These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Elephant in the Sub-Forum

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#1 - 2016-08-25 11:32:12 UTC
So...Just to point out the elephant in this sub-forum...

Did anyone ever actually figure out why the "GM Response On Bumping" thread is still stickied - given that it was locked almost a full year ago with a giant disclaimer at the top that it was 3 years old even then and

CCP CID wrote:
does not represent CCP´s current stance on the issue


I mean as far as I can tell it still *does* represent CCP's stance on the issue - I'm not aware of anybody being banned for bumping... But it has that giant disclaimer at the top...

Just a confusing mixed message there.

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)
Mike Adoulin
Happys Happy Hamster Hunting Club
#2 - 2016-08-25 12:42:05 UTC
shhhhhhhhhhhh

These are not the droids you're looking for.

Bear

Everything in EVE is a trap.

And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)

You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.

Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.
Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#3 - 2016-08-25 13:46:01 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
So...Just to point out the elephant in this sub-forum...

Did anyone ever actually figure out why the "GM Response On Bumping" thread is still stickied - given that it was locked almost a full year ago with a giant disclaimer at the top that it was 3 years old even then and

CCP CID wrote:
does not represent CCP´s current stance on the issue


I mean as far as I can tell it still *does* represent CCP's stance on the issue - I'm not aware of anybody being banned for bumping... But it has that giant disclaimer at the top...

Just a confusing mixed message there.

You do realize you are posting on the forum where ISD actually dump threads they want forgotten and trolled right?

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#4 - 2016-08-25 16:22:10 UTC
They locked it some time before they announced that they are internally thinking about bumping especially if used as tackle for big ships. All we know until now is that they try to implement that timer they spoke about at fanfest.

I would actually be surprised if this comes in the near future. They had to abandon features before when they tried to touch the fundamental stuff.

Evil RatKid
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#5 - 2016-08-25 16:30:35 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
They locked it some time before they announced that they are internally thinking about bumping especially if used as tackle for big ships. All we know until now is that they try to implement that timer they spoke about at fanfest.

I would actually be surprised if this comes in the near future. They had to abandon features before when they tried to touch the fundamental stuff.

They have waffled back and forth on the limits of "allowable" bumping forever...


I personally kind of feel like while they don't want CODE. claiming miner-bumping is CCP approved they also want to reduce petition traffic from it by indicating that it is allowed....

And if that is their reasoning then I get it...

But I'm not sure it even accomplishes that goal with the big disclaimers all over it - though I can't be sure since I obviously don't have access to the number of petitions filed about bumping.


I dunno, it just bugs me every time I come here P

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#6 - 2016-08-25 17:29:11 UTC
You need to re-read the entire thread so that you can get a clear view of all of it. If you read the whole thing once/week it's pretty clear.
Solecist Project
#7 - 2016-08-25 20:14:43 UTC
All I care about ...
... is that i can do whatever the **** i want ...
... to whoever the **** i want ...
... as long as i leave him a way out of his misery.

That's what i learned from this.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia
Esrevid Nekkeg
Justified and Ancient
#8 - 2016-08-25 21:08:42 UTC
You could always report that thread to ISD, making them aware that it seems rather silly that it is still stickied.
And point out to them that they might do something about that fact, possibly after consulting CCP about it. It being a DEV thread.

Just a suggestion. Smile

Here I used to have a sig of our old Camper in space. Now it is disregarded as being the wrong format. Looking out the window I see one thing: Nothing wrong with the format of our Camper! Silly CCP......
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#9 - 2016-08-25 21:40:38 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:

I personally kind of feel like while they don't want CODE. claiming miner-bumping is CCP approved they also want to reduce petition traffic from it by indicating that it is allowed....

Well they do have bumping explicitly in the "non-exploit" section here:

https://support.eveonline.com/hc/en-us/articles/204873262-Known-Declared-Exploits

So it should be still very clear that this is an allowed tactic.

Evil RatKid
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#10 - 2016-08-25 21:45:34 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:

I personally kind of feel like while they don't want CODE. claiming miner-bumping is CCP approved they also want to reduce petition traffic from it by indicating that it is allowed....

Well they do have bumping explicitly in the "non-exploit" section here:

https://support.eveonline.com/hc/en-us/articles/204873262-Known-Declared-Exploits

So it should be still very clear that this is an allowed tactic.

Aye it should - just makes the thread being stickied up there all the stranger...

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)
Le Plebo
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#11 - 2016-08-30 05:00:54 UTC
Lol get rekt nerd
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#12 - 2016-08-30 11:52:07 UTC
Le Plebo wrote:
Lol get rekt nerd

Just spam posting this in every thread you can find now?

I actualy do undock this alt - and I've been known to autopilot at random around high-sec from time to time... So if you think you can handle a forum alt you are welcome to come attack me any time you feel brave enough P

So far I've been killed by the anti-gankers significantly more often than CODE. They kept picking me off while I was (successfully) reinforcing every single mobile depot in Uedama with my rookie ship.

So... Anti-gankers 28, CODE. 0 so far - seems like you are the one getting rekt P

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)
pushdogg
relocation LLC.
#13 - 2016-09-02 05:48:59 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Le Plebo wrote:
Lol get rekt nerd

Just spam posting this in every thread you can find now?

I actualy do undock this alt - and I've been known to autopilot at random around high-sec from time to time... So if you think you can handle a forum alt you are welcome to come attack me any time you feel brave enough P

So far I've been killed by the anti-gankers significantly more often than CODE. They kept picking me off while I was (successfully) reinforcing every single mobile depot in Uedama with my rookie ship.

So... Anti-gankers 28, CODE. 0 so far - seems like you are the one getting rekt P


28? If ag can catch you that many times, code.'s job is done.
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#14 - 2016-09-02 11:56:19 UTC
pushdogg wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Le Plebo wrote:
Lol get rekt nerd

Just spam posting this in every thread you can find now?

I actualy do undock this alt - and I've been known to autopilot at random around high-sec from time to time... So if you think you can handle a forum alt you are welcome to come attack me any time you feel brave enough P

So far I've been killed by the anti-gankers significantly more often than CODE. They kept picking me off while I was (successfully) reinforcing every single mobile depot in Uedama with my rookie ship.

So... Anti-gankers 28, CODE. 0 so far - seems like you are the one getting rekt P


28? If ag can catch you that many times, code.'s job is done.

Pffft, if you think 28 is a lot you should see my losses in Jita last night P

But sure, if CODE.'s "job" is now defined as allowing/encouraging people to go afk with suspect flags shooting depots....and not even to shoot them personally...then "good job" P

I doubt you'll convince many miners to join me though....So I guess you fail with everyone else in EVE? Bear

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)
ISD Max Trix
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#15 - 2016-09-02 13:03:35 UTC
Good point, I will poke Falcon and see about getting it updated.

And I don't dump threads here to die. Those threads are clearly Nitchie alts.

ISD Max Trix

Lieutenant

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

I do not respond to EVE mails about forum moderation.
Mike Adoulin
Happys Happy Hamster Hunting Club
#16 - 2016-09-02 13:19:47 UTC
I had to give Trix a like due to him acknowledging the horror that is Nitshe.

Yes, I feel dirty now.

eeeeew

Everything in EVE is a trap.

And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)

You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.

Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.
pushdogg
relocation LLC.
#17 - 2016-09-02 23:34:52 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
pushdogg wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Le Plebo wrote:
Lol get rekt nerd

Just spam posting this in every thread you can find now?

I actualy do undock this alt - and I've been known to autopilot at random around high-sec from time to time... So if you think you can handle a forum alt you are welcome to come attack me any time you feel brave enough P

So far I've been killed by the anti-gankers significantly more often than CODE. They kept picking me off while I was (successfully) reinforcing every single mobile depot in Uedama with my rookie ship.

So... Anti-gankers 28, CODE. 0 so far - seems like you are the one getting rekt P


28? If ag can catch you that many times, code.'s job is done.

