These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Tech 2 Mining Barge Cost

First post
Author
Brigadine Ferathine
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2016-07-21 06:05:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Brigadine Ferathine
The price is high because of the cost of making them. They are NOT worth the cost. There really isn't much about them that makes them worth being 10 times more expensive than t1. No this isn't a rant but I feel like their effectiveness needs to be increased or the material cost needs to be decreased. IDC which, but they aren't good the way they are. Their price is very close to the manufacturing cost.... that says it all.
Noah Reese
#2 - 2016-07-21 06:07:12 UTC
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
The price is high because of the cost of making them. They are NOT worth the cost. There really isn't much about them that makes them worth being 10 times more expensive than t1. No this isn't a rant but I feel like their effectiveness needs to be increased or the material cost needs to be decreased. IDC which, but they aren't good the way they are. Their price is very close to the manufacturing cost.... that says it all.


Simple solution, don't use them then. In the mean time everyone else, who can use logic, will use them just fine.
Salah ad-Din al-Jawahiri
Dreamweb Industries
Novus Ordo.
#3 - 2016-07-21 06:20:20 UTC
Brigadine Ferathine
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2016-07-21 06:26:05 UTC
Salah ad-Din al-Jawahiri wrote:

uh?
Paranoid Loyd
#5 - 2016-07-21 06:26:40 UTC
What a surprise that reply confused you. Roll

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Brigadine Ferathine
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2016-07-21 06:27:05 UTC
Noah Reese wrote:
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
The price is high because of the cost of making them. They are NOT worth the cost. There really isn't much about them that makes them worth being 10 times more expensive than t1. No this isn't a rant but I feel like their effectiveness needs to be increased or the material cost needs to be decreased. IDC which, but they aren't good the way they are. Their price is very close to the manufacturing cost.... that says it all.


Simple solution, don't use them then. In the mean time everyone else, who can use logic, will use them just fine.

You mean, who cant use logic will use them?
Noah Reese
#7 - 2016-07-21 06:31:13 UTC
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
Noah Reese wrote:
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
The price is high because of the cost of making them. They are NOT worth the cost. There really isn't much about them that makes them worth being 10 times more expensive than t1. No this isn't a rant but I feel like their effectiveness needs to be increased or the material cost needs to be decreased. IDC which, but they aren't good the way they are. Their price is very close to the manufacturing cost.... that says it all.


Simple solution, don't use them then. In the mean time everyone else, who can use logic, will use them just fine.

You mean, who cant use logic will use them?


Looking at your long list of losses it seems you don't really understand EVE at all, it's therefore not surprising you don't seem to understand this either.
Brigadine Ferathine
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2016-07-21 06:40:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Brigadine Ferathine
Noah Reese wrote:
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
Noah Reese wrote:
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
The price is high because of the cost of making them. They are NOT worth the cost. There really isn't much about them that makes them worth being 10 times more expensive than t1. No this isn't a rant but I feel like their effectiveness needs to be increased or the material cost needs to be decreased. IDC which, but they aren't good the way they are. Their price is very close to the manufacturing cost.... that says it all.


Simple solution, don't use them then. In the mean time everyone else, who can use logic, will use them just fine.

You mean, who cant use logic will use them?


Looking at your long list of losses it seems you don't really understand EVE at all, it's therefore not surprising you don't seem to understand this either.

Yes, because killboards mean all. Did it ever occur to you many people don't care? For the record, I have never lost a tech two mining barge. I'm talking about raw manufacturing cost vs actual value vs are people willing to pay that much for such a little gain. How does that mean I don't understand this game?

Back on topic. This is an economics discussion not a how many times someone has been ganked discussion. Discuss my post not my killboard.
Noah Reese
#9 - 2016-07-21 06:51:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Noah Reese
Your killboard reads like a "how to get farmed 101" and "what to REALLY not do 101", it showcases a distinct lack of understanding which is perpetuated here, really. The fact that you haven't lost one yet doesn't somehow validate your... logic and of top of that if you "don't care", as you put it, why care about Exhumers?

Exhumers are fine, as always the last few percent of performance costs the most. This is the case in real life, in many aspects of EVE and as it turns out also with Exhumers. Who knew.
Brigadine Ferathine
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2016-07-21 06:57:50 UTC
Noah Reese wrote:
Your killboard reads like a "how to get farmed 101" and "what to REALLY not do 101", it showcases a distinct lack of understanding which is perpetuated here, really. The fact that you haven't lost one yet doesn't somehow validate your... logic and of top of that if you "don't care", as you put it, why care about Exhumers?

Exhumers are fine, as always the last few percent of performance costs the most. This is the case in real life, in many aspects of EVE and as it turns out also with Exhumers. Who knew.

Ignoring this, I refuse to let you side track this.
Paranoid Loyd
#11 - 2016-07-21 07:04:38 UTC
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
This is an economics discussion
The economic principle that drives the price of the T2 barges was linked for you. If your response to that is "uh?" it is blatantly obvious you are not capable of such a discussion.

