These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

What Kind of Highsec Content Creation Would Everyone Like Next?

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Jean Luc Clermont
Victory or Whatever
Nourv Gate Security Commission
#21 - 2016-07-15 15:56:01 UTC
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
Jean Luc Clermont wrote:
one with a less inflated ego that doesn't need to claim to be awesome?


In his defense, only people who can't actually DO anything need to thump their chests and brag about how great they are...



not really sure how that statement is "defending" him... Roll

and yes.. i know i double posted, I R Forum Fail
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#22 - 2016-07-15 15:58:17 UTC
Jean Luc Clermont wrote:
not really sure how that statement is "defending" him... Roll

and yes.. i know i double posted, I R Forum Fail


I was hoping my sarcasm was obvious.

Threads like this make me cringe. OP had 15 minutes of fame years ago and still thinks it's relevant/can't let it go.
Jean Luc Clermont
Victory or Whatever
Nourv Gate Security Commission
#23 - 2016-07-15 15:59:46 UTC
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
Jean Luc Clermont wrote:
not really sure how that statement is "defending" him... Roll

and yes.. i know i double posted, I R Forum Fail


I was hoping my sarcasm was obvious.

Threads like this make me cringe. OP had 15 minutes of fame years ago and still thinks it's relevant/can't let it go.


Oh... sorry...

I my sarcasm radar is failing me today...

But really, who the **** is this guy?
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#24 - 2016-07-15 16:05:10 UTC
Jean Luc Clermont wrote:
Oh... sorry...

I my sarcasm radar is failing me today...

But really, who the **** is this guy?


If he is who he claims to be, a guy who got his kicks trolling/messing with people IRL instead of keeping it in game and got banned for it.
Eli Stan
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2016-07-15 16:07:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Eli Stan
Held der Finsternis wrote:
What would you like to see in highsec?
I want to be able to fight in highsec without CONCORD interfering. I want all ships fitted with offensive modules or drones to be exempt from CONCORD or other NPC protection, including mine. I want to take a fleet into a citadel-bashing fleet and wreck them, or be wrecked by them, without bothering with war decs or anybody going criminal. Otherwise defenseless mining, industrial and transport ships, as well as defenseless combat ships, are the only ones that should ever get CONCORD spawns when shot. Ganking ships, Incursion ships, and security mission ships all should only have themselves and other players as protection. In other words, for combat ships highsec should be like NPC null except without bubbles or cynos.

In lore terms, CONCORD and NPCs tell us players they're busy dealing with drifters and we should HTFU and protect ourselves if we want to fly with weapons.
Jean Luc Clermont
Victory or Whatever
Nourv Gate Security Commission
#26 - 2016-07-15 16:29:26 UTC
Eli Stan wrote:
Held der Finsternis wrote:
What would you like to see in highsec?
I want to be able to fight in highsec without CONCORD interfering. I want all ships fitted with offensive modules or drones to be exempt from CONCORD or other NPC protection, including mine. I want to take a fleet into a citadel-bashing fleet and wreck them, or be wrecked by them, without bothering with war decs or anybody going criminal. Otherwise defenseless mining, industrial and transport ships, as well as defenseless combat ships, are the only ones that should ever get CONCORD spawns when shot. Ganking ships, Incursion ships, and security mission ships all should only have themselves and other players as protection. In other words, for combat ships highsec should be like NPC null except without bubbles or cynos.

In lore terms, CONCORD and NPCs tell us players they're busy dealing with drifters and we should HTFU and protect ourselves if we want to fly with weapons.


Dude...

two words

Low and Sec
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#27 - 2016-07-15 17:24:20 UTC
Why I'd like to see is a cargo hauling service where (1) escorts and intel are provided like a caravan, (2) you actually earn a buck.

Unfortunately, lacking (1) nobody pays for transport leading to (2) and no pay (2) leads back to square (1).

Furthermore, Ganking is the only thing making (1) a necessity but they're so uncommon and they only have a 30 sec window at most to prevent this from happening- making the threat level practically negligible.

Blanket wardecs on the other hand prevent (1) from happening in-corp until said cargo running corp reaches sufficient mass to actually deal with them.

