you are not forced to gather experience points until you reach the highest level, you can just buy everything. All you need is either time or money. The killmails and the drama this option generates are part of the EVE gameplay in my opinion. I totally agree, that everything in EVE let’s most people come to the conclusion that just buying yourself into big ships is a bad idea. Because it does not matter what skills your pilot has, your own players skills are what matters. BUT the option to bypass the journey is there and a small fraction of people will use it just because they can, why not, YOLO, no poors, whatever…

CCP themselves tell their customers: “Don’t fly what you can’t afford to lose and bigger is not better.” But I am sure that they are 100% aware that this won’t stop some players from doing it anyway. And I guess that they see this as part of content creation and perhaps are even quite happy about it because it generates cash and adds to the special “unforgiving” flavor of EVE. What is possible in EVE and what is an good idea are quite different things.

Of course it is 100% good advice to tell new players that this is a bad idea and that they need player skills and experience to fly the big ships. But are we in any way obligated to tell that to players that obviously don’t want to hear it? If he things he can handle it, let him try. More fun anyway. Perhaps I have just a bit more “Schadenfreude” than you assumed.
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#27 - 2017-01-26 15:28:17 UTC
thats not really encouraging “newbie carrier pilots”, any other mmo you can simply just rmt your way to the top stuff, ccp try to cut out rmt by offering the stuff themselves, so you are saying while other mmo's dont offer buying stuff from the company for real money they are essentially encouraging rmt?

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Gregorius Goldstein
Queens of the Drone Age
#28 - 2017-01-26 15:35:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Gregorius Goldstein
Lan Wang wrote:
thats not really encouraging “newbie carrier pilots”, any other mmo you can simply just rmt your way to the top stuff, ccp try to cut out rmt by offering the stuff themselves, so you are saying while other mmo's dont offer buying stuff from the company for real money they are essentially encouraging rmt?


Yeah, bad wording, sry. CCP encourages "Pay-to-Win" carrier pilots. I am totally cool with that. And it is up to debate if you win anything that way. But you can do it without third party RMT and without the risk to get your account banned. That PLEX>ISK>Injector>morePLEX>bigShip chain is quite unique to EVE. Sure, some people may buy a MMO account on EBAY, but I think the "against the EULA" part holds most/some players back. To much risk of a ban. CCP got rid of that risk. That is all I say.

EDIT: Do other games encourage RMT.. no idea.. perhaps the just hang onto an illusion?
Gregorius Goldstein
Queens of the Drone Age
#29 - 2017-01-26 15:40:51 UTC
Keno Skir wrote:


Capitals REQUIRE experience in-game to be used with any degree of safety. If someone does not have this experience it can be assumed they bought the skills / character and SHOULD NOT be encouraged.


But capitals REQUIRE no in game experience to lose them either. That is the beauty of EVE.
Helios Grim
Perkone
Caldari State
#30 - 2017-01-26 18:05:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Helios Grim
The potential that I could lose the carrier has already been WELL explained and the risks involved. Aside from Lulu, I have not received remotely any help from any of you. I asked for help and I got nothing but criticism and insults. This conversation is now over, and I hope none of you respond to other pilots in this way.
mkint
#31 - 2017-01-26 19:17:36 UTC
Helios Grim wrote:
The potential that I could lose the carrier has already been WELL explained and the risks involved. Aside from Lulu, I have not received remotely any help from any of you. I asked for help and I got nothing but criticism and insults. This conversation is now over, and I hope none of you respond to other pilots in this way.

The criticisms are valid. The perceived insults are suppositions, as we don't know you personally. The responses of "You're either asking in the wrong section or you are doing something that's a terrible idea" is the correct response to your question. That you haven't supplied information that suggests anything other than the second one being the case, the onus is on you to correct the most logical assumptions. That you don't like that response has no bearing on the validity of the responses.

In fact, the responses given were better advice than the question you asked: "get good first."

Maxim 6. If violence wasn’t your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.

Vortexo VonBrenner
Doomheim
#32 - 2017-01-26 20:28:52 UTC
Helios Grim wrote:
...I have not received remotely any help from any of you.

You most certainly have - you simply didn't like it or choose to recognize it.


Helios Grim wrote:
This conversation is now over...

"close your ears" if you wish, does not change any facts. Good luck.


Helios Grim wrote:
...I hope none of you respond to other pilots in this way.

