These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Establishing Government

Author
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#21 - 2016-11-21 03:08:08 UTC
Some of you Eve players over complicate things.

You seem to ignore the fact there are lots of solo pilots and small corps who like being small and being independent from an alliance. Being involved in some sort of blue community allows these smaller solos/corps to network among like-minded people and gain pvp or isk opportunities.

The OP could arrange for a specific group of corps to act as a security force for the blues in this "government" other blues can join the fleet and help out if they choose. We could have an intel channel which highlighted where the camps are in high sec, all our blues would gain an advantage being part of this "government"



Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#22 - 2016-11-21 03:16:38 UTC
Aaron wrote:
Some of you Eve players over complicate things.

You seem to ignore the fact there are lots of solo pilots and small corps who like being small and being independent from an alliance. Being involved in some sort of blue community allows these smaller solos/corps to network among like-minded people and gain pvp or isk opportunities.





Yeah, I'm one of em, but I do all these things solo, including PVP, without needing what you're talking about. I have one already, but we're all in different time zones and I only see them for about two hours of an evening. The rest of the day, I'm on my own, and do just fine. But all that aside, what's the difference between a 'blue community' and just joining a corp/alliance that does and lets you do what you want?

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#23 - 2016-11-21 03:18:15 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Aaron wrote:
Chopper Rollins wrote:
Aaron wrote:
Feel free to post my previous threads and try your hardest to ensure nothing happens with this.


Nobody has done a thing to get in your way except you.




Except tell me they agree with something when in fact they don't.

You see OP, lots of people will be quick to tell you how anything outside of a corp and alliance won't work. Try your best to ignore them and continue with your vision. Don't waste any of your time listening to people like Chopper and do your best to keep them out of your circle. Find people who are honestly passionate about the general idea and then work out the logistics in executing it.



Who are you and why should anyone listen to you over Chopper, who I know has been here for years and has tonnes of experience and understanding of the game.

At the end of the day, you do what you want, and what you have the power to do, in this game.


Who am I??!!

I'm the guy whose been on the front line since 2006 and had the courage to try things and analyse the results. I've invited new guys to npc 0.0 and watched them become more powerful than they could have ever imagined. I'm the guy who looks out for the little guy, I'm the guy who dares to dream. I'm the rebel, I am against all forms of elitism and capitalism.

I'm they guy whose had a very different experience from chopper.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2016-11-21 03:24:25 UTC
Capitalism is a necessary balancing factor to socialism, as socialism is to capitalism. When you have one without the other, you open the doors much wider to corruption and chaos. If you're against one or the other, it's for ideological reasons, not academic ones, which means you haven't got the ability to form a relevant, educated objection to either in the first place.

I know chopper. I don't know you. And 'daring to dream' is not a convincing qualifier when it comes to experience with EVE Online and its socioeconomic dynamics. Try again.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#25 - 2016-11-21 03:29:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Aaron
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Aaron wrote:
Some of you Eve players over complicate things.

You seem to ignore the fact there are lots of solo pilots and small corps who like being small and being independent from an alliance. Being involved in some sort of blue community allows these smaller solos/corps to network among like-minded people and gain pvp or isk opportunities.





Yeah, I'm one of em, but I do all these things solo, including PVP, without needing what you're talking about. I have one already, but we're all in different time zones and I only see them for about two hours of an evening. The rest of the day, I'm on my own, and do just fine. But all that aside, what's the difference between a 'blue community' and just joining a corp/alliance that does and lets you do what you want?


Quick answer, it all depends on perspective. I know that lots of money is pumped into ensuring the little guy is wardecced, ganked and robbed of anything he has. These acts are carried out by some of the large corps and alliances. Some people can get a kick out of fighting the corporate machine that keeps them under an oppressive regime.

It depends what you want really. You may not care for the things I speak of, I like things like this because it creates content and there's normally drama, politics and excitement surrounding it.

If I am involved in this i'd suggest having an npc null sec operation, wouldn't you find it cool to visit? and have a trusted blue here to back you up if anything kicks off?

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2016-11-21 03:31:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
And those are fair points, you've made your case, but it all comes back to what I said before: This is EVE, you do what you want and what you have the power to accomplish. In order to accomplish what this thread is looking for, then you need to understand that the players you want to get involved in this are also going to do what they want and what they have the power to accomplish. You need to figure out what that is for each individual that you want to convince to join you, so that you can cater to their needs. Government isn't as easy as you seem to think, and whether you like it or not, every leader, dictator or not, needs his keys.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#27 - 2016-11-21 03:47:16 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
And those are fair points, you've made your case, but it all comes back to what I said before: This is EVE, you do what you want and what you have the power to accomplish. In order to accomplish what this thread is looking for, then you need to understand that the players you want to get involved in this are also going to do what they want and what they have the power to accomplish. You need to figure out what that is for each individual that you want to convince to join you, so that you can cater to their needs. Government isn't as easy as you seem to think, and whether you like it or not, every leader, dictator or not, needs his keys.


