These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Character names, Alpha clones and Reputations.

Author
bardghost Isu
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#1 - 2016-09-23 09:17:56 UTC  |  Edited by: bardghost Isu
So it occurred to me earlier some of the potential dangers that come with alpha accounts and a lack of consequences for them when something bad happens. (Might I remind people that consequences are a vital part of this game)

Don't get me wrong I'm not against alpha's being introduced, But it needs to be done correctly. It has the potential to lose CCP a fair few subscribers who will probably earn them more than any alpha could.


So my point is simple for those of us who subscribe if we do bad thing intentionally or accidentally it sticks, you earn a reputation.

Known Ganker, Awoxer, Thief, Pirate, Scammer. Awesome FC, Alliance leader, Funder of major wars - With that you do you earn a reputation, Good or bad. That sticks.

Okay you could create a new account, but you lose some of your SP (Not as much as you used to due to injectors),Standings with empires, you may lose assets.
For a lot of people its a fair bit of stuff to lose. Plus the RL cash you have invested into the account
And if you want to take skills with you, then be prepared to stump up cash to do so.

However for an alpha, that's disposable.
It opens up ways for people to come in do anything they want from the list of actions that can get you a bad reputation and simply create a new account for free and lose very little SP. There is no consequence to the person using the alpha. It could result in:

war-decs = Create new account
kill-rights = Create new account
-10 standings = Create new account
The list go's on and on


I understand that any of us who subscribe could do that, But it'd be a lot to lose for us I'm not prepared to lose 40+ mil SP, and even less prepared to stump up £50+ to take it with me

An alpha doesn't have that to worry about, they cant extract skills anyway, so just create a skill plan and start again, be done within 15 days.. Anyone dedicated to cause trouble could just create 2 accounts at a time so they have a backup for when one has to be disposed of, then setup another whilst using the spare. Bang problem solved.


It seems too abusable for people and could only serve to damage the community in the long run. I'm also fully expecting to see people creating disposable accounts just to be throwing around, Sexist, Homophobic, racist, Etc... references anywhere is space.

And before people suggest doing IP bans to people that to that, All I would have to do is call my ISP to get my IP changed. (Might be different in other countries)


Apologies for a wall of text but I feel it needs to be said, And not in a thread that it'll be lost in just to keep people quiet.


TL'DR As subscribers we have things to lose if we want to do bad things on our accounts, An alpha won't they can just create a new account if anything goes wrong and lose next to nothing.
TheVirus32
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#2 - 2016-09-23 09:32:47 UTC
only future will tell :/, but you do make a point.
Erebus Vain
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#3 - 2016-09-23 10:54:17 UTC
bardghost Isu wrote:
So it occurred to me earlier some of the potential dangers that come with alpha accounts and a lack of consequences for them when something bad happens. (Might I remind people that consequences are a vital part of this game)

Don't get me wrong I'm not against alpha's being introduced, But it needs to be done correctly. It has the potential to lose CCP a fair few subscribers who will probably earn them more than any alpha could.


So my point is simple for those of us who subscribe if we do bad thing intentionally or accidentally it sticks, you earn a reputation.

Known Ganker, Awoxer, Thief, Pirate, Scammer. Awesome FC, Alliance leader, Funder of major wars - With that you do you earn a reputation, Good or bad. That sticks.

Okay you could create a new account, but you lose some of your SP (Not as much as you used to due to injectors),Standings with empires, you may lose assets.
For a lot of people its a fair bit of stuff to lose. Plus the RL cash you have invested into the account
And if you want to take skills with you, then be prepared to stump up cash to do so.

However for an alpha, that's disposable.
It opens up ways for people to come in do anything they want from the list of actions that can get you a bad reputation and simply create a new account for free and lose very little SP. There is no consequence to the person using the alpha. It could result in:

war-decs = Create new account
kill-rights = Create new account
-10 standings = Create new account
The list go's on and on


I understand that any of us who subscribe could do that, But it'd be a lot to lose for us I'm not prepared to lose 40+ mil SP, and even less prepared to stump up £50+ to take it with me

An alpha doesn't have that to worry about, they cant extract skills anyway, so just create a skill plan and start again, be done within 15 days.. Anyone dedicated to cause trouble could just create 2 accounts at a time so they have a backup for when one has to be disposed of, then setup another whilst using the spare. Bang problem solved.


It seems too abusable for people and could only serve to damage the community in the long run. I'm also fully expecting to see people creating disposable accounts just to be throwing around, Sexist, Homophobic, racist, Etc... references anywhere is space.

