These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What is the current status of high-sec ganking?

Author
Lasisha Mishi
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#101 - 2016-10-28 14:25:21 UTC
Galaxy Duck wrote:
Lasisha Mishi wrote:
Ima Wreckyou wrote:

The current miner business is full of AFK bot-aspirants who mine excessively and undercut the prices of all the hard working real miners who actually play the game and produce all the high quality ore we need for our ships.

which is why you tried to kill me on multiple times

including one time when i was actively having a conversation in local with a friend about upcoming movies.
easy to see i wasn't afk. or a bot.

and yet poof 2 code catalysts warp into my ice belt. and shoot at my poor Endurance. thankfully i can burn out of range easily enough (more proof i not afk, i manually changed course and turned on my afterburner)




so again, your lying out your ass.


First of all, nothing about your post contradicts or really even pertains to the snippet you quoted from Ima. just wanted to point that out.

Secondly, you have no permit and are therefore a Code-violator and a target. Is this complicated? Straight

oh i did buy a permit back in july (remember this is not my mining toon).

cause back then i had a ton of isk and was gullible enough

but 3 days after i bought the "permit" the first gank attempt happened (by the same person who sold me the permit).



the really frustrating part is, they tried to gank my endurance in the ice belt...when i had a "permit" when there was a group of 15 skiffs and procurers orbiting an orca. who were defenitly multibox.


but no, code ignore the "permit" and the multiboxers. and instead goes for the "weaker" ship at the edge of the ice field.



which summarizes code.
permits are worthless
and they attempt to gank people in low eff hp ships rather than actual multiboxers/bots/afkers.

Galaxy Duck
Galaxy Farm Carebear Repurposing
#102 - 2016-10-28 14:40:03 UTC
An endurance?!? Well of course you were targeted! Ventures and their variants are illegal in James 315 territory. What were you even doing flying an endurance in highsec? Clearly a ship for worm holes and such.
Lasisha Mishi
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#103 - 2016-10-28 14:46:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Lasisha Mishi
Galaxy Duck wrote:
An endurance?!? Well of course you were targeted! Ventures and their variants are illegal in James 315 territory. What were you even doing flying an endurance in highsec? Clearly a ship for worm holes and such.

and here you can see another case of code changing their rules to suit whatever excuse they come up with.


thanks for a live example of you changing it. you guys asked for proof earlier. heres your proof.


also what part of ICE MINING do you not understand.
go read description of a venture again and tell me why i use endurance for ICE MINING.

not GAS HARVESTING
Galaxy Duck
Galaxy Farm Carebear Repurposing
#104 - 2016-10-28 16:10:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Galaxy Duck
Lasisha Mishi wrote:
Galaxy Duck wrote:
An endurance?!? Well of course you were targeted! Ventures and their variants are illegal in James 315 territory. What were you even doing flying an endurance in highsec? Clearly a ship for worm holes and such.

and here you can see another case of code changing their rules to suit whatever excuse they come up with.


thanks for a live example of you changing it. you guys asked for proof earlier. heres your proof.


also what part of ICE MINING do you not understand.
go read description of a venture again and tell me why i use endurance for ICE MINING.

not GAS HARVESTING


And here you have a live example of a carebear whining due to their own ignorance of the laws of highsec. Go study the works of 315, my friend. The Savior's distaste for ventures and their variants in his realm is well known public information.


P.S. you'll notice I said "wormholes and such".
Lasisha Mishi
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#105 - 2016-10-28 16:31:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Lasisha Mishi
Galaxy Duck wrote:
Lasisha Mishi wrote:
Galaxy Duck wrote:
An endurance?!? Well of course you were targeted! Ventures and their variants are illegal in James 315 territory. What were you even doing flying an endurance in highsec? Clearly a ship for worm holes and such.

and here you can see another case of code changing their rules to suit whatever excuse they come up with.


thanks for a live example of you changing it. you guys asked for proof earlier. heres your proof.


also what part of ICE MINING do you not understand.
go read description of a venture again and tell me why i use endurance for ICE MINING.

not GAS HARVESTING


And here you have a live example of a carebear whining due to their own ignorance of the laws of highsec. Go study the works of 315, my friend. The Savior's distaste for ventures and their variants in his realm is well known public information.


