These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Taking the fight to CODE

First post
Author
Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#121 - 2016-08-17 14:19:07 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Loyal has been very active since the toon's creation.. he was already doing large scale freighter ganks over 18 months ago, once or twice a week, every week. Then he went on that amazingly fun rampage that lasted a couple of months, then he got banned.

Even though he's not with us anymore, his impact is set in the history of New Eden, whilst all the anti gankers have been long forgotten hehehe

Loyal was "active" in the sense that he ganked 1000 random things a month for most of his EVE career, yes.

Almost every single freighter he killed was in the end of January 2016 and the entire month of February 2016...He may have killed a couple before then, but no significant numbers.

Then he dropped to only 450 kills in March, and only 27 in April before he got himself banned...his lowest activity levels since he started the character.


If you exclude January/February of *this year* - Loyal would have no legacy at all - he would be just one of the more active CODE. members.


I would argue that Helicity's Hulkageddon events had *far* more impact on ganking of freighters (and hulks/other mining ships of course) than Loyal's month or so - and Loyal was merely copying a past legend for a brief moment of glory.



@ Faylee - yes, I've seen a gank fleet parked on a gate waiting for *me* specifically, in my jump freighter. The fleet was comprised of assorted Goons/CODE. members - who shockingly enough had high enough sec status they didn't get shot in the 0.5 system (at the time anyway). Fortunately for me I'm not an idiot, so there is no killmail to show for the incident.

No however, I never saw Loyal's fleets. Nor do I particularly care.

Loyal left his mark long before january/February of this year. Those two months only made sure of it.

On a side note, the fleets were a sight to see, both from inside and from outside.
I miss those 60-man velator fleets lol

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist

Faylee Freir
Abusing Game Mechanics
#122 - 2016-08-17 14:20:50 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Loyal has been very active since the toon's creation.. he was already doing large scale freighter ganks over 18 months ago, once or twice a week, every week. Then he went on that amazingly fun rampage that lasted a couple of months, then he got banned.

Even though he's not with us anymore, his impact is set in the history of New Eden, whilst all the anti gankers have been long forgotten hehehe

Loyal was "active" in the sense that he ganked 1000 random things a month for most of his EVE career, yes.

Almost every single freighter he killed was in the end of January 2016 and the entire month of February 2016...He may have killed a couple before then, but no significant numbers.

Then he dropped to only 450 kills in March, and only 27 in April before he got himself banned...his lowest activity levels since he started the character.


If you exclude January/February of *this year* - Loyal would have no legacy at all - he would be just one of the more active CODE. members.


I would argue that Helicity's Hulkageddon events had *far* more impact on ganking of freighters (and hulks/other mining ships of course) than Loyal's month or so - and Loyal was merely copying a past legend for a brief moment of glory.



@ Faylee - yes, I've seen a gank fleet parked on a gate waiting for *me* specifically, in my jump freighter. The fleet was comprised of assorted Goons/CODE. members - who shockingly enough had high enough sec status they didn't get shot in the 0.5 system (at the time anyway). Fortunately for me I'm not an idiot, so there is no killmail to show for the incident.

No however, I never saw Loyal's fleets. Nor do I particularly care.


edit: And in the minds of many I suspect that Loyal will be remembered for the behaviour that got him banned from the game, more than for his in-game achievements. A truly ignoble end to someone who admittedly does appear to have been a decent leader for a time and possibly had some potential to impact the game in some way.

I can personally attest that Loyal was very active during my ganking prime from July/August till the end of the year. So youre wrong.
Faylee Freir
Abusing Game Mechanics
#123 - 2016-08-17 14:22:33 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Faylee Freir wrote:
Seems like your info is wrong. Come back when you get it right.

I'd better not see you referencing any stats from zkill then - if it is all wrong.

Vendetta has *ZERO* validated kills - per you P

Tbis has nothing to do with Vendetta or the fact that you seem to be only focusing on 2016.
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#124 - 2016-08-17 14:25:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Dirty Forum Alt
Faylee Freir wrote:
I can personally attest that Loyal was very active during my ganking prime from July/August till the end of the year. So youre wrong.

