These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Taking the fight to CODE

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#161 - 2016-08-17 21:28:17 UTC
Sure ratting is a pain, but it would force gankers to undock in something other than a throw away ship so the players who's assets were destroyed could have a chance at some revenge. It's not a punishment, it's only fair. When I was a ganker I spent time ratting, that's how it should be.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#162 - 2016-08-17 21:34:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Herzog Wolfhammer
Dracvlad wrote:
...or even talked to someone from AG...



There's a wall between CCP and AG, and a bridge between the easy kill community and CCP. That's why the kill-farming ruse called "RvB" was able to go on so long, as just one example.

I still think there are factions in the organization at odds with each other. So there's hope. But I do miss the days when CODE. "always" won in space and we had a good time giving it try. Knowing they will win in the office removes motivation to try - and I'll bet the gankers themselves will become disenchanted when they realize all that HTFU cred they felt earlier was a lie.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#163 - 2016-08-17 22:13:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Dirty Forum Alt
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
There's a wall between CCP and AG, and a bridge between the easy kill community and CCP. That's why the kill-farming ruse called "RvB" was able to go on so long, as just one example.

I dunno how to break this to you....but RvB is still around - so a bit premature to be talking about them purely in the past tense. P


As for the "bridge" between CCP and the players who kill people (in all their forms) - that is the style of play that most of the CCP devs enjoyed back when they were allowed to openly play EVE *and* be a dev. It isn't some big conspiracy - they are just naturally inclined to favour their own personally preferred play-style within the game...


The bright side for you is there are fewer of those devs left, and new ones coming in who aren't as steeped in that side of the game - there may be hope for you yet on that front - time will tell.


edit: Oh and OP - I'm *still* not CODE. - and you are *still* an idiot whose suggestion is doomed to be ignored P

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#164 - 2016-08-17 22:37:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Cockchaos
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
There's a wall between CCP and AG, and a bridge between the easy kill community and CCP. That's why the kill-farming ruse called "RvB" was able to go on so long, as just one example.

I dunno how to break this to you....but RvB is still around - so a bit premature to be talking about them purely in the past tense. P


As for the "bridge" between CCP and the players who kill people (in all their forms) - that is the style of play that most of the CCP devs enjoyed back when they were allowed to openly play EVE *and* be a dev. It isn't some big conspiracy - they are just naturally inclined to favour their own personally preferred play-style within the game...


The bright side for you is there are fewer of those devs left, and new ones coming in who aren't as steeped in that side of the game - there may be hope for you yet on that front - time will tell.


edit: Oh and OP - I'm *still* not CODE. - and you are *still* an idiot whose suggestion is doomed to be ignored P


Yes I was born with more balls than brains, and I expect my suggestions to be ignored, however, you have to admit that these changes do no harm to suicide ganking. You must also admit that these changes would create some content and give players the ability to deal damage to those who suicide ganked their assets. If you say otherwise, you are an idiot.
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#165 - 2016-08-17 23:00:02 UTC
Cockchaos wrote:
Yes I was born with more balls than brains, and I expect my suggestions to be ignored, however, you have to admit that these changes do no harm to suicide ganking. You must also admit that these changes would create some content and give players the ability to deal damage to those who suicide ganked their assets. If you say otherwise, you are an idiot.

If it didn't affect them at all it would be pointless of you to bother requesting it....

Also as I keep pointing out to you - you can *already* deal damage to them....you simply refuse to.

To be honest from my perspective it would be worth seeing CCP implement your silly changes *just* so I could mock you when you came up with new excuses why you were unwilling to do anything.... But CCP still won't do so, so it is a moot point.

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#166 - 2016-08-17 23:35:29 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
There's a wall between CCP and AG, and a bridge between the easy kill community and CCP. That's why the kill-farming ruse called "RvB" was able to go on so long, as just one example.

I dunno how to break this to you....but RvB is still around - so a bit premature to be talking about them purely in the past tense. P


As for the "bridge" between CCP and the players who kill people (in all their forms) - that is the style of play that most of the CCP devs enjoyed back when they were allowed to openly play EVE *and* be a dev. It isn't some big conspiracy - they are just naturally inclined to favour their own personally preferred play-style within the game...


The bright side for you is there are fewer of those devs left, and new ones coming in who aren't as steeped in that side of the game - there may be hope for you yet on that front - time will tell.


edit: Oh and OP - I'm *still* not CODE. - and you are *still* an idiot whose suggestion is doomed to be ignored P




You protest too much.

As for developers playing the game their way and bias to those ends, well I think everybody can admit the game was better when the developers actually played it at all.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#167 - 2016-08-17 23:39:30 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
You protest too much.

As for developers playing the game their way and bias to those ends, well I think everybody can admit the game was better when the developers actually played it at all.

It had its issues, but yes - it was.

