These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Command Burst Fitting and Command Ships?

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Menaiya Zamayid
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#1 - 2016-10-15 16:21:47 UTC
Is it intentional that Command ships can only fit one command burst module period? I can understand if I can only have one effect, but the description is badly out of date then.

Will tech I battlecruisers be able to fit a single command burst?

If this is the case then the only reason to go for a command ship (Which requires a massive amount more training) is the resist profile.


Thank you CCP and ISD.
Amak Boma
Dragon Factory
xX SERENITY Xx
#2 - 2016-10-15 18:02:49 UTC
single command burst - all battlecruisers t1 and faction . gnosis aswell
if you fit command processors you can use more links on t1 or faction battlecruiser and gnosis
command destroyers can fit multiple command bursts.
Aldran Gentlharp
Unidentified Murderers and Young Hack Offenders
#3 - 2016-10-16 10:05:20 UTC
right now you can fit only 1 mining foreman command burst to an rorqual as well
Chan'aar
State War Academy
Caldari State
#4 - 2016-10-16 12:21:08 UTC
I suspect they have not authored all the command type ships to accept more than one of the new command bursts. The command bursts will be a new module type not a direct one-for-one replacement of the ganglink modules.

Hence the ship bonus's will need updating.
Arronicus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5 - 2016-10-17 00:26:22 UTC
Command ships and rorqs will be able to fit more than one, ccp is just fixing things.

It's also worth noting that ccp has said that command processors are going into the garbage, and we'll be getting rigs to replace them. We'll have to see how terrible the rigs are, CCP could really shaft everyone hard by putting 350 calibration on them, but at least now your shield command ships wont have a ****-poor tank compared to armor, especially when you consider how unfairly slaves boost armor command ship hp compared to shield commands.
Aldran Gentlharp
Unidentified Murderers and Young Hack Offenders
#6 - 2016-10-17 07:28:09 UTC
The problem is more that we can't test the changes properly while the patch on sissi is incomplete.
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#7 - 2016-10-17 08:44:46 UTC
Aldran Gentlharp wrote:
The problem is more that we can't test the changes properly while the patch on sissi is incomplete.

sure you can.

CCP: go try a thing,
is it ****ed?

you: k its ****ed.
is this thing supposed to be ****ed?

CCP: depends, how is it ****ed?

you : quite ****ed

CCP *pinches nose*

Murderers of Negotiable Motivations

=]|[=
CCP Habakuk
C C P
C C P Alliance
#8 - 2016-10-17 08:54:02 UTC
So yeah, this is indeed still work in progress, but I hope that this will be fixed with the one of the next two patches on Singularity.

CCP Habakuk | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five 0 | (Team Gridlock)

Bug reporting | Mass Testing
Darkblad
#9 - 2016-10-17 09:17:26 UTC
Arronicus wrote:
It's also worth noting that ccp has said that command processors are going into the garbage, and we'll be getting rigs to replace them. We'll have to see how terrible the rigs are, CCP could really shaft everyone hard by putting 350 calibration on them, [...]
The rigs exist (on sisi and chaos), but they don't have any attributes yet. So that's another thing to wait for

http://playground.schildwall.info/basics/types/types.php?name=Large%20Command%20Processor%20I

NPE-ISD-Übersetzt!