These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

When NPCs become detrimental to PVP

First post
Author
Khan Wrenth
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#381 - 2017-01-04 12:43:08 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Strawman.
Ad hominem.
Argumentum ad publicum.
Appeal to authority.

Im pressive fitting four logical fallacies in a single sentence.

Is this the best you have?

I'm not taking sides in this debate, nor am I making any sort of personal jab at you or the other guy you're arguing with.

But it's worth noting that anything related to rules of proper debate only mean anything within the confines of the classroom it's taught in. In the real world, no matter how much of a fallacy each might be, people can and are swayed by them every day. Calling them out is about the same as shaking your fist at the rain; it's not going to change anything. The best you can do is simply to return to the roots as it were, simply refute the central point. Being on the defensive is a losing strategy anyway.
Salvos Rhoska
#382 - 2017-01-04 12:44:58 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
If someone wants to actually discuss the point in a manner befitting a grown adult


Oh man, this one really takes the cake.


What really 'takes the cake' is when you think that I'm doing what you're doing, because it's something you do. Same thing happens when a thief loses something, he'll default to thinking someone stole it from him. Likewise, when I challenge your arguments, you accuse me of all the intellectual dishonesty you practice yourself. It's called 'projection', and you've been demonstrating that on these forums since 2014. I'm just repeating myself again, though. To who? I have no idea. You never listen, which is why I'm just not gonna bother anymore.


Tell me, honestly, do you think your discussion in this thread was conducted in a manner "befitting a grown adult"?

Im really looking forward to this.
Salvos Rhoska
#383 - 2017-01-04 12:50:00 UTC
Khan Wrenth wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Strawman.
Ad hominem.
Argumentum ad publicum.
Appeal to authority.

Im pressive fitting four logical fallacies in a single sentence.

Is this the best you have?

I'm not taking sides in this debate, nor am I making any sort of personal jab at you or the other guy you're arguing with.

But it's worth noting that anything related to rules of proper debate only mean anything within the confines of the classroom it's taught in. In the real world, no matter how much of a fallacy each might be, people can and are swayed by them every day. Calling them out is about the same as shaking your fist at the rain; it's not going to change anything. The best you can do is simply to return to the roots as it were, simply refute the central point. Being on the defensive is a losing strategy anyway.


The central points have already been refuted at length.

The comment to which that post refers in context, had no content relevant to any issue.
It was just 4 logical fallacies packed into one sentence.
No substance or relevant content whatsoever.

To carry your analogy, it was Remiel trying to defeat a fist, with rain.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#384 - 2017-01-04 12:51:09 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:

The central points have already been strawmanned at length.


FTFY

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Salvos Rhoska
#385 - 2017-01-04 12:54:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:

The central points have already been strawmanned at length.


FTFY


Misquoting does not fix anything, nor refute anything.

Its just intellectually dishonest and a convenient excuse for you (typically) to avoid addressing arguments (again).

The instances of personal insults and disrespectful conduct you have laid upon other posters in this thread number in the dozens. We have perhaps made a mistake in not reporting you for them.

Ill spend this afternoon reporting each instance of them.
Torin Corax
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#386 - 2017-01-04 12:57:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Torin Corax
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Torin Corax wrote:

I am no-one special, I am not unique nor particularly gifted at Eve....but I don't need NPC's to hold my hand while I do this, so why should CCP think this is required? i certainly don't want it. I respectfully, and with no intent to be offensive, believe that anyone who needs NPC back-up to operate in low sec, is not really ready to operate in low sec.]


This is specifically and explicitly explained in the CCP Dev post linked in this thread.

Furthermore, there are no "readiness" restrictions on player behavior in any sector of EVE.
All are open to everyone, at any time.


Of course everywhere is open to everyone, I never said otherwise. However an individuals readiness to deal with the increased threat of player interaction in low sec is dependent on their personal knowledge, skill, resources, awareness, and decision making ability.
The game places no arbitrary value on this, nor should it. That's player choice, that defines a players experience within the framework of a player driven game.

Quote:
This change means less "ready" players, as ypu define them, can now "more readily" operate in LS.
Whether they "need" the NPCs is arbitrary.
You dont "need" the NPCs to operate in LS.
You never have, and dont now either.


I think I may be misreading this? I know I don't need the NPC's, I said as much. Because of this, I profit in low sec based on my knowledge and ability to function there without the support (beyond the existing sentry mechanic) of NPC's.
That profit is hard won. It will become easier perhaps with this new mechanic. The debate ( from my perspective anyway) is whether it should be easier. Making it easier to profit in low sec vs. requiring greater awareness to profit in low sec. I tend towards the latter. My opinion only of course.

Quote:
LS is and remains a sector with NPC participation and control.
If you want NPC free autonomy, move to NS or WH.


Aaaaaaand the entire bloody point of this thread was to consider, discuss and debate to what extent this participation is to occur. Specifically, as in the OP the ramifications of the New NPC mining support fleets, and their particular programmed responses.
Just because CCP put something into the game, does not mean everyone has to agree with it. It does not mean we are forbidden to challenge it or suggest alterations and/ or alternatives.

Pretty much what this forum is for really.
Salvos Rhoska
#387 - 2017-01-04 13:03:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Torin Corax wrote:
Aaaaaaand the entire bloody point of this thread was to consider, discuss and debate to what extent this participation is to occur. Specifically, as in the OP the ramifications of the New NPC mining support fleets, and their particular programmed responses.
Just because CCP put something into the game, does not mean everyone has to agree with it. It does not mean we are forbidden to challenge it or suggest alterations and/ or alternatives.

Pretty much what this forum is for really.


Yes.

You dont agree with it. Others do.

Everyone aside from Remiel has been doing exactly that.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#388 - 2017-01-04 13:04:35 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:

The central points have already been strawmanned at length.


FTFY


Misquoting does not fix anything, nor refute anything.

Its just intellectually dishonest and a convenient excuse for you (typically) to avoid addressing arguments (again).

The instances of personal insults and disrespectful conduct you have laid upon other posters in this thread number in the dozens.
We have perhaps made a mistake in not reporting you for them.

Ill spend this afternoon reporting each instance of them.


You're not interested in how other forum posters are treated, you're interested in you, and playing the victim doesn't change the fact that my misquoting your posts is absolutely no different from your misrepresentations of mine. Report away, it's clear that this particular thread has served its purpose of raising awareness of the issue to people that matter, and people that matter are going to do with that what they will, including exploiting the **** out of this flawed mechanic to their advantage, not just in a way that can be considered emergent gameplay, but in an unbalanced way that only a select few players can, if for no other reason than the potential to do so.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Railyn Quisqueya
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#389 - 2017-01-04 13:06:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Railyn Quisqueya
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Etain Darklightner Agittain wrote:


Restating the obvious thing we should be doing in lowsec, while informative as to your position, is unnecessarily redundent.

The consequences are obvious, pop a pc in an npc mining Corp, get shot back at. Ganking shouldn't be easy for anyone, or in this case, as you put it, killing spies and scouts in system shouldn't be easy. CCP doesn't look like they're going to change the mechanics of this so maybe bring your friends along for all to get their kill mails?

You attack people in their posts for reading comprehension as they respond to you, as if, you're better than they are somehow. You're not, you look dodgy at best putting people down instead of taking into consideration that maybe they might have something to offer you. I just see you as trolling.


Sorry, but restating the same carebear crap that's already been argued against in this thread isn't a point. I suggest you try reading it. And if I'm vitriolic, it's because I'm getting sick and tired of the so far wilful ignorance that leads to posts like yours.


You know, Remiel? For someone who claims to be autistic, you sure like to insult people's intelligence for just simply disagreeing with you. I don't know if it's some kind of defense mechanism. I suspect it is. People have brought up very valid points in this thread that do not necessarily align with your views. It doesn't mean they're automatically inferior to your intelligence. You need to learn to accept that other people's opinions may be just as valid as yours. Or, if you feel it isn't valid, address the opinion, not the person. If you already have, then move on. No need for the snarky intelligence remarks. Just some thoughts to live by.
Nicolai Serkanner
Incredible.
Brave Collective
#390 - 2017-01-04 13:10:30 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:


I have given you my answer as well.
If you choose to reject it, that is your problem, not mine.

Furthermore the question is addressed to Torin. Not you.


Doesn't matter who it was addressed to, it was answered, and your post is just more 'intellectual' posturing. You're always so quick to dismiss or block people that challenge you on any level that makes you feel uncomfortable, aren't you. You know, there's actually a name for the problem you have - Dunning-Kruger.


Interesting. Thanks for the link.
Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#391 - 2017-01-04 13:12:21 UTC
So much chum in the water.
Might I suggest a Thunderdome match to settle things?
I mean, this is getting a bit messy.
Honestly I'm surprised it hasn't been locked yet.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#392 - 2017-01-04 13:13:09 UTC
Railyn Quisqueya wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Etain Darklightner Agittain wrote:


Restating the obvious thing we should be doing in lowsec, while informative as to your position, is unnecessarily redundent.

The consequences are obvious, pop a pc in an npc mining Corp, get shot back at. Ganking shouldn't be easy for anyone, or in this case, as you put it, killing spies and scouts in system shouldn't be easy. CCP doesn't look like they're going to change the mechanics of this so maybe bring your friends along for all to get their kill mails?

You attack people in their posts for reading comprehension as they respond to you, as if, you're better than they are somehow. You're not, you look dodgy at best putting people down instead of taking into consideration that maybe they might have something to offer you. I just see you as trolling.


Sorry, but restating the same carebear crap that's already been argued against in this thread isn't a point. I suggest you try reading it. And if I'm vitriolic, it's because I'm getting sick and tired of the so far wilful ignorance that leads to posts like yours.


You know, Remiel? For someone who claims to be autistic, you sure like to insult people's intelligence just by them simply disagreeing with you. I don't know if it's some kind of defense mechanism. I suspect it is. People have brought up very valid points in this thread that do not necessarily align with your views. It doesn't mean they're automatically inferior to your intelligence. You need to learn to accept that other people's opinions may be just as valid as yours. Or, if you feel it isn't valid, address the opinion, not the person. If you already have, then move on. No need for the snarky intelligence remarks. Just some thoughts to live by.


You have also demonstrated a refusal/inability to read and keep up and subsequently form any kind of educated opinion on the topic at hand, so why the **** should I care what you have to say or think about me? Maybe you should read more of the posts that these two have posted in open hostility to me BEFORE I became hostile to them. Oh, wait, you don't want to, because you'd rather be hostile to me as well, as you were in your own first post on this thread. GG.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Railyn Quisqueya
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#393 - 2017-01-04 13:22:15 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:


You have also demonstrated a refusal/inability to read and keep up and subsequently form any kind of educated opinion on the topic at hand, so why the **** should I care what you have to say or think about me? Maybe you should read more of the posts that these two have posted in open hostility to me BEFORE I became hostile to them. Oh, wait, you don't want to, because you'd rather be hostile to me as well, as you were in your own first post on this thread. GG.


I have disagreed with your OP from my first post, yes. What I have not done is gone straight for the ad hom as is customary of you. In any case, you've killed your own thread as far as I'm concerned. I still disagree with your OP, from which it follows I am not intelligent enough to participate in your debate. I'm out.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#394 - 2017-01-04 13:24:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Omar Alharazaad wrote:
So much chum in the water.
Might I suggest a Thunderdome match to settle things?
I mean, this is getting a bit messy.
Honestly I'm surprised it hasn't been locked yet.


I don't even care anymore. I've already cancelled my sub and as long as the mechanic remains this way, so too will my sub. Let the carebears have whatever EVE becomes, it's what they're gonna get eventually anyway. I'm just sick to death of the wilful ignorance on display for the sole purpose of seeing me, and other PVP'ers, on the back-foot. That's what they're driving for, a 'win', as if this was posted for the purpose of competing instead of meshing out balanced mechanics that benefit everyone. I'm honestly sick of the bile that results from this mentality of 'us vs them' and I have way too many real life issues for this to become one of them.

I started this thread because I noticed a mechanic in the game that demonstrably favours a select group at the expense of others, and quite possibly has the chance to become a detriment to PVP, especially solo PVP. Other people have recognised this as well, and that's enough for me, let them carry the flame. It's the wilful ignorance of others that has burned me out at this point, their spite towards me just because I raised an issue that effects PVP, their open arrogance... I'm done with it all, dude. But no one has made me lose more hope for humanity as a whole, and made me want to douse myself in petrol and light myself on fire, than Salvos. He is so infuriatingly petulant and lacking in self-awareness that I'm pretty sure if he has any offspring to speak of, we're all completely doomed. I can't deal with him, and I know if I post anything, he'll be there replying, even if I put his posts on ignore he'll be there for others to see.

There is too much hand-holding in this game now. There has been for a long time, and it's become this way by adding tiny little bits of hand-holding at a time. And we've all noticed it. You've noticed it too, I know you have. When is enough enough?

I said up top I've cancelled my sub, but I've already made a new Deteis alpha toon to take full advantage of this mechanic at the expense of as many carebears as possible. If people won't pay attention in this thread, I'll make them pay attention in the game. The hard way.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#395 - 2017-01-04 13:38:32 UTC
Honestly, for me enough was enough quite a while ago.
Just one more nerf became one too many the better part of a year ago.
The only reason I came back was that I missed interacting with the people here.

While I understand where you're coming from, god do I know... (Veers anyone?) some battles aren't worth the cost you have to pay in order to force a draw, much less a win. I've made my own point here as well, in that this mechanic not only can negatively impact PVP in the low-sec environment, but also has potential for being horribly abused in other sectors.

Ultimately though, the bottom line lies in whether or not you can still find joy in the game. If you can, you stay. If you cannot, then you do not.
Either way, fly safe.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Salvos Rhoska
#396 - 2017-01-04 13:52:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Remiel Pollard wrote:


I don't even care anymore. I've already cancelled my sub and as long as the mechanic remains this way, so too will my sub. Let the carebears have whatever EVE becomes, it's what they're gonna get eventually anyway.