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Avaelica Kuershin
Paper Cats
#12 - 2016-07-21 07:12:06 UTC
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
The price is high because of the cost of making them. They are NOT worth the cost. There really isn't much about them that makes them worth being 10 times more expensive than t1. No this isn't a rant but I feel like their effectiveness needs to be increased or the material cost needs to be decreased. IDC which, but they aren't good the way they are. Their price is very close to the manufacturing cost.... that says it all.


Why do you feel they need to be either better or cheaper?

If someone wants to spend 10 times more on a T2 hull for a small increase in performance, let them.

(And yes, I do use T2 hulls but mostly because of additional features - Ever since the expedition frigates came out, I've been wondering the worth of the squishier barges)
Brigadine Ferathine
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#13 - 2016-07-21 07:12:09 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
This is an economics discussion
The economic principle that drives the price of the T2 barges was linked for you. If your response to that is "uh?" it is blatantly obvious you are not capable of such a discussion.

The pricing of the T2 barges is right at their manufacturing cost. it is not that complicated.
Brigadine Ferathine
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2016-07-21 07:17:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Brigadine Ferathine
Avaelica Kuershin wrote:
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
The price is high because of the cost of making them. They are NOT worth the cost. There really isn't much about them that makes them worth being 10 times more expensive than t1. No this isn't a rant but I feel like their effectiveness needs to be increased or the material cost needs to be decreased. IDC which, but they aren't good the way they are. Their price is very close to the manufacturing cost.... that says it all.


Why do you feel they need to be either better or cheaper?

If someone wants to spend 10 times more on a T2 hull for a small increase in performance, let them.

(And yes, I do use T2 hulls but mostly because of additional features - Ever since the expedition frigates came out, I've been wondering the worth of the squishier barges)

The price just doesn't validate the gains over t1 barges. As far as I know the frigates are fine. I haven't used them in a long time. That's the thing, I feel like they aren't utilized because of the price. It just isn't worth it. The most expensive battleship t1 hull is the same price as a little t2 barge like why?
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#15 - 2016-07-21 07:42:41 UTC
I have to agree with the OP.

Due to the changes CCP did to Industry there's basically not much profit in doing production in this game.

I've spent the past month clearing out loot stashed in well over 300 stations in 21 regions that was gained from doing years of exploration and missions. After comparing sell price to reprocess price and going with the highest one, I thought I had amassed a sizable amount of Minerals to build a Bowhead Transport ship. After researching I realized I only had 1/5th of the Minerals required to build the Materials needed to build the Bowhead.

Since I had already purchased a Bowhead BPC package, I definitely wasn't going to spend the rest of the year mining Ore just to build the ship. I ended up buying the rest of the Minerals from the Market. After adding in the cost of production and the BPC package, the total amount I spent comes to 1.1 bill ISK.

The average Market price for the Bowhead is 1.5 bill ISK. Definitely not much profit to be made there and I didn't even include the time I spent doing it..

So yeah, I agree with the OP, the amount of Minerals required to build the Materials is too much. Also the amount of Materials required to build the hull is too much.

Seriously, I know this game is a time sink but this is just ridiculous.


DMC
Brigadine Ferathine
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#16 - 2016-07-21 07:47:44 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
I have to agree with the OP.

Due to the changes CCP did to Industry there's basically not much profit in doing production in this game.

I've spent the past month clearing out loot stashed in well over 300 stations in 21 regions that was gained from doing years of exploration and missions. After comparing sell price to reprocess price and going with the highest one, I thought I had amassed a sizable amount of Minerals to build a Bowhead Transport ship. After researching I realized I only had 1/5th of the Minerals required to build the Materials needed to build the Bowhead.

Since I had already purchased a Bowhead BPC package, I definitely wasn't going to spend the rest of the year mining Ore just to build the ship. I ended up buying the rest of the Minerals from the Market. After adding in the cost of production and the BPC package, the total amount I spent comes to 1.1 bill ISK.

The average Market price for the Bowhead is 1.5 bill ISK. Definitely not much profit to be made there and I didn't even include the time I spent doing it..

So yeah, I agree with the OP, the amount of Minerals required to build the Materials is too much. Also the amount of Materials required to build the hull is too much.

Seriously, I know this game is a time sink but this is just ridiculous.


DMC

That's a lot of time for a 400m profit... shoulda just went ratting lol!
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#17 - 2016-07-21 07:52:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
I have to agree with the OP.

Due to the changes CCP did to Industry there's basically not much profit in doing production in this game.

I've spent the past month clearing out loot stashed in well over 300 stations in 21 regions that was gained from doing years of exploration and missions. After comparing sell price to reprocess price and going with the highest one, I thought I had amassed a sizable amount of Minerals to build a Bowhead Transport ship. After researching I realized I only had 1/5th of the Minerals required to build the Materials needed to build the Bowhead.

Since I had already purchased a Bowhead BPC package, I definitely wasn't going to spend the rest of the year mining Ore just to build the ship. I ended up buying the rest of the Minerals from the Market. After adding in the cost of production and the BPC package, the total amount I spent comes to 1.1 bill ISK.

The average Market price for the Bowhead is 1.5 bill ISK. Definitely not much profit to be made there and I didn't even include the time I spent doing it..

