These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Closing incursions by killing the Mothership

First post First post
Author
Dzajic
#121 - 2012-01-17 20:41:20 UTC
Just read the relevant prats from CSM minutes please.
Lyrrashae
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#122 - 2012-01-17 20:50:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyrrashae
Dzajic wrote:
Tarsas Phage wrote:
Dzajic wrote:
Is pissing in rl sandboxes and breaking other kid's toys bad and socially unacceptable behavior? Yes ofc.

What difference is there then? If your only joy in a game is causing inconvenience suffering and loss to other players? If you weren't having IRL sociopathic tendencies such a thing would not be attractive or fun to you; it is simply not how a completely healthy person would think.

You are drawing satisfaction from causing (emotional and mental) injury to other human beings. Why does the medium in which this is done matter?


So people who like to be cast in roles as murders, rapists, or all-around bad guys in movies must like doing that stuff irl ?



[quote=Dzajic] [Plus a bunch of moralising based on a completely false premise...]


Emergent, open-world sandbox =/= scripted movie with pre-determined outcome. Go play SW:tOR or WoW if you want that.

And you're confusing immorality with amorality:

Intrinsically, there is nothing of the former in this game but what players make of it, because it's 100% the latter.

E: Snipped the appeal to emotion based on a premise that has no basis in what EVE is, or ever did.

Ni.

XXSketchxx
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
#123 - 2012-01-17 21:29:39 UTC
Dzajic wrote:
Just read the relevant prats from CSM minutes please.


I read it but it didn't say anything about sociopathy so its not really relevant to this thread.
Dzajic
#124 - 2012-01-17 21:40:49 UTC
First I wanted to rage so I walked away... that I cooled down and loled, and that I loled again.
Lyrrashae
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#125 - 2012-01-17 22:34:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyrrashae
Goose99 wrote:
Roime wrote:
XXSketchxx wrote:
Dzajic wrote:
If CCP wanted Incursions to be completed quickly why would have they given them a week long lifespan?


CCP is notorious for adding features to the game without accounting for even half the potential repercussions of said game features.


It is pretty much impossible to predict all the repercussions of any given new ruleset in an already complex system, which will be bent, poked, twisted and abused by tens of thousands determined and creative human minds at their prime.

EVE players are nerds. Nerds are clever. A huge mass of clever nerds interacting structurally and chaotically creates emergent gameplay, making New Eden what it is. CCP not only can't prevent this from happening, neither they would want to prevent it from happening.



Good god! Huge mass of basement dwellers who take internet spaceships too seriously, getting all giggly off thinking they ruined someone else's day, thus forcing them back to their real lives that said basement dwellers lack.Shocked


Oh, look, Goose99 trolling a thread whilst contributing nothing intelligent. Can't imagine how anyone didn't think that would happen, eh?

0/10, lacks any originality, style, or wit, back under your bridge you go!

E: I gave you a 0 from -1 originally because you got me to respond, but that's it, I'm afraid. Keep practising!)

Ni.

Clementina
University of Caille
#126 - 2012-01-18 00:15:51 UTC
I read the CSM notes with respect to Incursion sites.

The first thing that is interesting is that the notes are not complete spinless nerf-herding. I'll comment a little.

In the first paragraph, Vanguard sites are accused of being to easy. There is a lot to be said about Vanguard sites and their difficulty. However, it would be difficult to make them harder because lots of the toughness is in getting the 10 people together to do them. If it was as easy to find and lead 20 random people as it is to find and lead 10, the preference would be for Assaults.

The Second and Third paragraphs are about making sites vary more in order to make them more unpredictable and thus more risky. The CSM actually didn't want too much changes to alpha in sites, noting that bombers in Mothership sites can one-shot a logistics ship now.

The Forth paragraph is about the Nation's Consolidation Network which has a cruiser's gate and a battleship's gate. The CSM has told CCP that this is very unpopular because to do it some people have to reship into cruisers.

