These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

AFK Cloaking™: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals

First post First post
Author
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#6281 - 2016-07-06 20:50:47 UTC
Blade Darth wrote:
Congrats for being in an alliance with a bunch of people doing anoms in subcaps at any given time (that want to team up).

Past 2-3 ppl in a site isk/h is hurt, not to mention drone aggro and automatic targeter stop working.
But yea, better lower isk and manual targeting than no isk at all.


My alliance is dominated by Euros, so being a USTZ player....but then again, I don't really like ratting and do other things to make ISK.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6282 - 2016-07-06 20:56:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Teckos Pech wrote:
Blade Darth wrote:
Congrats for being in an alliance with a bunch of people doing anoms in subcaps at any given time (that want to team up).

Past 2-3 ppl in a site isk/h is hurt, not to mention drone aggro and automatic targeter stop working.
But yea, better lower isk and manual targeting than no isk at all.


My alliance is dominated by Euros, so being a USTZ player....but then again, I don't really like ratting and do other things to make ISK.


Roll

So you police the thread against anyone who criticises this AFK fun and yet you hardly do the activity that is most affected by this ...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Morrigan LeSante
Perkone
Caldari State
#6283 - 2016-07-08 12:48:59 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Blade Darth wrote:
Congrats for being in an alliance with a bunch of people doing anoms in subcaps at any given time (that want to team up).

Past 2-3 ppl in a site isk/h is hurt, not to mention drone aggro and automatic targeter stop working.
But yea, better lower isk and manual targeting than no isk at all.


My alliance is dominated by Euros, so being a USTZ player....but then again, I don't really like ratting and do other things to make ISK.


Roll

So you police the thread against anyone who criticises this AFK fun and yet you hardly do the activity that is most affected by this ...



Because no-one has found a way to "fix" this complete non problem which doesn't break other game areas and only ever serves to make their gameplay safer.

If you don't like being the threat of hotdropped (oh noes, not a ship loss!), check out highsec or wormholes.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6284 - 2016-07-08 12:52:19 UTC
Morrigan LeSante wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Blade Darth wrote:
Congrats for being in an alliance with a bunch of people doing anoms in subcaps at any given time (that want to team up).

Past 2-3 ppl in a site isk/h is hurt, not to mention drone aggro and automatic targeter stop working.
But yea, better lower isk and manual targeting than no isk at all.


My alliance is dominated by Euros, so being a USTZ player....but then again, I don't really like ratting and do other things to make ISK.


Roll

So you police the thread against anyone who criticises this AFK fun and yet you hardly do the activity that is most affected by this ...



Because no-one has found a way to "fix" this complete non problem which doesn't break other game areas and only ever serves to make their gameplay safer.

If you don't like being the threat of hotdropped (oh noes, not a ship loss!), check out highsec or wormholes.


Ship loss don't bother me, its not being able to bait out the blighter when he is at work, asleep or doing something naughty with the wife or whatever...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Morrigan LeSante
Perkone
Caldari State
#6285 - 2016-07-08 12:55:21 UTC
Rat in a carrier. That'll do it every time.
Logan Jakal
State War Academy
Caldari State
#6286 - 2016-07-08 15:52:18 UTC
Morrigan LeSante wrote:
Rat in a carrier. That'll do it every time.


lol
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6287 - 2016-07-08 15:53:32 UTC
Morrigan LeSante wrote:
Rat in a carrier. That'll do it every time.


What, even when he is not at his keyboard?

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#6288 - 2016-07-08 18:57:26 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Blade Darth wrote:
Congrats for being in an alliance with a bunch of people doing anoms in subcaps at any given time (that want to team up).

Past 2-3 ppl in a site isk/h is hurt, not to mention drone aggro and automatic targeter stop working.
But yea, better lower isk and manual targeting than no isk at all.


My alliance is dominated by Euros, so being a USTZ player....but then again, I don't really like ratting and do other things to make ISK.


Roll

So you police the thread against anyone who criticises this AFK fun and yet you hardly do the activity that is most affected by this ...


We have already covered this. Just because I do not rat does not mean I cannot have an interest in this thread. For one thing I have often used cloaking ships in many regards. As such, I want to ensure the ****** ideas many express in this thread are shown to be ******.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#6289 - 2016-07-08 19:03:08 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Morrigan LeSante wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Blade Darth wrote:
Congrats for being in an alliance with a bunch of people doing anoms in subcaps at any given time (that want to team up).

Past 2-3 ppl in a site isk/h is hurt, not to mention drone aggro and automatic targeter stop working.
But yea, better lower isk and manual targeting than no isk at all.


My alliance is dominated by Euros, so being a USTZ player....but then again, I don't really like ratting and do other things to make ISK.


Roll

So you police the thread against anyone who criticises this AFK fun and yet you hardly do the activity that is most affected by this ...



Because no-one has found a way to "fix" this complete non problem which doesn't break other game areas and only ever serves to make their gameplay safer.

If you don't like being the threat of hotdropped (oh noes, not a ship loss!), check out highsec or wormholes.


Ship loss don't bother me, its not being able to bait out the blighter when he is at work, asleep or doing something naughty with the wife or whatever...


And it bothers me not being able to bait out that guy AFK in station. Obviously we need some method to force an undock. I know, a POS module so that when the "butan" is pushed it undocks everyone in station unless they click abort. Oh...wait, no fuel. You can only stay docked if you have enough fuel in your ship...and if you are in a pod you have 30 seconds to get in a ship and put fuel in the cargo hold. Yeah...that'll do the trick. Fuel.

And since somebody in this thread is completely incapable of detecting even the most blatant sarcasm....[/sarcasm]

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6290 - 2016-07-09 07:42:39 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
And it bothers me not being able to bait out that guy AFK in station. Obviously we need some method to force an undock. I know, a POS module so that when the "butan" is pushed it undocks everyone in station unless they click abort. Oh...wait, no fuel. You can only stay docked if you have enough fuel in your ship...and if you are in a pod you have 30 seconds to get in a ship and put fuel in the cargo hold. Yeah...that'll do the trick. Fuel.

And since somebody in this thread is completely incapable of detecting even the most blatant sarcasm....[/sarcasm]


And my AFK flag will deal with that too, so an attacker coming into a system will be able to see who is likely not to be active give or take a few doing stuff in hisec on their other accounts of course, or station trading like you.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Wander Prian
Nosferatu Security Foundation
#6291 - 2016-07-09 08:35:09 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
And it bothers me not being able to bait out that guy AFK in station. Obviously we need some method to force an undock. I know, a POS module so that when the "butan" is pushed it undocks everyone in station unless they click abort. Oh...wait, no fuel. You can only stay docked if you have enough fuel in your ship...and if you are in a pod you have 30 seconds to get in a ship and put fuel in the cargo hold. Yeah...that'll do the trick. Fuel.

And since somebody in this thread is completely incapable of detecting even the most blatant sarcasm....[/sarcasm]


And my AFK flag will deal with that too, so an attacker coming into a system will be able to see who is likely not to be active give or take a few doing stuff in hisec on their other accounts of course, or station trading like you.


So your idea to fix a issue caused by free, 100% accurate intel is to introduce more free, 100% accurate intel? Greaaat... What could ever go wrong... Roll

Wormholer for life.

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6292 - 2016-07-09 13:30:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Wander Prian wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
And it bothers me not being able to bait out that guy AFK in station. Obviously we need some method to force an undock. I know, a POS module so that when the "butan" is pushed it undocks everyone in station unless they click abort. Oh...wait, no fuel. You can only stay docked if you have enough fuel in your ship...and if you are in a pod you have 30 seconds to get in a ship and put fuel in the cargo hold. Yeah...that'll do the trick. Fuel.

And since somebody in this thread is completely incapable of detecting even the most blatant sarcasm....[/sarcasm]


And my AFK flag will deal with that too, so an attacker coming into a system will be able to see who is likely not to be active give or take a few doing stuff in hisec on their other accounts of course, or station trading like you.


So your idea to fix a issue caused by free, 100% accurate intel is to introduce more free, 100% accurate intel? Greaaat... What could ever go wrong... Roll


So why is an AFK flag created by an Observatory Structure which sits behind the Observatory structure that supplies local (CCP is going to do this by the way), which is vulnerable to attack whenever it is active and costs 100m ISK free? So Local is no longer going to be free, except perhaps in Empire or NPC pirate space, sort of kills your single liner throw away line stone cold dead!.

For an attacker he will have to place one of these and then it will have to hack local, which I would suggest would require maybe one about 150m in cost rather than 100m. Now you have put skin in the game for your intel. And I am so looking foward to the complaints of people like you when they realise that people who live in space will have an advantage because they live in that space... Of course you could put your own local OS up...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Maria Dragoon
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#6293 - 2016-07-09 19:52:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Maria Dragoon
Dracvlad wrote:
Wander Prian wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
And it bothers me not being able to bait out that guy AFK in station. Obviously we need some method to force an undock. I know, a POS module so that when the "butan" is pushed it undocks everyone in station unless they click abort. Oh...wait, no fuel. You can only stay docked if you have enough fuel in your ship...and if you are in a pod you have 30 seconds to get in a ship and put fuel in the cargo hold. Yeah...that'll do the trick. Fuel.

And since somebody in this thread is completely incapable of detecting even the most blatant sarcasm....[/sarcasm]


And my AFK flag will deal with that too, so an attacker coming into a system will be able to see who is likely not to be active give or take a few doing stuff in hisec on their other accounts of course, or station trading like you.


So your idea to fix a issue caused by free, 100% accurate intel is to introduce more free, 100% accurate intel? Greaaat... What could ever go wrong... Roll


So why is an AFK flag created by an Observatory Structure which sits behind the Observatory structure that supplies local (CCP is going to do this by the way), which is vulnerable to attack whenever it is active and costs 100m ISK free? So Local is no longer going to be free, except perhaps in Empire or NPC pirate space, sort of kills your single liner throw away line stone cold dead!.

For an attacker he will have to place one of these and then it will have to hack local, which I would suggest would require maybe one about 150m in cost rather than 100m. Now you have put skin in the game for your intel. And I am so looking foward to the complaints of people like you when they realise that people who live in space will have an advantage because they live in that space... Of course you could put your own local OS up...


First of all, you should never balance things based on cost, we have seen time and time again how cost balancing totally fails. Titans, Poses, structures, All these have massive costs, in both time and isk, yet we are already seeing or have been seeing them everywhere. Every Alliance and their pet seems to have a titan hidden away some where

Second, if you want to introduce mechanics to help you hunt, or defend, then you need to increase player involvement, this is one of the main balancing factors for the game. IS PLAYER INVESTMENT, How much player creativity/time/effort vs reward that comes out. Your idea is **** because you have a net zero player investment, yet you get an instant reward. So all in all, your idea is shite, the idea of AFK flags, specially with how current Intel mechanics is set up, is shite.

Third of all, if you want to add in tools to hunt down other people, then you need to fix the current tools that we have, it simple as that. Local is a terrible tool because for net zero investment, you get 100% infallible information. It one of the reasons why local is one of the worst mechanics in eve online for both the hunter and the huntee. The defenders get a free early warning system, and the hunters can completely avoid empty sectors of space. So if you are hiding out in the middle of no where, someone will eventually find you because they will dodge all the empty systems.

As for the observation array, I wish they would just axe local intel system and come up with real tools. Just because you place a structure there for 100m, you still get the same result. Which is a net zero player investment and in turn, receive a reward for it. IT in my opinion goes against almost all other tools Eve online provides. I can think of very VERY few activities where the netcost of player investment is zero and they get rewarded for it.

Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated. Confucius

"A man who talks to people who aren't real is crazy. A man who talks to people who aren't real and writes down what they say is an author."

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6294 - 2016-07-09 23:15:54 UTC
Maria Dragoon wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Wander Prian wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
And it bothers me not being able to bait out that guy AFK in station. Obviously we need some method to force an undock. I know, a POS module so that when the "butan" is pushed it undocks everyone in station unless they click abort. Oh...wait, no fuel. You can only stay docked if you have enough fuel in your ship...and if you are in a pod you have 30 seconds to get in a ship and put fuel in the cargo hold. Yeah...that'll do the trick. Fuel.

And since somebody in this thread is completely incapable of detecting even the most blatant sarcasm....[/sarcasm]


And my AFK flag will deal with that too, so an attacker coming into a system will be able to see who is likely not to be active give or take a few doing stuff in hisec on their other accounts of course, or station trading like you.


So your idea to fix a issue caused by free, 100% accurate intel is to introduce more free, 100% accurate intel? Greaaat... What could ever go wrong... Roll


So why is an AFK flag created by an Observatory Structure which sits behind the Observatory structure that supplies local (CCP is going to do this by the way), which is vulnerable to attack whenever it is active and costs 100m ISK free? So Local is no longer going to be free, except perhaps in Empire or NPC pirate space, sort of kills your single liner throw away line stone cold dead!.

For an attacker he will have to place one of these and then it will have to hack local, which I would suggest would require maybe one about 150m in cost rather than 100m. Now you have put skin in the game for your intel. And I am so looking foward to the complaints of people like you when they realise that people who live in space will have an advantage because they live in that space... Of course you could put your own local OS up...


First of all, you should never balance things based on cost, we have seen time and time again how cost balancing totally fails. Titans, Poses, structures, All these have massive costs, in both time and isk, yet we are already seeing or have been seeing them everywhere. Every Alliance and their pet seems to have a titan hidden away some where

Second, if you want to introduce mechanics to help you hunt, or defend, then you need to increase player involvement, this is one of the main balancing factors for the game. IS PLAYER INVESTMENT, How much player creativity/time/effort vs reward that comes out. Your idea is **** because you have a net zero player investment, yet you get an instant reward. So all in all, your idea is shite, the idea of AFK flags, specially with how current Intel mechanics is set up, is shite.

Third of all, if you want to add in tools to hunt down other people, then you need to fix the current tools that we have, it simple as that. Local is a terrible tool because for net zero investment, you get 100% infallible information. It one of the reasons why local is one of the worst mechanics in eve online for both the hunter and the huntee. The defenders get a free early warning system, and the hunters can completely avoid empty sectors of space. So if you are hiding out in the middle of no where, someone will eventually find you because they will dodge all the empty systems.

As for the observation array, I wish they would just axe local intel system and come up with real tools. Just because you place a structure there for 100m, you still get the same result. Which is a net zero player investment and in turn, receive a reward for it. IT in my opinion goes against almost all other tools Eve online provides. I can think of very VERY few activities where the netcost of player investment is zero and they get rewarded for it.


I have never talked about cost balancing, I merely replied to you saying it was free intel and I explained why it was not.

So an AFK player has zero investment in time and effort, that is my issue.

Local is being sorted and will no longer be free in 0.0

If you are so fail you cannot blow it up then it is your problem.

The map in Eve gives plently of free intel to allow people to zero in, if you want local removed as free intel then ask for that to be removed too. Otherwise your are a hypocrite with a capital H...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Maria Dragoon
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#6295 - 2016-07-09 23:38:28 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:


I have never talked about cost balancing, I merely replied to you saying it was free intel and I explained why it was not.

So an AFK player has zero investment in time and effort, that is my issue.

Local is being sorted and will no longer be free in 0.0

If you are so fail you cannot blow it up then it is your problem.

The map in Eve gives plently of free intel to allow people to zero in, if you want local removed as free intel then ask for that to be removed too. Otherwise your are a hypocrite with a capital H...



Let me quote some things.

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

Dracvlad wrote:
which is vulnerable to attack whenever it is active and costs 100m ISK free? So Local is no longer going to be free, except perhaps in Empire or NPC pirate space, sort of kills your single liner throw away line stone cold dead!.

For an attacker he will have to place one of these and then it will have to hack local, which I would suggest would require maybe one about 150m in cost rather than 100m.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

See that up there, that you mate, that you attempting to quantify balance through the use of isk. That you making a horrible mistake. Never balance some through the use of isk.

Dracvlad wrote:

So an AFK player has zero investment in time and effort, that is my issue.


You are right, an AFK player has zero investment, in both time and effort, so his net cost is Zero, however, his net gain is also Zero.

See the balance here, See what he getting while afk? Thats right bucko. Zero, nothing, natta.

Everything he did, getting in your system, getting past your defenses, and then cloaking up in a safe spot, that was done while he was at his keyboard, he put in Time and Effort, and he gained a reward, that reward was making a safe spot in your system. So lets see here Time (check) Effort(Check) Reward(Check.)

You see the balance here? Do you see it? Of course you do, and you can argue till you are blue in the face but the truth is right here, and it doesn't change, his time, effort, and reward came from he being at the keyboard and breaking into your system, You lack of time and effort, has in turn resulted in a cloaker sneaking in to your system

Do you see a trend here? OF COURSE YOU DO.

Dracvlad wrote:
If you are so fail you cannot blow it up then it is your problem.


Oh my, someone attacking me, knowing nothing of me, knowing nothing about how I operate, and knowing nothing about what he talking about.

Really, it says it all and I shouldn't even respond to such a petty attack on my Persona.

Dracvlad wrote:
The map in Eve gives plently of free intel to allow people to zero in, if you want local removed as free intel then ask for that to be removed too. Otherwise your are a hypocrite with a capital H..


Fine buddy, have it removed my little friend, but in turn have it replace something.

Going to replace it with noise generators that you can point at systems to detect noise?

Going to replace it with the ability to pick up warp trails?

Going to replace it with something that takes Player Effort, for in turn a large reward?

Go on, we can take away local, we can take away the map tools. But: What will it be replace by? And how will these tools help the hunter and the huntee at the same time?


The only one that a hypocrite is you, this entire argument is nothing but you demanding pure, absolute safety.

You demand if we remove local, then we should remove map tools, and in turn out right neuter null sec hunting because it will be to ******* boring to scan every single system to find a target. You know this, so you demand it, then you challenge everyone that suggest otherwise saying they are a hypocrite.

So I'm calling you out on your silly challenge- We arn't just talking about removing the poorly design current tools, we are talking about REPLACING them, which in turn crop up the possibility that someone who gets really good at these tools can find your base of operations in a matter of days if they decide to put in enough effort.

I'm going to call you out right now Dracvlad

The only one that is a hypocrite with a capital H, is you, and if you deny giving better tools to both the hunter and huntee is the best of ideas, and Axe the current tools, you will show your true colors to everyone here.

Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated. Confucius

"A man who talks to people who aren't real is crazy. A man who talks to people who aren't real and writes down what they say is an author."

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6296 - 2016-07-09 23:50:39 UTC
So when you say remove local ask to remove all the free intel on the map too, let me hear you say it in capitals mate.

You say you can blow up a OS well no issue then, what the hell are you whining about then...

Well I am logged in trying to bait that fecker, that is wasting my game time bro.

Not 100% safety are you some sort of ******, it is all about knowing when I can go and hunt that scum bag and not waste my time

I am currently in hisec, please come and cloaky AFK camp me, I will laugh at you... War dec me so I can kill you instead...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Maria Dragoon
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#6297 - 2016-07-10 00:10:58 UTC



Dracvlad wrote:
So when you say remove local ask to remove all the free intel on the map too, let me hear you say it in capitals mate.


How childish, maybe you actually can't read.

No really, I honestly don't know if you can read or not, as everything is explained in the post above this, in like, broken paragraph format.

Dracvlad wrote:
You say you can blow up a OS well no issue then, what the hell are you whining about then...


The issue is, is that it still a zero effort intel system, plop down a intel device, and instant intel for everyone in your corp, gg only need to keep people from shooting it, hell you don't need to use the damn thing, and it will generate totally free intel for you.

That, is what we call, a zero effort, 100% reward system, and these systems are bad m-kay?

Dracvlad wrote:
Well I am logged in trying to bait that fecker, that is wasting my game time bro.


And the fact that I HAVE to AFK camp to find jucie targets is a waste of my game time, Bro. So why not introduce new intel systems that are challenging for both sides to use....Bro.

Dracvlad wrote:
Not 100% safety are you some sort of ******, it is all about knowing when I can go and hunt that scum bag and not waste my time


It is 100% safety, you want to know exactly when he on, thus you always have overwhelming forces regardless of what he does. Pretty sure that known as 100% safety, or so fraken close to it, that it rather sad.....Bro...



Dracvlad wrote:
I am currently in hisec, please come and cloaky AFK camp me, I will laugh at you... War dec me so I can kill you instead...



Man, I can't tell if you are just a sad, sad man, or one that has ZERO experience with cloaking mechanics, or maybe both! But if you are currently in high sec, then what up with that ******* talk about hunting people down in low and null sec and baiting them out. Jeezus- At least get your fraken story straight before you start an argument with someone......

Bro....

Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated. Confucius

"A man who talks to people who aren't real is crazy. A man who talks to people who aren't real and writes down what they say is an author."

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6298 - 2016-07-10 07:21:16 UTC
Maria Dragoon wrote:
Too many quotes...


Local is fine if behind an OS which is what CCP will do, then its up to you to take down local, I want them to remove that free intel on the map.

It is not free if you have to make it and buy it, then plonk it down and defend it or fuel it, if you want to call that free that is your issue.

Camping ATK is fine, you are not wasting your time AFK, you are wasting their time.

I do not want to waste my time baiting out someone who is not at his keyboard, it is a waste of my game time and very poor gameplay.

I have seen people trying to make a point about AFK cloaky camping say something like I will go AFK cloaky camp Jita, well no war decs and no cyno's, yeah right... And did you notice the word currently?

Argument, you have a fixation with local, I am so looking forward to people jumping into a system and having no local and the defenders have it, the crying will be epic.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Maria Dragoon
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#6299 - 2016-07-10 23:59:19 UTC
Maria Dragoon wrote:
Too many quotes...


Local is fine if behind an OS which is what CCP will do, then its up to you to take down local, I want them to remove that free intel on the map.

It is not free if you have to make it and buy it, then plonk it down and defend it or fuel it, if you want to call that free that is your issue.

Camping ATK is fine, you are not wasting your time AFK, you are wasting their time.

I do not want to waste my time baiting out someone who is not at his keyboard, it is a waste of my game time and very poor gameplay.




Dracvlad wrote:

Local is fine if behind an OS which is what CCP will do, then its up to you to take down local, I want them to remove that free intel on the map.

It is not free if you have to make it and buy it, then plonk it down and defend it or fuel it, if you want to call that free that is your issue.


Local if left how it currently is, and simply put behind a structure is still free intel because it requires no player interaction to gather said intel, the fact you can't see this simple detail is staggering.

Dracvlad wrote:

Camping ATK is fine, you are not wasting your time AFK, you are wasting their time.

I do not want to waste my time baiting out someone who is not at his keyboard, it is a waste of my game time and very poor gameplay.


And I can argue it a waste of my time when everyone docks up and stays docked up like that, Docking creates no intresting gameplay at all.... See it works bothways mate.

Dracvlad wrote:

I have seen people trying to make a point about AFK cloaky camping say something like I will go AFK cloaky camp Jita, well no war decs and no cyno's, yeah right... And did you notice the word currently?

Argument, you have a fixation with local, I am so looking forward to people jumping into a system and having no local and the defenders have it, the crying will be epic.


I don't see how Jita, or I assume high sec is in anyway relevant to the topic at hand.

Second point: It highly unlikely they will make Local a defender only tool mate. Highly unlikely.

Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated. Confucius

"A man who talks to people who aren't real is crazy. A man who talks to people who aren't real and writes down what they say is an author."

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6300 - 2016-07-11 09:55:21 UTC
It is not free intel if supplied by an OS, I am amazed that you still cling to that as a reason. The player has to actually setup something and maintain it, including defending it.

But you can destroy the Citadel if they are in, or reinforce the Station or its services if in 0.0 Sov space. It just that you don't have the ability or numbers to do so and therefore force them into space, all you need is an entosis link and the will to do it.

I found it very amusing that someone said in an AFK claoking thread that he would AFK cloaky camp Jita, it was so stupid that I like to mention it every so often.

They are going to do that, they are hardly going to supply the data free to you are they, as it is not free intel, they worked for it. I reckon you are going to really hate it.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp