These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

AFK Cloaking™: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals

First post First post
Author
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#7641 - 2016-11-24 09:22:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Teckos Pech wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:


My dear troll, I am one of those people who operates even with people in local, to do that means understanding the risk that the other person poses and you either go high, make it so they have no chance or low make it so they get nothing more than a T1 destroyer, the fun part is the cat and mouse game with these plonkers, reverse windups, I have had cloaky AFK campers leave the system I am in because I continued to operate. So you sprouting off nonsense means nothing to me.


Well, I read this and all I can think is...where is the problem then? Doesn't seem like a problem to me.

Dracvald the only human who is completely immune to cognitive dissonance.

Edit: And you are a bald face liar too...an AFK camper cannot leave system. To do that he'd have to be ATK. Roll


You try too hard to be smart and look even more stupid, the simple thing is that AFK cloaky camping is the last bastion of AFK play that CCP has not dealt with and they will. You can huff and buff and insult and cry and moan and whine, but at the end of the day they will do something about it.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#7642 - 2016-11-24 17:05:16 UTC
Xcom wrote:
Noone gives a s**t about what you should or shouldn't bring. Its about the fact that people think its not balanced. Falcon, Nano domi/phoon, Ishtar all got nerfed because they were used in unexpected ways that made alot of people unhappy. If CCP were bunch of idiots they would ignore that fact but they didn't, they nerfed them. Thats what people in this threads trying to indicate, change, because they are not happy.

Its also proven that any change causes rage in the eve community. Even if its directly superior or not. You just happen to be amongst the raging conservative bunch. Good luck trying to prove that people shouldn't be happy and take the big fat d**k up there a**es by the cloaky in there system and still be contempt. Unhappy people are allowed to have there opinions and its stupid arguing against it.

Cloaking still needs a limitation no matter the mechanics its connected too.

Edit: Note the actual word cloaking literally, yes its during the actual cloaking faze I'm referring too. The second you drop your cloak its a different ballgame as everyone in this treads pointed out. And if your stupid enough to argue that you show up in local then why don't people show up in local when they cloak in wormhole space?


If you agree to a nerf to local in sov null I agree with a nerf to cloaking. You can't have one without the other.

Dracvlad wrote:
Simple, AFK play is not acceptable.


So what are your ideas for nerfing risk free AFK ratting/mining in sov null? Those actually earn ISK, AFK cloaking doesn't kill anyone or make money.

Dracvlad wrote:
My dear troll, I am one of those people who operates even with people in local, to do that means understanding the risk that the other person poses and you either go high, make it so they have no chance or low make it so they get nothing more than a T1 destroyer, the fun part is the cat and mouse game with these plonkers, reverse windups, I have had cloaky AFK campers leave the system I am in because I continued to operate. So you sprouting off nonsense means nothing to me.

Actually if you go back earlier you will notice that I mentioned that I had friends who were in a WH and being the strategic and tactical thinker that I am I picked their brains about living in a WH and the battles they had, including evicting someone, being evicted, losing caps and killing caps. You know communication, listening, asking questions. Moving through WH chains to get stuff into Stain is practical experience and closing WH's in null sec because they lead to a dangerous alliances space was also something I have done. I have not lived in WH space myself, but I am damn sure I would not find it difficult and as I pointed out in all my time moving stuff though WH space, I have not lost a ship, well a little slip, one of my alts got bombed once in a Stealth Bomber, made me laugh that one and was so meaningless I had forgotten it.

You can do quotes, not impressed...


How many fights have you been in in wormholes? Give me a specific number.

And why do you keep talking about caps? 95% of WH living has nothing to do with capital ships. If you've actually spent time in them, you would know that. I'm assuming at this point you've just watched a few youtube videos about WH fights and never actually spent time in them. It's almost painful how oblivious you sound about what it's like to live in WHs....
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#7643 - 2016-11-24 17:50:47 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:


My dear troll, I am one of those people who operates even with people in local, to do that means understanding the risk that the other person poses and you either go high, make it so they have no chance or low make it so they get nothing more than a T1 destroyer, the fun part is the cat and mouse game with these plonkers, reverse windups, I have had cloaky AFK campers leave the system I am in because I continued to operate. So you sprouting off nonsense means nothing to me.


Well, I read this and all I can think is...where is the problem then? Doesn't seem like a problem to me.

