These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Intrusion Mining with Frigates

Author
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2016-12-23 02:07:27 UTC
Serendipity Lost wrote:
What is the gas volume for c320 and c540? How can you consider this low? You just said this would take care of the problem in a previous post, now you're saying not to worry, afk mining will be impacted by a 'very tiny amount'. Which is it?

At this poiht I have to ask - Have you ever used a venture or a prospect? Have you ever gassed?
Have you? The volume is irrelevant, a Venture at max skills with t2 harvesters pulls in 160m3 gas per minute, without command bursts. That'll take over a half hour to fill the Venture's ore bay, over an hour to fill the Prospect. That takes longer to fill up than a Mackinaw mining ice.

To answer your question, yes I have mined gas, and yes I have flown a Venture plenty of times.


Cade Windstalker wrote:
Nope, I'm saying that for the risk (a relatively cheap ship in a wormhole many other ships can't even enter) the reward is quite high.

If you're looking for a better reward out of a T1 Frigate than you can get out of a much large ship that's more expensive, more vulnerable, and mines more... I'd say pull the other one, it's got bells on. That's just not how risk/reward works in Eve.

How does the reward compare to low-risk mining in a cheap retriever in Nullsec? I can mine up an average value of crokite all day on days PL isn't around, which is about half of the days. Are you mining up enough ore to break even in profit with a retriever constantly mining crokite?

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#22 - 2016-12-23 02:45:14 UTC
I think this idea is very close to gas sites.

What I've really come to say is make 5% and 10% ore much rarer but buff yields to +50% and +100%. I say this because i find 5% and 10% ores annoying but rather than remove them completely, putting super-versions of them in dangerous space could be fun.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Cade Windstalker
#23 - 2016-12-23 04:24:29 UTC
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Cade Windstalker wrote:
Nope, I'm saying that for the risk (a relatively cheap ship in a wormhole many other ships can't even enter) the reward is quite high.

If you're looking for a better reward out of a T1 Frigate than you can get out of a much large ship that's more expensive, more vulnerable, and mines more... I'd say pull the other one, it's got bells on. That's just not how risk/reward works in Eve.

How does the reward compare to low-risk mining in a cheap retriever in Nullsec? I can mine up an average value of crokite all day on days PL isn't around, which is about half of the days. Are you mining up enough ore to break even in profit with a retriever constantly mining crokite?


In a Prospect? Sure, probably, though without hard mining numbers for the two I can't say too much.

Again though, the Venture is still *far* cheaper than the Retriever, to the point that you can lose around 8-10 T2 fitted Ventures for the cost of one T2 fitted Retriever.

Also your Retriever is being protected by an entire Alliance's work and logistics, and is at worst slightly less likely to die than a careful and clever completely solo Venture pilot who knows how their D-Scan works.

Even if I upgrade to a Prospect my ship is worth less than your Retriever and it has a cloak while being innately harder to catch.

Again, the risk here is far lower, the ship being risked is worth far less, the time required to pay back the cost of said ship is minuscule, and the rewards are just fine. What you're asking for isn't needed for the game or at all realistic.

The only way to create what you're looking for here would be to introduce something massively out of line with the current rewards for mining and then try to weirdly and artificially restrict it to make it somehow magically not broken or the best possible thing someone can do with their time in a mining ship ever.

That's patently ridiculous and I'm really not sure how you can't seem to see that...
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2016-12-23 04:50:28 UTC
Cade Windstalker wrote:
That's patently ridiculous and I'm really not sure how you can't seem to see that...

