These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Every year, there are less users playing, why??

First post
Author
Galaxy Chicken
Galaxy Farm Carebear Repurposing
#1061 - 2016-08-04 19:54:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Galaxy Chicken
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Galaxy Chicken wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Alternatively you could just target miners more than a month old who fit t2 modules...

Or scan your targets...

Or just hit the haulers and become rich...



I'm talking t2 fit, no tank.


Again, this isn't complicated maths.

A basic t2 fit retriever should drop ~3 million isk in loot (1 strip miner, 1 mining upgrade)

It can be ganked by a 2 million isk t1 fit catalyst in any 0.5 system with concord pre-pulled (using a free rookie ship)

You get 750k of the catalyst cost back - so total cost of the gank is 1.25 million isk.

3.75 million isk loot > 1.25 million isk lost.

Profit.


If you *choose* to gank ships that will not be profitable, by using cost-ineffective ships or targetting ships that are not cost effective to kill - that is still your *choice*....

Deal with it.


edit: I will grant you that strip miners and other mining modules are only half the price they were when I was ganking - shortly after the big infamous mining ship hp buff - and you are correct this did skew my old profit calculations. noticeably.... But the fact remains that you *know* going in exactly what your likely profit/loss is likely to be. You get the luxury of *choosing* how much isk to make. So don't cry if you make stupid choices.


Oh okay, so as long as I only gank completely untanked ships with t2 fittings in 0.5 systems and never fail a gank, I'll be good. Roll

So I say again, unless you're super selective about your targets (only occasionally actually ganking but spending most of your time passing up otherwise viable targets), you can expect to lose money over time.

You asserted that this is how "most people who gank miners" operate, which is very much incorrect.


I'm not whining about anything friend, I don't gank for profit. I'm just pointing out that the claims you made are false and you clearly don't know what you're talking about.


Look at it this way, by far the largest and most active miner-ganking organization in the game, doesn't do so for profit but rather for ideological reasons. What does that tell you about the profitability of ganking miners?
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#1062 - 2016-08-04 20:21:36 UTC
Galaxy Chicken wrote:
Look at it this way, by far the largest and most active miner-ganking organization in the game, doesn't do so for profit but rather for ideological reasons. What does that tell you about the profitability of ganking miners?

To be fair he puts it right out in the open - the leader of the largest miner-ganking organization in the game *does* do it for profits - and he puts 90% of all isk donated directly into his own pocket (over a trillion isk so far - and that is just what he has publicly reported) and doesn't even do any ganking himself...

But that is probably a discussion for another time/place P


Also TBH you may do a lot of ganking, but CODE is more of an RP group than real suicide gankers...I dunno if you qualify as "typical"...


In any case, have fun ganking Pirate

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Sarah Flynt
Red Cross Mercenaries
Silent Infinity
#1063 - 2016-08-04 20:36:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Sarah Flynt
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Like strip miners used to be 4 million, now they are 2 million. Retriever used to cost 35-40 million, now it is 25 million.

Where are you gettings these prices from? 2 million? Then you got very lucky as that is far away from their usual price point which hovers between 3.5 and 4 million these days (currently slightly below 3.7 million in Jita). Edit: I suppose you mean T2?

Retriever for 35-40 must have been a price spike a long time ago that you're remembering. 25 mil is also very cheap. They're usually traded for close to 30 mil, depending on mineral prices (currently 29 mil in Jita). Apart from that, drawing conclusions from T1 items/ships is dangerous as they're also built by the "minerals are free" idiots.

Have a look at http://eve-marketdata.com for statistics that exceed the 1 year limit of the ingame price history. It's quite interresting.

Sick of High-Sec gankers? Join the public channel Anti-ganking and the dedicated intel channel Gank-Intel !

Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#1064 - 2016-08-04 20:41:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Dirty Forum Alt
Sarah Flynt wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Like strip miners used to be 4 million, now they are 2 million. Retriever used to cost 35-40 million, now it is 25 million.


Where are you gettings these prices from? 2 million? Then you got very lucky as that is far away from their usual price point which hovers between 3.5 and 4 million these days (currently slightly below 3.7 million in Jita). Edit: I suppose you mean T2?

I got the prices in jita...where else?

TBH I just looked at T1..because not many miners seem to use T2...and I don't think I've ever actually purchased one - just got them as drops from miners...but the in-game estimate said close to 4 million isk...

and as I said, it was back just after the mining ship buff - so that may have spiked prices at the time I suppose.

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Paranoid Loyd
#1065 - 2016-08-04 20:43:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Paranoid Loyd
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
real suicide gankers...I dunno if you qualify as "typical"...
Huh?
What is a real suicide ganker?
What do you think is typical?

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Lex Gabinia
Res Repetundae
#1066 - 2016-08-04 20:48:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Lex Gabinia
Blood Retributor wrote:
Everyone is talking about Eve as a cold and harsh universe. Most of those people have no idea what that really means. Bedroom/basement/home office "warriors" Blink. If you are a considerate person and have experienced real life harsh and cold universe/environment, you will never want to "reap tears" without a very sound reason.

Well, it is a game. If someone in game has angered me or encroached on my space or I just do not look the like of them then why can I not try to reap in game tears? Not sure this is relevant at all because if one is unable to separate real life from a game environment then there are much bigger issues to work on.

Blood Retributor wrote:
Mining - boring, missions - boring/repetitive with negative effect on one's standings, lowsec - gatecamped, nullsec - divided/owned and most of the time unreachable for a noob that does not care about corporations/alliances.

THIS is the reason EVE is not for you. It is not a solo game in the long term. There are plenty of solo activities but playing the game solo usually does not lend itself to long term play.

Blood Retributor wrote:
Maybe Eve was intended as a sandbox, but it is not (especially for a new player). I looked on the recruitment forum to find a corp to join, that is in a WH/null. What do I find? Logi/mining ship/bait frigate skills for null, 20 mill SP for WH. Is that an open world/go wherever/do whatever you want environment? Hardly so!

First of all you contradict yourself in this section about corps compared to the one above. Also, I do not think you looked very hard because there are numerous new player friendly corps.

Anyway, in game design terms it is unquestionably a sandbox. You may not like the color of the sand or how it feels between your toes, but it is a sandbox.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#1067 - 2016-08-04 20:49:32 UTC
Blood Retributor wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:


Let me see, whining? Check.

Wanting only to have player-to-player interaction on his own term? Check.

Wild exaggeration in regards to ganking? Check.

Calling those who gank psychopaths? Check.

Eve is not a sandbox? Check.

Complaining about the learning curve? Check.

Maybe this isn't the game for those who are insistent on remaining ignorant and lazy.



Good try, but you failed Lol!

Lazy? Not really. I was spending 5-16 hours a day in the game for the whole time since I created my only character. To the point that I started having issues with my spouse. Reading, reading, reading!

Ignorant? Not really. More like Inquistive. I had invested years in some other activities (not gaming) earlier in my life that ended up to be a waste of time, so I have become more cautious.

I just value my time reserved for "fun" and do not want to put up with the BS you swallowed years ago and are now defending. Read again this whole thread and see what you yourselves, older players, are saying about the game and CCP.

Pease, make sure that you read and UNDERSTAND, before jumping to personal offences.

Sorry for using the more generic "psychopath" term. Should have used the more precise "sadists". Use Google to research the term and tell me how do you call those who thrive on other people's suffering ("tear reaping").

If you also paid attention I did not complain about learning curve. English is not my native language so I just used an expression that another vet player used in one of these forums. I just considered it the most accurate and descriptive.

You seem to be in the arguing mood, so I will ignore your future comments. You should follow Jenn aSide example. She at least brought value to the thread with her comment.


So you act like a jackass, you get called on it, you apologize and then use another offensive psychiatric diagnosis for players doing things you don't ilke...and you are the one complaining about my discourse? I guess that takes a special type of self-centeredness.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#1068 - 2016-08-04 20:49:37 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
real suicide gankers...I dunno if you qualify as "typical"...
Huh? What do you think is typical?

For gankers? Hauler gankers who do it to make a profit...Or people who do occasional miner/whatever ganks for fun. I realize they are fewer in number - but they've been around since the game began 13 years ago.


CODE. is a relatively new concept in EVE - and isn't even limited to just ganking, that is just one of the tools they use. They seem to be primarily focused on their role-play of "saving high-sec" from the "evil bot-aspirants" - not ganking. I believe even the CODE. members here will agree with me when I say that for CODE. ganking is just a *tool* - not the end goal of their organization...

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Paranoid Loyd
#1069 - 2016-08-04 21:00:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Paranoid Loyd
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
real suicide gankers...I dunno if you qualify as "typical"...
Huh? What do you think is typical?

For gankers? Hauler gankers who do it to make a profit...Or people who do occasional miner/whatever ganks for fun. I realize they are fewer in number - but they've been around since the game began 13 years ago.


CODE. is a relatively new concept in EVE - and isn't even limited to just ganking, that is just one of the tools they use. They seem to be primarily focused on their role-play of "saving high-sec" from the "evil bot-aspirants" - not ganking. I believe even the CODE. members here will agree with me when I say that for CODE. ganking is just a *tool* - not the end goal of their organization...

Relatively new or not, should the majority not be considered typical? Ignoring what typical is, what does classifying someone as typical or not typical accomplish? Is one's opinion any less relevant if they are not typical? Relevance should be based on knowledge and experience, not what is typical.