Actually people have been fairly nice to you in their responses. If you are so easily offended by these NCQ&A forum responses, one wonders how you react to things such as loss and/or local smack ingame. I invite you to post this same thread in the general discussion or even ships & modules subforums and compare the responses you get there with what you have received here.






ergherhdfgh
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#33 - 2017-01-27 02:28:33 UTC
Gregorius Goldstein wrote:


TL;dr: OK, bad wording on my part. EVE encourages Pay-to-Win carrier pilots and the hilarious drama it causes.

There is no bound to character, bound to account, bound on equip or bound on pick up loot in EVE, most games I know have this concept to some extent. Usually you can’t buy “endgame” stuff with ingame currency and you can’t buy ingame currency with real money from the company running the game either. In a lot of games the best equipment drops from raids and endbosses, is quite rare and binds to the player picking it up. Or at least to the first account using the item. And is it absolutely not common that you can buy skills and “higlevel” characters for ingame and by proxy real money either. That’s because most games try to pretend there was no “pay to win” option and the best stuff can only be reached by the best players.

EVE is different. If you are willing to risk your money you are welcome to do so. You are not forced to grind raids until stuff drops, you are not forced to gather experience points until you reach the highest level, you can just buy everything. All you need is either time or money.

Oh ok now I understand what you are saying. I totally see your point with the exception of you putting the blame on CCP and vets looking for easy KMs. I'll explain... But first I want to say that I think that us vets and CCP out of our way to try and explain it but new players just don't believe us because it goes against everything they learned in other games.

Yes Eve is different in many ways. First off there is no end game in Eve so your comment about not having to grind raid bosses for end game gear is at best a moot point and more likely just completely mis-guided. No ship in Eve is any better than any other ship. Each ship has it's uses and everything in Eve is situational.

In other games a level 90 character doesn't even have a chance against a level 100 character and a character with a gearscore a couple hundred points higher has exponential factors of power over a lower geared player. In Eve a carrier is not better than a BS or even a cruiser or a frig it's just different. In Eve people don't fly cruisers because they can't afford battleships they fly cruisers to do stuff that cruisers do well and fly battleships for stuff that battleships do well. A very new player in a very small cheap ship can get under the guns of a very high skill point character in a very expensively fit Battleship and pwn him. You will never see a level 10 beating a level 100 in WoW.

I think that there are a few more points about Eve that you are missing:

First there is no structured anything in Eve. We have no instanced content that is balanced for a fixed number of players of a fixed level. You can run a level 4 mission by yourself or you can run one with 200 of your closest friends. On top of that anyone else can bring 400 of their closest friends into your mission space to join you. A corpmate of mine was solo belt ratting in a T1 cruiser that was cheaply fit because we had a cloaky camper in local and he didn't want to mine so he decided to rat in something not worth hot dropping on. The camper decided to drop him anyway and the fleet that came in had 9 super capitals. That is 3 Titans and 6 Moms plus a handful of smaller ships just to take out one, **** fit, cruiser. It was a hilarious loss mail!

Note in the above story it was the smaller ships that came with the supers that killed him. The supers weren't there to add power to kill him, they were more just bait to try and escalate the situation. My point with that story is the old saying in Eve that if you were involved in a fair fight something went horribly wrong.

Big ships have a difficult time hitting small ships. Bigger is not better. The most followed statistic in PvP in Eve is probably kill efficiency which is isk value of the ships that you have lost versus the ships that you have destroyed. The point of Eve is doing more with less.

Also you can deadspace fit your ratting ship and get better isk / hour but when you loose one it costs a lot more to replace. So often you'll wind up more cash flow positive if you just fly T2 fit ships. Thus more expensive ( read that as decked out in purples ) is not necessarily better.

But probably the main point with regards to this is that what you are flying and how it's fit is far less of a determining factor on outcomes than is player knowledge. What you know is an exponentially bigger factor in this game than in most others. You can find all kinds of examples of experienced players, on very low skill point characters, and in very cheaply fit ships beating multiple, much higher skill point characters in T2 ships with more expensive fits.


Gregorius Goldstein wrote:

Perhaps I have just a bit more “Schadenfreude” than you assumed.

I had to look up what it meant but now that I know I'll say probably not. This is Eve after all and one of the favorite pastimes in Eve is surfing killboards for LOL KMs.