And yet Z-Kill says he only ganked 2,045 freighters and 163 Jump Freighters in his entire 6-year EVE career - and he killed over 4,500 ships in January/February 2016 alone. Even if we assume that half of those are pods and some weren't freighters...that is still the *vast* majority of his freighter kills right there.

So while he may have been "active" at other times - he certainly wasn't killing "every freighter"....or even any significant number of freighters.

I can also personally attest that I periodically autopilotted multiple freighters right down the main trade pipes fairly frequently from 2012 to 2015 - and I *never* saw a Loyal fleet, despite taking no particular precautions. So I'd say that counter-balances your anecdotal evidence of "seeing him active"...

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Faylee Freir
Abusing Game Mechanics
#125 - 2016-08-17 14:27:10 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Faylee Freir wrote:
I can personally attest that Loyal was very active during my ganking prime from July/August till the end of the year. So youre wrong.

And yet Z-Kill says he only ganked 2,045 freighters and 163 Jump Freighters in his entire 6-year EVE career - and he killed over 4,500 ships in January/February 2016 alone. Even if we assume that half of those are pods and some weren't freighters...that is still the *vast* majority of his freighter kills right there.

So while he may have been "active" at other times - he certainly wasn't killing "every freighter"....or even any significant number of freighters.

Go ask AG who they hate more, Loyalanon or Warrakini. They probably wont know who Warrakini is.
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#126 - 2016-08-17 14:32:38 UTC
Faylee Freir wrote:
Go ask AG who they hate more, Loyalanon or Warrakini. They probably wont know who Warrakini is.

Loyal went out of his way to make a specific enemy of AG - and was banned for crossing the line in doing so....so they are hardly a fair group to ask.

And I don't know who Warrakini is either - should I? I'm afraid I don't have an encyclopedic knowledge of every player who has ever played EVE....

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Faylee Freir
Abusing Game Mechanics
#127 - 2016-08-17 14:40:15 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Faylee Freir wrote:
Go ask AG who they hate more, Loyalanon or Warrakini. They probably wont know who Warrakini is.

Loyal went out of his way to make a specific enemy of AG - and was banned for crossing the line in doing so....so they are hardly a fair group to ask.

And I don't know who Warrakini is either - should I? I'm afraid I don't have an encyclopedic knowledge of every player who has ever played EVE....

Cute. Ever heard of Goonswarm?

Anyway. Beachtime. You enjoy whatever it is that Dirty Forum Alts do.
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#128 - 2016-08-17 14:44:54 UTC
To be clear - I'm only disputing your assertion that Loyal had an actual, meaningful impact on freighter traffic in the actual game.

I'm not disputing that he was well-known, or that he had a disproportionately large *psychological* impact on hauler traffic and anti-gankers....I'm just pointing out that aside from a bit over a month of *this year* he had no particular impact on actual freighter traffic at all - and he burned himself out of the game in just over a month of actually doing so.

Ganking has always been manageable and had a minimal impact on the game (outside of isolated "special events" that occur maybe once per year)...and Loyal did *not* change that.

Additionally, since you guys replied before I had added it in as an edit on my previous post, I'll move this up here:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
And in the minds of many I suspect that Loyal will be remembered for the behaviour that got him banned from the game, more than for his in-game achievements. A truly ignoble end to someone who admittedly does appear to have been a decent leader for a time and possibly had some potential to impact the game in some way.

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#129 - 2016-08-17 14:47:13 UTC
Faylee Freir wrote:
Cute. Ever heard of Goonswarm?

Anyway. Beachtime. You enjoy whatever it is that Dirty Forum Alts do.

I've heard of them, I've killed some of their members, I really have no particular interest in their politics or history. So if he is related to them in some meaningful way - that would by why I've never heard of him P

Enjoy the beach o/

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#130 - 2016-08-17 14:58:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Dirty Forum Alt
As a specific example: Kusion is averaging around 4 freighter kills per day, every single day.

He already has 50% of the total freighter kills amassed by Loyalanon over the course of Loyal's *6* years - even though he has only been active for around 2 years... And in 1-2 more years he will *pass* Loyal's total - 2 years faster than Loyal got there, even with his enormous spree early this year.

And maybe that is a legacy of Loyal - since he got Kusion started....


But *you yourself* say that Kusion is not having a significant impact on freighter traffic - even though he is killing them at a significantly higher average rate than Loyal did.


That is my point.

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#131 - 2016-08-17 17:52:33 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:

As for bumping though - sure - if you want to hail Brokk as a paragon of epic pilotting - who defeated an EZ-Mode machariel who should have been untouchable using nothing more than a clumsy hauler...I'll go with it. Yay Brokk - nobody else could possibly match your skill o7


Weird. I was under the impression I either got one lucky bump off, enough for that sandcrawler to get away. Or I distracted him. Or he thought maybe more were coming- idk.

He was definitely doing a much better job at it than I was; but we did find ourselves 17km off the Fenrir when it warped off. Somehow.

The point is, there were others nearby that could have helped and were in more suitable ships to do it. Right after Drac's post I wondered "yup, perhaps that's what it must have been: training" but we'll never know, do we? ZKill does not show "wasn't-killed-mail".

The take away all from this? I'm not sure whether it was one of my bumps that stopped him or at least made him miss but I *do* take offense to "clumsy hauler". U WOT M8? I've got nano thank you very much Lol
Faylee Freir
Abusing Game Mechanics
#132 - 2016-08-17 18:14:12 UTC
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:

As for bumping though - sure - if you want to hail Brokk as a paragon of epic pilotting - who defeated an EZ-Mode machariel who should have been untouchable using nothing more than a clumsy hauler...I'll go with it. Yay Brokk - nobody else could possibly match your skill o7


Weird. I was under the impression I either got one lucky bump off, enough for that sandcrawler to get away. Or I distracted him. Or he thought maybe more were coming- idk.

He was definitely doing a much better job at it than I was; but we did find ourselves 17km off the Fenrir when it warped off. Somehow.

The point is, there were others nearby that could have helped and were in more suitable ships to do it. Right after Drac's post I wondered "yup, perhaps that's what it must have been: training" but we'll never know, do we? ZKill does not show "wasn't-killed-mail".

The take away all from this? I'm not sure whether it was one of my bumps that stopped him or at least made him miss but I *do* take offense to "clumsy hauler". U WOT M8? I've got nano thank you very much Lol

Couldnt say as i would have had to witness it. The fact that you were counter bumping in a hauler is testament to the fact that players CAN and often times DO combat bumping effectively.

The sad thing is that if you had a proper setup Machariel with a full set of mid-grade nomads you very well could prove all of AG wrong and become real efficient at saving freighters from bumps. The problem is that most people are too lazy playing the victim card to actually do anything... So in their eyes bumping and ganking are imbalanced.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#133 - 2016-08-17 18:16:29 UTC
Faylee Freir wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Faylee Freir wrote:
I can personally attest that Loyal was very active during my ganking prime from July/August till the end of the year. So youre wrong.

And yet Z-Kill says he only ganked 2,045 freighters and 163 Jump Freighters in his entire 6-year EVE career - and he killed over 4,500 ships in January/February 2016 alone. Even if we assume that half of those are pods and some weren't freighters...that is still the *vast* majority of his freighter kills right there.

So while he may have been "active" at other times - he certainly wasn't killing "every freighter"....or even any significant number of freighters.

Go ask AG who they hate more, Loyalanon or Warrakini. They probably wont know who Warrakini is.



We know who they are.

And loyal will be best remembered, by me, for his chimping out when we denied him some fat loot with a cheap ship.

This is why we can't help but notice that there were five Hulkageddons spaced over a couple of years, why hyperdunking got an OK for a long time until it was not OK, and bumping has gone on forever and a prescribed fix for it has not even occurred yet, but as soon as we started popping freighter wrecks the change came in a matter of months.