P.S. you'll notice I said "wormholes and such".

Changes to a contract after signing can not be applied to the contractee unless they sign a revised contract.

so no.

also the "laws of highsec" is concord's laws. aka the people who spend most of their day ripping up your mafia ass.

don't like it? go take it up with concord. for all code's preaching of high sec being "your domain", you still get murdered by the actual rulers of high sec.


btw my endurance isn't the only one who you guys have tried to gank. its just my favorite as its avoided dying in all the attempts.

Retriever had an attempt in Pulin. again though, you failed pvpers were unable to kill it before concord ripped your arses apart.





and yet when you read your "code"
- Upon being suicide ganked, a miner should congratulate the ganker on his success. A "good fight" or "gf" in local is customary.

aka you'll get ganked even with a permit. which sorta defeats the point of a permit.





also no where in your webpage do you make mention of venture-class ships being illegal.





so, as someone who you guys have tried to gank 5 times (6 as of this morning) and succeeded 0 times.
i can safely say your a bunch of fail pvpers, scam artists, and general pests.
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#106 - 2016-10-28 16:50:03 UTC
Well did you ask an Agent if it is ok to use an endurance in Highsec? Because everyone knows they are illegal in New Order territory. It seams to me this is just another case of some space lawyering and an attempt to blame our noble Agents for you own crimes.
Lasisha Mishi
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#107 - 2016-10-28 16:56:52 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Well did you ask an Agent if it is ok to use an endurance in Highsec? Because everyone knows they are illegal in New Order territory. It seams to me this is just another case of some space lawyering and an attempt to blame our noble Agents for you own crimes.

jee, you'd think one of you failed pvpers would have said something as to why your ganking me in the times you failed to gank.

but no, instead of saying "venture is illegal" instead your reasons are always "permit only applies to the person you paid" or "only applies to the system you paid in" or "only applies to the ship you were in when you originally paid"


or you'd think you'd have that listed in the code.



but no, your making crap up. which is a reason why no one takes you seriously. 6 attempts btw. a competent PvPer would have had at least 1 successful gank by now. not 6 failed attempts.

and the real rulers of high sec, aka Concord, defenitly isn't failing like you. they keep blowing you up.



what kind of "ruler" gets murdered by others in their own territory. unless of coarse that territory really isn't yours, and you don't own squat.



face it, your a bunch of failed PvPers who got your asses spanked red in null and low sec by ACTUAL PvPers, and fled to high sec to hide from them while you pretend to be "good" PvPers by attacking people who don't even have guns.

and yet even then you fail to kill them properly.


Geronimo McVain
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#108 - 2016-10-28 16:57:42 UTC
I want more popcorn BearBearBearBearBear

Simple rule: You pay a permit with isk or Phased Plasma (TM). CODE accepts both. Cool
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#109 - 2016-10-28 17:04:03 UTC
Lasisha Mishi wrote:
not 6 failed attempts.

Is this some kind of self perpetuating big fish story? Looks like this numbers increase with every post you make. Maybe you should stop lying, apologise to us all and finally get another mining permit and a New Order approved mining vessel.
Lasisha Mishi
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#110 - 2016-10-28 17:07:28 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Lasisha Mishi wrote:
not 6 failed attempts.