Want to talk? Join Cara's channel in game: House Forelli

Chainsaw Plankton
FaDoyToy
#34 - 2017-01-27 03:57:36 UTC
Lulu Lunette wrote:
You didn't post in the wrong channel. And to you regulars, this isn't GD. If you really can't just answer the question or post something constructive.. well basically just get bent.

99/100 posts in NCQA are helpful, however no effort how do I capital posts deserve whatever they get.

The first two results on google for "eve online carrier ratting" have a ton of info and are:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4h9gzo/the_quick_and_dirty_carrier_ratting_guide/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Slq-aVS4_w

Plus there is always the option to go on sisi and try it out.

@ChainsawPlankto on twitter

Wander Prian
Nosferatu Security Foundation
#35 - 2017-01-27 11:06:44 UTC
Helios Grim wrote:
The potential that I could lose the carrier has already been WELL explained and the risks involved. Aside from Lulu, I have not received remotely any help from any of you. I asked for help and I got nothing but criticism and insults. This conversation is now over, and I hope none of you respond to other pilots in this way.


First warning-sign was the fact that you were asking about carriers in this forum. Not the ship&modules, where fitting-questions usually go. The next was the fact that you are in a NPC-corporation and haven't been in a large nullsec-corporation at all. Then your wording suggested that you haven't actually done any reading up on capital ship mechanics, which all combined just leads to a quick loss of a carrier and you rage-quitting the game due to nobody warning you how difficult it is.

Could I have made my point less bluntly, sure, but I like saying things like they are. After all the discussion here, I'm still standing by my first opinion.

You shouldn't get a carrier until you go read up on capital ship mechanics.

Wormholer for life.

Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#36 - 2017-01-27 11:14:11 UTC
i gave solid advice on how to delay you killing my Angel friends, just saying is all Big smile

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Chihuahuaraffe
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2017-01-27 16:59:11 UTC
Keno Skir wrote:
Capitals REQUIRE experience in-game to be used with any degree of safety.

Well, the same is also true of T1 frigates, it's only a matter of scale.

You can always offer to be a Personal Capital Training Instructor for the small sum of, say, five billion isk per month, and help redistribute their wealth a bit :)

And besides, exploding Carriers make the economy go 'round!
Gregorius Goldstein
Queens of the Drone Age
#38 - 2017-01-28 19:46:55 UTC
ergherhdfgh wrote:

Oh ok now I understand what you are saying. I totally see your point with the exception of you putting the blame on CCP and vets looking for easy KMs. I'll explain... But first I want to say that I think that us vets and CCP out of our way to try and explain it but new players just don't believe us because it goes against everything they learned in other games.

Yes Eve is different in many ways. First off there is no end game in Eve so your comment about not having to grind raid bosses for end game gear is at best a moot point and more likely just completely mis-guided. No ship in Eve is any better than any other ship. Each ship has it's uses and everything in Eve is situational.

In other games a level 90 character doesn't even have a chance against a level 100 character and a character with a gearscore a couple hundred points higher has exponential factors of power over a lower geared player. In Eve a carrier is not better than a BS or even a cruiser or a frig it's just different. In Eve people don't fly cruisers because they can't afford battleships they fly cruisers to do stuff that cruisers do well and fly battleships for stuff that battleships do well. A very new player in a very small cheap ship can get under the guns of a very high skill point character in a very expensively fit Battleship and pwn him. You will never see a level 10 beating a level 100 in WoW.

I think that there are a few more points about Eve that you are missing...


Nice, than we are on the same page as I don't "blame" CCP nor anyone looking for easy killmails. I am even quite fond of the fact that you can buy almost anything in EVE because they made it so that you can blow up nearly everything too.

And I can see the difference between EVE and didn't miss the points you wrote down. I agree with them all. Only thing I wanted to point out is that is a bit funny that people are "OMG where do all those new carrier wannabe pilots come from" in a game that offers a fast track. Is it stupid to take the fast track? Abolutely! Is it a wonder that it keeps happening? Not so much. Should you warn players even when they didn't ask for it and are adamant to go for it. Up to dabate.
Gregorius Goldstein
Queens of the Drone Age
#39 - 2017-01-28 19:49:19 UTC
Chihuahuaraffe wrote:

You can always offer to be a Personal Capital Training Instructor for the small sum of, say, five billion isk per month, and help redistribute their wealth a bit :) And besides, exploding Carriers make the economy go 'round!


Yes, my point exactly. If anyone ask if something is risky one should give good advice, if someone wants to undock nice stuff why would one interfere?
Previous page12