These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

DO NOT BELIEVE IT

First post
Author
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#61 - 2016-06-22 18:40:39 UTC
Unconspicous Alt wrote:
Fumya wrote:
Obviously the OP and the rest of the people here are too polite to tell you in the face,


Thank you but please do not bother. Everyone here already has a very good idea about this guy's real intelligence. For the such like him, the best way is to ignore them. They do not write anything worth reading anyways.

I tell you what, I'm willing to put the time in if you are - eve-mail me on your main character with the location of your astrahus and I'll come over so you can demonstrate its combat capabilities to me. If after said testing I concur that it is weaker than a standard medium POS, I'll publicly post here renouncing my comments. If not, you have to do so yourself.

Deal?

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Bootis
Doomheim
#62 - 2016-06-22 18:58:02 UTC
Doc Fury wrote:
Wait, are you telling Doc that CCP spent a lot of time and effort hyping a new feature, ignored substantial player feedback regarding it's shortcomings, and then delivered an incomplete mess that does not work as advertised?





Next thing you'll say is that they released it on a day that ends in "y".

LMFAO!
Pandora Carrollon
Provi Rapid Response
#63 - 2016-06-22 19:23:14 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
I think there is a reason most of the complaining about Astrahuses comes from high sec, and that is that the average high sec player has an 'all or nothing' type attitude.

The Medium Citadel is perfectly defensible, it just won't let you solo blap a well prepared attacking fleet like a POS can. High Sec players put them up like they do POSes and expect to be able to leverage the game's mechanics to keep them safe. But medium citadels don't work like that. in ALL parts of space they require a defense fleet to ensure their survival.

That all or nothing attitude is Pervasive in high sec, you can see it with high sec miners ("even if i tank my mining ship, they will just bring more ganking ships so why bother tanking it, ill just fit for max yield!"), haulers ("I can still be bumped even if i bring a webbing alt, even with the anti-bumping warp mechanic, so CCP needs to do more!") and mission runners ("they are going to gank me anyways, might as well put that gist x type booster on"). And now with high sec Medium Citadel owners...

In other words, it's not the nature of the Medium Citadel, it' the natures of the high sec players who complain about them even when they see others of us outside of high sec using them easily. There is no help for that.


Jenn, you've been giving good advice but stereotyping all HiSec players as entitled idiots doesn't help.

As one of those HiSec idiots, I feel anything but entitled. The only real benefit I'm getting from HiSec is a reduction of risk allowing me to fit ships more effectively to purpose. War Dec mayhem generally limits the utility of what you're trying to imply is the case in HiSec, it isn't. A War Dec almost immediately turns HiSec into NullSec for the two parties involved. Most HiSec players realize this.

What is true is that players really don't know how to defend a Citadel yet, especially the small Astrahaus. It is not, and was not, intended to be an equal to a POS as has been stated many times already.

The Simple Reality:

If you are a HiSec corp with an Astrahaus, and you are under War Dec, you must have a fleet defense available any time the Citadel is in it's vulnerable window. If there is no War Dec on you, your Citadel is pretty darned safe in HiSec.

There... even us HiSec idiots can understand that... entitled or not! LolShocked
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#64 - 2016-06-22 19:50:20 UTC
Pandora Carrollon wrote:
Jenn, you've been giving good advice but stereotyping all HiSec players as entitled idiots doesn't help.

Some of us have bittervet trained to level 5. I personally have it at level 6 Straight

Pandora Carrollon wrote:
As one of those HiSec idiots, I feel anything but entitled. The only real benefit I'm getting from HiSec is a reduction of risk allowing me to fit ships more effectively to purpose. War Dec mayhem generally limits the utility of what you're trying to imply is the case in HiSec, it isn't. A War Dec almost immediately turns HiSec into NullSec for the two parties involved. Most HiSec players realize this.

You are a minority in my experience.

Pandora Carrollon wrote:
What is true is that players really don't know how to defend a Citadel yet, especially the small Astrahaus. It is not, and was not, intended to be an equal to a POS as has been stated many times already.

The Simple Reality:

If you are a HiSec corp with an Astrahaus, and you are under War Dec, you must have a fleet defense available any time the Citadel is in it's vulnerable window. If there is no War Dec on you, your Citadel is pretty darned safe in HiSec.