Dracvald the only human who is completely immune to cognitive dissonance.

Edit: And you are a bald face liar too...an AFK camper cannot leave system. To do that he'd have to be ATK. Roll


You try too hard to be smart and look even more stupid, the simple thing is that AFK cloaky camping is the last bastion of AFK play that CCP has not dealt with and they will. You can huff and buff and insult and cry and moan and whine, but at the end of the day they will do something about it.


This is hilarious as I was one of the early advocates of a player controlled intel system and moving away from local. I'm totally fine with the overall concept. Implementation will have lots of details and issues to be solved, but removing AFK cloaking while also removing local as a source of intel I'm fine with.

So your entire paragraph is just a strawman.

And you completely ignored my point. You wrote an entire paragraph arguing that you have basically adapted to the AFK cloaking situation which makes it....really a non-issue, or so you claim. But then you turn around and say, "Nope it is a terribly important issue."

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#7644 - 2016-11-24 18:00:41 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:


Simple, AFK play is not acceptable.


Why?

No really? What s the problem with AFK broadly speaking?

If I am AFK in station what is the issue? If I am AFK inside say POS shields or tethered to a citadel in HS? Where is the issue?

BTW a large chunk market transactions take place where one party is....wait...wait....wait....AFK. CCP set up the market to work so that usually one part of many transactions are not only AFK they aren't even logged in.

So somebody is logged in and not at their keyboard? What is the problem?

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#7645 - 2016-11-24 18:10:40 UTC
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:


Actually if you go back earlier you will notice that I mentioned that I had friends who were in a WH and being the strategic and tactical thinker that I am I picked their brains about living in a WH and the battles they had, including evicting someone, being evicted, losing caps and killing caps. You know communication, listening, asking questions. Moving through WH chains to get stuff into Stain is practical experience and closing WH's in null sec because they lead to a dangerous alliances space was also something I have done. I have not lived in WH space myself, but I am damn sure I would not find it difficult and as I pointed out in all my time moving stuff though WH space, I have not lost a ship, well a little slip, one of my alts got bombed once in a Stealth Bomber, made me laugh that one and was so meaningless I had forgotten it.

You can do quotes, not impressed...


How many fights have you been in in wormholes? Give me a specific number.

And why do you keep talking about caps? 95% of WH living has nothing to do with capital ships. If you've actually spent time in them, you would know that. I'm assuming at this point you've just watched a few youtube videos about WH fights and never actually spent time in them. It's almost painful how oblivious you sound about what it's like to live in WHs....


I find the hubris of Dracvlad both humorous and annoying. I know I know very little about WHs and refrain from opining on them. Yes, I've moved through them yes. I have read about and talked to people who have lived in them. But I know that there is quite a bit I am probably missing. Yes, talking and writing and reading are wonderful, but sometimes you just have to do it to really get what is going on.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Xcom
US Space Force
Black Rose.
#7646 - 2016-11-24 20:35:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Xcom
Teckos Pech wrote:
Xcom wrote:

Cloaking still needs a limitation no matter the mechanics its connected too.

Edit: Note the actual word cloaking literally, yes its during the actual cloaking faze I'm referring too.

Except that even while all of your examples were nerfed relatively shortly after those dominant tactics were used AFK cloaking remains....despite over what...a decade to change the mechanics of cloaking.

And we have Devs from CCP pointing out things like, "Cloaked ships do remarkably little DPS."

Sorry, what you feel is irrelevant. What CCP thinks on the other hand....

Why haven't this guy been banned from this thread. 6 posts in a row? what kind of forum is that even acceptable posting behaviour.

Teckos Pech please learn to restrain yourself from posting junk. No one cares what you think either. You have already said your piece in this thread over 100 times over, time to move on. Now let people that have something useful to discuss in this thread not get drowned out by your spamming.

And WTF are you talking about, low DPS? Learn to read. DPS is not related to cloaking, you cant shoot while cloaked.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#7647 - 2016-11-24 20:44:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
What is amusing is that the HTFU police on this thread accuse you of not knowing stuff, or not able to deal with it at a personal level, so when you say how you dealt with it and defeated some of them then there is not a problem, but I have also lost to AFK cloaky campers which I have detailed in this thread too.