And before people suggest doing IP bans to people that to that, All I would have to do is call my ISP to get my IP changed. (Might be different in other countries)


Apologies for a wall of text but I feel it needs to be said, And not in a thread that it'll be lost in just to keep people quiet.


TL'DR As subscribers we have things to lose if we want to do bad things on our accounts, An alpha won't they can just create a new account if anything goes wrong and lose next to nothing.



This an interesting idea of how it "could" go. Abused mechanics (mostly) get changed by CCP once they are a hindrance to the overall development of the game though.

good to think of these things, but making your own thread and not just adding this into the official thread means i expect this to be locked.

good thoughts, wrong place.
Geronimo McVain
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2016-09-23 10:57:48 UTC
Try doing bad things with a new toon. Alphas can't extract so you loose ALL your SP.
IMHO if someone is up to mischief and cares enough to figure it out how to he will most likely sub to do more. Your possibilities as an alpha are rather limited.
bardghost Isu
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#5 - 2016-09-23 11:17:19 UTC
Erebus Vain wrote:
bardghost Isu wrote:
So it occurred to me earlier some of the potential dangers that come with alpha accounts and a lack of consequences for them when something bad happens. (Might I remind people that consequences are a vital part of this game)

Don't get me wrong I'm not against alpha's being introduced, But it needs to be done correctly. It has the potential to lose CCP a fair few subscribers who will probably earn them more than any alpha could.


So my point is simple for those of us who subscribe if we do bad thing intentionally or accidentally it sticks, you earn a reputation.

Known Ganker, Awoxer, Thief, Pirate, Scammer. Awesome FC, Alliance leader, Funder of major wars - With that you do you earn a reputation, Good or bad. That sticks.

Okay you could create a new account, but you lose some of your SP (Not as much as you used to due to injectors),Standings with empires, you may lose assets.
For a lot of people its a fair bit of stuff to lose. Plus the RL cash you have invested into the account
And if you want to take skills with you, then be prepared to stump up cash to do so.

However for an alpha, that's disposable.
It opens up ways for people to come in do anything they want from the list of actions that can get you a bad reputation and simply create a new account for free and lose very little SP. There is no consequence to the person using the alpha. It could result in:

war-decs = Create new account
kill-rights = Create new account
-10 standings = Create new account
The list go's on and on


I understand that any of us who subscribe could do that, But it'd be a lot to lose for us I'm not prepared to lose 40+ mil SP, and even less prepared to stump up £50+ to take it with me

An alpha doesn't have that to worry about, they cant extract skills anyway, so just create a skill plan and start again, be done within 15 days.. Anyone dedicated to cause trouble could just create 2 accounts at a time so they have a backup for when one has to be disposed of, then setup another whilst using the spare. Bang problem solved.


It seems too abusable for people and could only serve to damage the community in the long run. I'm also fully expecting to see people creating disposable accounts just to be throwing around, Sexist, Homophobic, racist, Etc... references anywhere is space.

And before people suggest doing IP bans to people that to that, All I would have to do is call my ISP to get my IP changed. (Might be different in other countries)


Apologies for a wall of text but I feel it needs to be said, And not in a thread that it'll be lost in just to keep people quiet.


TL'DR As subscribers we have things to lose if we want to do bad things on our accounts, An alpha won't they can just create a new account if anything goes wrong and lose next to nothing.



This an interesting idea of how it "could" go. Abused mechanics (mostly) get changed by CCP once they are a hindrance to the overall development of the game though.

good to think of these things, but making your own thread and not just adding this into the official thread means i expect this to be locked.

good thoughts, wrong place.



I expect it to be locked too. However it would be hidden in amongst loads of comments in the other thread and barely acknowledged. Here people can be made aware of the situation, If it gets locked then I'll take it as they don't care about feedback.
bardghost Isu
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#6 - 2016-09-23 11:20:47 UTC
Geronimo McVain wrote:
Try doing bad things with a new toon. Alphas can't extract so you loose ALL your SP.
IMHO if someone is up to mischief and cares enough to figure it out how to he will most likely sub to do more. Your possibilities as an alpha are rather limited.



Yes, I know they cant extract, but they are locked at 5 mil cap.

I'd rather lose a few 5 mil sp accounts that are free than tarnish a 40+ mil sp account that I'd have to:

A) Lose all the 40+ mil sp for a new character
B) Pay £50+ to transfer the sp across

5 Mil SP is next to nothing when you can create an account for free and have one training whilst you use the other and keep chaining it every month.