There... even us HiSec idiots can understand that... entitled or not! LolShocked

A good summary. o7

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#65 - 2016-06-22 20:48:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Tau Cabalander
Citadels were advertised as the first of the new structures, designed to be the safest (asset recovery system), and primarily function as offices. The Fortizar is best compared to a Gallente Outpost, and there is no equivalent for the other two sizes.

When compared to a player-owned starbase (POS) used as a base of operations, citadels are definitely a functionality improvement. Anyone that has lived out of arrays in w-space will surely agree. [I lived in w-space for nearly my first 3 years.]

As for the perceived weakness of citadels, the vast majority of destroyed citadels has been during their first repair timer, when citadels are the weakest and completely defenseless. Fish in a barrel are more defensive.

When operational, the contained assets have been recoverable, unlike when losing a POS.

Personally, I could sit watching citadel flak cannons obliterating random small fleets all day. Citadels falling to organized concerted efforts, is definitely an improvement over invulnerable outposts.

At that I have to state that CCP delivered as advertised, and that I'm eager to see the new industry (fall) and mining (winter) structures, as well as the others (e.g. medium and large stargate BPOs are in the SiSi database). Until then, the bulk of POS functionality won't exist.

About the only thing I do hope CCP consider for the future, are SMALLER structures, that are intended to be more temporary. An Astrahaus is definitely a superior replacement for my small reprocessing POS, but I honestly think it is overkill for that role, and the deployment time is particularly onerous compared to a small POS.
Sustrai Aditua
Intandofisa
#66 - 2016-06-22 20:55:09 UTC
Soldarius wrote:
https://zkillboard.com/system/30000250/ship/35833/
Looks pretty exciting to me. Our Fortizar in P3EN-E gets about 10 kills a day; mostly solo.
Hilarious. Cool

If we get chased by zombies, I'm tripping you.

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#67 - 2016-06-22 22:03:23 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:


The only citadel dieing to small fleets AT ALL is the astrahus - and as advertized it is equivalent to a small/medium POS and can be killed by 3-5 people.

Except has has been specifically quoted in this thread by multiple people already, it was advertised as equal to a L POS. And it's not equal to a M Pos with guns at all, maybe a small POS.
This is directly against what CCP said, and the Citadel was also meant to act as a force multiplier helping the defence fleet hit well above it's size. This also has not happened.
The L & XL are also similarly gimped in highsec, no-one has attacked the ones near Jita because they belong to the same groups that run around smashing everyone else's toys.

It's nothing to do with entitlement, Jenn has just turned into a broken record on that front with no mind to what the actual complaint is, and is actually to do with actually wanting a structure which is useful and matches CCP's claims as to how it will help defence fleets in all areas of space. Living in Null should not be compulsory to get anywhere in EVE.
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#68 - 2016-06-22 22:25:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Dirty Forum Alt
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:


The only citadel dieing to small fleets AT ALL is the astrahus - and as advertized it is equivalent to a small/medium POS and can be killed by 3-5 people.

Except has has been specifically quoted in this thread by multiple people already, it was advertised as equal to a L POS. And it's not equal to a M Pos with guns at all, maybe a small POS.
This is directly against what CCP said, and the Citadel was also meant to act as a force multiplier helping the defence fleet hit well above it's size. This also has not happened.
The L & XL are also similarly gimped in highsec, no-one has attacked the ones near Jita because they belong to the same groups that run around smashing everyone else's toys.

It's nothing to do with entitlement, Jenn has just turned into a broken record on that front with no mind to what the actual complaint is, and is actually to do with actually wanting a structure which is useful and matches CCP's claims as to how it will help defence fleets in all areas of space. Living in Null should not be compulsory to get anywhere in EVE.

Actually everyone keeps just saying "a POS" - as if there were only 1 type in the entire game. And while I know that is the direction we are heading with the new structures, it is NOT true of the old ones. Unless I've missed something in the walls of ranting from you and your ilk, NOBODY ever specified a large one, least of all CCP. Do you actually have a *link* to that dev post? Also, how far before the release was the post? early dev work? just before release? We already know you guys are trying to live 8 years in the past in 2008, so please BE SPECIFIC.

Clearly you haven't killed enough medium POSes to know how weak they really are. A Citadel is roughly the equivalent of having a sieged dreadnaught on your side, but with a bit more dps and tank. In high sec. If that isn't enough for you, too bad.