I think things would have gone a different way had they made an example of the devs who cheated and put in safeguards to prevent future occurrences...but had *not* banned devs from actively playing.

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#168 - 2016-08-17 23:56:43 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Cockchaos wrote:
Yes I was born with more balls than brains, and I expect my suggestions to be ignored, however, you have to admit that these changes do no harm to suicide ganking. You must also admit that these changes would create some content and give players the ability to deal damage to those who suicide ganked their assets. If you say otherwise, you are an idiot.

If it didn't affect them at all it would be pointless of you to bother requesting it....

Also as I keep pointing out to you - you can *already* deal damage to them....you simply refuse to.

To be honest from my perspective it would be worth seeing CCP implement your silly changes *just* so I could mock you when you came up with new excuses why you were unwilling to do anything.... But CCP still won't do so, so it is a moot point.



Why are you so against putting mechanics in place that don't change ones ability to suicide gank, and also gives the EVE community the means to retaliate against those who suicide ganked them??? Oh wait, thats right, you are a CODE alt hahahaha
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#169 - 2016-08-17 23:58:47 UTC
Cockchaos wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Cockchaos wrote:
Yes I was born with more balls than brains, and I expect my suggestions to be ignored, however, you have to admit that these changes do no harm to suicide ganking. You must also admit that these changes would create some content and give players the ability to deal damage to those who suicide ganked their assets. If you say otherwise, you are an idiot.

If it didn't affect them at all it would be pointless of you to bother requesting it....

Also as I keep pointing out to you - you can *already* deal damage to them....you simply refuse to.

To be honest from my perspective it would be worth seeing CCP implement your silly changes *just* so I could mock you when you came up with new excuses why you were unwilling to do anything.... But CCP still won't do so, so it is a moot point.



Why are you so against putting mechanics in place that don't change ones ability to suicide gank, and also gives the EVE community the means to retaliate against those who suicide ganked them??? Oh wait, thats right, you are a CODE alt hahahaha

I honestly don't think you can read...

I bolded/underlined part of my post that you *just quoted* - see if you can find 2 whole brain cells to rub together and *try* to read it...

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#170 - 2016-08-18 00:00:18 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Cockchaos wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Cockchaos wrote:
Yes I was born with more balls than brains, and I expect my suggestions to be ignored, however, you have to admit that these changes do no harm to suicide ganking. You must also admit that these changes would create some content and give players the ability to deal damage to those who suicide ganked their assets. If you say otherwise, you are an idiot.

If it didn't affect them at all it would be pointless of you to bother requesting it....

Also as I keep pointing out to you - you can *already* deal damage to them....you simply refuse to.

To be honest from my perspective it would be worth seeing CCP implement your silly changes *just* so I could mock you when you came up with new excuses why you were unwilling to do anything.... But CCP still won't do so, so it is a moot point.



Why are you so against putting mechanics in place that don't change ones ability to suicide gank, and also gives the EVE community the means to retaliate against those who suicide ganked them??? Oh wait, thats right, you are a CODE alt hahahaha

I honestly don't think you can read...

I bolded/underlined part of my post that you *just quoted* - see if you can find 2 whole brain cells to rub together and *try* to read it...


You don't actually mean that though, that's why I ignored it. You and I both know that you and your boyfriends would be crushed if these changes were made.
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#171 - 2016-08-18 00:01:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Cockchaos
It's so funny to me how worked up you get about this, we both know why you do though hahahahaha

That is why earlier in this thread you freaked out like a little teenaged girl hahahaha
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#172 - 2016-08-18 00:06:51 UTC
In point of fact I have remained calm throughout this entire thread...

But as we have illustrated you are an idiot who can't read, so I suppose I understand your confusion.

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#173 - 2016-08-18 00:09:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Cockchaos
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
In point of fact I have remained calm throughout this entire thread...

But as we have illustrated you are an idiot who can't read, so I suppose I understand your confusion.



Debatable hahahaha

Yes, blessed with more balls than brains, you are good at pointing out the obvious, terrible at hiding the fact that you are a CODE alt hahahaha

What blows your cover is that you don't want the player base to be able to retaliate against gankers.
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#174 - 2016-08-18 00:15:47 UTC
Cockchaos wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
In point of fact I have remained calm throughout this entire thread...

But as we have illustrated you are an idiot who can't read, so I suppose I understand your confusion.



Debatable hahahaha

Yes, blessed with more balls than brains, you are good at pointing out the obvious, terrible at hiding the fact that you are a CODE alt hahahaha

What blows your cover is that you don't want the player base to be able to retaliate against gankers.

Well, I wasn't aware I needed to hide something that is self evidently not true...

Should I try harder to hide the fact that I am also the owner of CCP? Or the fact that every CEO of every corporation in EVE is actually *my alt*? Perhaps I should be trying to hide the fact that you've been permanently banned from EVE? I mean with most people I don't have to hide these things, because they are self evidently not true....But with you that seems to equate to proof positive...



