These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A Brief Note on the Theology Council Edict on Souls of Clones.

Author
Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#41 - 2016-12-23 21:15:49 UTC
Jamyl was known to be a capsuleer before her Shathol'Syn, as far back as YC105. Just like every other heir of the time. Those of us watching from home saw them all self-destruct pods. It's recorded in the news.

You are mistaking acknowledgment of being a capsuleer with acknowledgment of being a clone. The two are not the same thing.
Gaven Lok'ri
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#42 - 2016-12-23 21:18:54 UTC
Sinjin Mokk wrote:
Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
Sinjin Mokk wrote:
The TL;DR version:

The Theology Council jumped through ecclesiastical hoops to legitimize Jamyl Sarum after the Drifters killed here in her pod, thus exposing her status as a. Capsuleer. But you must not ask questions because otherwise you're a BAD PERSON.



If you are going to do a summary, you might at least try to make it an even remotely accurate one.



Oh?

So all the venom spewed by Amarr loyalists over the years regarding Jamyl being a clone didn't happen? Keral wasn't a clone? Khanid just had a lot of really good replacement parts? I thought Jamyl's resurrection was supposed to have been a miracle? Now all of a sudden we're forgetting that debate and being a clone is fine and your soul is intact as long as you obey Scripture? I think I was fairly accurate in my assessment, Admiral. Sacred Flesh was a thing in the Empire right up until it was proven that Jamyl's flesh was far from sacred. But I suppose I'm the heretic?

You were recently bemoaning how many former Praetorians had left the Empire and found other paths of Faith. Perhaps we got tired of killing the innocent in the name of a lie? Maybe you're now on the cusp of the same crisis of faith that we BAD PEOPLE had? Maybe you're beginning to see that the Empire is and has been a puppet, dancing on the ISK-strings of CONCORD? I would hope so. Because I don't see how you can be loyal to the Empire as it was and serve the Empire as it is.

'Which test reveals more of the soul - the test that a man will take to prove his faith. or the test that finds the man who believed his faith already proven?"





Maybe you should try summarizing my actual discussion, rather than providing an idiosyncratic background narrative of the Amarrian history that led to that discussion?

Admiral of the Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris

Divine Commodore 24th Imperial Crusade

Holder. Vassal of the Emperor Family

Sinjin Mokk
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#43 - 2016-12-23 21:20:34 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:

Which merely reinforces my point that you cannot make an analogy between it and reproducable scientific matters.



Andreus,

I'm of a scientific mind, but I'm also a man of Faith. The two can exist in conjunction. One can believe in the soul or the spirit on faith and still map the neurons that cause consciousness.

Look at it like this. You loved your parents, but can you scientifically prove it? No. Love, like Faith, cannot be measured in a beaker. Maybe that's "Space Magic," maybe it's all do to biology and serotonin levels, but you can't deny that it has power over us.

Let the Faithful debate their Faith, let the Lovers bemoan their Love and let's not try to quantify what can't be placed against a ruler.

"Angels live, they never die, Apart from us, behind the sky. They're fading souls who've turned to ice, So ashen white in paradise."

Sinjin Mokk
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#44 - 2016-12-23 21:23:07 UTC
Gaven Lok'ri wrote:


Maybe you should try summarizing my actual discussion, rather than providing an idiosyncratic background narrative of the Amarrian history that led to that discussion?



Are you actually open to debate? Your words in this thread seem to indicate that you've made up your mind and will accept no other interpretation. I respect your vast amount of theological knowledge, but are you willing to look at the subject through a different lens?


"Angels live, they never die, Apart from us, behind the sky. They're fading souls who've turned to ice, So ashen white in paradise."

Gaven Lok'ri
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#45 - 2016-12-23 21:31:36 UTC
With you? No. Indulging in debate with monsters is a waste of everyone's time.

But then I did not write this thread for you. I only responded to you at all because you grossly mischaracterized the content of the note.

Admiral of the Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris

Divine Commodore 24th Imperial Crusade

Holder. Vassal of the Emperor Family

Casserina Leshrac
Sanguine Illuminations
#46 - 2016-12-23 21:35:14 UTC
Mitara Newelle wrote:
Vlad Cetes wrote:
What is your proof that cloning causes damage?


You.


Careful how you make your claims my dear. Just because the False Scriptures say you're closer to your god, doesn't mean it is so.

We stand at the Abyss, drawing the Patterns of Fate - Casserina Leshrac, Savant, Sani Sabik.