Some force multipliers are bigger than others - just because an astrahus can't counter-balance a full heavy armor gang that *could* take down the *average* large POS does NOT mean it isn't acting as a force multiplier. It just isn't as big of a multiplier as you want it to be. The massively positive kill ratios of all citadel types larger than the astrahus (which tbh I'm blaming on the fact that all the noobs and morons like you are using them) is ample proof that they *do* work as force multipliers when used correctly.

Additionally, unlike POSes, the citadels don't have fixed stats. They are only as good as YOU FIT THEM TO BE. And only as good as YOUR SKILL AT CONTROLLING THEM. A good analogy would perhaps be that a good merc in a faction fit machariel can kill your entire corporation - but YOU in your faction fit missioning machariel will die to his assault frigate every time. They are only as good as their fit and their pilot allow them to be. If you aren't getting good results out of the equipment, there is a good chance it is YOUR FAULT for sucking at EVE.


Personally, I can't find a single Fortizar kill in high sec since their release. And the number of Astrahus kills is pretty low given how many citadels have already sprung up.

Stats aside, the *biggest* defense you have with these citadels is the fact that since none of the items stored in them can ever drop, the *only* reward for an annoying 2 weeks of war + timers is the module drop from the citadel itself - so most PvP groups have simply decided they aren't worth bothering with. As such, they (once again) don't need *any* combat defenses. Nobody even wants to kill them in high sec for the most part.



Leading me, once again, to my core point: S T O P - W H I N I N G

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#69 - 2016-06-22 23:00:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Dirty Forum Alt
For the record, I actually went and read the dev blog linked in the OP, and it turns out that he missed an important part of the quote. The full quote is as follows:

CCP Dev Team: Team Game of Drones wrote:
We want to cover a very broad price tag with new structures. While the medium structures should be similar to a fully fitted Starbase...

CCP Dev Team: Team Game of Drones wrote:
Medium Structure hulls will cost around 350-700m ISK in materials to build.

And looking at the materials required in the handy TABLE they provided, a miracle occurred and they DID NOT CHANGE. So, if you weren't so impatient, the final researched product, once demand settles, is only going to cost 350-700 million isk.

CCP made no mention whatsoever of the combat capabilities being in any way related to or similar to any POS of any kind. EVER.


Thus proving that you are all ranting and raving not because CCP lied to you - but because you clearly CAN NOT READ.

Q. E. D.



edit: And since a Large Control Tower with *no* defenses of any kind costs 5-600 million isk - this *is* in fact the cost equivalent of a fully fitted out *MEDIUM* tower.

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#70 - 2016-06-23 03:49:08 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:


The only citadel dieing to small fleets AT ALL is the astrahus - and as advertized it is equivalent to a small/medium POS and can be killed by 3-5 people.

Except has has been specifically quoted in this thread by multiple people already, it was advertised as equal to a L POS. And it's not equal to a M Pos with guns at all, maybe a small POS.
This is directly against what CCP said, and the Citadel was also meant to act as a force multiplier helping the defence fleet hit well above it's size. This also has not happened.
The L & XL are also similarly gimped in highsec, no-one has attacked the ones near Jita because they belong to the same groups that run around smashing everyone else's toys.

It's nothing to do with entitlement, Jenn has just turned into a broken record on that front with no mind to what the actual complaint is, and is actually to do with actually wanting a structure which is useful and matches CCP's claims as to how it will help defence fleets in all areas of space. Living in Null should not be compulsory to get anywhere in EVE.


Yeah. I can't remember, but I think I made my sig because of Jenn or people who used that word too much.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#71 - 2016-06-23 07:11:14 UTC  |  Edited by: DeMichael Crimson
Chewytowel Haklar wrote:
Unconspicous Alt wrote:
DO NOT BELIEVE IT ... immortal words as said by the cat in Tom & Jerry after being blown up :)
I do not believe the voices in my head, they tell me things see. The voices also tell me that I will be able to make a Stargate to a private part of the universe where no one can hurt me. No more bad touch it said. I DON'T BELIEVE IT!

But............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... I Want To Believe

Sad



DMC
Mike Adoulin
Happys Happy Hamster Hunting Club
#72 - 2016-06-23 07:53:14 UTC
I like being able to finally look out the windows and see what's outside.

Citadels rock.

Bear

Everything in EVE is a trap.

And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)

You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.

Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#73 - 2016-06-23 12:36:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Nevyn Auscent wrote:


It's nothing to do with entitlement, Jenn has just turned into a broken record on that front with no mind to what the actual complaint is, and is actually to do with actually wanting a structure which is useful and matches CCP's claims as to how it will help defence fleets in all areas of space. Living in Null should not be compulsory to get anywhere in EVE.


How does null have anything to do with it, other than the fact that in null (and low and WH space) people don't actually put up structures they cannot defend.

I think that's the main point. One of the side effects of the protections of high sec is that the people who play there exclusively sometimes don't learn key lessons about the game, because high sec's mechanics up till now have shielded them from having to learn, unlike the rest of EVE space were you learn or go broke. What's worse is their tendency to put the blame on others (like CCP) rather than themselves , fostering this false and juvenile feeling of 'oppression' like we see in the above quoted comment.

CCP has said for a long time that they were moving the game away from NPC based protections and more towards player actions. This is the real unspoken issue here, these high sec players (again, notice that the ONLY people complaining or in high sec) have hidden behind the npc's skirts (in forms like CONCORD and automated POS defenses) for so long that the idea of CCP correcting these mistakes and making players do things for themselves ticks them off. Thus this thread.

Medium Citadels work fine, I named our 1st one in Vale of the Silent and it's still there, because we defend it.. If you can't provide a small remote repping or logi supported covering force or don't have the isk reserves to hire mercenaries to do that, don't put them up in the 1st place. Invest in a Fortizar instead, none of those have been killed in high sec as far as I'm concerned. But whatever you do, for BoB's sake stop whining and drop that entitled (omg there's that word again) attitude.
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#74 - 2016-06-23 12:43:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Dirty Forum Alt
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Yeah. I can't remember, but I think I made my sig because of Jenn or people who used that word too much.

I have not until this point used the word "entitlement" in any of my posts.

I'm even willing to agree with you that perhaps Jenn does over-use it *some* - and generalizes a bit far, since of course not *everyone* in high sec is like that. As previously mentioned, this is a classic symptom of advanced bittervet syndrome - which tends to be an unavoidable product of playing EVE long term. This doesn't mean that Jenn is wrong however, merely that he is speaking in general/stereotypical terms and ignoring the exceptions/outliers.


General usage aside however, in *THIS* instance people are literally complaining because they didn't get something that *THEY WERE NEVER PROMISED*. It was *NEVER EVEN HINTED AT*. They just *ASSUMED* that they were *ENTITLED* to it.

And that, my good sir, is in fact the very definition of ENTITLEMENT.

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#75 - 2016-06-23 12:50:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
For the record I've never ever said "everyone in high sec". However I think we all know that there is a 'high sec only/casual only/solo only/ME only" class that lives mostly (not exclusively) in high sec. Those are the ones I'm talking about, and not even all of them because I personally know people like that who don't think the world owes them something.
Unconspicous Alt
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#76 - 2016-06-23 13:46:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Unconspicous Alt
Ok posts from brainless highshool bullies aside, this is my conclusion in regards to CCP's blog statements.

Team Game of Drones wrote:
New structure hulls are going to replace Starbases, Outposts and Deployables over time


CCP FAQ wrote:
What do the size differences mean for Citadels?
Medium sized Citadel structures will be around 5-25km in diameter and are tailored for individual or small groups of players. They will be able to fit some appropriate defenses to offer resistance against most kind of assaults including capital ships.


At least for now, citadels do NOT replace the POSes in any other regard than large-anchorable-hangars in space. They cannot be used for manufacturing or research. They have nowhere near the defense capabilities of POSes ( ESPECIALLY for "Individual players" ), and any test on sisi ( for people that are interested in something else than exposing their 2 neurons way of thinking without actually trying ) can show that. The reason there are no fortizar kills after the initial vulnerability period is that nobody has attacked one that belongs to a small corporation yet. And most likely there will not be for a time, since most people with brains will research and think twice before investing 20 bil in something they cannot defend.

I completely understand the way a citadel works. As a new item in eve, they are fine. They fill a new niche, as better homes for alliances that can put up a defense fleet. As replacement for POSes however, they do not work as indended. Most of the POSes in hisec and w-space belong to very small corporations from 1 to 10 people who never wanted something else, or tried and got tired of CTAs and being hunted in nullsec, or simply do not want pvp. Players who have a busy RL and invest at most 3-5 hours per week in this game. They will rarely, if ever, be able to field even 4-5 ships in defense of their new structures. Also, a weird thing, some of them even take vacations 1-2 weeks at a time and go camping, hiking or relax with their families somewhere where there is no internet access. Who will man their citadel defenses then ? For those players, once the POSes are gone, if they still do not want nullsec, the game is pretty much over. If a large POS could have been destroyed only by an organized fleet of 15-20 people ( and with a good risk of losing some ships ), a citadel is easy prey for any 4-5 man gang.

What i cannot get is the need of a noisy part of the eve players to impose their way of thinking and style of playing against the others. They do not understand that some of them simply do not like nullsec and pvp, and, when they fail to convince them, they start using words like "idiots", "whiners" and the such. They gloat when they see a change in the game that makes their life harder, without thinking that, with that part of the playerbase gone, they will have to do the very thing they hate : mining, researching and manufacturing. When i saw in Niarja a bunch of pirates obliterating a freighter, there was one comment on local from the freighter's pilot : "gf" and several from the pirates, most with the same meaning "thanks for the loot, you f***ing carebear loser".

You know, nobody is calling you idiots because you do not want to live in hisec. Try show some maturity and respect the other players as they respect you.

Of course some will reply to this post with their usual brainless comments, but, unless i see something worthy to discuss, i will not bother to. I have graduated highschool long ago :)
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#77 - 2016-06-23 13:55:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Dirty Forum Alt
Unconspicous Alt wrote:
What i cannot get is the need of a noisy part of the eve players to impose their way of thinking and style of playing against the others. They do not understand that some of them simply do not like nullsec and pvp, and, when they fail to convince them, they start using words like "idiots", "whiners" and the such. They gloat when they see a change in the game that makes their life harder, without thinking that, with that part of the playerbase gone, they will have to do the very thing they hate : mining, researching and manufacturing. When i saw in Niarja a bunch of pirates obliterating a freighter, there was one comment on local from the freighter's pilot : "gf" and several from the pirates, most with the same meaning "thanks for the loot, you f***ing carebear loser".

You know, nobody is calling you idiots because you do not want to live in hisec. Try show some maturity and respect the other players as they respect you.

I live in high sec. I haven't always, but over half my EVE life has been spent there, and I live there now. So I assure you, I'm not biased against you because you live in high sec.

But *I* can't understand why *you* are complaining that citadels don't replace POSes - since nobody ever said they would...

The Mobile Depot did not 100% replace Orcas + Rorquals + Carriers - does that mean we need to start a thread complaining about how awful and useless the Mobile Depot is? Because that is what you are doing here - complaining that a new item doesn't do something nobody ever said it would do...


I suggest you go back and re-read the dev post on the first page of this thread. Citadels are working exactly as intended. They were *never intended* to 100% replace POSes + Outposts + NPC stations in 1 new object - they are just the first item in a long list that CCP has released to *eventually* replace those things.

But I suppose the Dev's are just high school bullies as well? Perhaps you should go back to WoW.


edit: I really do have bittervet trained to level 6, and I'm not denying that I certainly come across as a bully much of the time - but I do have the advantage of being *RIGHT* in the vast majority of cases - including this one. I think you know it, even if you won't admit it.

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#78 - 2016-06-23 14:25:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Unconspicous Alt wrote:
Ok posts from brainless highshool bullies aside, this is my conclusion in regards to CCP's blog statements.

Team Game of Drones wrote:
New structure hulls are going to replace Starbases, Outposts and Deployables over time


CCP FAQ wrote:
What do the size differences mean for Citadels?
Medium sized Citadel structures will be around 5-25km in diameter and are tailored for individual or small groups of players. They will be able to fit some appropriate defenses to offer resistance against most kind of assaults including capital ships.


At least for now, citadels do NOT replace the POSes in any other regard than large-anchorable-hangars in space. They cannot be used for manufacturing or research. They have nowhere near the defense capabilities of POSes ( ESPECIALLY for "Individual players" ), and any test on sisi ( for people that are interested in something else than exposing their 2 neurons way of thinking without actually trying ) can show that. The reason there are no fortizar kills after the initial vulnerability period is that nobody has attacked one that belongs to a small corporation yet. And most likely there will not be for a time, since most people with brains will research and think twice before investing 20 bil in something they cannot defend.

I completely understand the way a citadel works. As a new item in eve, they are fine. They fill a new niche, as better homes for alliances that can put up a defense fleet. As replacement for POSes however, they do not work as indended. Most of the POSes in hisec and w-space belong to very small corporations from 1 to 10 people who never wanted something else, or tried and got tired of CTAs and being hunted in nullsec, or simply do not want pvp. Players who have a busy RL and invest at most 3-5 hours per week in this game. They will rarely, if ever, be able to field even 4-5 ships in defense of their new structures. Also, a weird thing, some of them even take vacations 1-2 weeks at a time and go camping, hiking or relax with their families somewhere where there is no internet access. Who will man their citadel defenses then ? For those players, once the POSes are gone, if they still do not want nullsec, the game is pretty much over. If a large POS could have been destroyed only by an organized fleet of 15-20 people ( and with a good risk of losing some ships ), a citadel is easy prey for any 4-5 man gang.

What i cannot get is the need of a noisy part of the eve players to impose their way of thinking and style of playing against the others. They do not understand that some of them simply do not like nullsec and pvp, and, when they fail to convince them, they start using words like "idiots", "whiners" and the such. They gloat when they see a change in the game that makes their life harder, without thinking that, with that part of the playerbase gone, they will have to do the very thing they hate : mining, researching and manufacturing. When i saw in Niarja a bunch of pirates obliterating a freighter, there was one comment on local from the freighter's pilot : "gf" and several from the pirates, most with the same meaning "thanks for the loot, you f***ing carebear loser".

You know, nobody is calling you idiots because you do not want to live in hisec. Try show some maturity and respect the other players as they respect you.

Of course some will reply to this post with their usual brainless comments, but, unless i see something worthy to discuss, i will not bother to. I have graduated highschool long ago :)


This post is the perfect example of the kinds of high sec people I'm talking about:


-Personal issues (but i want to go fishing/camping but can't because of space structures!!!) seen as something CCP needs to fix for them? Check

-Preoccupation with the idea that someone doesn't like their "playstyle" because they explained the realities of EVE to them? Check

-Rejecting simple logical solutions to their problem (if you can't defend it don't put it up!) for nonsense 'reasons' that resmeble crying and a feeling of entitlement? Oh so Check

-Defaulting to calling people "bullies" because those people explained that they are being silly? SJW check

-Pretending that they speak for "the player base" (and offering up the empty "people will quit the game" threat) rather than being truthful and saying "this is just my personal opinion, but I don't like this"? Double Check

-Acting like the problem is pvp or null sec when niether pvp nor null sec has anything to do with it (although they DID choose to play a pvp-centric game btw)? Final ultimate Check.


In other words, typical high sec poster. Yea it's a generalization, it just also happens to be true as anyone who spends any time in GD can attest.
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#79 - 2016-06-23 14:33:09 UTC
Since you edited your post after I replied, I'll address this as well:

Team Game of Drones wrote:
New structure hulls are going to replace Starbases, Outposts and Deployables over time

As the dev emphasized for you, the key words are OVER TIME!

CCP FAQ wrote:
What do the size differences mean for Citadels?
Medium sized Citadel structures will be around 5-25km in diameter and are tailored for individual or small groups of players. They will be able to fit some appropriate defenses to offer resistance against most kind of assaults including capital ships.

They do this. They hit capital sized ships much better than subcapitals, and they do apply effects to subcapitals as well, though you might derive more from the e-war modules than the capital sized weaponry as a high-sec force multiplier. As previously stated, when fit for damage dealing they are roughly equivalent to a sieged dreadnought, but with more HP and a little more dps... So they are a bit better than having an extra capital ship on your side - even in high sec.

Nowhere was anything mentioned that said their abilities would be in any way similar to or related to POS defenses. You just made that up.

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Fyt 284
Requiem Eternal Holdings
#80 - 2016-06-23 14:36:27 UTC
CCP Darwin wrote:
Quote:
New structure hulls are going to replace Starbases, Outposts and Deployables over time

(emphasis mine.)

This time has not yet arrived.

In the meantime, please feel most welcome to construct a player-owned-starbase our outpost if they fit your needs better.


I don't think they ever will to be honest, but I am speaking of one piece of functionality in particular: the ability to store a super capital. Sure you can dock them up in keepstars, but the price point of a keepstar keeps them far out of reach of most alliances, where as right now, I can go out and buy a XLSMA pos w/ faction guns for just over 1b isk. (Yes, I know someone can buy a sitter toon and safe log it off a citadel, but even that is flawed since ships can be bumped off a citadel.)