Player Features and Ideas Discussion

nah

Just make it so the person scanned has a warning show up on his screen identifying who scanned him.

Why do I owe you any respect?

Already have that.

And people not aligned one way or the other. No circle jerk. Just pointing out BS for being BS.

Except it is not BS what I raised .

My dear stalker you backed off when I called you out on it, then your next post on me was an attack post at a personal level and nothing to do with the discussion. That is why I called you out on it before. By all means talk about the issue I raised on the EHP of wrecks but to make digs without addressing the issue defines what you are doing.

The previous post you did was when Dirty Forum Alt used the expression Psychology about another player, not me, you then jumped in and said something along the lines of suggesting I was an expert in Psychology in a mocking tone. I was in that thread, but not involved in that lively debate. For you to jump in and then throw that comment like that shows that you have an issue. I looked at your post shook my head and thought he is back at it again, I will ignore him, then you come in here and start again.

Earlier one of your fellow ganker supporters got all upset because I dealt with their hamfisted attempt to scare me with slander rubbish which I dealt with my clarifying with my legal advisor what I can and cannot do in terms of my accusation on the EHP wreck buff. At which point he goes off as if I am threatening him with lawyers and invokes the Scientology religion threat as if I was doing the same, some sort of guilt by association, which I ignored because it was so silly. I am quite happy to protect myself against people who might decide to use legal action against me, some of you people take this game way to seriously so best to be sure, but I will never do that myself. It is a game and winning in it by means like that is just silly.

You have got into a mocking insulting pattern, so that everytime I post you accuse me of saying I am an expert in something or whatever takes your fancy . This is because in one thread I pointed out that you were going on about fighting and PvP and yet you had not killed anything in terms of PvP. Ever since then you took it very personally and keep making snarky insulting posts like the one above.

I suggest you grow up and stop acting like a man child.

What in the **** does wreck ehp have to do with being "safe"?

Do you guys even read your posts sometimes?



I mean I'm not even disagreeing with your core point necessarily - the timing on the wreck ehp change may well be a coincidence...but why in the **** did you throw in the comment about safety along with it

It is not so much the issue of what was done, hell CCP have to make a decision on game balance and doing things that make sense, the EHP of wrecks in itself was a good move and Endie made the case for it and I don't disagree with that point.

The important part was that the AG players were just starting to blow up wrecks, some of them myself included were training up ganker alts to fly a certain ship type and some people were starting to do it. This was not the normal passive defence type of play where one tries to rep up a freighter, or blow up or jam the gankers, people were doing something like the gankers, using toons that would be -10. It was offensive action and it was effective, then this change gets pushed through, pushed by the CEO of the corp that was the major ganker corp.

The gankers had tried to stop this, they shot at the players blowing up wrecks and webbed them etc., but they were having troubles, because it was the same as us trying to shoot gankers, fast moving frigates warping quickly coming in blasting things getting CONCORDED. AG was playing like the gankers and they did not like it.

Afterwards Fozzie realised they had been had so they applied the EHP buff to freighters from the DCU II which could not be used on a freighter. And said it was to balance off against something...

The issue is that the AG players were doing a fun offensive action and the gankers could not deal with it, we can both agree with the wreck EHP being silly and all that but what gets me is that Gankers have been crying about nerfs and using the EHP buff to freighters as if they are hard done by and yet that was a massive balance in their favour and I got fed up with their propaganda and decided to blast them for it.

In doing this I am sadly attacking a player who a lot of people respect and like which is never a good thing, hell I know people who know and like him, but this entire issue needs to be shown up for what it is. CCP were not biased towards ganking here, they were just incompetent.

But most of all it is to show that the game balance around ganking is completely skewed, they have the cheek to start going on about this nerf when they are coming out way way on top with this exchange of nerf buff. The AG players have to do passive defence only.

You saw in this thread baltec1 being told by me, now you know what it is like trying to kill small fast targets like that. So when these people go off and start whining about nerf's to ganking, this whole sorry episode of vested interest and incompetence and destroying great content for the AG players should be rammed down their collective throats. Yeah ruin their game, you are only there to be shot at, you cannot do the shooting, yeah right, that's what these players wanted and that is what they have got, remember AG is fail, but not is all black and white on that comment is it...

So like bumping, ganking needs another no-consequence mechanic.

Check.

Must be a good idea then.