I can't seem to see how you actually believe your Venture mines anything close to Retriever value with such a large fraction of down time, even if you were mining exclusively +10% Arkonor. Is there some new kind of ore in these sites, or is one of us completely failing at math here? It seems pretty simple: Venture mines about half what the Retriever mines, running through sites takes up at least a third of your time, so you'd have to mine ores 3x the value of Crokite to break even with me. Even if you were mining at a significantly lower profit, it could be reasonable since it doesn't require alliance logistics and the Venture is much cheaper than the Retriever (Prospect is NOT). But I'm finding it difficult to believe you make significantly more profit than mining Veldspar in highsec with a Retriever. Once again, I haven't done this and I can't find a lot of resources online to study it, but if it's just ore, the math doesn't add up to you getting some decent profit justifying the work.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#25 - 2016-12-23 11:45:45 UTC
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Serendipity Lost wrote:
What is the gas volume for c320 and c540? How can you consider this low? You just said this would take care of the problem in a previous post, now you're saying not to worry, afk mining will be impacted by a 'very tiny amount'. Which is it?

At this poiht I have to ask - Have you ever used a venture or a prospect? Have you ever gassed?
Have you? The volume is irrelevant, a Venture at max skills with t2 harvesters pulls in 160m3 gas per minute, without command bursts. That'll take over a half hour to fill the Venture's ore bay, over an hour to fill the Prospect. That takes longer to fill up than a Mackinaw mining ice.

To answer your question, yes I have mined gas, and yes I have flown a Venture plenty of times.


Cade Windstalker wrote:
Nope, I'm saying that for the risk (a relatively cheap ship in a wormhole many other ships can't even enter) the reward is quite high.

If you're looking for a better reward out of a T1 Frigate than you can get out of a much large ship that's more expensive, more vulnerable, and mines more... I'd say pull the other one, it's got bells on. That's just not how risk/reward works in Eve.

How does the reward compare to low-risk mining in a cheap retriever in Nullsec? I can mine up an average value of crokite all day on days PL isn't around, which is about half of the days. Are you mining up enough ore to break even in profit with a retriever constantly mining crokite?



So here's how it works in WH space. You have to go 1 to 3 systems out to mine the gas. So where a Nullninny like you is just round tripping to station in your upgraded system, WH gas mining involves 1 or more jumps to get you gas back to a citadel. Dropping the hold down is a big deal. I recommend you come to WH space and use these ships for what they were designed for before you come up with some whacky idea to screw them over. My corp is in an OK spot as we can scan access to high end WH. Smaller low end corps can't readily do that. Your hold reduction would pretty much kill low end wh gassing for the little guy. This is yet another case of an idea that hasn't really looked at the big picture and clearly doesn't give a crap about the little guy trying to make his way up the ladder.

Overall you want to nerf 2 currently balanced ships in order to create mini high end ore sites that go directly against current standard mining practices. Sigh.... SMOKE LESS, THINK MORE!
elitatwo
Zansha Expansion
#26 - 2016-12-24 02:37:22 UTC
Again, mining frigates are awesome and can stay as they are until the end of time.

Venture - perfect balanced and nuanced beginner and even veterans choice.

Prospect - covert ops and cyno gank mobi- errm I mean gas and ore mining frigate

Endurance - Ice mining perfection in a small swiss-army-knife.


Everything is fine.

Eve Minions is recruiting.

This is the law of ship progression!

Aura sound-clips: Aura forever

Lugh Crow-Slave
#27 - 2016-12-24 02:39:56 UTC
this is another case of "I" cant find a use in something so it must be broken
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2016-12-24 06:02:52 UTC
Serendipity Lost wrote:
So here's how it works in WH space. You have to go 1 to 3 systems out to mine the gas. So where a Nullninny like you is just round tripping to station in your upgraded system, WH gas mining involves 1 or more jumps to get you gas back to a citadel. Dropping the hold down is a big deal. I recommend you come to WH space and use these ships for what they were designed for before you come up with some whacky idea to screw them over. My corp is in an OK spot as we can scan access to high end WH. Smaller low end corps can't readily do that. Your hold reduction would pretty much kill low end wh gassing for the little guy. This is yet another case of an idea that hasn't really looked at the big picture and clearly doesn't give a crap about the little guy trying to make his way up the ladder.

Overall you want to nerf 2 currently balanced ships in order to create mini high end ore sites that go directly against current standard mining practices. Sigh.... SMOKE LESS, THINK MORE!