Also - since we have clearly established that you *have no balls* and are too chicken to do a single ****ing thing....does that mean you actually have a *negative* supply of brains? That actually explains a lot...

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#175 - 2016-08-18 00:18:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Cockchaos
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Cockchaos wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
In point of fact I have remained calm throughout this entire thread...

But as we have illustrated you are an idiot who can't read, so I suppose I understand your confusion.



Debatable hahahaha

Yes, blessed with more balls than brains, you are good at pointing out the obvious, terrible at hiding the fact that you are a CODE alt hahahaha

What blows your cover is that you don't want the player base to be able to retaliate against gankers.

Well, I wasn't aware I needed to hide something that is self evidently not true...

Should I try harder to hide the fact that I am also the owner of CCP? Or the fact that every CEO of every corporation in EVE is actually *my alt*? Perhaps I should be trying to hide the fact that you've been permanently banned from EVE? I mean with most people I don't have to hide these things, because they are self evidently not true....But with you that seems to equate to proof positive...



Also - since we have clearly established that you *have no balls* and are too chicken to do a single ****ing thing....does that mean you actually have a *negative* supply of brains? That actually explains a lot...



Wtfuck are you babbling about lol
Nitshe Razvedka
#176 - 2016-08-18 03:20:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Nitshe Razvedka
CrazyRooster is after my pot-stiring-award. Must get a DNA check.Smile


(might have been that wild ni in Tama)

Thieving pirates discuss INTEGRITY; Anarchist gankers give us LAWS; and Whoring merc's cry then blow off clients with INSULTS.

Up is down and down is up in the C&P Forum.
Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#177 - 2016-08-18 03:24:22 UTC
Cockchaos wrote:

Yes I was born with more balls than brains

I highly doubt that, especially since:
You're talking on an alt (like you were scared of repercussions),
You obviously never ganked (your limited knowledge on how to stop something you supposedly did, dead giveaway),
You do a lot of big talk, but you're unable to do anything you say

Stop trying to be a victim when you're nothing but an excuse.
Adapt or Die
Cool

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist
Nitshe Razvedka
#178 - 2016-08-18 03:31:30 UTC
Dom, I leave you in good hands with the OP. try and find your safe place .Smile

Thieving pirates discuss INTEGRITY; Anarchist gankers give us LAWS; and Whoring merc's cry then blow off clients with INSULTS.

Up is down and down is up in the C&P Forum.
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#179 - 2016-08-18 03:31:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Cockchaos
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Cockchaos wrote:

Yes I was born with more balls than brains

I highly doubt that, especially since:
You're talking on an alt (like you were scared of repercussions),
You obviously never ganked (your limited knowledge on how to stop something you supposedly did, dead giveaway),
You do a lot of big talk, but you're unable to do anything you say

Stop trying to be a victim when you're nothing but an excuse.
Adapt or Die
Cool


Hahahaha, more balls than brains regarding real life bud. Balls don't cross over to an internet spaceship game, however, my stupidity does.

For now I'm using this character to talk on the forums, eventually I will use my main.... actually I dont know which character is my main at this point, I biomassed my main main, the toon I used to gank with years ago while you were busy grinding your moon elf up in World of Warcraft.

I have not said I would do anything until it is feasible to do more than disrupt CODE, the purpose of this post is to point out that gankers operate with impunity in high sec due to current game mechanics. I'm hoping things change, so members of CODE have to undock in something other than throw away gank ships.


...you imbecile
Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#180 - 2016-08-18 09:23:01 UTC
Cockchaos wrote:
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Cockchaos wrote:

Yes I was born with more balls than brains

I highly doubt that, especially since:
You're talking on an alt (like you were scared of repercussions),
You obviously never ganked (your limited knowledge on how to stop something you supposedly did, dead giveaway),
You do a lot of big talk, but you're unable to do anything you say

Stop trying to be a victim when you're nothing but an excuse.
Adapt or Die
Cool


Hahahaha, more balls than brains regarding real life bud. Balls don't cross over to an internet spaceship game, however, my stupidity does.

For now I'm using this character to talk on the forums, eventually I will use my main.... actually I dont know which character is my main at this point, I biomassed my main main, the toon I used to gank with years ago while you were busy grinding your moon elf up in World of Warcraft.

I have not said I would do anything until it is feasible to do more than disrupt CODE, the purpose of this post is to point out that gankers operate with impunity in high sec due to current game mechanics. I'm hoping things change, so members of CODE have to undock in something other than throw away gank ships.


...you imbecile

Go on with the name calling, it's really showing your toxic cause.
Keep on asking for CCP to do the player's job for you, it'll never happen.

Good luck in your endeavors... If you ever grow a pair to actually do something else than whining on the forums lmao

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist