These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Character names, Alpha clones and Reputations.

Author
bardghost Isu
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#21 - 2016-09-23 17:02:13 UTC
Chopper Rollins wrote:
bardghost Isu wrote:

Its not so much a list of baddies, Just a list of things that can get you a reputation that's FREAKIN AWESOME!.


Seriously, your idea of a bad reputation is different from mine.
Now i know some of us like to crouch backwards into the future in a permanently defensive posture, cringing from even the threat of one of life's slaps or stings, but you have the option to DROP TROU and sprint merrily into the fire waving a hatchet.
I mean the choice is yours.

The amount of evil one of these alphas could get up to isn't worth hiding from.
Cycling catalyst derps to pick at hisec warts is lame, like most things that happen in hisec, lame and paltry.








That's not how I mean bad reputation per se. Some of them to some people would be pretty cool to some people. And I'm not against alpha's being able to do them. I can deal with it,

The problem comes when there is someone out there that can do all they want to screw people over (Not a problem), but then walk away from it without any consequences because they can just roll a new FREE account. We wouldn't have that luxury as we have a lot more assets and SP to be dealing with.


Plus i'm waiting for people to keep rolling accounts and making neo-Nazi comments and such in local. This has the potential to tear a good part of the community apart, I don't want to see that.
bardghost Isu
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#22 - 2016-09-23 17:05:02 UTC
KaarBaak wrote:
bardghost Isu wrote:
Cristl wrote:
[quote=bardghost Isu]Known Ganker, Awoxer, Thief, Pirate, Scammer.



Account > Playstyle > Bad Rep > Throw acc > New Account > Playstyle > ......
Account > Train skills > Switch to account > Play, Bad rep > Throw > Train new > .....

Hope that gets the point across, With a trial you cant do that as you are time limited.


Edit: I may have originally misread your comment slightly but have amended my reply.


Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I kinda thought that was the point of Alphas? People can experiment with different playstyles and maybe get into a different aspect of the game? Or new players can learn what they like and what works without being [financially] chained to an account?

You see a problem. I see a key component of the functionality.

Abuse has been covered ad nauseum in the thread you chose not to post in.

KB


Sure people can experiment with alpha's, and I don't mind the not being chained part. Its just that there IS (Not maybe) people out there ready to abuse it.

Oh and FYI all those things put in the thread I chose not to post in, I have seen very little response to them because of the amount of comments about the change. Kind of feels to me like CCP want to drown out the negative concerns by getting all the positive ones to outweigh them.
KaarBaak
Squirrel Team
#23 - 2016-09-23 18:41:07 UTC
bardghost Isu wrote:
KaarBaak wrote:
bardghost Isu wrote:
Cristl wrote:
[quote=bardghost Isu]Known Ganker, Awoxer, Thief, Pirate, Scammer.



Account > Playstyle > Bad Rep > Throw acc > New Account > Playstyle > ......
Account > Train skills > Switch to account > Play, Bad rep > Throw > Train new > .....

Hope that gets the point across, With a trial you cant do that as you are time limited.


Edit: I may have originally misread your comment slightly but have amended my reply.


Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I kinda thought that was the point of Alphas? People can experiment with different playstyles and maybe get into a different aspect of the game? Or new players can learn what they like and what works without being [financially] chained to an account?

You see a problem. I see a key component of the functionality.

Abuse has been covered ad nauseum in the thread you chose not to post in.

KB


Sure people can experiment with alpha's, and I don't mind the not being chained part. Its just that there IS (Not maybe) people out there ready to abuse it.

Oh and FYI all those things put in the thread I chose not to post in, I have seen very little response to them because of the amount of comments about the change. Kind of feels to me like CCP want to drown out the negative concerns by getting all the positive ones to outweigh them.

TBH, there are people out there ready to take advantage of any change. 2% increase to cargo capacity of Falcon? Boom! Find a way to exploit it.

The Alphas are a good idea and CCP is managing it in a way to keep out 99% of the potential exploits. The remaining 1% will be patched in the days that follow or will just become a new playstyle or "content creation" method.

I realize people don't like change. Considering CCP is tries to implement change for 30,000 highly-organized min-maxers, I think they do a pretty good job managing it.

Some folks will like it. Some folks won't. Some folks will ignore it. Some folks will adapt and maybe exploit it into their playstyle.

The concerns in your OP are pretty minimal. I believe that your tinhattery about CCP ignoring concerns is pretty much the same for every minor change that comes about. You can stress and lose sleep over it. You can contribute to the appropriate threads in the hopes that CCP might take them into consideration (but don't be disappointed if they don't respond.) Or you can just login and go about your business, because at the end of the day this will impact individuals very very little. How much you let it impact you...well, CCP can't control that.