Pffft, if you think 28 is a lot you should see my losses in Jita last night P

But sure, if CODE.'s "job" is now defined as allowing/encouraging people to go afk with suspect flags shooting depots....and not even to shoot them personally...then "good job" P

I doubt you'll convince many miners to join me though....So I guess you fail with everyone else in EVE? Bear


Join you? In shooting things? We all know miners don't shoot at anything.

Wait....fail at what? Shoot them personally? Ag shoots the suspects....code. doesn't shoot anything that doesn't result in a Concord response. Who is failing at what here?

You mentioned being "brave enough", implying you were somehow awesome. I mentioned 28 losses to the most unorganized group in Eve. Who is failing again? The only fail, might be my ability to understand your animosity toward code..
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#18 - 2016-09-03 00:03:09 UTC
pushdogg wrote:
Join you? In shooting things? We all know miners don't shoot at anything.

Wait....fail at what? Shoot them personally? Ag shoots the suspects....code. doesn't shoot anything that doesn't result in a Concord response. Who is failing at what here?

You mentioned being "brave enough", implying you were somehow awesome. I mentioned 28 losses to the most unorganized group in Eve. Who is failing again? The only fail, might be my ability to understand your animosity toward code..

I believe you will find *you* began by insulting *me* - I didn't initiate this confrontation... I have no animosity towards CODE. P

Now see, normally you could claim that you have no reason to fight me - and it would be true... But in this case, *you* came into a thread in which I had said nothing negative whatsoever about either you or CODE. - and you demanded that I "get rekt"...

I just pointed out that since you want me to "get rekt" - you are welcome to come and make me any time you want.

You have responded by making up excuses why you are too pathetic to be able to do so - even though you admit the anti-gankers have managed it quite a few times...

So basically you've started a fight you know you can't win, purely to admit that the anti-gankers are better at your stated goal than you are...

If that isn't failing, I don't know what is.


James would be quite ashamed of you if he found out.

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)
pushdogg
relocation LLC.
#19 - 2016-09-03 03:29:00 UTC  |  Edited by: pushdogg
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
pushdogg wrote:
Join you? In shooting things? We all know miners don't shoot at anything.

Wait....fail at what? Shoot them personally? Ag shoots the suspects....code. doesn't shoot anything that doesn't result in a Concord response. Who is failing at what here?

You mentioned being "brave enough", implying you were somehow awesome. I mentioned 28 losses to the most unorganized group in Eve. Who is failing again? The only fail, might be my ability to understand your animosity toward code..

I believe you will find *you* began by insulting *me* - I didn't initiate this confrontation... I have no animosity towards CODE. P

Now see, normally you could claim that you have no reason to fight me - and it would be true... But in this case, *you* came into a thread in which I had said nothing negative whatsoever about either you or CODE. - and you demanded that I "get rekt"...

I just pointed out that since you want me to "get rekt" - you are welcome to come and make me any time you want.

You have responded by making up excuses why you are too pathetic to be able to do so - even though you admit the anti-gankers have managed it quite a few times...

So basically you've started a fight you know you can't win, purely to admit that the anti-gankers are better at your stated goal than you are...

If that isn't failing, I don't know what is.


James would be quite ashamed of you if he found out.


I didn't tell you to get rekt, someone else did. I just reacted to your overreaction.

Pathetic....really?
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#20 - 2016-09-03 03:47:54 UTC
pushdogg wrote:
I didn't tell you to get rekt, someone else did. I just reacted to your overreaction.

Pathetic....really?

TBH I didn't even bother to read your names P

You picked up the conversation, so I just assumed you were involved in any way P

As for overreactions... If you think *that* is an overreaction I'm afraid you've lived a far too sheltered life for EVE - you might find that your fragile sensibilities fare better in a friendlier, happier game where people would never dream of extending an open invitation to someone to come and kill them... Perhaps "Hello Kitty Online" would be more to your tastes?

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)
12Next page