BTW the best bumper IMO was Sigfried Cohenburg. He was only surpassed by Brad Neece who made short range ganks with blasters obsolete.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#134 - 2016-08-17 18:23:42 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Faylee Freir wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Faylee Freir wrote:
I can personally attest that Loyal was very active during my ganking prime from July/August till the end of the year. So youre wrong.

And yet Z-Kill says he only ganked 2,045 freighters and 163 Jump Freighters in his entire 6-year EVE career - and he killed over 4,500 ships in January/February 2016 alone. Even if we assume that half of those are pods and some weren't freighters...that is still the *vast* majority of his freighter kills right there.

So while he may have been "active" at other times - he certainly wasn't killing "every freighter"....or even any significant number of freighters.

Go ask AG who they hate more, Loyalanon or Warrakini. They probably wont know who Warrakini is.



We know who they are.

And loyal will be best remembered, by me, for his chimping out when we denied him some fat loot with a cheap ship.

This is why we can't help but notice that there were five Hulkageddons spaced over a couple of years, why hyperdunking got an OK for a long time until it was not OK, and bumping has gone on forever and a prescribed fix for it has not even occurred yet, but as soon as we started popping freighter wrecks the change came in a matter of months.


BTW the best bumper IMO was Sigfried Cohenburg. He was only surpassed by Brad Neece who made short range ganks with blasters obsolete.

Thing is, wreck changes affected everyone.
Not just gankers.
not just highsec

But you guys cried so hard when it happened, 'twas gloriously funny

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist

Faylee Freir
Abusing Game Mechanics
#135 - 2016-08-17 18:29:33 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Faylee Freir wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Faylee Freir wrote:
I can personally attest that Loyal was very active during my ganking prime from July/August till the end of the year. So youre wrong.

And yet Z-Kill says he only ganked 2,045 freighters and 163 Jump Freighters in his entire 6-year EVE career - and he killed over 4,500 ships in January/February 2016 alone. Even if we assume that half of those are pods and some weren't freighters...that is still the *vast* majority of his freighter kills right there.

So while he may have been "active" at other times - he certainly wasn't killing "every freighter"....or even any significant number of freighters.

Go ask AG who they hate more, Loyalanon or Warrakini. They probably wont know who Warrakini is.



We know who they are.

And loyal will be best remembered, by me, for his chimping out when we denied him some fat loot with a cheap ship.

This is why we can't help but notice that there were five Hulkageddons spaced over a couple of years, why hyperdunking got an OK for a long time until it was not OK, and bumping has gone on forever and a prescribed fix for it has not even occurred yet, but as soon as we started popping freighter wrecks the change came in a matter of months.


BTW the best bumper IMO was Sigfried Cohenburg. He was only surpassed by Brad Neece who made short range ganks with blasters obsolete.

I dont fault you for remembering Loyalanon in whatever way you want.

Im curious, elaborate on why Hyperdunking needed patching out. I had plenty of them stopped just by simply bringing one T1 logi or by simply bumping my Bowhead away.

Dont see how bumping is a problem when its easy to counter bump a freighter as we saw here in this thread. All you need to do as a mining ship is simply orbit the asteroids. Could also fit a higgs anchor rig.

The wreck ehp change was because of the inability for capital wrecks to be looted due to them being destroyed shortly after the ship popping.
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#136 - 2016-08-17 18:31:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Brokk Witgenstein
Faylee Freir wrote:

Dont see how bumping is a problem when its easy to counter bump a freighter as we saw here in this thread. All you need to do as a mining ship is simply orbit the asteroids. Could also fit a higgs anchor rig.


It's not easy. What you saw in this thread was I wasn't even sure it worked OR the bumper screwed up. Either that or someone hand me a medal please cause I'm the real McCoy.

What I was saying, was more along the lines of "Hey! Somebody give us a hand here please?"
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#137 - 2016-08-17 18:37:41 UTC
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:
Faylee Freir wrote:

Dont see how bumping is a problem when its easy to counter bump a freighter as we saw here in this thread. All you need to do as a mining ship is simply orbit the asteroids. Could also fit a higgs anchor rig.