That's not something I could do with my account. the closest I can come is a trail account, and they are time limited so wiping away training one whilst using another.
Yarosara Ruil
#7 - 2016-09-23 11:40:10 UTC
Here's the thing. Nothing what so ever stops a person from starting hundreds throwaway Alpha accounts with Gallentean characters in them, set them to train every skill allowed to an Alpha to excel at Catalysts and just wait the 2 months or so it takes for them to train up.

After that it is just a matter of biomassing the characters and cycle through them so the ganker has always a new character with fresh standings to gank with at zero cost. There's not even an ISK cost involved since it takes them about thirty minutes doing opportunities and career missions to get everything they need.
Cristl
#8 - 2016-09-23 11:41:44 UTC
bardghost Isu wrote:
Known Ganker, Awoxer, Thief, Pirate, Scammer.

Your choice of 'baddies' only really has one profession (pirate) that requires more than a trial alt's worth of SP anyway. And I'm not sure how that could be abused either.

I'd be more concerned about faction warfare alts which don't have to care about standings, since you can have an army in each militia.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
#9 - 2016-09-23 12:30:10 UTC
bardghost Isu wrote:
Anyone dedicated to cause trouble could just create 2 accounts at a time so they have a backup for when one has to be disposed of, then setup another whilst using the spare. Bang problem solved.
This is the bit that mainly concerns me. Being able to just cycle alts by training one and playing the other then adding new ones each time you chuck and old one out.

bardghost Isu wrote:
And before people suggest doing IP bans to people that to that, All I would have to do is call my ISP to get my IP changed. (Might be different in other countries)
All I have to do is change the MAC address setting on my router and it gives me a new IP address. Many ISPs actually have dynamic IPs but you reserve the one you're on for a short time and the internet is always connected so it looks static. Change the MAC connecting to it and you don't get the reservation anymore so you get a new IP. There's other ways to ban people, using machinekeys and the like, but none are foolproof.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Geronimo McVain
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2016-09-23 13:37:20 UTC
There is still the problem what you can achiev with an Alpha char. CCP is most likely limiting the amount of Alphas to one and only the Alpha can go online, nothing else. That's IMHO the main reason for the launcher changes. A Alpha with just T1 weapons will not pose a threat even to a hulk. Someone calculated that you will need to double the gankers with Alpha which will double the costs (ships, weapons etc.) and so ganking with Alphas will not make big money. And you Need a lot people because no multiboxing. You may play around with virtual machines but if it's worth it...
Keebler Wizard
Skew The Suits
#11 - 2016-09-23 13:47:29 UTC
bardghost Isu wrote:
I expect it to be locked too. However it would be hidden in amongst loads of comments in the other thread and barely acknowledged. Here people can be made aware of the situation, If it gets locked then I'll take it as they don't care about feedback.


Because you're analysis is so important and so original, it deserves its own thread.

/sarcasm.
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#12 - 2016-09-23 14:18:08 UTC
While I agree with OP, that probably also reinforces the 15 mil SP minimum or GTFO rule. Some alliances even call for 50 mil SP.

It is quite possible we'll see Alpha-only corp rise.
bardghost Isu
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#13 - 2016-09-23 14:36:47 UTC  |  Edited by: bardghost Isu
Cristl wrote:
bardghost Isu wrote:
Known Ganker, Awoxer, Thief, Pirate, Scammer.

Your choice of 'baddies' only really has one profession (pirate) that requires more than a trial alt's worth of SP anyway. And I'm not sure how that could be abused either.

I'd be more concerned about faction warfare alts which don't have to care about standings, since you can have an army in each militia.



Its not so much a list of baddies, Just a list of things that can get you a reputation that's not all too great. Its easier to avoid that reputation if your an alpha as it can just be cycled account after account.

I know what you mean with them being less that the amount of trial SP, its just the fact that when I setup an account I can do 2 an (Hopefully little graphic explains it)

Account > Playstyle > Bad Rep > Throw acc > New Account > Playstyle > ......
Account > Train skills > Switch to account > Play, Bad rep > Throw > Train new > .....

Hope that gets the point across, With a trial you cant do that as you are time limited.


Edit: I may have originally misread your comment slightly but have amended my reply.
bardghost Isu
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#14 - 2016-09-23 14:38:26 UTC
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:
While I agree with OP, that probably also reinforces the 15 mil SP minimum or GTFO rule. Some alliances even call for 50 mil SP.

It is quite possible we'll see Alpha-only corp rise.



In all honesty I've considered forming my own corp of alpha's and seeing what can be done with the numbers that could be offered by them.