I can't speak for everyone but ganking is not the end goal of my organization and I fall into what you would arbitrarily call typical.

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#1070 - 2016-08-04 21:52:33 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
real suicide gankers...I dunno if you qualify as "typical"...
Huh? What do you think is typical?

For gankers? Hauler gankers who do it to make a profit...Or people who do occasional miner/whatever ganks for fun. I realize they are fewer in number - but they've been around since the game began 13 years ago.


CODE. is a relatively new concept in EVE - and isn't even limited to just ganking, that is just one of the tools they use. They seem to be primarily focused on their role-play of "saving high-sec" from the "evil bot-aspirants" - not ganking. I believe even the CODE. members here will agree with me when I say that for CODE. ganking is just a *tool* - not the end goal of their organization...

Relatively new or not, should the majority not be considered typical? Ignoring what typical is, what does classifying someone as typical or not typical accomplish? Is one's opinion any less relevant if they are not typical? Relevance should be based on knowledge and experience, not what is typical.

I can't speak for everyone but ganking is not the end goal of my organization and I fall into what you would arbitrarily call typical.

You could certainly consider them typical due to the number of people...but if we are going to start rating the balance or gankability of ships in terms of CODE.'s motivations... then the typical ganker shouldn't care whether there is any profit in it or not, nor how much tank the ship hull natively has... They have essentially endless isk to throw at their fun ganking - both from their profitable ganking and from numerous donations...So the entire discussion of costs vs profits becomes irrelevant.

But sure, if we use CODE. as a baseline - their average low-level member ganking miners doesn't make a profit from the gank itself - they only make a profit if they manage to sell a "permit". But they don't need to make a profit - because ganking is merely their form of highly aggressive door-to-door salesmanship/evangelism of their cult (again, all in game - role-play as I have said multiple times).

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1071 - 2016-08-04 21:58:56 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:

should the majority not be considered typical?

is the typical EvE player a .01 ISK biomassed Jita scammer?
is the typical EvE player bearing it up solo multiboxing?
is the typical EvE player AFK icemining?

There are some subtle differences between how many toons are participating versus how many genuine persons are playing. Does a multiboxed bomberwing count? Do the 6 alts also count?

In a discussion entirely around profit for the last 16 pages, I would think trying to earn a buck would classify as "typical" yes. If that doesn't factor in, then what the hell are y'all even talking about??
Galaxy Chicken
Galaxy Farm Carebear Repurposing
#1072 - 2016-08-04 22:14:13 UTC
Here's you saying gankers, "on average" break even or profit:

Dirty Forum Alt wrote:

On average people who gank mining ships at least break even nearly every time - and often make a small profit.


Here's you admitting most miner gankers = New Order:

Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
...even though I do realize they are the primary ganker of mining ships.



Here's you claiming that the "primary gankers of mining ships" are not "real" or "typical" and therefore do not count:

Dirty Forum Alt wrote:

Also TBH you may do a lot of ganking, but CODE is more of an RP group than real suicide gankers...I dunno if you qualify as "typical"...


It was important that you backpedal out of that one really quick, so you don't have to admit that the "primary gankers of mining ships" = New Order = ganking at a loss.


I knew if I gave you enough rope, you'd hang yourself.
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#1073 - 2016-08-04 22:23:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Dirty Forum Alt
Galaxy Chicken wrote:

I knew if I gave you enough rope, you'd hang yourself.

If you want to discuss ganking profitability in terms of CODE. - the mining ships are irrelevant.

Fine, lets say you lose a couple million isk per mining ship - doesn't matter.

Because then we have to factor in all the *other* ships your alliance ganks. The freighters, the industrials, the missioning ships, etc.

Your average freighter gank seems to drop around, what, 2 billion isk in loot as a safe low-ball estimate? Multiply that by 3600 freighters ganked and that gives us an estimated profit of 7.2 trillion isk. Just from freighters - not even including haulers/etc.

Now, lets say you lose 5 million isk per miner you gank - that means you are still making a profit overall for at least 1.44 million miner ganks.

Now, lets assume CODE. is nothing but a scam on its own members (just for the fun of it), and your leadership just puts 90% of that straight into their own pockets - that still leaves you with 144,000 fully paid for miner ganks. Since CODE. has only performed 65,000 kills to date - total, I'd say you are making quite a handsome profit with your ganking.