I've done enough talking for now, I'd like to read more from the OP. Ill come back to your point later on in the thread.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#28 - 2016-11-21 10:12:56 UTC
its called the csm, you're not relevant enough

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Vigirr
#29 - 2016-11-21 10:21:17 UTC
People who WANT to lead rarely are qualified to do so, mostly has to do with low self esteem and illusions of grandeur.

People who choose to lead because they feel someone needs to take control to in order to deal with a specific situation tend to become the best leaders.

People who want to lead and create a character with an obvious name, somehow trying to signify their leadership capabilities, are hilariously obvious and by default not leadership quality. In EVE there is one exception to this and even that one is debatable


EVE is a meritocracy, if you want to lead you had be better be good at it.
Chopper Rollins
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#30 - 2016-11-21 11:14:28 UTC
Vigirr wrote:
People who WANT to lead rarely are qualified to do so, mostly has to do with low self esteem and illusions of grandeur...


People are more complex than that. Napoleon Bonaparte said that once he'd experienced command he could never take orders again. Nobody argues that he was either a bad leader, an idiot or flawed somehow. His actions changed the genetic makeup of a continent, for a long time he was the archetypal historic 'great man' that drives history and now when people hear his name they think of cognac.
Eve mechanics are simpler and more forgiving than life, what with resources spawning forever and nobody ever dying.
Great thing about Eve is tinpot little dictator types can be quite useful in generating action, while good, smart men get used as stooges for the players behind coups. I'm looking at you BNI 2015.

OP, people set up all sorts of arrangements but the game's limits remain. Democracy requires more of the individual and the organisation than most spaecships pilots are willing to commit.

That link from Remiel is gold, it collapses big important things down into sentences.





Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.

Otago Dogwalker
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2016-11-21 11:19:37 UTC
OP lit the fuse and ran.....
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#32 - 2016-11-21 14:01:42 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
its called the csm, you're they're not relevant enough

Blink
Natural CloneKiller
Commonwealth Mercenaries
BLACKFLAG.
#33 - 2016-11-21 15:19:00 UTC
Dietrich Roosevelt wrote:
I want to work on establishing a functioning government in-game, something I've never truly seen. This wouldn't be a Corporation or an Alliance per se, but rather an organization of players separate from other politics. I think it should be put together from the ground up after numerous discussions and planning. Some vague thoughts on what this could look like:

-True democracy in action: organized elections and actual branches of government
-financial regulation: find ways to allow financial systems to exist in EVE and prevent fraud
-ambitious projects, such as a constantly updated wormhole map with autopilot
-laws and law enforcement: develop the ability to attach consequence to player actions and enforce them through player action

I'm not discussing a Corporation or Alliance, so I don't believe this belongs in Recruitment forum. If I'm wrong, I apologize and I ask a moderator to kindly move me over there. I'm also not suggesting updates to the game itself, this is purely something that players would run within the existing game structure.

I'm not calling for a total upheaval of the game's political and power structures, rather something that runs parallel to them. If any of this interests you or you simply want to follow developments, please comment in the thread.


FWIW: I'm an old '09 player who has returned under the new Free to Play system (handy since I haven't the money to play otherwise).

This is player driven and player lead. You can dream but there will always be many different politics structures in eve.
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#34 - 2016-11-21 16:21:58 UTC
Aaron wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
And those are fair points, you've made your case, but it all comes back to what I said before: This is EVE, you do what you want and what you have the power to accomplish. In order to accomplish what this thread is looking for, then you need to understand that the players you want to get involved in this are also going to do what they want and what they have the power to accomplish. You need to figure out what that is for each individual that you want to convince to join you, so that you can cater to their needs. Government isn't as easy as you seem to think, and whether you like it or not, every leader, dictator or not, needs his keys.


I've done enough talking for now, I'd like to read more from the OP. Ill come back to your point later on in the thread.


Ill answer your points now.

It is a governments responsibility to look at the state of affairs on different issues and then take some sort of action that will result in the issue being resolved.

So lets say the OP set up some sort of government and pledged to do something about ganking and made lots of people aware of his intentions. I think the onus would be on the general Eve populace to decide if they want to sign up to the op's government and help do something about ganking. I accept that some people may not be affected by ganking so there would be no real incentive for them to get involved, but what about the little guy who is affected by ganking? Will he just accept being repeatedly ganked or will he stand up and be counted and join something that could help?

If the OP has to convince people to join then they probably wont. I think it is better to publicise the core ideals of this government and what issues they can resolve and then see how many people are interested in joining.

