These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP baiting us on a free can....Vehemently opposed to the Vehement
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Kaely Tanniss
The Conference Council
The Conference
#81 - 2016-08-14 05:05:58 UTC
Celeste Coeval wrote:
Evi Polevhia wrote:
Look, seriously. If you have better ideas, hash it out with the CSM reps. While some good could possibly come out of this thread, talking to people who can actually do things is going to be better. This is EVE. Complaining in the wrong place will simply get you mocked more often than not.


I'm an '06 player.....pretty sure I know this already, a forum is a forum. a dialogue starts somewhere and here is as good a place as any, I can take the toxic elements in the community in my stride, but please don't assume this is simply a whine or a complaint, it's a critique. As for better ideas, do I really have to point to the hundreds if not thousands of other community ideas that are better than a reskin, a quick stats edit and a tour around the graphics department. This isn't hard, CCP designed everything else we love in this game, this is damn lazy. I am someone who solves problems, I am not a designer of ships, but I am pretty sure you can't call the Vehement a designed ship, it's a reskin...


Then doesn't said "critique" belong in the features and ideas forum? Blink

If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#82 - 2016-08-14 13:27:02 UTC
Celeste Coeval wrote:
Doc Fury wrote:
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Can we get a tl;dr before this gets locked?



New events, re-balances (dumbing-down) and new shinies are aimed at players who are more willing/likely to buy PLEX.





Which is not what built this games community originally, I don't mind the micro transactions, I don't mind the pointless shiny things, I do mind the enforced grind, the lazy design and I expect so much more from this games studio.



I do not think this word means what you think it means.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Celeste Coeval
The Gosimer and Scarab
#83 - 2016-08-16 08:03:41 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Celeste Coeval wrote:
Doc Fury wrote:
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Can we get a tl;dr before this gets locked?



New events, re-balances (dumbing-down) and new shinies are aimed at players who are more willing/likely to buy PLEX.





Which is not what built this games community originally, I don't mind the micro transactions, I don't mind the pointless shiny things, I do mind the enforced grind, the lazy design and I expect so much more from this games studio.



I do not think this word means what you think it means.


That is surely a matter of perspective. The route to one of these bpc is a long one, so is the route to building one, it is an arbitrarily long process to build one of these ships, an enforced grind. If you don't see it that way, then each to their own :)
Celeste Coeval
The Gosimer and Scarab
#84 - 2016-08-16 08:06:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Celeste Coeval
Kaely Tanniss wrote:


Then doesn't said "critique" belong in the features and ideas forum? Blink


For sure it is getting to that stage, but thanks for the prompt. If the mods felt it did, it would have been moved already, we are on page 5. But I think you are right, and it's time to start thinking about a concise set of suggestions.