Q.E.D. - having done the math - The *typical* ganker (hereby defined as CODE.) is making massive profits on average.


edit: And I didn't even include your donations at all, nor the hauler kills, nor any other sources of income. The real profit amount is of course significantly higher.

edit #2: And please take notice that I literally just *threw away* 90% of my calculated profit with my (ridiculous?) assumption that CODE. is just a scam - if we assume the CODE. leadership isn't running it as a scam and that all of the money gets used for ganking....well...I'm 10 times as right using those numbers... (or we could assume a ridiculously low profit of only 200m isk per freighter and use my current -90% numbers - either way really)

edit #3: **** even if we just take your total isk lost for all time on zkill - which includes POSes, POCOs, your own mining barges, etc etc etc etc (a lot more than ganking ships) - that is still only 1.18t. And I do think that my estimate of 7.2 trillion isk in loot drops is pretty ridiculously low with a total of 33.81t isk destroyed...I mean that is only a value drop rate of 21%...That is just your potential *bounty payouts* before loot is even factored in...

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Galaxy Chicken
Galaxy Farm Carebear Repurposing
#1074 - 2016-08-04 22:50:57 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Fine, lets say you lose a couple million isk per mining ship...


I like this guy Big smile , he admits he's wrong when he's shown to be so.


Galaxy Chicken
Galaxy Farm Carebear Repurposing
#1075 - 2016-08-04 23:04:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Galaxy Chicken
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Because then we have to factor in all the *other* ships your alliance ganks. The freighters, the industrials, the missioning ships, etc.

Your average freighter gank seems to drop around, what, 2 billion isk in loot as a safe low-ball estimate? Multiply that by 3600 freighters ganked and that gives us an estimated profit of 7.2 trillion isk. Just from freighters - not even including haulers/etc.

Now, lets say you lose 5 million isk per miner you gank - that means you are still making a profit overall for at least 1.44 million miner ganks.



Your math is, as usual, pretty messed up, but before we even get into that, please explain to me how Jason Kusion ganking a freighter somehow results in cash going into my pocket.

I'm a miner ganker, that is what we were talking about before you started desperately trying to make this about the Savior of Highsec and whatever else...


You act like we have an alliance treasury or something, we don't. We have an SRP fund that is filled through donations.
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#1076 - 2016-08-04 23:24:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Dirty Forum Alt
Galaxy Chicken wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Because then we have to factor in all the *other* ships your alliance ganks. The freighters, the industrials, the missioning ships, etc.

Your average freighter gank seems to drop around, what, 2 billion isk in loot as a safe low-ball estimate? Multiply that by 3600 freighters ganked and that gives us an estimated profit of 7.2 trillion isk. Just from freighters - not even including haulers/etc.

Now, lets say you lose 5 million isk per miner you gank - that means you are still making a profit overall for at least 1.44 million miner ganks.



Your math is, as usual, pretty messed up, but before we even get into that, please explain to me how Jason Kusion ganking a freighter somehow results in cash going into my pocket.

I'm a miner ganker, that is what we were talking about before you started desperately trying to make this about the Savior of Highsec and whatever else...


You act like we have an alliance treasury or something, we don't. We have an SRP fund that is filled through donations.

Like I said - the miner gankers in CODE. lose money.

You are the peons.

The amusing slaves upon whose back the empire is built.

I agreed with you on that point already: Yes, miner-ganking as CODE. does it is *not* profitable - and would be considered *stupid* if taken purely on its own without reference to the greater motivations of the CODE. organization.

Since you probably can't understand all those big words, let me simplify it for you:

You = Right.

You = Bad @ Gank for $$$

But You = OK because CODE. = Reasons

Yay You

Roll

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Galaxy Chicken
Galaxy Farm Carebear Repurposing
#1077 - 2016-08-04 23:28:38 UTC
Hey thanks bud. It's really classy of you to admit when you lose at forum PVP.
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#1078 - 2016-08-04 23:28:59 UTC
And for the record - yes, I am jealous of CODE.

I wish I'd thought of it first...

I mean **** - forget people who afk mine to earn isk for PLEX to play for free.....Arbitrarily declaring myself leader of high sec and recruiting a bunch of easily amused drones to farm isk for me, so that I *don't even have to log in* to earn isk to get PLEX and play for free? That is absolutely brilliant.

James 315 truly is a visionary - at least in the running for the absolute best scammer in EVE history.

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#1079 - 2016-08-04 23:29:47 UTC
Galaxy Chicken wrote:
Hey thanks bud. It's really classy of you to admit when you lose at forum PVP.

gf

P

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#1080 - 2016-08-04 23:51:25 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
And for the record - yes, I am jealous of CODE.

I wish I'd thought of it first...

I mean **** - forget people who afk mine to earn isk for PLEX to play for free.....Arbitrarily declaring myself leader of high sec and recruiting a bunch of easily amused drones to farm isk for me, so that I *don't even have to log in* to earn isk to get PLEX and play for free? That is absolutely brilliant.

James 315 truly is a visionary - at least in the running for the absolute best scammer in EVE history.


Shocked

That is alot of AFK mining. And PLEX is not playing for free.

Sorry, couldn't let that softball go by.....

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online