The Fifth paragraph is about bugs and exploits. I have not personally seen any bugs in my scant incursions running time, but there are a few things that might not be working as intended. Interestingly enough it's two out of three Vanguards.
In the Nation's Mining Colony, it is intended for the players to mine the ore and then use it to destroy the refinery. However what has been happening is that there is extra ore and some people have been saving it (Particularly people who run in the 'shiny fleets') So they finish the Sansha fleet, then use their stored ore to actually destroy the facility.
In the Override Transfer Array, it is intended that someone hack the Override Transfer Arrays in order to defeat the Sansha Logistics and thus finish the site. However, what people have been doing is simply shooting the Deltotes, which even with the Transfer Array support are still fragile enough to defeat. Very shiny fleets can shoot DDD, but unshiny fleets have to shoot AAD AAD D or some similar variation.

The Sixth paragraph is about Site Competition and the number of sites. CCP wanted more sites and the CSM did not.

The Seventh paragraph is about timing, the CSM believes that incursions end too soon, specifically the mothership appears to soon in high-sec. I wonder if opinions are still this?

The Eighth paragraph is about why Incursions always seem to happen in Amarrian space. CCP says they happen there because if you pick a high-sec constellation at random, the probability is greatest that it is an Amarrian constellation.

The benefits of Incursions as a social activity was praised in the closing paragraphs. The CSM said that improvements to Eve Voice, Tagging of enemies on the overview, and Fleet Command tools (especially with respect to knowing how many people are in your fleet) Would be Incursion boosts.

If you made it this far. We're probably going to see Incursion sites changed to make the ships within them more probabilistic. Vanguard and also the Nation's Consolidation Network could see significant changes to their mechanics.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#127 - 2012-01-18 01:13:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Andrea Roche wrote:

The Mittani abused his postion as a CSM to initiate a war vs all mining barges in high sec.
Now Darius is also abusing his position to do this.
As a CSM you should not be forcing your type of gaming into the rest of eve nor should you be using your position to carry out your private vandettas OR you will fail as CSM.


How did they "abuse" of their position?
I mean, you don't need to be CSM at all to suicide gank stuff. There are plenty of regular corps which in the past have done mass miners kills, mass missions "interdiction" and much more.


Dzajic wrote:

So mr Darius III; how come that you as CSM took a nearly completely different position on Incursions than one you have in game? Hypocrisy much? Trying to be buddy buddy with CCP while pissing on their playerbase while they don't look?


The CSM is not composed of 1 member, the collective decisions come from multiple sources confronting on their positions.
If he can't convince the majority of something, then his point of view won't get taken just as is. Might be taken partially or even not at all.
Tauranon
Weeesearch
CAStabouts
#128 - 2012-01-18 02:34:31 UTC
Andrea Roche wrote:
What i am about to say is to all parties.
I think the level of hypocracy coming from the CSMs lately is disapointing.
You are supose to stand for the overal of the game not just the pvp section.
There are no lack of people in 0.0.
The problem is when you set blue everyone around you then ofcource you have no one to shoot at.
There is a negative effect to blue everyone around you!


I can't see the hypocrisy at all I'm afraid. The reality is they became CSMs by being popular players. They didn't become popular players by becoming CSMs, and being a CSM is not about abandoning being a player, or refraining from doing something perfectly normal like pve content. The forums are a perfectly fine place to recruit a 40 man fleet or two, to take down the biggest baddest pve content in the game.

Quote:

There are plenty of people that do not play this game for the pvp. From my part pvp is it the most fun part of this game but to others its not.
The Mittani abused his postion as a CSM to initiate a war vs all mining barges in high sec.
Now Darius is also abusing his position to do this.
As a CSM you should not be forcing your type of gaming into the rest of eve nor should you be using your position to carry out your private vandettas OR you will fail as CSM.


The war against barges was initiated by Helicity Boson, who is not the Mittani. Goons ran their own unrelated campaign against ice mining in gallente space.


Fronkfurter McSheebleton
Horse Feathers
CAStabouts
#129 - 2012-01-18 06:48:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Fronkfurter McSheebleton
Clementina wrote:
I read the CSM notes with respect to Incursion sites.