Experience in the trenches does not mean you understand grand strategy or even tactics, having the ability to pick up on other peoples experiences and work out your own strategies and tactics is key to winning, when I started this game I dived into the forums, read Crime and Punishment, learnt all the dirty tricks, checked out bubble camps to see how to break through them after reading about people not being able to break through them, it is a joke to me that people seem to think that you cannot learn from listening to others and their rich experiences, yes of course applying what you know is key, WH space is not an issue and when I talk about it I am talking back to WH players who ignore the reality of cyno's and the instant drop and strategic impact from them. If I spend the time to compare to their reality then I am what, bad at Eve. Simply put when I gave the example of cyno's the best that Sonya could come out with is logging off and that takes some organisation if going after a Capital escalation fleet or going for an eviction. The sheer power that can come through a cyno can be so much greater than a WH eviction force, if you get dropped by PL, Goons or NCDOT.

I am glad that I annoy you Teckos, and your petty insults go right over my head, I will patiently explain it, the game has an issue, in so many areas the best way to deal with things is to just hunker down and let it pass, be it war decs in hisec or being AFK cloaky camped by the top alliances, however both are very destructive to player retention, the simple issue here is that I do not agree that people who log in and then go to work, sleep or do something else should have the right to interfere with active players with impunity. But I also do not want to see cloaks destroyed, because they help people who have to go away from their keyboard.

I have seen over the years that it has been made much easier to catch people ratting in 0.0 and yet so many losers continue to AFK cloaky camp and defend it as the only way to catch people and yet they do not realise that were they to stop AFK cloaky camping there would be so many more people in 0.0 and so much more willing to fight roaming gangs. The key thing is to find a way to hunt these AFK cloaky campers when they are AFK so people feel that they can do something.

I will continue to ram this down your puerile little throats and I will take joy in your annoyance.

You seem to love using the market retort in terms of AFK, but you are selling a product offering a service, you are in compettion to others in that market selling a product, what is an AFK cloaky camper selling? Simple, he is selling a reason for people to go and play another game or head back to hisec if they are outside of the main TZ of the alliance or corp. Ice mining is no longer AFK, at some point CCP will deal with this, I expect to see you and the others here cry over it, I know CCP will create an OA to supply local and you will have to shoot it if you don't like it, whine more when you cannot do it...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#7648 - 2016-11-24 20:48:43 UTC
Sonya Corvinus wrote:


So what are your ideas for nerfing risk free AFK ratting/mining in sov null? Those actually earn ISK, AFK cloaking doesn't kill anyone or make money.



Turn off the stupid auto-attacking drones to stop afk ratting. Anything else require you to be at your keyboard because of reloads and target swap.

As for mining, they could make all roids much smaller and have all mining cycles much faster. You would constantly have to target new roids so no more AFK.
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#7649 - 2016-11-24 21:36:15 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
What is amusing is that the HTFU police on this thread accuse you of not knowing stuff, or not able to deal with it at a personal level, so when you say how you dealt with it and defeated some of them then there is not a problem, but I have also lost to AFK cloaky campers which I have detailed in this thread too.

Experience in the trenches does not mean you understand grand strategy or even tactics, having the ability to pick up on other peoples experiences and work out your own strategies and tactics is key to winning, when I started this game I dived into the forums, read Crime and Punishment, learnt all the dirty tricks, checked out bubble camps to see how to break through them after reading about people not being able to break through them, it is a joke to me that people seem to think that you cannot learn from listening to others and their rich experiences, yes of course applying what you know is key, WH space is not an issue and when I talk about it I am talking back to WH players who ignore the reality of cyno's and the instant drop and strategic impact from them. If I spend the time to compare to their reality then I am what, bad at Eve. Simply put when I gave the example of cyno's the best that Sonya could come out with is logging off and that takes some organisation if going after a Capital escalation fleet or going for an eviction. The sheer power that can come through a cyno can be so much greater than a WH eviction force, if you get dropped by PL, Goons or NCDOT.

I am glad that I annoy you Teckos, and your petty insults go right over my head, I will patiently explain it, the game has an issue, in so many areas the best way to deal with things is to just hunker down and let it pass, be it war decs in hisec or being AFK cloaky camped by the top alliances, however both are very destructive to player retention, the simple issue here is that I do not agree that people who log in and then go to work, sleep or do something else should have the right to interfere with active players with impunity. But I also do not want to see cloaks destroyed, because they help people who have to go away from their keyboard.

