These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Establishing Government

Author
Dietrich Roosevelt
The Honourable Four Empires Trading Company
#1 - 2016-11-20 20:55:26 UTC
I want to work on establishing a functioning government in-game, something I've never truly seen. This wouldn't be a Corporation or an Alliance per se, but rather an organization of players separate from other politics. I think it should be put together from the ground up after numerous discussions and planning. Some vague thoughts on what this could look like:

-True democracy in action: organized elections and actual branches of government
-financial regulation: find ways to allow financial systems to exist in EVE and prevent fraud
-ambitious projects, such as a constantly updated wormhole map with autopilot
-laws and law enforcement: develop the ability to attach consequence to player actions and enforce them through player action

I'm not discussing a Corporation or Alliance, so I don't believe this belongs in Recruitment forum. If I'm wrong, I apologize and I ask a moderator to kindly move me over there. I'm also not suggesting updates to the game itself, this is purely something that players would run within the existing game structure.

I'm not calling for a total upheaval of the game's political and power structures, rather something that runs parallel to them. If any of this interests you or you simply want to follow developments, please comment in the thread.


FWIW: I'm an old '09 player who has returned under the new Free to Play system (handy since I haven't the money to play otherwise).
Engage You
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2016-11-20 20:59:11 UTC
it's called code

a communist state and a dictatorship
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#3 - 2016-11-20 21:06:34 UTC
Bahaha, no they're not.
Don't get me wrong now I like CODE. I think they're funny as hell and ****ing with miners is always a good thing

But an authority they are not.
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#4 - 2016-11-20 21:08:48 UTC
You are asking for a Corp in Null. Where you can enforce your rules and revoke docking access if they don't obey your rules.
You can have organised elections and the like in your corp if you want, nothing stops you running your corp like that.
Valkin Mordirc
#5 - 2016-11-20 21:16:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Valkin Mordirc
That a very big idea, and starting here of all places is not the start you want.


Edit: And CODE. authority if they had actually authority AFK mining and autopilot wouldn't be a thing. But it is.
#DeleteTheWeak
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#6 - 2016-11-20 21:25:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Aaron
Dietrich Roosevelt wrote:
I want to work on establishing a functioning government in-game, something I've never truly seen. This wouldn't be a Corporation or an Alliance per se, but rather an organization of players separate from other politics. I think it should be put together from the ground up after numerous discussions and planning. Some vague thoughts on what this could look like:

-True democracy in action: organized elections and actual branches of government
-financial regulation: find ways to allow financial systems to exist in EVE and prevent fraud
-ambitious projects, such as a constantly updated wormhole map with autopilot
-laws and law enforcement: develop the ability to attach consequence to player actions and enforce them through player action

I'm not discussing a Corporation or Alliance, so I don't believe this belongs in Recruitment forum. If I'm wrong, I apologize and I ask a moderator to kindly move me over there. I'm also not suggesting updates to the game itself, this is purely something that players would run within the existing game structure.

I'm not calling for a total upheaval of the game's political and power structures, rather something that runs parallel to them. If any of this interests you or you simply want to follow developments, please comment in the thread.


FWIW: I'm an old '09 player who has returned under the new Free to Play system (handy since I haven't the money to play otherwise).


I tried to do something reasonably similar. I invited people to npc nullsec and got them to blue every other corp/solo player involved. Communication was done via mailing list.

It worked for a short while, we had people who scanned out wh hi sec routes, we had people who did missions and invited other blues we had lookouts gathering intel. It did fall apart due to difference of opinion with lots of people wanting to roll us up into one corp or alliance. I disagreed claiming that people liked their independence and wanted to be part of a relaxed blue coalition and still maintain their identity.

It sounds like you and I have similar views and I would be more than happy to talk with you on this. Perhaps a blue coallition where there is a council and an elected leadership specialising in operating in hi sec and npc nullsec.

EDIT: I think when doing things like this it is best to be honest about ideas you like and dislike. Many times people have told me they agree with ideas when in fact they think the complete opposite.

If we do get something off the ground we have to be careful of people who will come along and try to change it into a corp or alliance, they will try to sway the others involved into rolling ourselves up into alliance.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Chopper Rollins
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#7 - 2016-11-20 21:49:41 UTC
Amateur-planner megalomania is a thing.
You want to run a democratic group separate from other politics?
Impossible because you're in the same closed environment with no way to keep others out of your territory or out of your group as spais. Any group is part of the bigger picture, it's actually a good thing about eve that 17 guys tearing up a lowsec pipe will develop relationships with groups that are huge and play a part in the ecosystem.
Aaron wanted things done his way and has exploded groups in comedy fireballs repeatedly, losing members to properly and seriously organised neighbours.
Has the US election made you care about politics? In days of old it was seen as a refuge for men unhappily married.



Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.

Shallanna Yassavi
qwertz corp
#8 - 2016-11-20 22:03:09 UTC
The nullbears have this big blue donut nobody wants to poke.

A signature :o

Nana Skalski
Taisaanat Kotei
EDENCOM DEFENSIVE INITIATIVE
#9 - 2016-11-20 22:09:58 UTC
Villore Accords maybe. They have even done something like Villore Assembly that is doing stuff only politicians do.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#10 - 2016-11-20 22:16:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Go talk to Aaron. This seems a bit like hub zero.

Then go look at the previous hub zero threads.
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#11 - 2016-11-20 22:39:53 UTC
Chopper Rollins wrote:
Amateur-planner megalomania is a thing.

Aaron wanted things done his way and has exploded groups in comedy fireballs repeatedly, losing members to properly and seriously organised neighbours.




My way seems to be precisely what the op is suggesting. If the OP is interested in working together on this we would need to find more people who agree with the OP and not people who pretend to agree with the OP.

Have your fun with trolling this. Big smile I know there are a good 50 people lining up ready to insult me and attempt to stop the OP and myself working together with stories of how hard they found me to work with etc. Feel free to post my previous threads and try your hardest to ensure nothing happens with this.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Chopper Rollins
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#12 - 2016-11-20 23:40:08 UTC
Aaron wrote:
Feel free to post my previous threads and try your hardest to ensure nothing happens with this.


Nobody has done a thing to get in your way except you. The thread is not about you and won't be.
OP needs to understand that working outside the corp/alliance/coalition structure has real drawbacks.
"Your way" has to provide for members, there are groups numbering in their thousands out there, they are not losers who give up their identity or freedom. When leadership doesn't enable a stable place to operate from, or provide content for the more passive line members, the group dissolves.
The rest is RP fluff and details.




Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.

Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#13 - 2016-11-21 00:15:22 UTC
Chopper Rollins wrote:
Aaron wrote:
Feel free to post my previous threads and try your hardest to ensure nothing happens with this.


Nobody has done a thing to get in your way except you. The thread is not about you and won't be.
OP needs to understand that working outside the corp/alliance/coalition structure has real drawbacks.
"Your way" has to provide for members, there are groups numbering in their thousands out there, they are not losers who give up their identity or freedom. When leadership doesn't enable a stable place to operate from, or provide content for the more passive line members, the group dissolves.
The rest is RP fluff and details.






Of course there are drawbacks to working outside of the corp/alliance structure. The fun and challenge is in seeing if something different can be achieved. It depends on you're perspective, you don't strike me as a person who is interested in helping to build something like this.

Perspective is like a block of flats with 50 floors. Depending on what floor you live on your perspective when you look out of the window will be different from the others.

Chopper I'd suggest you leave to OP and myself to think exactly how we want to think. We understand the drawbacks fully and I get the impression the OP likes doing stuff like this cos its interesting. You took a wrong turn somewhere chopper and ended up posting in this thread.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#14 - 2016-11-21 00:19:48 UTC
Chopper Rollins wrote:
Aaron wrote:
Feel free to post my previous threads and try your hardest to ensure nothing happens with this.


Nobody has done a thing to get in your way except you.




Except tell me they agree with something when in fact they don't.

You see OP, lots of people will be quick to tell you how anything outside of a corp and alliance won't work. Try your best to ignore them and continue with your vision. Don't waste any of your time listening to people like Chopper and do your best to keep them out of your circle. Find people who are honestly passionate about the general idea and then work out the logistics in executing it.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#15 - 2016-11-21 00:28:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Mara Rinn
True democracy, without the politics?

You need to understand that wherever you get two or more people together, the politics have already started before anyone says a word. You can not escape politics, and I would suggest you try the conventional organisational model and draw on the experience of others before you start trying to create your utopia.

I wish you well, but I think you have some painful lessons to learn about herding cats, butting heads, and finding out that wrangling egos involves compromising many of the ideals that you have up to now considered holy and pure. You will be lying to friends and shaking hands with enemies, and politics will become part of your everyday life.

When you have some experience, you will find people who want to follow you. When you have concrete ideas on how to establish this government, people will follow.

Without people-wrangling experience or any concrete ideas on how things will work (e.g.: a constitution and charter) you are basically setting yourself up for failure.

Join an existing organisation, see if you can develop the skills for leadership and administration, then come looking for followers.
Chopper Rollins
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#16 - 2016-11-21 00:53:42 UTC
Aaron wrote:
Chopper I'd suggest you leave to OP and myself to think exactly how we want to think.


You don't think maybe it's your advice that would be damaging?
Captain of Titanics 1 to 5?



Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.

Memphis Baas
#17 - 2016-11-21 01:00:40 UTC
This is a pipe dream that's impossible to implement.

Players who want to organize themselves this way join a corp or nullsec alliance. Players who don't, they stay in high-sec.

A lot of the infrastructure for "government" would have to be coded by CCP as changes to the game mechanics, because otherwise nobody's gonna follow the "laws."

The game already has rules ("laws") that we follow, no need for more.

Organizing anything that involves people, a fleet op, a corp, an alliance, is a ton of work and quite a few expenses out of pocket. Those who want to put in the work already do it. You going to elect "officials" to do the work? First thing I'd do if elected would be to steal whatever money I'm given, give everyone the bird in an email, and log off for a year. You can't make people work in a game if they don't want to.
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#18 - 2016-11-21 02:18:46 UTC
Isn't this pretty much provibloc ? (after a fashion)
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2016-11-21 02:55:53 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Bahaha, no they're not.
Don't get me wrong now I like CODE. I think they're funny as hell and ****ing with miners is always a good thing

But an authority they are not.


They've never claimed to be an authority, either. Just the saviours and peacekeepers that they are, upholding and enforcing the law of highsec. Blink

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2016-11-21 03:00:21 UTC
Aaron wrote:
Chopper Rollins wrote:
Aaron wrote:
Feel free to post my previous threads and try your hardest to ensure nothing happens with this.


Nobody has done a thing to get in your way except you.




Except tell me they agree with something when in fact they don't.

You see OP, lots of people will be quick to tell you how anything outside of a corp and alliance won't work. Try your best to ignore them and continue with your vision. Don't waste any of your time listening to people like Chopper and do your best to keep them out of your circle. Find people who are honestly passionate about the general idea and then work out the logistics in executing it.



Who are you and why should anyone listen to you over Chopper, who I know has been here for years and has tonnes of experience and understanding of the game.

At the end of the day, you do what you want, and what you have the power to do, in this game.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

123Next pageLast page