It's not easy. What you saw in this thread was I wasn't even sure it worked OR the bumper screwed up. Either that or someone hand me a medal please cause I'm the real McCoy.

What I was saying, was more along the lines of "Hey! Somebody give us a hand here please?"

Sadly I don't think I can give you a medal unless you join my corp P

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Faylee Freir
Abusing Game Mechanics
#138 - 2016-08-17 18:47:35 UTC
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:
Faylee Freir wrote:

Dont see how bumping is a problem when its easy to counter bump a freighter as we saw here in this thread. All you need to do as a mining ship is simply orbit the asteroids. Could also fit a higgs anchor rig.


It's not easy. What you saw in this thread was I wasn't even sure it worked OR the bumper screwed up. Either that or someone hand me a medal please cause I'm the real McCoy.

What I was saying, was more along the lines of "Hey! Somebody give us a hand here please?"

Its easier than you think. If you wanna learn how ro bump i can show you some stuff.
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#139 - 2016-08-17 18:58:49 UTC
Faylee Freir wrote:

Its easier than you think. If you wanna learn how ro bump i can show you some stuff.

I know how to bump, I know how to manual pilot and I know how impact (mass x velocity) gets transfered. I was just in the wrong ship to make a meaningful difference. A distraction, a slight course correction were the best I could do. Thanks for the offer anyway tho.


Now, I've been thinking, the main issue with gang prevention is the narrow window of opportunity. It all happens in under 30 seconds; not enough time to even warp over there. It really has to come from the people already on grid who see it happen before their very eyes-- not a problem in a busy pipe, one would think.

Yet, the anonymous crowd does not launch drones, does not fire up their guns, the falcon flying through does not stop to jam 5-6 catalysts ... it's sad.

I've heard it said Highsec folks bring it upon themselves and I'd have to agree. The same applies to miners by the way: do you know how much DPS a flock of Procurers puts out? I can't figure out for the life of me why they don't just shoot the darn things. Nobody else is going to be there in time to save their skin but those already on grid. THEY are the ones who need to step up -- not someone else.

You can't expect a bunch of unpaid Griffins to preemptively patrol the belts, or have anti-bumpers near every gate "just in case". So you have to work with what you've got. That makes it a little harder than the theoretical "it's easy". It's only easy if you're in the right ship prepared for what's about to go down. Less so when in "whatever" ship responding to events as they transpire.
Faylee Freir
Abusing Game Mechanics
#140 - 2016-08-17 19:06:34 UTC
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:
Faylee Freir wrote:

Its easier than you think. If you wanna learn how ro bump i can show you some stuff.

I know how to bump, I know how to manual pilot and I know how impact (mass x velocity) gets transfered. I was just in the wrong ship to make a meaningful difference. A distraction, a slight course correction were the best I could do. Thanks for the offer anyway tho.


Now, I've been thinking, the main issue with gang prevention is the narrow window of opportunity. It all happens in under 30 seconds; not enough time to even warp over there. It really has to come from the people already on grid who see it happen before their very eyes-- not a problem in a busy pipe, one would think.

Yet, the anonymous crowd does not launch drones, does not fire up their guns, the falcon flying through does not stop to jam 5-6 catalysts ... it's sad.

I've heard it said Highsec folks bring it upon themselves and I'd have to agree. The same applies to miners by the way: do you know how much DPS a flock of Procurers puts out? I can't figure out for the life of me why they don't just shoot the darn things. Nobody else is going to be there in time to save their skin but those already on grid. THEY are the ones who need to step up -- not someone else.

You can't expect a bunch of unpaid Griffins to preemptively patrol the belts, or have anti-bumpers near every gate "just in case". So you have to work with what you've got. That makes it a little harder than the theoretical "it's easy". It's only easy if you're in the right ship prepared for what's about to go down. Less so when in "whatever" ship responding to events as they transpire.

Youre very right. Which is why these threads are the same old arguments posted by different people (or altsP) that result in the same usual crowds going back and forth. Ultimately theres nothing none of us can do to persuade another if were all not willing to discuss things rationally. The issue is that most people are too lazy to help themselves, much less stay educated in mechsnics.