I have seen over the years that it has been made much easier to catch people ratting in 0.0 and yet so many losers continue to AFK cloaky camp and defend it as the only way to catch people and yet they do not realise that were they to stop AFK cloaky camping there would be so many more people in 0.0 and so much more willing to fight roaming gangs. The key thing is to find a way to hunt these AFK cloaky campers when they are AFK so people feel that they can do something.

I will continue to ram this down your puerile little throats and I will take joy in your annoyance.

You seem to love using the market retort in terms of AFK, but you are selling a product offering a service, you are in compettion to others in that market selling a product, what is an AFK cloaky camper selling? Simple, he is selling a reason for people to go and play another game or head back to hisec if they are outside of the main TZ of the alliance or corp. Ice mining is no longer AFK, at some point CCP will deal with this, I expect to see you and the others here cry over it, I know CCP will create an OA to supply local and you will have to shoot it if you don't like it, whine more when you cannot do it...


That was a whole lot of text to further prove you are completely clueless on how to live in wormhole space. One more time. How many fights have you been in in wormholes? Give me a direct answer, or stop talking about it.

The reality of cynos is if you are watching local chat in sov null, you will literally never die. I've lived in null, you haven't lived in wormholes. Why are you still talking about parts of the game you don't understand? Move into a C1 on your own for a few months. It's pretty easy. I can give you tips if you would like.

Quote:
the best that Sonya could come out with is logging off


When on earth did I say for anyone to log off? I said to rat in groups of 10+ people in the same sites with logi, with PvP fit ships. At worst your earn isk, at best you get to kill hotdroppers. Don't put words in my mouth, kitten.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#7650 - 2016-11-24 22:12:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Teckos Pech
Xcom wrote:


And WTF are you talking about, low DPS? Learn to read. DPS is not related to cloaking, you cant shoot while cloaked.


OMG....no kidding you can't target let alone shoot, hence the low DPS. It was a Dev being sarcastic about the supposed OP nature of cloaks.

AFK cloaking is not a problem because a cloaking device will destroy your ship, but because seeing an unfriendly mug in local scares the bajeebers out of you.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#7651 - 2016-11-24 22:14:56 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
What is amusing is that the HTFU police on this thread accuse you of not knowing stuff, or not able to deal with it at a personal level, so when you say how you dealt with it and defeated some of them then there is not a problem, but I have also lost to AFK cloaky campers which I have detailed in this thread too.

Experience in the trenches does not mean you understand grand strategy or even tactics, having the ability to pick up on other peoples experiences and work out your own strategies and tactics is key to winning, when I started this game I dived into the forums, read Crime and Punishment, learnt all the dirty tricks, checked out bubble camps to see how to break through them after reading about people not being able to break through them, it is a joke to me that people seem to think that you cannot learn from listening to others and their rich experiences, yes of course applying what you know is key, WH space is not an issue and when I talk about it I am talking back to WH players who ignore the reality of cyno's and the instant drop and strategic impact from them. If I spend the time to compare to their reality then I am what, bad at Eve. Simply put when I gave the example of cyno's the best that Sonya could come out with is logging off and that takes some organisation if going after a Capital escalation fleet or going for an eviction. The sheer power that can come through a cyno can be so much greater than a WH eviction force, if you get dropped by PL, Goons or NCDOT.

I am glad that I annoy you Teckos, and your petty insults go right over my head, I will patiently explain it, the game has an issue, in so many areas the best way to deal with things is to just hunker down and let it pass, be it war decs in hisec or being AFK cloaky camped by the top alliances, however both are very destructive to player retention, the simple issue here is that I do not agree that people who log in and then go to work, sleep or do something else should have the right to interfere with active players with impunity. But I also do not want to see cloaks destroyed, because they help people who have to go away from their keyboard.

I have seen over the years that it has been made much easier to catch people ratting in 0.0 and yet so many losers continue to AFK cloaky camp and defend it as the only way to catch people and yet they do not realise that were they to stop AFK cloaky camping there would be so many more people in 0.0 and so much more willing to fight roaming gangs. The key thing is to find a way to hunt these AFK cloaky campers when they are AFK so people feel that they can do something.

I will continue to ram this down your puerile little throats and I will take joy in your annoyance.

You seem to love using the market retort in terms of AFK, but you are selling a product offering a service, you are in compettion to others in that market selling a product, what is an AFK cloaky camper selling? Simple, he is selling a reason for people to go and play another game or head back to hisec if they are outside of the main TZ of the alliance or corp. Ice mining is no longer AFK, at some point CCP will deal with this, I expect to see you and the others here cry over it, I know CCP will create an OA to supply local and you will have to shoot it if you don't like it, whine more when you cannot do it...


How bad do you have to be to lose to some one AFK?

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Xcom
US Space Force
Black Rose.
#7652 - 2016-11-24 23:07:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Xcom
Teckos Pech wrote:
Xcom wrote:


And WTF are you talking about, low DPS? Learn to read. DPS is not related to cloaking, you cant shoot while cloaked.


OMG....no kidding you can't target let alone shoot, hence the low DPS. It was a Dev being sarcastic about the supposed OP nature of cloaks.

AFK cloaking is not a problem because a cloaking device will destroy your ship, but because seeing an unfriendly mug in local scares the bajeebers out of you.


Sir please read before posting before making a fool out of yourself.

Let me repost the vital key line of text you seam to have missed.

Xcom wrote:

Cloaking still needs a limitation no matter the mechanics its connected too.


Cloaking is broken, just cause there is a metagame revolving around its broken nature and some players unwilling stupidity to abuse it to hell doesn't justify the ecosystem that's in place.

But something tells me that your just here for the forum warrioring. Why am I even explaining this to you, your just here to arguing for the argument sake. Noone with relentless post counts in this thread have any intent in its outcome other then feeding there ego or whatever they get out of this.
Wander Prian
Nosferatu Security Foundation
#7653 - 2016-11-25 00:52:30 UTC
Xcom wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Xcom wrote:


And WTF are you talking about, low DPS? Learn to read. DPS is not related to cloaking, you cant shoot while cloaked.


OMG....no kidding you can't target let alone shoot, hence the low DPS. It was a Dev being sarcastic about the supposed OP nature of cloaks.

AFK cloaking is not a problem because a cloaking device will destroy your ship, but because seeing an unfriendly mug in local scares the bajeebers out of you.


Sir please read before posting before making a fool out of yourself.

Let me repost the vital key line of text you seam to have missed.

Xcom wrote:

Cloaking still needs a limitation no matter the mechanics its connected too.


Cloaking is broken, just cause there is a metagame revolving around its broken nature and some players unwilling stupidity to abuse it to hell doesn't justify the ecosystem that's in place.

But something tells me that your just here for the forum warrioring. Why am I even explaining this to you, your just here to arguing for the argument sake. Noone with relentless post counts in this thread have any intent in its outcome other then feeding there ego or whatever they get out of this.


If cloaking was broken, it would cause issues everywhere. Somhow it seems to only be issue where you rely on the free intel given by local. I don't hear anyone complain in highsec, lowsec or w-space. Somehow it seems that sovnull is the only place where "cloaking is broken"

Wormholer for life.

Vakr Onzo
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#7654 - 2016-11-25 00:52:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Vakr Onzo
Well, this would be a variety of AFK timer but have modules that have been running continuously for a very long time to take 'fatigue' damage like you would from overheat, for operation time over a day or more. Of course, the covert op cloak would have a better tolerance before it started taking fatigue damage or such.
Xcom
US Space Force
Black Rose.
#7655 - 2016-11-25 01:04:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Xcom
Wander Prian wrote:

If cloaking was broken, it would cause issues everywhere. Somhow it seems to only be issue where you rely on the free intel given by local. I don't hear anyone complain in highsec, lowsec or w-space. Somehow it seems that sovnull is the only place where "cloaking is broken"

Cloaking is broken everywhere.

But then some people could swear on the fact that entosis interceptors wasn't broken either. Neither was carrier hotswapping moduals in mid battle. Hell even repping concordicon suiciders keeping them alive in empire wasn't broken at one point too. My favourite was off grid DDs that whipped entire fleets using a cyno when titans were added. Lets just bring that s**t back cause you know, they weren't broken.

Edit: Totally forgot, best example right in front of me. Off grid fleet boosting. That **** was totally broken right? CCP decided to just rip the whole thing apart and redo it. Time to look at a 400 page long thread and ask if we should still fly invulnerable in space.
Wander Prian
Nosferatu Security Foundation
#7656 - 2016-11-25 03:42:30 UTC
Xcom wrote:
Wander Prian wrote:

If cloaking was broken, it would cause issues everywhere. Somhow it seems to only be issue where you rely on the free intel given by local. I don't hear anyone complain in highsec, lowsec or w-space. Somehow it seems that sovnull is the only place where "cloaking is broken"

Cloaking is broken everywhere.

But then some people could swear on the fact that entosis interceptors wasn't broken either. Neither was carrier hotswapping moduals in mid battle. Hell even repping concordicon suiciders keeping them alive in empire wasn't broken at one point too. My favourite was off grid DDs that whipped entire fleets using a cyno when titans were added. Lets just bring that s**t back cause you know, they weren't broken.

Edit: Totally forgot, best example right in front of me. Off grid fleet boosting. That **** was totally broken right? CCP decided to just rip the whole thing apart and redo it. Time to look at a 400 page long thread and ask if we should still fly invulnerable in space.


Off-grid boosting was just stupid everywhere, not just in one area of space. Same with swapping capital modules mid-fight. It made fights in wormhole-space annoying as well. Your problem is not with the cloak , but the cyno. You just don't want to nerf it because you use it yourself.

Wormholer for life.

Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#7657 - 2016-11-25 04:23:03 UTC
Well ...... I've lived in a wormhole several times, and while I wouldn't go as far as to call it 'broken', it sure is boring. I wonder why I even bother D-Scanning every waking second when there's never nothing on scan anyway -- right until 14 guys decloak right beside you.


I would offer these up for consideration:

* is it right and proper that you know, for a fact, that somebody's keeping eyes on you and there is absolutely nothing you can do about it? Counterplay where?

* if there is so much life in wormholes, how comes we had to abandon ours a couple of days ago because there was never, ever, any god darned thing to shoot? Anywhere? Not in our hole, not in the one nextdoor, not in the one after that; not the next day, not over the weekend. I'm not going to knock it just because I don't like it, but I certainly wouldn't want the rest of nullsec to feel that way. People say "just because you think you're alone in space doesn't mean there's nobody watching you" .... but I swear to Bob, I would (quite literally) have killed for one of those Wingspan guys to jump in me like they do on youtube. Instead, I got bored out of my skull! Definitely need more peeps in space yo. If having local means that people actually undock, then by all means keep it!

* I'm absolutely and totally against ISK printers -- as everyone should know by now. But would it perhaps be possible there is another way to address that issue, that would allow us to get rid of the AFK cloaker by adding counterplay to cloaks in general?

* is it just me, or does it not feel quite right to keep cloakers uncounterable in order to 'fix' one issue, thereby allowing other cloak-related issues to exist? For example, the cloaky hotdropper you know for a fact is there (because you saw him enter your system -- don't give me "because of local" crap). One would think the potential to teleport an entire fleet right on top of you at any time of its choosing is a big enough advantage to allow us poor gatecampers to hunt you down, no? Apparently no. The question is ... are we really convinced this is okay? Is there no room for doubt that maybe, after awhile, such encounters should be allowed to happen bothways?


I guess that all I'm saying here is that perhaps we should hear these guys out without shouting them down immediately. They're not entirely wrong you know?
Xcom
US Space Force
Black Rose.
#7658 - 2016-11-25 05:51:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Xcom
Wander Prian wrote:
Xcom wrote:
Wander Prian wrote:

If cloaking was broken, it would cause issues everywhere. Somhow it seems to only be issue where you rely on the free intel given by local. I don't hear anyone complain in highsec, lowsec or w-space. Somehow it seems that sovnull is the only place where "cloaking is broken"

Cloaking is broken everywhere.

But then some people could swear on the fact that entosis interceptors wasn't broken either. Neither was carrier hotswapping moduals in mid battle. Hell even repping concordicon suiciders keeping them alive in empire wasn't broken at one point too. My favourite was off grid DDs that whipped entire fleets using a cyno when titans were added. Lets just bring that s**t back cause you know, they weren't broken.

Edit: Totally forgot, best example right in front of me. Off grid fleet boosting. That **** was totally broken right? CCP decided to just rip the whole thing apart and redo it. Time to look at a 400 page long thread and ask if we should still fly invulnerable in space.


Off-grid boosting was just stupid everywhere, not just in one area of space. Same with swapping capital modules mid-fight. It made fights in wormhole-space annoying as well. Your problem is not with the cloak , but the cyno. You just don't want to nerf it because you use it yourself.

*major facepalm*
I just have no words. Read between the lines and look up sarcasm.

Please read, take a short break. Let that information sink in so you understand the concept of what the poster is trying to convey. Pause yet again just to make sure before hitting that post button.

Cyno is not the problem in a cloaking thread. Cyno is a different topic. Cloaking is the problem in its entirety. Its not to complicated to understand that.

Let me spell it out. C L O A K I N G

Fix cloaking and no more cloaking complaints. Cloaking needs a nerf.

Just going to make damn sure its right on the point and not an inch to the left.

CLOAKING IS THE PROBLEM.

No cloaking fix, big cloaking complaint thread. Cloaking fix, no more complaints.

Its that thing you do in space where your actually cloaked, you know when your ship disappears and stays invisible. Yes, that thing you do, the cloaking thing. That needs to be nerfed because it lacks any productive counter. It makes people sad. That's why people are complaining. So many people wouldn't complain if cloaking wasn't broken. If things were balanced people would be happy. People are not happy and that is why they are here, complaining.

No need blaming anything or anyone else or even out right flaming me personally. When I step away someone else will show up out of the blue and complain, someone I don't even have any contact with. Another person that have basically stepped over the big fat problem that's right here clear as glass. You might know what I'm talking about by now. Unless you skipped over anything I just typed and hit that post button.

People will keep showing up complaining and it wont stop until this problem is resolved. Smart people find problems and resolve them ahead of time before they even show up. It takes a different kind of snowflake to hear so many complaints and still ignore the problem, even worse outright attack the people pointing out the flaw.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#7659 - 2016-11-25 06:37:13 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
What is amusing is that the HTFU police on this thread accuse you of not knowing stuff, or not able to deal with it at a personal level, so when you say how you dealt with it and defeated some of them then there is not a problem, but I have also lost to AFK cloaky campers which I have detailed in this thread too.

Experience in the trenches does not mean you understand grand strategy or even tactics, having the ability to pick up on other peoples experiences and work out your own strategies and tactics is key to winning, when I started this game I dived into the forums, read Crime and Punishment, learnt all the dirty tricks, checked out bubble camps to see how to break through them after reading about people not being able to break through them, it is a joke to me that people seem to think that you cannot learn from listening to others and their rich experiences, yes of course applying what you know is key, WH space is not an issue and when I talk about it I am talking back to WH players who ignore the reality of cyno's and the instant drop and strategic impact from them. If I spend the time to compare to their reality then I am what, bad at Eve. Simply put when I gave the example of cyno's the best that Sonya could come out with is logging off and that takes some organisation if going after a Capital escalation fleet or going for an eviction. The sheer power that can come through a cyno can be so much greater than a WH eviction force, if you get dropped by PL, Goons or NCDOT.

I am glad that I annoy you Teckos, and your petty insults go right over my head, I will patiently explain it, the game has an issue, in so many areas the best way to deal with things is to just hunker down and let it pass, be it war decs in hisec or being AFK cloaky camped by the top alliances, however both are very destructive to player retention, the simple issue here is that I do not agree that people who log in and then go to work, sleep or do something else should have the right to interfere with active players with impunity. But I also do not want to see cloaks destroyed, because they help people who have to go away from their keyboard.

I have seen over the years that it has been made much easier to catch people ratting in 0.0 and yet so many losers continue to AFK cloaky camp and defend it as the only way to catch people and yet they do not realise that were they to stop AFK cloaky camping there would be so many more people in 0.0 and so much more willing to fight roaming gangs. The key thing is to find a way to hunt these AFK cloaky campers when they are AFK so people feel that they can do something.

I will continue to ram this down your puerile little throats and I will take joy in your annoyance.

You seem to love using the market retort in terms of AFK, but you are selling a product offering a service, you are in compettion to others in that market selling a product, what is an AFK cloaky camper selling? Simple, he is selling a reason for people to go and play another game or head back to hisec if they are outside of the main TZ of the alliance or corp. Ice mining is no longer AFK, at some point CCP will deal with this, I expect to see you and the others here cry over it, I know CCP will create an OA to supply local and you will have to shoot it if you don't like it, whine more when you cannot do it...


How bad do you have to be to lose to some one AFK?


One of the same alliances that kicked you out of the north mate!!!!

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#7660 - 2016-11-25 06:38:41 UTC
LOL #REKT