These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

New mirror for Singularity in the next few days + Citadel cleanup

First post First post
Author
CCP Habakuk
C C P
C C P Alliance
#1 - 2016-09-19 13:41:29 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Habakuk
Hi.

Within the next few days we are planning to deploy a new mirror to Singularity. The copy from TQ was already taken.

Citadels: There was quite some concern regarding mirroring Citadels from TQ to Singularity due to spying issues. Unfortunately this is not an as easy task as for Starbases, as we would need to do a lot of cleanup to prevent for example stuck clones or contracts.
After several internal discussions and also discussing this with the CSM we are currently leaning towards doing following, when we apply a new mirror to Singularity:

  • Keep all Citadels in place (the position of Citadels is the least worry to most parties)
  • Delete all fitting of all Citadels, except Structure Services
  • Move all assets of Citadels in W-space into asset safety and fake this asset safety packet to be located in 6-CZ49
  • There is slight chance that the previous step is not doable as it might be too slow, in this case we would fall back to just trash all assets from W-Space Citadels.

As far as I can see this should prevent nearly all concerns with spying, while still leaving the test environment in a healthy state.

Please give feedback on this solution, but please keep in mind that we discussed this already for quite some time internally and rejected several other proposals due to various limitations. Mostly interesting: Did we miss any issues with spying? Feel free to send me a pm, if you have any confidential information to be considered.

FAQ:

  • What happens with my character, which was logged off in a WH Citadel? - You will appear in your ship in 6-CZ49. (Yes, you might have it difficult to get back into your WH)

CCP Habakuk | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five 0 | (Team Gridlock)

Bug reporting | Mass Testing

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#2 - 2016-09-19 13:56:45 UTC
Not a perfect solution, but I can't think of a better one which doesn't involve *breaking* the code just for Singularity. Which would defeat the point of it.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Sullen Decimus
Polaris Rising
Goonswarm Federation
#3 - 2016-09-19 13:58:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Sullen Decimus
I realize that for some of you this will not be what you want as it means WH'ers will essentially have to move assets back to the hole after mirror. I recommend utilizing the "moveme" command to do so.

This is the best solution that could be come up with as writing specialty code for SISI defeats the purpose of the server as a test bed. Regardless I think we can all agree that this is a far better situation than current.

CSM XI Member

Twitter: Sullen_Decimus

Tweetfleet: @sullen_decimus

Zand Vor
OpSec.
Wrong Hole.
#4 - 2016-09-19 14:06:06 UTC
Hmm...I'm missing the reasoning why citadels need to be mirrored at all?

Or is it just easier to copy everything on TQ over to SISI and be done?

Please fix wormhole combat sites: c1 20mil - c2 40 mil - c3 80 mil - c4 160 mil - c5 320 mil - c6 640 mil

Sullen Decimus
Polaris Rising
Goonswarm Federation
#5 - 2016-09-19 14:11:51 UTC
Zand Vor wrote:
Hmm...I'm missing the reasoning why citadels need to be mirrored at all?

Or is it just easier to copy everything on TQ over to SISI and be done?


Citadels are closer to outpost (mirrored) than pos (not mirrored). The key is they want the code on SISI as close to tranquility as possible. This is the best solution to leave the SISI code intact while removing the intelligence aspect.

CSM XI Member

Twitter: Sullen_Decimus

Tweetfleet: @sullen_decimus

The Judge
State War Academy
Caldari State
#6 - 2016-09-19 14:20:14 UTC
This is definitely a good middle ground given what would need to happen for anything different. Glad you could jump on this so quickly Habakuk!

CSM XII Member and CSM XI Permanent Attendee

Diplomat for Circle-Of-Two

@_TheJudge on Twitter

thejudge@csm.eve.com

CCP Habakuk
C C P
C C P Alliance
#7 - 2016-09-19 14:23:35 UTC
Sullen Decimus wrote:
Zand Vor wrote:
Hmm...I'm missing the reasoning why citadels need to be mirrored at all?

Or is it just easier to copy everything on TQ over to SISI and be done?


Citadels are closer to outpost (mirrored) than pos (not mirrored). The key is they want the code on SISI as close to tranquility as possible. This is the best solution to leave the SISI code intact while removing the intelligence aspect.


To add to this: It is much easier to exclude starbases than to exclude citadels. For starbases we delete the starbase items and drop a few database tables. For Citadels we would need to fix some other stuff, like your jump clones, homestation, market orders, contracts and similar. We are currently handling all of this when a Citadel blows up, but this would be a bit tricky and time-consuming as mirror preparation step.

CCP Habakuk | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five 0 | (Team Gridlock)

Bug reporting | Mass Testing

Zand Vor
OpSec.
Wrong Hole.
#8 - 2016-09-19 14:25:20 UTC
Understood. I think you do have a good "middleground" answer with transferring or dumping assets in the Citadel.

Please fix wormhole combat sites: c1 20mil - c2 40 mil - c3 80 mil - c4 160 mil - c5 320 mil - c6 640 mil

NoobMan
Perkone
Caldari State
#9 - 2016-09-19 14:56:56 UTC
Thanks Jerzii, for killing whlers citadels and recording all the drops...

But ya I think this is good change. you can get a lot of info from what drops, like a ballpark of how many capitals and if they have any secret doctrines.

Operations Director of Hard K(n)ocks Inc.

Bobmon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2016-09-19 14:59:45 UTC
Thanks! Good solution

@BobmonEVE - BOBMON FOR CSM 12

Seraph Essael
Air
The Initiative.
#11 - 2016-09-19 15:14:22 UTC
Yep, I'm happy with this.
Where my citadel is, is of no concern. What is of concern are the fittings and assets, which you are taking care. I think the removal of assets and fittings is more than enough, in this situation.

Quoted from Doc Fury: "Concerned citizens: Doc seldom plays EVE on the weekends during spring and summer, so you will always be on your own for a couple days a week. Doc spends that time collecting kittens for the on-going sacrifices, engaging in reckless outdoor activities, and speaking in the 3rd person."

Torvald McBeardson
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2016-09-19 16:34:53 UTC
Seraph Essael wrote:
Yep, I'm happy with this.
Where my citadel is, is of no concern. What is of concern are the fittings and assets, which you are taking care. I think the removal of assets and fittings is more than enough, in this situation.

Actually, they said they're only moving assets from citadels in WH space. People could still blow up a citadel anywhere else and see what drops. Makes me glad I don't keep anything important in citadels, just yet, along with the issue that you can't see personal assets in citadels from the API.
CCP Habakuk
C C P
C C P Alliance
#13 - 2016-09-19 16:42:39 UTC
Torvald McBeardson wrote:
Seraph Essael wrote:
Yep, I'm happy with this.
Where my citadel is, is of no concern. What is of concern are the fittings and assets, which you are taking care. I think the removal of assets and fittings is more than enough, in this situation.

Actually, they said they're only moving assets from citadels in WH space. People could still blow up a citadel anywhere else and see what drops. Makes me glad I don't keep anything important in citadels, just yet, along with the issue that you can't see personal assets in citadels from the API.

Your normal assets do not drop in normal space - they go to asset safety anyway. Only Citadel fittings and similar like fuel would drop.

CCP Habakuk | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five 0 | (Team Gridlock)

Bug reporting | Mass Testing

Morwen Lagann
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#14 - 2016-09-19 16:47:36 UTC
Sullen Decimus wrote:
I realize that for some of you this will not be what you want as it means WH'ers will essentially have to move assets back to the hole after mirror. I recommend utilizing the "moveme" command to do so.

Unless they've drastically changed how the /moveme command works on Singularity, no, that won't be a thing. They'll have to scout themselves back in and move all their **** into the wormhole one ship at a time (or orca/bowhead-load at a time).

Morwen Lagann

CEO, Tyrathlion Interstellar

Coordinator, Arataka Research Consortium

Owner, The Golden Masque

Seraph Essael
Air
The Initiative.
#15 - 2016-09-19 17:01:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Seraph Essael
Torvald McBeardson wrote:
Seraph Essael wrote:
Yep, I'm happy with this.
Where my citadel is, is of no concern. What is of concern are the fittings and assets, which you are taking care. I think the removal of assets and fittings is more than enough, in this situation.

Actually, they said they're only moving assets from citadels in WH space. People could still blow up a citadel anywhere else and see what drops. Makes me glad I don't keep anything important in citadels, just yet, along with the issue that you can't see personal assets in citadels from the API.

Well no, because Citadels in normal space have asset security. In wormholes they do not. Everything is destroyed.
Plus I'm a wormholer so I was talking in regards to wormholes in my previous post Big smile

EDIT: Damnit didn't read CCP reply. Derp.

Quoted from Doc Fury: "Concerned citizens: Doc seldom plays EVE on the weekends during spring and summer, so you will always be on your own for a couple days a week. Doc spends that time collecting kittens for the on-going sacrifices, engaging in reckless outdoor activities, and speaking in the 3rd person."

Sentient Blade
Crisis Atmosphere
Coalition of the Unfortunate
#16 - 2016-09-19 17:14:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Sentient Blade
This is probably a fairly terribad idea I'm sure... but would it not be an option to to set the invulnerability windows of any *existing* citadels to zero hours when the mirror is done? Clearly the client prevents it but I assume the native database server has no such constraints.

That way all your pre-existing citadels would be defacto invulnerable, rendering any privacy issues after destroying them inert, and if you need new citadels for play-testing, they're seeded on market, so simply drop them after the mirror.

This would have the advantage of it being a one-time deal.
Airi Cho
Dark-Rising
Wrecking Machine.
#17 - 2016-09-19 19:52:14 UTC
just a quality of life idea: to make restocking citadels easier ... how about all of them have a seeded market?
Amak Boma
Dragon Factory
xX SERENITY Xx
#18 - 2016-09-19 20:08:20 UTC
for wormhole citadels , we would like to have ability to move us back into said wormhole , perhaps give us ability to move to any wormhole maybe /teleport command that would only teleport us to the wh and only wh space to ditch the wormhole from moveme system . this is good move to clean up citadel stuff. but wy not delete the wormhole citadel instead?
Alruan Shadowborn
State War Academy
Caldari State
#19 - 2016-09-19 21:39:48 UTC
Maybe not for this mirror, but something for the future, why not make a copy assets feature that copies the assets for an individual only in their current location and works only once per mirror per character.

Woul make it easier for wormholers in your articulate to test things in their environment
CCP Habakuk
C C P
C C P Alliance
#20 - 2016-09-20 17:55:11 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Habakuk
Thank you for your suggestions. While they are out of scope for now, we will keep them in mind for whenever we do further changes to our tools for Singularity.

Short update: The mirror has been applied (Citadel fitting is removed and Citadel assets from W-space is in asset safety) and is currently in VIP mode, while we test a few things and setup beacons and similar. We will probably also apply a code update before we open the server again.

CCP Habakuk | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five 0 | (Team Gridlock)

Bug reporting | Mass Testing

12Next page