...

I'm done with it all, dude. But no one has made me lose more hope for humanity as a whole, and made me want to douse myself in petrol and light myself on fire, than Salvos. He is so infuriatingly petulant and lacking in self-awareness that I'm pretty sure if he has any offspring to speak of, we're all completely doomed. I can't deal with him, and I know if I post anything, he'll be there replying, even if I put his posts on ignore he'll be there for others to see..


Get rekt. Your arguments failed. Your conduct failed. Your will failed.

You cant handle the heat, yet you have perpetually ignored and insulted everyone in this thread pointing out the errors in your position and arguments, thereby bringing it upon yourself as a consequence of your own choices.

I'm glad I was the one to ram your own behavior down your own throat till you choked on it.

Go ahead and play on an Alpha. Nobody cares.
You utterly destroyed what little remained of your reputation here.

The changes/plans are already in the pipeline. Deal with it.

We will discuss them in due time here, again, but not in a disaster of a thread like this, headed by an OP who's only recourse and behavior was ignoring and insulting anyone that disagreed with him.

Even here on GD, I have never seen a OP so systematically and perniciously self-destruct their own thread and reputation, by incessantly, vitriolically, insulting and/or ignoring every participant that disagrees with him.



The very fact that you are now infact going to join an NPC corp on an alpha, in the very corp you had issue with, speaks volumes to the fact that there never was an issue in the first place.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#397 - 2017-01-04 14:10:01 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:


I don't even care anymore. I've already cancelled my sub and as long as the mechanic remains this way, so too will my sub. Let the carebears have whatever EVE becomes, it's what they're gonna get eventually anyway.

...

I'm done with it all, dude. But no one has made me lose more hope for humanity as a whole, and made me want to douse myself in petrol and light myself on fire, than Salvos. He is so infuriatingly petulant and lacking in self-awareness that I'm pretty sure if he has any offspring to speak of, we're all completely doomed. I can't deal with him, and I know if I post anything, he'll be there replying, even if I put his posts on ignore he'll be there for others to see..


Get rekt. Your arguments failed. Your conduct failed. Your will failed.


Your opinion that I failed is as valid as any other you have. That is, not at all. But "getting rekt" on the forums, is that what you accept as victory? See, this is where I pity you, Veers. It's clear you're incapable of doing much of worth in-game, so this 'victory' of yours must mean a lot to you.

The only victories that mean anything to me are my almost-2000 in game, vs your 0. That's where you and I differ the most, I think. I actually play the game.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Salvos Rhoska
#398 - 2017-01-04 14:14:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:


I don't even care anymore. I've already cancelled my sub and as long as the mechanic remains this way, so too will my sub. Let the carebears have whatever EVE becomes, it's what they're gonna get eventually anyway.

...

I'm done with it all, dude. But no one has made me lose more hope for humanity as a whole, and made me want to douse myself in petrol and light myself on fire, than Salvos. He is so infuriatingly petulant and lacking in self-awareness that I'm pretty sure if he has any offspring to speak of, we're all completely doomed. I can't deal with him, and I know if I post anything, he'll be there replying, even if I put his posts on ignore he'll be there for others to see..


Get rekt. Your arguments failed. Your conduct failed. Your will failed.


Your opinion that I failed is as valid as any other you have. That is, not at all. But "getting rekt" on the forums, is that what you accept as victory? See, this is where I pity you, Veers. It's clear you're incapable of doing much of worth in-game, so this 'victory' of yours must mean a lot to you.

The only victories that mean anything to me are my almost-2000 in game, vs your 0. That's where you and I differ the most, I think. I actually play the game.


Hurrduurr

"If you dont play the game like I do, you aren't playing it!"

"Only what I do in EVE is worthwhile!"

"Salvos is a stupid, ignorant, illiterate meany with cognitive capacity below a 3yr old, is a wet dog turd etc etc!"

"I am a victim! I didnt do nothing wrong! Its not my fault everyone else is an idiot and can't read!"

"Halp, the NPCs are hurting me :((((!"

"Only my opinions are valid! I insult and ignore everyone elses"!

The above pretty much sums up this thread.

Who is Veers? Are you now trying to insinuate I am someone else?

Go play on your alpha in an NPC corp already.
Go become exactly that which you so espoused to hate.
Its a fitting end for such a hypocrite.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#399 - 2017-01-04 14:23:45 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:


Hurrduurr


Oh look, it's literally every post you've ever made all conveniently rolled into one.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Salvos Rhoska
#400 - 2017-01-04 14:26:12 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:


Hurrduurr


Oh look, it's literally every post you've ever made all conveniently rolled into one.


No.

Its just the only word you actually read in the entire thread.