These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

AFK Cloaking™: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals

First post First post
Author
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6481 - 2016-08-30 15:47:55 UTC
Daichi Yamato wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:


So you rat sometimes in 0.0 and don't live there and you call me stupid? Nothing to be with being left alone, my issue is solely with the AFK part, I like many others have no issue when they are ATK.


No i actually do have a char living in null again. But its more for the PvP side of things. Even if i didn't have a char in null, how would that make me stupid exactly?

You seem to have become confused. I was talking to someone else before you tried to say that if we dont remove afk cloaking, then the only PvP left in the game will be afk cloaking...

Dracvlad wrote:

Throwing one liner insults based around your feelings is just lame, the only one doing a brain fart is you, well add Teckos to that too. Big smile


I didnt insult you, but the post you made and the one made by Kimberly Sun were stupid. We all should know this thread wasnt meant to indicate coming changes to the game. We all know we are not entitled to rat, especially in null, without the risk of bad guys coming a long, and we all know EVE's PvP in its entirety does not revolve around afk cloaking.

As for throwing insults being 'lame'.


Dracvlad wrote:

Methinks you are another lazy AFK camper toe rag.


come on....


Your post is totally stupid and was insulting, like so many of you. who is saying it should be safe to rat in 0.0, I never said that, its your projecting your stupid hate on others. As I keep pointing out I do not like the AFK side of this, where people not ATK can interact with no issues.

You might not have noticed but that toe rag comment was after you were insulting with the brain fart comment not before.

The AFK cloaking makes people not bother to log in, if that is what you lot want to do then that's it, over time you will see the population of Eve reduce even more and my point was that all you will have is people AFK cloaking camping each other while playing other games waiting for someone to do something and they won't. Will be kinda funny...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#6482 - 2016-08-30 23:56:19 UTC
Except people are still ratting even with afk cloakers in local and have been for years.

When the population of eve was growing every year it obviously wasn't under threat from afk cloakers. What changed between then and now? Because it wasn't afk cloaking...if anything afk cloaking was nerfed with jump fatigue lol.

The people that dont bother logging in because of afk cloakers would only log in if it was 100% guaranteed to be safe. Catering to these carebears will end up, and is, killing the game. Why can't these players, rather than making empty threats to quit, go back to hi-sec where they can make more isk than they would logged off or un-subbed?

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6483 - 2016-08-31 06:11:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Daichi Yamato wrote:
Except people are still ratting even with afk cloakers in local and have been for years.

When the population of eve was growing every year it obviously wasn't under threat from afk cloakers. What changed between then and now? Because it wasn't afk cloaking...if anything afk cloaking was nerfed with jump fatigue lol.

The people that dont bother logging in because of afk cloakers would only log in if it was 100% guaranteed to be safe. Catering to these carebears will end up, and is, killing the game. Why can't these players, rather than making empty threats to quit, go back to hi-sec where they can make more isk than they would logged off or un-subbed?


Again failure to assess the game changes, there is a huge amount of players who now have the ability to fly and use blak ops. second we have the fact that those players are extremely wealthy, another aspect is that they are bored, add to that the removal of the watch list and you have an increased risk that you will get dropped execution style, now add skill injectors to that mix and you have a much changed situation. For example Cyno 5 was a bit of a train so AFK campers tended to have a history, now they don't. Did you note that the jump fatigue is a lot less for BLOPS?

When I saw that carriers had an initial buff, I was really happy because the blops groups would have a real risk, but CCP back tracked on that.

The last time I was heavily AFK cloaky camped we got a spy in the group, I can say it now, though they did not fully trust him, what was evident was their mode of operation, they were account sharing with the camping alts and due to this were covering 12 different systems, the main guy was also playing other games while waiting for someone to do something in Eve, then he would pause his game and go execution style with other mates from his main alliance, who were operating nearby.

We set up to trap his BLOPS but he would not drop, he had a whiff of a risk he would not drop, simple as.

I have seen people AFK cloaky camp like this, I was ratting in Stain, belt ratting by the way, in would come a Russian guy, their top killer by the way, a legend with the Russians, he would be in a Legion, I knew his fit, he would come into the system I was in and wait. I would wait a bit then go to the next door system, an hour later he would come into that system, rinse and repeat, this lasted for three weeks. That is the level of lameness I am getting at, the guy was doing other stuff on other characters and then would check this toon every so often. Roll That just got so damn boring...

It is nothing to do about your assertion that it is catering for hisec carebears, in fact the biggest carebears are the BLOPS droppers, true they drop expensive ships with expensive mods and use expensive implants, however they are mainly incredibly risk averse.

Those players you despise want to be in 0.0 and want to get involved in PvP, however to do PvP requires income, first of all they need to get the ships to do alliance doctrines, then the ships to compete against roaming gangs, pay for their plex, etc., not all of those players operate in the main alliance play times either.

Eve is a game of accounts, they are best off having a toon or two in hisec that can just go do incursions and do hisec missions, but then the question comes into their brains why bother in 0.0, so they don't, then they find hisec missions poorly paying and incursions mind boggling boring and get bored and just go and play something else. I have seen it happen so many times...

I saw people log in note the AFK campers and log out, they said they would play other games, they then lost interest in Eve, they were old players.

I said in this thread a number of times that I used to hunt the campers, but I cannot bait them when they are AFK, and I have suggested a AFK flag system linked to an OS, to remove the AFK part, if they are active then no issue on my part, its is purely the AFK part that is the issue.

A lot of you players just throw carebear insults around like confetti, you did it above, but it does not matter, because the trajectory of the game is that it is turning into a game where risk averse old players can sit there like AFK cloaky camping and strangle anyone trying to develop in the game in such a lame fashion, and people once they see this will just say nope and walk away and that is what I was pointing out to you, where will you lot be when the only people left are two sets of cloaky AFK losers hoping that the other one will do something so they can drop on them, will be funny and very deserved.

As for me, my second accounts expires 5th September and this account expires 5th October. My conclusion is that Eve is no longer worth my time as it has terrible game imbalances that reward lame play. So the only way to get it to change is to walk away and leave your lot staring at each other and not committing, because that is exactly what is going to happen from my experience of the people who AFK cloaky camp. Enjoy your weaponised boredom...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#6484 - 2016-08-31 07:21:12 UTC
Removed an off topic post.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

vipeer
Infinite Point
Pandemic Horde
#6485 - 2016-08-31 08:07:44 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
[ A lot of great text worth reading


I agree with every single word there.
I dont mind the active blops hunters who roam, or camp a system for an hour or two. But when you have people logging in right after DT and stay in the system for weeks, to shutdown all operations it's silly.

I've seen lots of players quit the game due to this, and I dare to say that 1000 times more players have left the game due to the AFK Camping, than players have stayed and ejoyed that gameplay.

It's always been a problem, but with both the skill injectors and Aegis Sov it actually became a legit and even more widely used mechanic to reduce the ADM of a system and make it easier to take.

Damn, I realize I'm just repeating what Dracvlad said so well already. I'll shutup and rather +10 his post.

Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#6486 - 2016-08-31 14:37:42 UTC
vipeer wrote:
I agree with every single word there.
I dont mind the active blops hunters who roam, or camp a system for an hour or two. But when you have people logging in right after DT and stay in the system for weeks, to shutdown all operations it's silly.

I've seen lots of players quit the game due to this, and I dare to say that 1000 times more players have left the game due to the AFK Camping, than players have stayed and ejoyed that gameplay.

It's always been a problem, but with both the skill injectors and Aegis Sov it actually became a legit and even more widely used mechanic to reduce the ADM of a system and make it easier to take.

Damn, I realize I'm just repeating what Dracvlad said so well already. I'll shutup and rather +10 his post.


If people are so risk averse that they refuse to play the game because they can't live in null in 100% safety, maybe we are better off without that kind of carebear
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6487 - 2016-08-31 14:59:39 UTC
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
vipeer wrote:
I agree with every single word there.
I dont mind the active blops hunters who roam, or camp a system for an hour or two. But when you have people logging in right after DT and stay in the system for weeks, to shutdown all operations it's silly.

I've seen lots of players quit the game due to this, and I dare to say that 1000 times more players have left the game due to the AFK Camping, than players have stayed and ejoyed that gameplay.

It's always been a problem, but with both the skill injectors and Aegis Sov it actually became a legit and even more widely used mechanic to reduce the ADM of a system and make it easier to take.

Damn, I realize I'm just repeating what Dracvlad said so well already. I'll shutup and rather +10 his post.


If people are so risk averse that they refuse to play the game because they can't live in null in 100% safety, maybe we are better off without that kind of carebear


That 100% safety insult is just so old hat and pathetic, just used to mask peoples need for easy kills to bolster their own egos while using ultra lame tactics. Roll

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#6488 - 2016-08-31 15:11:24 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
That 100% safety insult is just so old hat and pathetic, just used to mask peoples need for easy kills to bolster their own egos while using ultra lame tactics. Roll


There are no lame/not lame tactics. There are only tactics.

There are no fair/unfair fights, there are only fights.

Anyone paying attention at their keyboard can avoid being dropped on, which is literally the only complaint when it comes to AFK cloaking. I'll repeat myself, if you are so risk averse that you won't undock when someone not friendly is in your system, go back to highsec.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6489 - 2016-08-31 15:21:19 UTC
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
That 100% safety insult is just so old hat and pathetic, just used to mask peoples need for easy kills to bolster their own egos while using ultra lame tactics. Roll


There are no lame/not lame tactics. There are only tactics.

There are no fair/unfair fights, there are only fights.

Anyone paying attention at their keyboard can avoid being dropped on, which is literally the only complaint when it comes to AFK cloaking. I'll repeat myself, if you are so risk averse that you won't undock when someone not friendly is in your system, go back to highsec.


That is rather funny, I don't think I suggested anywhere the need for fair fights, nor did I suggest 100% safety, still projecting, what a lameass... Roll

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#6490 - 2016-08-31 15:27:09 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
That is rather funny, I don't think I suggested anywhere the need for fair fights, nor did I suggest 100% safety, still projecting, what a lameass... Roll


You do realize you jumping to personal insults just makes you sound like you're 13 years old, right?

You're proposing 100% safety for AFK ratters and miners in null.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6491 - 2016-08-31 15:38:08 UTC
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
That is rather funny, I don't think I suggested anywhere the need for fair fights, nor did I suggest 100% safety, still projecting, what a lameass... Roll


You do realize you jumping to personal insults just makes you sound like you're 13 years old, right?

You're proposing 100% safety for AFK ratters and miners in null.


I am now a year older, gee wizz, well enjoy shooting Alpha clones, about your level RollBig smile

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#6492 - 2016-08-31 15:48:09 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
I am now a year older, gee wizz, well enjoy shooting Alpha clones, about your level RollBig smile


So again with insults instead of discussing the issue? You're adorable. I'll shoot anyone I can, I typically fly NPSI. If someone decloaks and drops me, I'll call for help (I'm not in HS, so I'm already in a standing fleet and on comms) and fight back.

If I didn't want to do that, I'd live in HS.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6493 - 2016-08-31 15:52:55 UTC
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
I am now a year older, gee wizz, well enjoy shooting Alpha clones, about your level RollBig smile


So again with insults instead of discussing the issue? You're adorable. I'll shoot anyone I can, I typically fly NPSI. If someone decloaks and drops me, I'll call for help (I'm not in HS, so I'm already in a standing fleet and on comms) and fight back.

If I didn't want to do that, I'd live in HS.


Your special... Keep it up, you have not added anything to the discussion just normal HTFU talking points like, wanting 100% safety, get back to hisec etc., if you call that discussing the issues then suggesting you are special is rather apt. LolRoll

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#6494 - 2016-08-31 15:53:26 UTC
Yeah blops suffer from more jump fatigue than they did two years ago. You're trying to attribute the loss of subs to your pet peeve, despite subs falling long before the changes you suggest are the cause and the population of players exposed to afk cloaking being tiny.

The players you and vipeer think are the reason for the loss of subs have always been quitting and they've been doing so long before subs were declining. They are the same as kimberly sun, they are renters that actually DON'T want to get into pvp. They just want to pve so they can 'level up their raven'. They could rat in groups to push up their ADM's but they don't want to. When you say they quit because hi-sec doesn't pay enough you're just showing how self entitled these people are. Eve is about risk vs reward but these players want the highest rewards without any risk. They will never stick with eve for its pvp sandbox and catering to them will kill this game even faster.

The afk flag doesn't work because it still advertises to ratters when its completely safe to undock and the moment it is un-safe. Best thing to deal with the afk cloaky problem is to remove local. That way being afk cloaked does nothing and neither the ratters nor the campers get any certainty of safety.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#6495 - 2016-08-31 15:58:52 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Your special... Keep it up, you have not added anything to the discussion just normal HTFU talking points like, wanting 100% safety, get back to hisec etc., if you call that discussing the issues then suggesting you are special is rather apt. LolRoll


I'll just patiently wait for you to explain how people ratting in groups while in fleets and on comms together have anything to worry about with AFK cloakers.

Go on, take your time. I look forward to your educated, well thought out response.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6496 - 2016-08-31 15:59:44 UTC
Daichi Yamato wrote:
Yeah blops suffer from more jump fatigue than they did two years ago. You're trying to attribute the loss of subs to your pet peeve, despite subs falling long before the changes you suggest are the cause and the population of players exposed to afk cloaking being tiny.

The players you and vipeer think are the reason for the loss of subs have always been quitting and they've been doing so long before subs were declining. They are the same as kimberly sun, they are renters that actually DON'T want to get into pvp. They just want to pve so they can 'level up their raven'. They could rat in groups to push up their ADM's but they don't want to. When you say they quit because hi-sec doesn't pay enough you're just showing how self entitled these people are. Eve is about risk vs reward but these players want the highest rewards without any risk. They will never stick with eve for its pvp sandbox and catering to them will kill this game even faster.

The afk flag doesn't work because it still advertises to ratters when its completely safe to undock and the moment it is un-safe. Best thing to deal with the afk cloaky problem is to remove local. That way being afk cloaked does nothing and neither the ratters nor the campers get any certainty of safety.


People can game it easily, the entire thing is to force people to gather intel and enable people to get into space when people are actually at work and asleep and get rid of these lame AFK players. It is not completely safe, the cloaker could get into a site and sit there waiting for someone to come in on him. There you go rewards active play...

Local is going to be supplied by an OS, if you don't like local go and shoot it...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6497 - 2016-08-31 16:00:31 UTC
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Your special... Keep it up, you have not added anything to the discussion just normal HTFU talking points like, wanting 100% safety, get back to hisec etc., if you call that discussing the issues then suggesting you are special is rather apt. LolRoll


I'll just patiently wait for you to explain how people ratting in groups while in fleets and on comms together have anything to worry about with AFK cloakers.

Go on, take your time. I look forward to your educated, well thought out response.


Already explained that in this thread.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#6498 - 2016-08-31 16:02:53 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Already explained that in this thread.


Already explained why your explanation is just an excuse for carebears in this thread.

Obviously in a 325 page thread neither of us are going to say something new. And obviously the answer is to compromise and nerf cloaking as well as removing local, but you're never going to agree to that, so back to personal insults, yeah?
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6499 - 2016-08-31 16:05:17 UTC
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Already explained that in this thread.


Already explained why your explanation is just an excuse for carebears in this thread.

Obviously in a 325 page thread neither of us are going to say something new. And obviously the answer is to compromise and nerf cloaking as well as removing local, but you're never going to agree to that, so back to personal insults, yeah?


I did, with the AFK flag on an OS linked to the coming local one, but that's just me. So 100% safety is the way to reply to that, whoooooaaaaah so bad....

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#6500 - 2016-08-31 16:21:42 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
I did, with the AFK flag on an OS linked to the coming local one, but that's just me. So 100% safety is the way to reply to that, whoooooaaaaah so bad....


I'll take an afk flag if you give me the ability to take away local chat. Local = 100% risk free PvE in sov null