Is this some kind of self perpetuating big fish story? Looks like this numbers increase with every post you make. Maybe you should stop lying, apologise to us all and finally get another mining permit and a New Order approved mining vessel.

it was 5 before
with a 6th this morning.



i had a mining permit in july
i've flown Retrievers, Procurers, and Endurances. all that have had attempts on them.

no where in your code you list any "illegal" ships.

so your making up rules, and i stopped caring about what i fly after the 2nd attempt (when they said "permit only applies to the person you paid it to")


so keep pretending to be king. the real king will keep murdering you. concord ftw
Galaxy Duck
Galaxy Farm Carebear Repurposing
#111 - 2016-10-28 17:12:43 UTC
Lasisha Mishi wrote:
Galaxy Duck wrote:
Lasisha Mishi wrote:
Galaxy Duck wrote:
An endurance?!? Well of course you were targeted! Ventures and their variants are illegal in James 315 territory. What were you even doing flying an endurance in highsec? Clearly a ship for worm holes and such.

and here you can see another case of code changing their rules to suit whatever excuse they come up with.


thanks for a live example of you changing it. you guys asked for proof earlier. heres your proof.


also what part of ICE MINING do you not understand.
go read description of a venture again and tell me why i use endurance for ICE MINING.

not GAS HARVESTING


And here you have a live example of a carebear whining due to their own ignorance of the laws of highsec. Go study the works of 315, my friend. The Savior's distaste for ventures and their variants in his realm is well known public information.


P.S. you'll notice I said "wormholes and such".

Changes to a contract after signing can not be applied to the contractee unless they sign a revised contract.

so no.

also the "laws of highsec" is concord's laws. aka the people who spend most of their day ripping up your mafia ass.

don't like it? go take it up with concord. for all code's preaching of high sec being "your domain", you still get murdered by the actual rulers of high sec.


btw my endurance isn't the only one who you guys have tried to gank. its just my favorite as its avoided dying in all the attempts.

Retriever had an attempt in Pulin. again though, you failed pvpers were unable to kill it before concord ripped your arses apart.





and yet when you read your "code"
- Upon being suicide ganked, a miner should congratulate the ganker on his success. A "good fight" or "gf" in local is customary.

aka you'll get ganked even with a permit. which sorta defeats the point of a permit.





also no where in your webpage do you make mention of venture-class ships being illegal.





so, as someone who you guys have tried to gank 5 times (6 as of this morning) and succeeded 0 times.
i can safely say your a bunch of fail pvpers, scam artists, and general pests.


Space lawyer alert!
Galaxy Duck
Galaxy Farm Carebear Repurposing
#112 - 2016-10-28 17:14:27 UTC
Lasisha Mishi wrote:
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Well did you ask an Agent if it is ok to use an endurance in Highsec? Because everyone knows they are illegal in New Order territory. It seams to me this is just another case of some space lawyering and an attempt to blame our noble Agents for you own crimes.

jee, you'd think one of you failed pvpers would have said something as to why your ganking me in the times you failed to gank.

but no, instead of saying "venture is illegal" instead your reasons are always "permit only applies to the person you paid" or "only applies to the system you paid in" or "only applies to the ship you were in when you originally paid"


or you'd think you'd have that listed in the code.



but no, your making crap up. which is a reason why no one takes you seriously. 6 attempts btw. a competent PvPer would have had at least 1 successful gank by now. not 6 failed attempts.

and the real rulers of high sec, aka Concord, defenitly isn't failing like you. they keep blowing you up.



what kind of "ruler" gets murdered by others in their own territory. unless of coarse that territory really isn't yours, and you don't own squat.



face it, your a bunch of failed PvPers who got your asses spanked red in null and low sec by ACTUAL PvPers, and fled to high sec to hide from them while you pretend to be "good" PvPers by attacking people who don't even have guns.

and yet even then you fail to kill them properly.




There you go quoting no one again. Please stop making things up.
Mark Marconi
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#113 - 2016-10-28 22:14:42 UTC
Galaxy Duck wrote:


There you go quoting no one again. Please stop making things up.

Why not you do.

The CSM gets in the way of CCP communicating properly with the players of this game.

After all we are not just players, we are customers.