The first thing that is interesting is that the notes are not complete spinless nerf-herding. I'll comment a little.

In the first paragraph, Vanguard sites are accused of being to easy. There is a lot to be said about Vanguard sites and their difficulty. However, it would be difficult to make them harder because lots of the toughness is in getting the 10 people together to do them. If it was as easy to find and lead 20 random people as it is to find and lead 10, the preference would be for Assaults.
It's easy as hell to get 10 people together. 40 people, even...there's at least one group that runs headquarters fleets on a regular basis, every day. The hard part comes from the fact that vanguards are so packed during peak hours, that you have to have a fleet full of nothing but mares/machs/vindis or legions in order to get paid.

Quote:
The Forth paragraph is about the Nation's Consolidation Network which has a cruiser's gate and a battleship's gate. The CSM has told CCP that this is very unpopular because to do it some people have to reship into cruisers.
Not to mention the fact that it's SLOW. You could remove an entire room from it and it'd still be slower than the other sites.

Quote:
Very shiny fleets can shoot DDD, but unshiny fleets have to shoot AAD AAD D or some similar variation.

This actually has as much to do with tank as it does with damage output. T1 hulls have a habit of being a tad squishy. Their lower dps output doesn't help either, though, since they have a lot longer to be shot at. Even a fleet full of T2 fit navy faction ships (or tankier T1 hulls, like the rokh) can relatively easily run them DDD, though.

Quote:
If you made it this far. We're probably going to see Incursion sites changed to make the ships within them more probabilistic. Vanguard and also the Nation's Consolidation Network could see significant changes to their mechanics.

The TTPH headquarters site also needs work....like the NCN, you could remove one of its first two rooms and it'd still be slower than the other two sites, though not by much when compared to the TCRC. (which is harder than the mothership site, btw...)

thhief ghabmoef

Gizan
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#130 - 2012-01-18 07:09:03 UTC
Dzajic wrote:


Edit. No one is doing lowsec and null incursions. They just despawn at full red bars after 5 days or a week. This is true for so much cases that few exceptions are irrelevant. They could pay 10x as much as they pay now (which is already 45% more than highsec ones) and you'd still have a microscopic number of people doing them.



goons get an incursion in their space every week and the bar is almost full!. whether they kill the mom or not doesnt matter cuz they are getting even more isk/hour then the rest of us and they have an incursion every week...
Darius III
Interstellar eXodus
The Initiative.
#131 - 2012-01-18 07:12:43 UTC
Theres a lot of misinformation in this thread. While it is true I don't mind griefing carebears Pirate I also want people to be happy and make money. My motivation is to publicize the issues I have with incursions currently as well as have fun and get some lifesaving tears.

Incursion money is not balanced with the rest of Eve. Incursion money is not balanced within the incursions themselves. The vanguard sites need a nerf and the assault sites need a buff in payouts. I would like to see more LP's for killing the mom. Also incursions being more spread out would be in order IMO.

Everyone seems to be saying that I want to end incursion availability for everyone.This is 100% false. We discussed finishing all sites and decided against it. We did this partly so we could grief the bears in the existing incursion because it would be so overpopulated it would be easy to sucker people in to our non-repping logi fleet. Also we left it open so people could do their thing and enjoy eve and make some money, and because I was paid 500m. If it was all about the tears, we would have finished all sites.

While it is kinda cool everyone thinks it is ME ME ME really Krissada is the main guy. I just get some guys and try to act cool.

I plan on running as the incursion candidate, I have demonstrated knowledge and ability, as well as a desire to help my hisec brothers out. I will vote for FAIR rebalancing of incursions and to bring risk VS Reward more into line with everything else. (for those of you who may have missed it-I like to troll too).

People have literally come out of the woodwork to help out. Special thanks to Cigarellos for donating 10 Typhoons for the fleet and T2 fittings for same including trimarks. Woot! Double thanks to Kill it With Fire and Skunkworks for making it happen and again to Krissada for being the glue and inspiration and main promulgator. Good times were had by all..well all of us anyway. Look for video/audio tomorrow D3

Hmmm

Jarnis McPieksu
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#132 - 2012-01-18 07:24:16 UTC
Dzajic wrote:
First I wanted to rage so I walked away... that I cooled down and loled, and that I loled again.