Casserina Leshrac
Sanguine Illuminations
#47 - 2016-12-23 21:48:06 UTC
Vlad Cetes wrote:
Gaven Lok'ri wrote:


The first words specify that clones embody souls. This is worth some discussion on its own as it is a rejection of simplistic “soul is lost on first cloning” interpretations of the issue. It is not, however, a rejection of more complex interpretations that have souls being degraded by cloning. The evidence for the latter is clear and all but undeniable when we examine the activities of the nullsec barbarians. Clearly the act of cloning causes damage.


What is your proof that cloning causes damage? Do you have a device that can measure soul strength and produce a reproducible study on that?


Alas my old friend Vlad offers yet a valid point. And I see PIE is there with the answer of "official doctrine" of the Empire. I am curious what the Empress has to say about such an edict?

As well as new friend Valerie who makes an excellent point that the Sani Sabik knows more on the subject of souls, then the Theology Council.

Only a fool trusts any edict of the Theology Council. It is good Gaven you still adhere to them. I look forward to trading barbs with you and now some of your ilk in the future. Perhaps knowledge will be gained.

Men and in particularity those who follow the Theology Council too often follow blindly the Scriptures. And if there is "gray" area conveniently fill in the gap with some new dogma for the masses.

Once you have crossed the void without body or ship, the issue of the Soul becomes moot.

A capsule is just a vessel that holds the flesh.

A cloned body is just another vessel that holds the Blood of Life.

A Soul needs neither, and yet yearns for both.

We stand at the Abyss, drawing the Patterns of Fate - Casserina Leshrac, Savant, Sani Sabik.

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#48 - 2016-12-23 21:49:46 UTC
Casserina Leshrac wrote:
I am curious what the Empress has to say about such an edict?


She was the one that requested it.
Casserina Leshrac
Sanguine Illuminations
#49 - 2016-12-23 21:57:15 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:
Casserina Leshrac wrote:
I am curious what the Empress has to say about such an edict?


She was the one that requested it.


Perhaps a source to cite on this? I see nonthing that seems to support this.

Or should I just trust in my "faith" in the Theology Council? Big smile

We stand at the Abyss, drawing the Patterns of Fate - Casserina Leshrac, Savant, Sani Sabik.

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#50 - 2016-12-23 22:00:45 UTC
Casserina Leshrac
Sanguine Illuminations
#51 - 2016-12-24 01:04:16 UTC


Indeed she did. Thank you for clarifying.

We stand at the Abyss, drawing the Patterns of Fate - Casserina Leshrac, Savant, Sani Sabik.

Arrendis
TK Corp
#52 - 2016-12-24 03:22:20 UTC
Mitara Newelle wrote:
Vlad Cetes wrote:
What is your proof that cloning causes damage?


You.


Wow. That right there is almost enough to convince the skeptics.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#53 - 2016-12-24 03:42:46 UTC
Sinjin Mokk wrote:
You loved your parents, but can you scientifically prove it?


Actually, yes. It's pretty easy. It's all biochemical signals and hormone release triggers rooted in basic primate empathy and close social bonding due to dependency (on the part of the child) and the mammalian biological imperative to protect and care for progeny (on the part of the parents).

From there, you provide certain stimuli (pictures of the parents, recordings of their voices or video footage, etc) depicting them in different situations, like a happy gathering, or in distress, or seriously injured, and you can measure the chemical-state responses in the brain.

Love's kind of a quantifiable thing, really.
Ashlar Vellum
Esquire Armaments
#54 - 2016-12-24 13:18:23 UTC
Mizhara Del'thul wrote:
However much fun it is to see these attempts to incorporate another fairly simple aspect of the modern world into their mysticism in a vain attempt to keep it relevant in this day and age, the matter is worth discussing once you drop the ridiculous trappings of 'faith'.

Yes, repeated cloning can have an effect on people due to imperfect infomorph transfer. This is not by any means certain to be damage to the infomorph since this also happens every day on its own. Some experiences are forgotten, some are added, some drown in substance abuse, some are imagined and the sum total of what makes up 'you' changes all the time. Some infinitesimal change has next to no real impact that isn't already rivaled or far surpassed by all the other natural mechanics that does the same. The technology will also improve and advance, reducing this even further as time passes.