Don't get me wrong, this could be a good change for the game. But ONLY if it is done correctly, If its done wrong then its going to get bad and quickly.
bardghost Isu
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#15 - 2016-09-23 14:42:04 UTC
Geronimo McVain wrote:
There is still the problem what you can achiev with an Alpha char. CCP is most likely limiting the amount of Alphas to one and only the Alpha can go online, nothing else. That's IMHO the main reason for the launcher changes. A Alpha with just T1 weapons will not pose a threat even to a hulk. Someone calculated that you will need to double the gankers with Alpha which will double the costs (ships, weapons etc.) and so ganking with Alphas will not make big money. And you Need a lot people because no multiboxing. You may play around with virtual machines but if it's worth it...



I know what you mean, However you can currently create unlimited trial accounts on one email and I doubt anything will change there.

And with regards to limiting only 1 alpha online, People have already figured ways around it using virtual machines. Not everyone will do that.
But my point here isn't about multiboxing, its about unlimited throwaway accounts that can be lost and not bothered about. The minute I deem one to be having too bad a reputation then I just throw the account, use the standby character, then setup a new one to train whilst that one is being used.
bardghost Isu
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#16 - 2016-09-23 14:45:25 UTC
Yarosara Ruil wrote:
Here's the thing. Nothing what so ever stops a person from starting hundreds throwaway Alpha accounts with Gallentean characters in them, set them to train every skill allowed to an Alpha to excel at Catalysts and just wait the 2 months or so it takes for them to train up.

After that it is just a matter of biomassing the characters and cycle through them so the ganker has always a new character with fresh standings to gank with at zero cost. There's not even an ISK cost involved since it takes them about thirty minutes doing opportunities and career missions to get everything they need.



Yes, that's an issue. A lack of consequences for actions.

My mind-set may be different to some but for me.

Paid account = Something I have invested time and effort into and I wouldn't want to do anything that can ruin future play-types I may want to do.

Free account = Bah, no cash spent on it so screw it, I can just make another one if it goes wrong.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
#17 - 2016-09-23 15:56:50 UTC
Geronimo McVain wrote:
There is still the problem what you can achiev with an Alpha char. CCP is most likely limiting the amount of Alphas to one and only the Alpha can go online, nothing else. That's IMHO the main reason for the launcher changes. A Alpha with just T1 weapons will not pose a threat even to a hulk. Someone calculated that you will need to double the gankers with Alpha which will double the costs (ships, weapons etc.) and so ganking with Alphas will not make big money. And you Need a lot people because no multiboxing. You may play around with virtual machines but if it's worth it...
You can get a good 4-5 T1 gank cats for the price of a T2. You'd certainly be able to do it cheaper with multiple T1s than with a T2. People will multibox them regardless of whether or not there are limitations, just like people multibox trials, trials however have a limited time before you have to pay, alphas won't.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Elenahina
No.Mercy
Triumvirate.
#18 - 2016-09-23 16:02:54 UTC
I'll be curious to see how hard it is for Alpha accounts to join corporations in terms of people actually recruiting them - because of how limited they are.

Eve is like an addiction; you can't quit it until it quits you. Also, iderno

Chopper Rollins
hahahlolspycorp
Brave Collective
#19 - 2016-09-23 16:06:36 UTC
bardghost Isu wrote:

Its not so much a list of baddies, Just a list of things that can get you a reputation that's FREAKIN AWESOME!.


Seriously, your idea of a bad reputation is different from mine.
Now i know some of us like to crouch backwards into the future in a permanently defensive posture, cringing from even the threat of one of life's slaps or stings, but you have the option to DROP TROU and sprint merrily into the fire waving a hatchet.
I mean the choice is yours.

The amount of evil one of these alphas could get up to isn't worth hiding from.
Cycling catalyst derps to pick at hisec warts is lame, like most things that happen in hisec, lame and paltry.






Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.

KaarBaak
Squirrel Team
#20 - 2016-09-23 16:49:18 UTC
bardghost Isu wrote:
Cristl wrote:
[quote=bardghost Isu]Known Ganker, Awoxer, Thief, Pirate, Scammer.



Account > Playstyle > Bad Rep > Throw acc > New Account > Playstyle > ......
Account > Train skills > Switch to account > Play, Bad rep > Throw > Train new > .....

Hope that gets the point across, With a trial you cant do that as you are time limited.


Edit: I may have originally misread your comment slightly but have amended my reply.


Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I kinda thought that was the point of Alphas? People can experiment with different playstyles and maybe get into a different aspect of the game? Or new players can learn what they like and what works without being [financially] chained to an account?

You see a problem. I see a key component of the functionality.

Abuse has been covered ad nauseum in the thread you chose not to post in.

KB

Dum Spiro Spero

12Next page