You, dear sir, seem to understand EVE.

(Unlike so many others in this bad thread)
Tian Nu
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#133 - 2012-01-18 07:25:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Tian Nu
Jarnis McPieksu wrote:

this bad thread


+1 was fun the first 24h now is just stupid

Father O'Malley about Darius III begging for whelp: “Hows that working out for ya ? I make it 02:21 and all I see is you begging Riverini to get numbers and trying to recruit from the incursion public channel.”

Umega
Solis Mensa
#134 - 2012-01-18 07:28:23 UTC
If someone punches me in the face.. I punch them back.

Tears help fuel some of the 'events' in highsec, influenced by nullsec. Which is true.. it does help motivate and boost the troops. At the base level tho.. these events have other meanings and agendas. Usually boiling down to a nullsec alliance's balance sheet via one way or another.

Just like it is Economics to you.. it is to them. Whether they admit so or not. They likely won't, and they shouldn't for a variety of reasons.

And nullsec players get it. You highsec players don't. You think you should live in some invuln bubble overheated by your tears to 100% resists.. delicate flowers that shall not be stomped upon because you 'pay to play this game like everyone else' and you believe that cause you wish to be highsec mains, your somehow different. And that's the thing.. you're not different. A nullsec main and a highsec main, wh, low.. whatever. You're all PLAYERS of EVE. I believe those outside of highsec get this..

And they use it to their advantage, and rightfully so. This is EVE. You signed up for it, just as they did. You all play the same game.. and they 'exploit' you time and again because of how naive and easy it is to use you for their personal gains. It is by no means illegal exploit in the sense of breaking rules and mechanics (most of the time).. in the grand, public events that happen to which I speak of, they are legitament.

Stop crying and actually play the game. If there are thousands of you negatively effected by this, quit being lil bitches so easily slapped around by your nullsec pimps. Do something and hit them back one way or another. You'd be surprised what several hundred people with a common goal can accomplish if you stop being lazy whiney lil bitches. Nullsec players are doing something about their ingame problems, INGAME. Do the same.

Quit making excuses.. there are no excuses when there is no effort to fix the problem yourself.. NONE. IMO the more demented people are the ones that ***** fit outside of the game, than those that simply do immoral acts in a fantasy game and leave it there. Keep it in the game, do something in the game.

A lot of you simply make it harder on yourself.. and you will never get this Game.

If someone punches you in the face.. punch them back.
Fronkfurter McSheebleton
Horse Feathers
CAStabouts
#135 - 2012-01-18 07:32:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Fronkfurter McSheebleton
Umega wrote:
And nullsec players get it. You highsec players don't. You think you should live in some invuln bubble overheated by your tears to 100% resists.. delicate flowers that shall not be stomped upon because you 'pay to play this game like everyone else' and you believe that cause you wish to be highsec mains, your somehow different. And that's the thing.. you're not different. A nullsec main and a highsec main, wh, low.. whatever. You're all PLAYERS of EVE. I believe those outside of highsec get this..

I do believe you've vastly underestimated the percentage of people that use incursions to fund pvp.

Also, just out of curiosity....how do you make isk?

thhief ghabmoef

Takis Carter
Interstellar Apathy
#136 - 2012-01-18 07:34:21 UTC
Darius III wrote:
Theres a lot of misinformation in this thread. While it is true I don't mind griefing carebears Pirate I also want people to be happy and make money. My motivation is to publicize the issues I have with incursions currently as well as have fun and get some lifesaving tears.

Incursion money is not balanced with the rest of Eve. Incursion money is not balanced within the incursions themselves. The vanguard sites need a nerf and the assault sites need a buff in payouts. I would like to see more LP's for killing the mom. Also incursions being more spread out would be in order IMO.

Everyone seems to be saying that I want to end incursion availability for everyone.This is 100% false. We discussed finishing all sites and decided against it. We did this partly so we could grief the bears in the existing incursion because it would be so overpopulated it would be easy to sucker people in to our non-repping logi fleet. Also we left it open so people could do their thing and enjoy eve and make some money, and because I was paid 500m. If it was all about the tears, we would have finished all sites.

While it is kinda cool everyone thinks it is ME ME ME really Krissada is the main guy. I just get some guys and try to act cool.

I plan on running as the incursion candidate, I have demonstrated knowledge and ability, as well as a desire to help my hisec brothers out. I will vote for FAIR rebalancing of incursions and to bring risk VS Reward more into line with everything else. (for those of you who may have missed it-I like to troll too).

People have literally come out of the woodwork to help out. Special thanks to Cigarellos for donating 10 Typhoons for the fleet and T2 fittings for same including trimarks. Woot! Double thanks to Kill it With Fire and Skunkworks for making it happen and again to Krissada for being the glue and inspiration and main promulgator. Good times were had by all..well all of us anyway. Look for video/audio tomorrow D3



Whilst I can't help but agree with some of this, I also can't help but despise people who feel they can force their views on others by such means. If you have a valid point to make (and you may well have, to a degree) then stick to the forums and CSM etc, and leave other people alone to play the game.

My own feeling is that High-Sec has long needed something like incursions, and whilst they may need a little tweaking, I see no good reason that the self-important 0.0 corps/alliances out there who believe they are the most important thing in the Eve universe, should have any right to dictate how it plays, to others.
Kahega Amielden
Rifterlings
#137 - 2012-01-18 07:57:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Kahega Amielden
Quote:
Whilst I can't help but agree with some of this, I also can't help but despise people who feel they can force their views on others by such means. If you have a valid point to make (and you may well have, to a degree) then stick to the forums and CSM etc, and leave other people alone to play the game.

...

Welcome to EVE? Exactly what part of it has made you think thus far that the design philosophy is "No one is allowed to attack or inconvenience anyone else ever"?
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#138 - 2012-01-18 07:58:28 UTC
Takis Carter wrote:


Whilst I can't help but agree with some of this, I also can't help but despise people who feel they can force their views on others by such means. If you have a valid point to make (and you may well have, to a degree) then stick to the forums and CSM etc, and leave other people alone to play the game.

My own feeling is that High-Sec has long needed something like incursions, and whilst they may need a little tweaking, I see no good reason that the self-important 0.0 corps/alliances out there who believe they are the most important thing in the Eve universe, should have any right to dictate how it plays, to others.


There is this little detail: this is an unconsensual PvP game whose very intro shows people ruthlessly ascending to positions of power.

Exactly like those despisable individuals attack your golden eggs chicken, you can attack in turn and defend your interests.

After all, being owners of multi-billion ships shows you do have the money to fight back.
Umega
Solis Mensa
#139 - 2012-01-18 08:01:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Umega
Fronkfurter McSheebleton wrote:
Umega wrote:
And nullsec players get it. You highsec players don't. You think you should live in some invuln bubble overheated by your tears to 100% resists.. delicate flowers that shall not be stomped upon because you 'pay to play this game like everyone else' and you believe that cause you wish to be highsec mains, your somehow different. And that's the thing.. you're not different. A nullsec main and a highsec main, wh, low.. whatever. You're all PLAYERS of EVE. I believe those outside of highsec get this..

I do believe you've vastly underestimated the percentage of people that use incursions to fund pvp.

Also, just out of curiosity....how do you make isk?


Perhaps I do underestimate. If they don't like what is happening.. they can, and should.. do something about it ingame.

I don't see how I make Isk as being the slighest bit relevent. I don't do Incursions, they are boring. I don't take advantage of ppl that don't deserve it.. which is why I posted in the first place. I have no horse in this race ultimately.. because..

I do find this whole thing hilarious. And applaud those involved for making a stand ingame against something they dislike.. altho I think there is more to it than that..