Time for the CSM to be disbanded.

Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#114 - 2016-10-29 00:10:21 UTC
Galaxy Duck wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
Mark Marconi wrote:
You claim your actions are good and in his name but you lie and use his name for profit.

Of course there use it for profit. They are actually required to have that as a motivation by CCP.



Complete nonsense. Where do you get this stuff?

As long as a kill mail is involved, profit is unnecessary and irrelevant.

A killmail is all the ingame-benefit you need. Please ask a GM instead of spreading this BS myth.

Go back and look at James explanation of why there is a permit and why it costs 10 million ISK.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."

Galaxy Duck
Galaxy Farm Carebear Repurposing
#115 - 2016-10-29 01:19:50 UTC
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
Galaxy Duck wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
Mark Marconi wrote:
You claim your actions are good and in his name but you lie and use his name for profit.

Of course there use it for profit. They are actually required to have that as a motivation by CCP.



Complete nonsense. Where do you get this stuff?

As long as a kill mail is involved, profit is unnecessary and irrelevant.

A killmail is all the ingame-benefit you need. Please ask a GM instead of spreading this BS myth.

Go back and look at James explanation of why there is a permit and why it costs 10 million ISK.


1) You are the one that needs to read up on some things, not me.

2) That was because he was BUMPING. When you are GANKING, the killmail counts as an in-game benefit and so profit is completely irrelevant.

3) I say again: It is not against the rules to kill spaceships in this spaceship-killing game.

Think about what you're saying, man!

Don't take my word for it. I encourage you to go straight to the horse's mouth and ask a GM.
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#116 - 2016-10-29 01:59:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Shae Tadaruwa
Galaxy Duck wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
Galaxy Duck wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
Mark Marconi wrote:
You claim your actions are good and in his name but you lie and use his name for profit.

Of course there use it for profit. They are actually required to have that as a motivation by CCP.



Complete nonsense. Where do you get this stuff?

As long as a kill mail is involved, profit is unnecessary and irrelevant.

A killmail is all the ingame-benefit you need. Please ask a GM instead of spreading this BS myth.

Go back and look at James explanation of why there is a permit and why it costs 10 million ISK.


1) You are the one that needs to read up on some things, not me.

2) That was because he was BUMPING. When you are GANKING, the killmail counts as an in-game benefit and so profit is completely irrelevant.

3) I say again: It is not against the rules to kill spaceships in this spaceship-killing game.

Think about what you're saying, man!

Don't take my word for it. I encourage you to go straight to the horse's mouth and ask a GM.

Who said it was illegal to kill ships. Turn your ******** level down. Killing ships is the best part about the game and I never claimed anything different.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."

Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
#117 - 2016-10-29 02:26:25 UTC
Is there a way to buy a freighter permit? Say, if somebody actually wanted to? And say, somebody else would actually be arsed to check it?
Loutro Fift
Hoplite Brigade
Ushra'Khan
#118 - 2016-10-29 02:30:44 UTC
Khergit Deserters wrote:
Is there a way to buy a freighter permit? Say, if somebody actually wanted to? And say, somebody else would actually be arsed to check it?



Find some one dumb enough who has bought a permit (check their bio, that's where it is posted), copy and paste.

Or...ignore all this nonsense and fly your ship like you stole it.
Keno Skir
#119 - 2016-10-29 03:11:14 UTC
The butt-hurt in this thread is real..
Mark Marconi
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#120 - 2016-10-29 05:27:12 UTC
Khergit Deserters wrote:
Is there a way to buy a freighter permit? Say, if somebody actually wanted to? And say, somebody else would actually be arsed to check it?

If you find one of these frauds and pay them cash they will just say you were
a) AFK
b) carrying to much

So there is no reason to give money to these false CODE enforcers.

The CSM gets in the way of CCP communicating properly with the players of this game.

After all we are not just players, we are customers.

Time for the CSM to be disbanded.