I would claim with a fair bit of confidence - borne from what data we do have, and personal experience - that the cloning process can almost be entirely dismissed as the cause of CeeDee or whatever other buzzword that finds itself favored by the doomsayers and gossipmongers. Consider the sheer differences between the lives of baseliners and capsuleers. Consider the experiences. Power difference. Wealth difference. Practical immortality. Add in almost constant conflict - by most baseliner standards -, oceans of blood spilled, complete changes in perspective and a complete change in enforced responsibility for actions.

Even the most peaceful of highsec dweller - mining or trading their way to wealth through the war economy we dabble in - has a life so vastly abnormal and arguably unnatural compared to baseliners that it is frankly ludicrous to start trying to blame something so insignificant as the cloning process for the aberrations we see in capsuleer behaviours, and that's not even taking the ridiculous leap of faith - or drunken tumble down mount dumbarse - it requires to start adding claims about souls into the mix.

It would be very interesting to see good research done on every facet of that non-euclidean lookin' jewel we call Capsuleer Dementia, but until such research has been performed it'd probably serve us all better to use at least some reason rather than jump to conclusions that are entirely baseless.

Which brings us to the Theology Council, but then when the hell have they actually had to produce their work? It's telling that even something as basic and simple as 'peer review' would in all likelihood see them laughed out of any sensible company.

You are making strange argument. You mentioned that "practical immortality" could be one of the causes and it is only achievable via cloning and yet you say that the cloning process can almost be entirely dismissed as the cause.
Mizhara Del'thul
Kyn'aldrnari
#55 - 2016-12-24 13:57:12 UTC
The mechanics of cloning and the impact on the psyche from practical immortality are two very different things.How the practical immortality is achieved makes little difference, be it magic, cloning, someone inventing an immortality pill, or whatever else you can dream up that'd achieve it. The impact is what matters, not the mechanic used.
Sinjin Mokk
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#56 - 2016-12-24 16:05:37 UTC
Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
With you? No. Indulging in debate with monsters is a waste of everyone's time.

But then I did not write this thread for you. I only responded to you at all because you grossly mischaracterized the content of the note.



You...wound me, Lord Gaven.

But I'm curious. How exactly am I a monster?


"Angels live, they never die, Apart from us, behind the sky. They're fading souls who've turned to ice, So ashen white in paradise."

Arrendis
TK Corp
#57 - 2016-12-24 16:07:37 UTC
Sinjin Mokk wrote:
But I'm curious. How exactly am I a monster?


Wll, there's that hair....
Sinjin Mokk
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#58 - 2016-12-24 16:20:48 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Sinjin Mokk wrote:
But I'm curious. How exactly am I a monster?


Wll, there's that hair....



As evidenced by yours and mine, there is a significant lack of talented hair stylists in NullSec.

Maybe we should wear hats?




"Angels live, they never die, Apart from us, behind the sky. They're fading souls who've turned to ice, So ashen white in paradise."

Arrendis
TK Corp
#59 - 2016-12-24 16:24:46 UTC
Sinjin Mokk wrote:
As evidenced by yours and mine, there is a significant lack of talented hair stylists in NullSec.

Maybe we should wear hats?


I could use Mitten's stylist. He's always impeccable. But no, I just don't bother with 'styling' much. And the last time someone tried to get me to wear a hat, it was that godawful bronze Gallente head-shell. Uggggggh. No thanks, Asher, I'll be the hell out of uniform.
Gaven Lok'ri
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#60 - 2016-12-24 18:11:20 UTC
Sinjin Mokk wrote:
Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
With you? No. Indulging in debate with monsters is a waste of everyone's time.

But then I did not write this thread for you. I only responded to you at all because you grossly mischaracterized the content of the note.


You...wound me, Lord Gaven.

But I'm curious. How exactly am I a monster?



The following dialogue occurred in the channel the Summit. It was recorded from 1:19-1:22 on December 23rd of this year:


"Nauplius > Sinjin Mokk, were you the one who wanted to see me slaves? Or was that someone else?

Sinjin Mokk > I have some for sale, yes

Nauplius > Well, I do not need them now, and I still don't have a colony of them, but on the 3rd day of the 3rd month is the anniversary of the one million slave sacrifice.
Nauplius > I usually start stocking up on them a month before that.
Nauplius > So perhaps around that time we can discuss arrangements.

Sinjin Mokk > Happy Anniversary. Let me know how many you'll want for this year and I'll give you a price quote"

So yes. Monster.



Admiral of the Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris

Divine Commodore 24th Imperial Crusade

Holder. Vassal of the Emperor Family