I didn't know that, but it's not super important to the economics of gas mining. When CCP released the Venture, they gave us a huge boost to gas mining. This caused gas prices and booster prices to drop a lot. It's easier to mine gas now, but you get less profit for doing it. The playerbase balances this aspect. Gas mining wouldn't be killed at all by an ore hold reduction, it'll just become more difficult and more rewarding.

Just the same, however, I don't want gas mining to get any harder than it is, and I don't want boosters to be any more expensive than they are. But I think the solution would be to offer more options for gas mining than just the mining frigates. They already reduced the Exequror's cargohold, I used to use that ship for gas mining back when it had 900m3 base cargo. Perhaps the Porpoise could be able to use gas harvesting drones. Also if you are gas mining with a group, someone can bring an industrial--a Miasmos can hold over 6 Venture-hours worth of gas.



Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
this is another case of "I" cant find a use in something so it must be broken

You might be right. I am asking nicely for one of you guys to explain to me how a Venture can make decent profit mining ore. Or at least I'm asking. Perhaps someone could give me the juicy details? So far all I've been told are vague notions of something along the lines of this:
1.) get Venture
2.) fly into shattered frigate system
3.) ???
4.) profit

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#29 - 2016-12-24 12:59:57 UTC
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
I am asking nicely for one of you guys to explain to me how a Venture can make decent profit mining ore. Or at least I'm asking. Perhaps someone could give me the juicy details? So far all I've been told are vague notions of something along the lines of this:
1.) get Venture
2.) fly into shattered frigate system
3.) ???
4.) profit



I'll give it a try.

1.) get Venture
2.) fly into shattered frigate system
3.) mine ABCs or whatever other high end ores are in system
4.) profit

How's that?
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2016-12-24 13:09:15 UTC
The mining frigates are currently some of the best balanced ships for their respective jobs.

Move along please, nothing to see here...
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2016-12-24 17:14:03 UTC
Danika Princip wrote:
I'll give it a try.

1.) get Venture
2.) fly into shattered frigate system
3.) mine ABCs or whatever other high end ores are in system
4.) profit

How's that?

If that's all it is, you'll need to explain how you make significantly more than 75% mining uptime, because any less and you're going to fall short of my retriever mining Veldspar in highsec. I don't know if you have checked ABC prices lately, they're nothing to shake a stick at.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Iain Cariaba
#32 - 2016-12-24 17:43:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Iain Cariaba
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Danika Princip wrote:
I'll give it a try.

1.) get Venture
2.) fly into shattered frigate system
3.) mine ABCs or whatever other high end ores are in system
4.) profit

How's that?

If that's all it is, you'll need to explain how you make significantly more than 75% mining uptime, because any less and you're going to fall short of my retriever mining Veldspar in highsec. I don't know if you have checked ABC prices lately, they're nothing to shake a stick at.

Pyfa's All 5 character, both ships fit for max yield and unboosted.

Venture: 9.93 m3/s
Retriever: 19.7 m3/s

With current eve-central mineral prices, you're going to make a couple hundred isk/cycle more mining Arkonor and Bistot with a venture than mining veld with a retriever. That's it.

However, there's an exception.

Go wormhole diving with a venture hunting Mercoxit, and you're going to make significantly more money than the retriever.

And before you even bring it up, Reaver, if you know what you're doing, down time to unload the hold in a venture is insignificant. Using a close safe anchored can, downtime to unload matches that of docking a retriever. There are way to do this even faster, but matching the retriever makes a good baseline.

So, as I pointed out back on page 1. What you want is already here, you just have to go do it.

Edit: Go do this in a Prospect for better survivability, and even more isk.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#33 - 2016-12-25 02:07:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Lugh Crow-Slave
not to mention we are talking the T1 frig with these numbers a prospect gets 16m3/s


and gas is easily the best choice if you want isk/hr and these are the best ships to do it in hands down
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#34 - 2016-12-25 03:37:55 UTC
Thanks for the detailed answers. I can see how the Venture can be profitable mining ore. I already knew it's profitable for mining gas--Venture/Prospect are the apex gas mining ships in the game. But I can see that mining ore in a Venture or Prospect isn't necessarily a waste of time, and I definitely see how mining Mercoxit can make good money. I wasn't aware its price was so high. Last time I checked it (a few years back), it was actually less profitable than Arkonor due to the lower volume of the yield of deep core mining lasers/strips.


I still feel that the current use of the Venture and Prospect is far too similar to mining with a barge. There's a bit more activity in hunting good sites down, but there's still a high abundance of high-end ores, and even with the Venture/Prospect's smaller ore holds, they still sit there mining for several minutes just on a single load of ore. So there's no mining opportunities really like what I'm asking for except Mercoxit, and that isn't available in many places. Where it is available, it is often not what you find. And when you do find it, it is often readily accessibly to barges, making the use of Venture/Prospect as a mercoxit miner fairly weak.



Perhaps the Jaspet in highsec and the Gneiss/Dark Ochre in lowsec could occur exclusively in tiny bits suitable for Ventures and Prospects to mine, and nullsec could have fewer large chunks of Mercoxit in trade for a relative abundance of small Mercoxit pockets ideal for Ventures and Prospects.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Iain Cariaba
#35 - 2016-12-25 05:30:23 UTC
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Thanks for the detailed answers. I can see how the Venture can be profitable mining ore. I already knew it's profitable for mining gas--Venture/Prospect are the apex gas mining ships in the game. But I can see that mining ore in a Venture or Prospect isn't necessarily a waste of time, and I definitely see how mining Mercoxit can make good money. I wasn't aware its price was so high. Last time I checked it (a few years back), it was actually less profitable than Arkonor due to the lower volume of the yield of deep core mining lasers/strips.


I still feel that the current use of the Venture and Prospect is far too similar to mining with a barge. There's a bit more activity in hunting good sites down, but there's still a high abundance of high-end ores, and even with the Venture/Prospect's smaller ore holds, they still sit there mining for several minutes just on a single load of ore. So there's no mining opportunities really like what I'm asking for except Mercoxit, and that isn't available in many places. Where it is available, it is often not what you find. And when you do find it, it is often readily accessibly to barges, making the use of Venture/Prospect as a mercoxit miner fairly weak.

Just because I absolutely refuse to mine, ever, doesn't mean I forgot everything I learned over five years of active mining, in all regions of the game. Twisted

No, the Venture is a great little ship. I quit mining before the Prospect came out, so I've never actually flown one, but I have experience in Ventures. It's great for noobs, but put some skills into it and it'll really shine.

As to the part I bolded above. Yes, it can be. But it doesn't have to be, especially the Prospect. It's all in how you use it.


Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Perhaps the Jaspet in highsec and the Gneiss/Dark Ochre in lowsec could occur exclusively in tiny bits suitable for Ventures and Prospects to mine, and nullsec could have fewer large chunks of Mercoxit in trade for a relative abundance of small Mercoxit pockets ideal for Ventures and Prospects.

Honestly, the +10%s fill this role already. There's usually only a few, and they're scattered through the belts. If you're mining low quantities of higher end ore, like with a Venture or Prospect, it makes sense to use the speed and maneuverability to get the most profitable ores, right?
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2016-12-25 05:44:49 UTC
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Honestly, the +10%s fill this role already. There's usually only a few, and they're scattered through the belts. If you're mining low quantities of higher end ore, like with a Venture or Prospect, it makes sense to use the speed and maneuverability to get the most profitable ores, right?

+10% isn't enough difference to justify the lower yield of the frigate, but the biggest reason that doesn't hold up is that I easily mine up all of the +10% ores in a barge. I can continue mining when they're gone, but I can mine exclusively +10% and never shut off the strip miners until they're all gone. There's still no advantage to using the frigate.

So no, the +10% ores do not fill that role.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

elitatwo
Zansha Expansion
#37 - 2016-12-25 06:06:41 UTC
I could scram you another advantage of a Venture but I ain't telling.

Eve Minions is recruiting.

This is the law of ship progression!

Aura sound-clips: Aura forever

Cade Windstalker
#38 - 2016-12-25 06:59:24 UTC
A
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Cade Windstalker wrote:
That's patently ridiculous and I'm really not sure how you can't seem to see that...