So yeah, I agree with the OP, the amount of Minerals required to build the Materials is too much. Also the amount of Materials required to build the hull is too much.

Seriously, I know this game is a time sink but this is just ridiculous.


DMC

That's a lot of time for a 400m profit... shoulda just went ratting lol!


You have to say that anyone who mines in this game is a goddam hero...

I had a look at manufacturing and got to invention and it annoyed the hell out of me, so I decided not to bother. hmmmmm I think another break from Eve is o the cards...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Elmund Egivand
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#18 - 2016-07-21 07:54:14 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
I have to agree with the OP.

Due to the changes CCP did to Industry there's basically not much profit in doing production in this game.

I've spent the past month clearing out loot stashed in well over 300 stations in 21 regions that was gained from doing years of exploration and missions. After comparing sell price to reprocess price and going with the highest one, I thought I had amassed a sizable amount of Minerals to build a Bowhead Transport ship. After researching I realized I only had 1/5th of the Minerals required to build the Materials needed to build the Bowhead.

Since I had already purchased a Bowhead BPC package, I definitely wasn't going to spend the rest of the year mining Ore just to build the ship. I ended up buying the rest of the Minerals from the Market. After adding in the cost of production and the BPC package, the total amount I spent comes to 1.1 bill ISK.

The average Market price for the Bowhead is 1.5 bill ISK. Definitely not much profit to be made there and I didn't even include the time I spent doing it..

So yeah, I agree with the OP, the amount of Minerals required to build the Materials is too much. Also the amount of Materials required to build the hull is too much.

Seriously, I know this game is a time sink but this is just ridiculous.


DMC

That's a lot of time for a 400m profit... shoulda just went ratting lol!


You have to say that anyone who mines in this game is a goddam hero...


I mine whenever I can't be arsed to do anything else for the day due to long work day.

A Minmatar warship is like a rusting Beetle with 500 horsepower Cardillac engines in the rear, armour plating bolted to chassis and a M2 Browning stuck on top.

Salah ad-Din al-Jawahiri
Dreamweb Industries
Novus Ordo.
#19 - 2016-07-21 07:55:48 UTC
Alright, I'm taking one for the team lest this thread get out of hand.

You see, the ISK cost / productivity ratio of most ships and equipment here in EVE is exponential, not linear. It means that with every upgrade you make to your ship you get diminishing results (the marginal cost of upgrates gets higher and higher).

For instance, the staple equipment of the New Order of Highsec is the miner ganking Catalyst, which has two primary fits: T1 and T2. T1 has 400 DPS and costs 2 million ISK. T2 dishes out 750 DPS and costs 10 million ISK. We can conclude that the upgrade is 5 times more expensive, but gives less than 2 time the damage. Now, if our ganking fleets had enough manpower, we all would be using T1 fits, because T1 is clearly the king of cost efficiency. However, good numbers aren't always available, so the gankers have to fit better ships - and go for higher costs - to achieve their goal (read: a ganked miner).

It doesn't apply to ganking only, this principle is universal: quantity versus quality, productivity versus cost efficiency. It gives us, the players, meaningful choices in our game experience. For a fleet commander, it's the choice between swarms of cheap expendable ships or expensive doctrines with better dakka. A miner will choose between mining yield and the assets he will risk losing to PvPers who are preying on them.

Now, the fact that the sell prices of T2 barges aren't far off from their production cost simply means that this particular market is overcrowded. More barges are being produed and sold than there are barges getting blown up, supply is higher than demand. For the manufacturer it leads to the necessity to switch to a different item to produce or to move to a different location to sell what he's got.

Agent of the New Order

Live by the Code - die by the Code.

The Voice of Highsec

Brigadine Ferathine
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2016-07-21 07:59:41 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
I have to agree with the OP.

Due to the changes CCP did to Industry there's basically not much profit in doing production in this game.

I've spent the past month clearing out loot stashed in well over 300 stations in 21 regions that was gained from doing years of exploration and missions. After comparing sell price to reprocess price and going with the highest one, I thought I had amassed a sizable amount of Minerals to build a Bowhead Transport ship. After researching I realized I only had 1/5th of the Minerals required to build the Materials needed to build the Bowhead.

Since I had already purchased a Bowhead BPC package, I definitely wasn't going to spend the rest of the year mining Ore just to build the ship. I ended up buying the rest of the Minerals from the Market. After adding in the cost of production and the BPC package, the total amount I spent comes to 1.1 bill ISK.

The average Market price for the Bowhead is 1.5 bill ISK. Definitely not much profit to be made there and I didn't even include the time I spent doing it..

So yeah, I agree with the OP, the amount of Minerals required to build the Materials is too much. Also the amount of Materials required to build the hull is too much.

Seriously, I know this game is a time sink but this is just ridiculous.


DMC

That's a lot of time for a 400m profit... shoulda just went ratting lol!


You have to say that anyone who mines in this game is a goddam hero...

I had a look at manufacturing and got to invention and it annoyed the hell out of me, so I decided not to bother. hmmmmm I think another break from Eve is o the cards...

For real. Its like people don't know where their ships come from...
123Next pageLast page