If I could focus on you for a sec Remiel, It appears that you think this isn't possible because Chopper said its not possible, not because you've tried it for yourself and come to your own conclusion.

When I did my first Invitation to 0.0 thread lots of people said what I suggested wasn't possible I proved them wrong by inviting 6 new guys into npc null and teaching them everything I knew about survival and guerrilla warfare. It worked very well we were able to earn lots of isk and we fought back and got lots of kills on the larger enemy we were fighting. Most of the guys listened to me intently and I was very impressed.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#35 - 2016-11-21 16:43:34 UTC
Aaron wrote:
but what about the little guy who is affected by ganking? Will he just accept being repeatedly ganked or will he stand up and be counted and join something that could help?

He will not stand up.
Sasha Nemtsov
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2016-11-21 17:36:13 UTC
The New Order of Highsec is the nearest thing you'll find to a government within the game.

It stands independent of player Corp and Alliance affiliations. Its members cover all the professions available in Highsec (yes, even mining!), and it is itself governed by a set of guidelines which are flexible enough to allow for individual interpretation, but clear enough to be understood by the citizens of Highsec.

James 315 heads up the Government and the New Order, by popular agreement, and for the simple reason that no one else has proven capable of managing such a diverse population and Staff.

Much as I love them, I want you to forget about the CODE. Alliance, for the moment - don't worry, they're sufficiently elite to take it on the chin.

There are hundreds of us non-allied folks toiling away in Highsec, on behalf of our Government, an administration which has been established for more than 4 years - a very long unbroken line in EVE Online, where stuff changes routinely.

Many people come to the Forums to pour scorn on us, but I've a simple challenge for them:

Alone and unaided, devise and implement a scheme in Highsec which will (over time) attract more than a trillion Isk in investment, provide entertainment and 'content' for thousands of players (willingly or otherwise), be instantly recognisable for anyone visiting Highsec, have a dedicated long-running well-written and popular blog, produce its own art and media work, light up any EVE Online sub-forum where it appears - and get right under the skin of a certain type of EVE player, without fail.

I'm not a betting person, but I am willing to lay what used to be called a 'Sportsman's Bet' (sadly no longer able to be so used - see 'Football') that not a single one of you will be able to approach what James has achieved - whether you agree with our methods and justifications or not.

The challenge stands. Do it alone, or get your pals together to help you. If you don't like us, organise a popular revolt - I've heard that's a way to bring down governments...
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#37 - 2016-11-21 17:57:46 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Capitalism is a necessary balancing factor to socialism, as socialism is to capitalism.


The next person's greed is the balancing factor for capitalism, and is why it works fairly well. Socialism doesn't balance capitalism.

To the topic at hand, CODE is very far from a form of government, it's entertaining to watch, but it's closer to a racketeering scheme than government. Major sov null alliances are the closest thing to a government we will ever find.
Neuntausend
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#38 - 2016-11-21 18:22:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Neuntausend
Governments do exist in Eve - I believe goonswarm has already been mentioned. They are not a democracy by any means, more akin to a socialist autocracy. They have a dictator and a directorate comprised of very capable people (call it a cabinet of ministers if you like) for all kinds of things. Finances, infrastructure, internal and external affairs, secret service, military and so on. They collect taxes, have state-run resource mining and processing facilities and infrastructure and use the funds gained through that to take care of their own by providing ship reimbursement, jump bridges, staging and production structures, subsidies, military defense, yadayada. They have a set of laws on what people may and may not do within their sphere of influence and ways to enforce it.

So, Governments do exist in the game, and they work. However, I don't see the same thing being possible for democracy. There is one major problem with democracy, not only in Eve: Democracy is the rule of the people, and most people don't make good rulers. Most people lack the insight necessary to make the right decisions for the whole group. With Eve being a spaceship game on the internets, this is even more of a problem, as we are all anonymous, unless we choose to not be, and it's even more difficult to figure out the true intentions of a political figure in Eve than it is in the real world. It's relatively easy to rile up a bunch of people and get them to follow your alleged cause, but those people will never know what you are really after. On top of the support of its people, a democratic government will need funds and the ability to access and use them. Eve players are way too good at acting to make this work. It is very easy to just fabricate a new identity once they've burnt theirs, have run your little government into the ground, taken all the funds and assets they could get and vanished into the darkness of space.
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#39 - 2016-11-21 19:22:22 UTC
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:
Aaron wrote:
but what about the little guy who is affected by ganking? Will he just accept being repeatedly ganked or will he stand up and be counted and join something that could help?

He will not stand up.


Seems like manipulation to me. I strongly feel there is a doctrine to either ruin the little guy or make him part of a corp/alliance. Your comments seem very negative toward the little guy.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Chopper Rollins
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#40 - 2016-11-21 21:55:49 UTC


Reality is very negative towards the little guy.



Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.