I can't seem to see how you actually believe your Venture mines anything close to Retriever value with such a large fraction of down time, even if you were mining exclusively +10% Arkonor. Is there some new kind of ore in these sites, or is one of us completely failing at math here? It seems pretty simple: Venture mines about half what the Retriever mines, running through sites takes up at least a third of your time, so you'd have to mine ores 3x the value of Crokite to break even with me. Even if you were mining at a significantly lower profit, it could be reasonable since it doesn't require alliance logistics and the Venture is much cheaper than the Retriever (Prospect is NOT). But I'm finding it difficult to believe you make significantly more profit than mining Veldspar in highsec with a Retriever. Once again, I haven't done this and I can't find a lot of resources online to study it, but if it's just ore, the math doesn't add up to you getting some decent profit justifying the work.


Ah, see, there's the disconnect here. A Venture won't mine anything close to the amount of ore a Retriever pulls in, because it's a tiny fraction of the cost and risk of a Retriever. The Venture fills two roles, a low cost entry ship for newbie miners who can't afford something larger, and a low cost expendable mining ship for people who don't want to risk something larger.

If you want a fast mining ship with good yield you either upgrade to a Prospect or drop the "fast" requirement and go get a Barge or Exhumber.

Also worth noting here, the value per m3 for Veldspar and most other High Sec ores is around 150 to 180, the value for Bistot is currently at about 360, or double the higher end High Sec ores.

A maxed out Venture can pull in 511 per minute, a Retriever maxed without boosts gets 980, so going for optimal Ore in a Null or WH system a Venture can actually about break even with or even beat a Retriever.

Also, as I've said repeatedly, the fully T2 Venture is worth about 1/5th of the cost of that Retriever, and is way easier to survive in under almost any circumstances.

Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Danika Princip wrote:
I'll give it a try.

1.) get Venture
2.) fly into shattered frigate system
3.) mine ABCs or whatever other high end ores are in system
4.) profit

How's that?

If that's all it is, you'll need to explain how you make significantly more than 75% mining uptime, because any less and you're going to fall short of my retriever mining Veldspar in highsec. I don't know if you have checked ABC prices lately, they're nothing to shake a stick at.


This seems like we're back to:

Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
this is another case of "I" cant find a use in something so it must be broken


Just because it's not the most absolutely optimal thing for you doesn't mean it doesn't get used for this, or that it's not a decent niche for the ship.

Not every ship in the game needs to have an optimal use for a player with 100mil SP for it to be a good ship with a solid role, which the Venture absolutely is.
Iain Cariaba
#39 - 2016-12-25 11:27:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Iain Cariaba
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Honestly, the +10%s fill this role already. There's usually only a few, and they're scattered through the belts. If you're mining low quantities of higher end ore, like with a Venture or Prospect, it makes sense to use the speed and maneuverability to get the most profitable ores, right?

+10% isn't enough difference to justify the lower yield of the frigate, but the biggest reason that doesn't hold up is that I easily mine up all of the +10% ores in a barge. I can continue mining when they're gone, but I can mine exclusively +10% and never shut off the strip miners until they're all gone. There's still no advantage to using the frigate.

So no, the +10% ores do not fill that role.

So your entire baseline on whether or not something is worth running is whether or not it makes you the most isk? Because that's what I'm reading above. If I'm incorrect, please clarify.

What it boils down to is, if you feel safe enough to use the Retriever, you're going to make more mining the same asteroids. However, if a particular type of asteroid is not available to you, and you want to mine it, a Venture makes a very good, very cheap, very expendable ship to go ninja mining.
Iain Cariaba
#40 - 2016-12-25 11:33:47 UTC
Cade Windstalker wrote:
A Venture won't mine anything close to the amount of ore a Retriever pulls in, because it's a tiny fraction of the cost and risk of a Retriever.

A Venture mines about half what a retriever does per second, a Prospect pulls about 80%. They're actually extremely good mining ships.
Previous page123Next page