It's pretty damn funny at face value. And this is EVE.. do something about it just like they are, ingame. That was and is the whole damn point of my post.. they get it, others don't and sadly never will.

EDIT: PvP players.. PvE players.. it is an excuse. A bullshit excuse. Everyone is an EVE player.. it is that simple. Making it more than that is denying the foundation and core of this Sandbox PvP MMO. All in the same box.. given same tools.
Endeavour Starfleet
#140 - 2012-01-18 09:33:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Endeavour Starfleet
Darius III wrote:
Theres a lot of misinformation in this thread. While it is true I don't mind griefing carebears Pirate I also want people to be happy and make money. My motivation is to publicize the issues I have with incursions currently as well as have fun and get some lifesaving tears.


No you don't in my opinion. These people are not brick squad and will likely never vote for you and you want those that are alts of your corps to be forced back into CTAs. Stop trying to hide this. You've lost power and you want it back.

Darius III wrote:
Incursion money is not balanced with the rest of Eve. Incursion money is not balanced within the incursions themselves. The vanguard sites need a nerf and the assault sites need a buff in payouts. I would like to see more LP's for killing the mom. Also incursions being more spread out would be in order IMO.


There was already a discussion in general about this. Explaining why only small changes are needed to vanguards without touching the payouts. Not like you care in my opinion.

Darius III wrote:
Everyone seems to be saying that I want to end incursion availability for everyone.This is 100% false. We discussed finishing all sites and decided against it. We did this partly so we could grief the bears in the existing incursion because it would be so overpopulated it would be easy to sucker people in to our non-repping logi fleet. Also we left it open so people could do their thing and enjoy eve and make some money, and because I was paid 500m. If it was all about the tears, we would have finished all sites.


Bolded part is the Only thing that is even halfway true in this paragraph in my opinion.

Darius III wrote:
While it is kinda cool everyone thinks it is ME ME ME really Krissada is the main guy. I just get some guys and try to act cool.


Please don't even try to hide it now. You are at risk of being voted out of the CSM you are losing members to incursions. You pulled a stunt in my opinion. Try to claim it was "for teh good of teh game" all you want but few are buying it.

Darius III wrote:
I plan on running as the incursion candidate, I have demonstrated knowledge and ability, as well as a desire to help my hisec brothers out. I will vote for FAIR rebalancing of incursions and to bring risk VS Reward more into line with everything else. (for those of you who may have missed it-I like to troll too).


You sir know absolutely nothing meaningful about incursions in my opinion and do not not need to be given a chance to represent them as a member of the CSM in my opinion.

Tho thanks for pulling this crap. Now BTL and others can galvanize those that actually care that Incursions help non alliance players have a chance to group and have fun in the game of EVE galvanize them and get them to the polls to defeat you in the next election.

(Forum only allows 5 quotes so I am quoting Darius III) People have literally come out of the woodwork to help out. Special thanks to Cigarellos for donating 10 Typhoons for the fleet and T2 fittings for same including trimarks. Woot! Double thanks to Kill it With Fire and Skunkworks for making it happen and again to Krissada for being the glue and inspiration and main promulgator. Good times were had by all..well all of us anyway. Look for video/audio tomorrow D3 ENDQUOTE

I am glad to see that many that hate incursions come out of the woodwork and burn their characters out of any chance of being in a decent fleet in my opinion. This will encourage incursion running fleets and BTL to develop better methods of keeping blacklisted members out of fleets. New software and hiring of PIs to also find out who the blacklisted characters are alts of and have them blacklisted as well. Trying to wreck an entire playstyle that doesn't involve defend an alliance moon goo supply should have serious in game consequences for said characters.




Of course all of this revolves around if BTL even cares anymore. People continued to spam their fits and act as if this doesn't matter at all. And to be honest. If it weren't for your actions in my opinion obviously being about focusing you and nullsec power. I would not give a damn as well because it is shiny fleets actually perishing from your fake rep fleets. And if they do not actually DO something after this madness and work to vote you out and make better defenses against this in the future. I will vote for you myself.