EVE General Discussion

Yeah, the local police dont shoot at your face when they see it.
Seems a fairly big benifit to me.

Beyond that, why should players be penalised for pvp again?

Calling someone as prolific and helpful as Ralph a 'like farmer' is incredibly disingenuous (not to mention insulting), and completely undermines the swill you peddle.

OP - no benefits (either now or in the foreseeable future, I'm afraid), but I believe that at one point it was possible to get 5.5 positive sec status through a COSMOS mission, IIRC...a true badge for the real carebear!

Translation: I am Jelly of all the likes you have, and I aspire to someday reach the stars that you have set for us mortal's.

The wardec alliances have a lot of 5.0 security status characters in them because:
1: Locator agents and reputation.
2: They buy off CONCORD so they don't get hit for their bear-farming activities.
3: Flashy yellows of opportunity.

To you.

I personally wish your sec status effected concord response time if you where attacked. Zero being default, the closer to 5 you are the quicker they respond ( based off the security of the system) and the closer you are to -5 (or the magic number that makes you a criminal) the slower they respond. That would be kind of cool.

Yes like camera shakes or [insert hundreds of examples here]

Consider it "highsec content creation" :P

But honestly having a mechanic like that would make sense. As long as you dont dip below -2 or whatever the number is currently arbitrary. If you lowsec pirate just do some ratting before going out in your mining barge. Assuming you do that.

Unless you are talking about the fact it would be harder to highsec gank care bears... Wich really isn't PVP to be honest, doing that should be difficult if the target is fit correctly. As for the other end of it. You could find people mining with -1 status and gank them easy.

Although I've always felt that loosing sec status in lowsec (other then podding) is kind of stupid because theres not any authorities out there to see it happen. They could lower the fine for killing people in lowsec to help counter act it.

Just saying it would be cool if it worked that way. Consequences for actions and all that.

somethings in the eve community never change and the forum warrior brotherhood is one of them. You talk as if I have peddled this "swill" in copious amounts, compared to the meme'd to death forum garbage that alot of you folks seem to find endlessly amusing, degrading and ultimately belittling to well thought out and genuine questions and critiques. I haven't posted in years and the first thing this guy says to me in a post I spent a good deal of time typing and thinking about is "TL;DR IBTL". These are the actions of someone who thinks they can shut something down before it gets a chance to get going and someone who is fishing for likes. Ralph might be all of the things you say, but that's your experience, not mine. That post didn't get locked, nor will it.

Bumblefck, you seem to think you are entitled to speak for everyone here as does Ralph, you aren't, the likes have gone to your heads, it's the same on Facebook and elsewhere on the t'internets, it's narcissistic and shallow. You are a like farmer too. Before anyone accuses me of being envious in some way, I am not, I just have spent long enough on the web to spot self-aggrandizement when I see it.

Queue the pseudo "we don't care what you think" responses to this post.

Ill give you that, i was expecting a lock for a rant and miss judged, my fault for skim reading.
I still think its a silly point to stick on though, sort of like arguing that the at ships are imballanced.