KB

Dum Spiro Spero

bardghost Isu
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#24 - 2016-09-23 19:33:46 UTC  |  Edited by: bardghost Isu
KaarBaak wrote:


TBH, there are people out there ready to take advantage of any change. 2% increase to cargo capacity of Falcon? Boom! Find a way to exploit it.

The Alphas are a good idea and CCP is managing it in a way to keep out 99% of the potential exploits. The remaining 1% will be patched in the days that follow or will just become a new playstyle or "content creation" method.

I realize people don't like change. Considering CCP is tries to implement change for 30,000 highly-organized min-maxers, I think they do a pretty good job managing it.

Some folks will like it. Some folks won't. Some folks will ignore it. Some folks will adapt and maybe exploit it into their playstyle.

The concerns in your OP are pretty minimal. I believe that your tinhattery about CCP ignoring concerns is pretty much the same for every minor change that comes about. You can stress and lose sleep over it. You can contribute to the appropriate threads in the hopes that CCP might take them into consideration (but don't be disappointed if they don't respond.) Or you can just login and go about your business, because at the end of the day this will impact individuals very very little. How much you let it impact you...well, CCP can't control that.

KB



I know what you mean, I hope it is done right. This was just a realisation me and a few alliance buddies had. Yeah I'm probably thinking too much of it. But at the end of the day I want to see this done right, Because a lot of us fear it being done wrong and driving away some of the decent people who play the game. Only for them to be replaced by douchebags and those out to ruin a great community. I think that's probably my main fear with the alpha aspect, I've seen F2P communities before they're not good.

A few weeks ago I was in a game on LOL and something kept throwing out Neo-Nazi comments, I'd already had 3 games of it. Reports felt like they were doing crap but its the best you can do. In that case I just quit and decided I'd rather take a 2 week suspension for leaving matches rather than put up with that kind of crap.

That's what I see people doing here if that kind of language takes mainstream hold, but they won't come back

Yeah sure there are already alliances out there pushing it, but its not there at every turn, its not in your face every moment of play.
Lulu Lunette
Savage Moon Society
#25 - 2016-09-23 21:46:41 UTC
I think this is gonna be totally overblown, no offense.

Sure, there will be alpha clones used by older players to do ganking, maybe even genuinely new players will get into that. At the same time though, New Eden's economy gonna have a nice boost and there will be plenty of people that don't succumb to highsec treachery and go and do things like the Serpentis Hideaways or maybe go on public fleets and that sort of thing.

Free and no pressure is a good feature I have a good feeling about the upcoming clone states.

@lunettelulu7

Anasta Tahyan
Doomheim
#26 - 2016-09-23 22:10:53 UTC
If this would lead to an increase in ganking it might very well be intended by CCP since earlier studies have shown that players who get blown up early on in their EVE 'career' often choose to keep playing while players who grind PVE for a month without much meaningful player interaction quit.
Mephiztopheleze
Laphroaig Inc.
#27 - 2016-09-23 22:33:37 UTC
More than any design change or game mechanics tweak or new skin or graphics update, EVE desperately needs more people logged in, undocked and shooting one another.

Alpha accounts have a lot of promise in this regard. Hopefully, they'll get new people into the game who will enjoy it and maybe start subscribing.

This will be good for everyone. You, me, the Alpha player having enough fun that they sub and, not least, CCP.

Occasional Resident Newbie Correspondent for TMC: http://themittani.com/search/site/mephiztopheleze

This is my Forum Main. My Combat Alt is sambo Inkura

Eternus8lux8lucis
Guardians of the Gate
RAZOR Alliance
#28 - 2016-09-23 23:56:46 UTC
The neo-Nazi type issue will NEVER be an issue. CCP will squash that so fast itll make the guys head spin as he and all his alts, alpha or omegas, get the heaviest banhammer known to the viking world thrown at them.

The rest of the abuse of accounts is well documented in other threads. But in the end it will only create a range of new prices and new supply/demand to resettle at that CCP can tweak over the long term and really doesnt change much tbh as most major or even minor rebalances create such new supply/demand curves already.

As for what it SHOULD bring in? Thats easy. Anyone that likes Eve, has played it and wants to but cant afford it but enjoys the gameplay enough to keep an account. Then if you make isk further than the alphas skills you can buy injectors to add skills that arent a part of an alpha that if you WISH to or have spare isk or dollars sub and then use. It means you wont be shut out anymore if you have RL shitfests going on and you need the RL cash on something else or if you get bored of the game and want to play something else you dont have to ever stop completely anymore youll still have access to the game and game play.

So things like unsubbing accounts to take breaks wont be needed. You can just not pay for it and feel the sunk cost fallacy of the $$ or time spent plexing being "ugh" in nature for what you get out of the game atm.

For CCP it will mean WAY less of a yoyo in subs as people get bored, need breaks, go GRRRCCP!!! or whatever and unsub. As now these people can still log in every now and again and go do things without worrying about making that plex isk or dropping that cash. You can still fleet up, do most Eve activities of all sorts and still be a productive member of any group or team or even solo without that pressure. But you know that there are benefits to omega clones and its now your CHOICE. Its not all or nothing, its all or something at least. And THAT is a smart move by CCP for actual in space numbers.Blink

Have you heard anything I've said?

You said it's all circling the drain, the whole universe. Right?

That's right.

Had to end sometime.

sero Hita
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#29 - 2016-09-24 07:05:16 UTC  |  Edited by: sero Hita
Elenahina wrote:
I'll be curious to see how hard it is for Alpha accounts to join corporations in terms of people actually recruiting them - because of how limited they are.


My corp (on my main), are already planning how the alpahes can be a wortwhile ressource in terms off lowsec "insta" locking thrasher gatecamp gangs. We do them now for newbs and vets alike, and people have fun on coms. The hope is some will subscribe for the SP heavier doctrines after having tasted the fun of playing the game and those who just want stay alpha are also fine.

"I'm all for pvp, don't get me wrong. I've ganked in Empire, blobed in low sec. Got T-shirts from every which-where.. But to be forced into a pvp confrontation that I didn't want is wrong ccp." RealFlisker

Geronimo McVain
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2016-09-24 07:44:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Geronimo McVain
Elenahina wrote:
I'll be curious to see how hard it is for Alpha accounts to join corporations in terms of people actually recruiting them - because of how limited they are.

For some time Alphas are not different from new toons. So corps that accept noobs will have no problems accepting Alphas. IMHO nobody will stay a long time as an alpha when he hits the skill limit. You either sub or quit. The nice thing with Alphas is, that at this time they've got enough experience and skillpoints to Plex an account. I don't imagine alphas as a playing "class" but as a prolonged test phase. If Eve hooks you, you are in, if not you are out. The limits are that hard, that staying for a longer time as an alpha when you can't progress any more will be extremely frustrating and thats what CCP is counting on.

BTW: the mentioned problems will not be problems of Alphas but on the sociopathic behavior of us, the subscribed players. Noobs don't know enough to be a real annoyance apart from shittalk, which a lot of vet are experts in, and naming, which CCP will quickly take care of.
Vincent Pelletier
Pelletier Imports and Exports
#31 - 2016-09-24 10:24:13 UTC
KaarBaak wrote:
I believe that your tinhattery about CCP ignoring concerns is pretty much the same for every minor change that comes about.


Very often I get the feeling that CCP doesn't fully understand the implications of a change, then proposes it to the CSM who instantly understand how to exploit it fully but because it benefits them they keep quiet.

Just like the new 400k starting SP with overheating and everything. I can fully see CCP going "we're going to increase starter SP, CSM could you think of a few skills that would be useful" and the 0.0 sock puppet CSM with gank alts going "well uuuuhm, overheating would be nice and lets make it so people can get into destroyers really easy not having to spend cash and time on support skill, for no real reason ofcourse.... just because". and CCP going "uuuhh ok".
Pleasure Hub Node-514
Pleasure Hub Hotline
#32 - 2016-09-24 22:47:41 UTC
In terms of mass shitposting accounts, I think we've already been though this to some extent with free Dust 514 accounts. People survived (except for the shut down). It is fun reviewing the **** dust bunnies said in game.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCRLm-VVyB0

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxKiN7Kt1Eh2bER5Z3FQNTAwYUU

In terms of corralling in-game and forum behavior there's certainly some improvements that can be made to moderation. I'm curious how the Valkyrie forum community is fairing with Discourse as a community moderation tool

'One night hauler' The tell all story of a pleasure bot in Jita 4-4

Piugattuk
Litla Sundlaugin
#33 - 2016-09-25 05:55:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Piugattuk
If I can use an alpha clone most likely I will use it to make incursions into WH space, null, and low sec, cause OP makes a valid point, I won't worry about trashing that toon to hell and back, on the flip side tho....it may make low Snickers happy as people will be more willing to go into those regions because people won't fret too much about alpha toons, I got an escalation today, didn't go because its in low sec, if I had an alpha clone it would have been on!

Maybe if CCP could give 1 alpha clone to paid accounts then it would be very useful to have that toon on our main accounts.
Serene Repose
#34 - 2016-09-25 07:13:26 UTC
Nothing will damage this community more than it being over run by people with nothing invested in it.

We must accommodate the idiocracy.

Previous page12