For these reasons, haulers stay in NPC corps ensuring (2) does not happen. That's a pity, really.
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#28 - 2016-07-15 17:50:54 UTC
I am Ero(itcally charged)

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log
Eli Stan
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2016-07-15 18:22:07 UTC
Jean Luc Clermont wrote:
Eli Stan wrote:
Held der Finsternis wrote:
What would you like to see in highsec?
I want to be able to fight in highsec without CONCORD interfering. I want all ships fitted with offensive modules or drones to be exempt from CONCORD or other NPC protection, including mine. I want to take a fleet into a citadel-bashing fleet and wreck them, or be wrecked by them, without bothering with war decs or anybody going criminal. Otherwise defenseless mining, industrial and transport ships, as well as defenseless combat ships, are the only ones that should ever get CONCORD spawns when shot. Ganking ships, Incursion ships, and security mission ships all should only have themselves and other players as protection. In other words, for combat ships highsec should be like NPC null except without bubbles or cynos.

In lore terms, CONCORD and NPCs tell us players they're busy dealing with drifters and we should HTFU and protect ourselves if we want to fly with weapons.


Dude...

two words

Low and Sec
I fight in lowsec fairly often. I want to fight in highsec too, against other combat ships.
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2016-07-15 21:50:41 UTC
you want to fight? Just do it.

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#31 - 2016-07-15 22:07:13 UTC
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
If he is who he claims to be, a guy who got his kicks trolling/messing with people IRL instead of keeping it in game and got banned for it.

Maybe you should really read up on the stuff you are commenting about. Not sure why you think this had something to do with RL. He got one of those famous blank reason bans which you get if some dude at CCP has a personal problem with you or if they just want you gone and there is no real reason like an actual TOS/EULA violation (which they would obviously cite instead of just not telling you why you got banned).

Evil RatKid
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2016-07-15 22:20:13 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
If he is who he claims to be, a guy who got his kicks trolling/messing with people IRL instead of keeping it in game and got banned for it.

Maybe you should really read up on the stuff you are commenting about. Not sure why you think this had something to do with RL.

You wouldn't believe but every character in this game is controlled by real person.


Scary i know Shocked

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#33 - 2016-07-15 22:31:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Sonya Corvinus
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Maybe you should really read up on the stuff you are commenting about. Not sure why you think this had something to do with RL. He got one of those famous blank reason bans which you get if some dude at CCP has a personal problem with you or if they just want you gone and there is no real reason like an actual TOS/EULA violation (which they would obviously cite instead of just not telling you why you got banned).


First off, I appreciate the salt.

Anything in comms that has nothing to do with the game (ie, any bonus room, really) is just children acting like 12 year olds. Keep it in game please. That being said, I'm proud of you for writing something new instead of copy/pasting the same four messages you post here. Way to go!

Keep the salt coming. I do enjoy it.
Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
Citizen's Star Republic
#34 - 2016-07-16 00:35:08 UTC
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#35 - 2016-07-16 00:45:00 UTC
No matter what's going on here, I love this thread.

Nice post OP!

As for content ideas... pudding? Can we do pudding?

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
Empire Raider
Spicy Onion Rings
#36 - 2016-07-16 01:30:47 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
You signed your post Ero? So you have been evading your ban with this character the whole time? Or are you some douche impersonating Ero?


Right? And the funny part is that he is either getting banned for evading his ban or for impersonating another player.

RIP another troll who didn't read the EULA
Caco De'mon
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#37 - 2016-07-16 01:43:55 UTC
Held der Finsternis wrote:
What would you like to see to save Eve from itself and the carebears?


A 5th empire...Hub, enforced borders,citizenship, etc...

*"See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand."
Sustrai Aditua
Intandofisa
#38 - 2016-07-16 10:26:30 UTC
content creation...hooboy, youkillme...players playing a game "creating content". The "playing devs". Oh my. Youkillme.

If we get chased by zombies, I'm tripping you.
Hengle Teron
Red Sky Morning
The Amarr Militia.
#39 - 2016-07-16 17:55:23 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
If he is who he claims to be, a guy who got his kicks trolling/messing with people IRL instead of keeping it in game and got banned for it.

Maybe you should really read up on the stuff you are commenting about. Not sure why you think this had something to do with RL. He got one of those famous blank reason bans which you get if some dude at CCP has a personal problem with you or if they just want you gone and there is no real reason like an actual TOS/EULA violation (which they would obviously cite instead of just not telling you why you got banned).

Yep, looking to break a guy mentally into quitting your "minigame" after you scammed all his ingame assets is obviously still part of the "ingame".
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#40 - 2016-07-16 21:15:59 UTC
Hengle Teron wrote:
Yep, looking to break a guy mentally into quitting your "minigame" after you scammed all his ingame assets is obviously still part of the "ingame".

Sounds pretty ingame to me, since they scammed him for ingame assets and they made a great effort to keep everything ingame. Not sure what you mean by "break a guy", they simply requested that he sings songs to get his stuff back. Does not sound too serious if you ask me.

Evil RatKid
Previous page123Next page