These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

New Docking/Undocking Transition
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Kalpel
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#1 - 2016-06-21 02:11:04 UTC
I just watched a video on youtube of the "New Docking/Undocking Transition" and immediately thought to myself I hope this is an optional feature

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLTdqifvLLQ

So is this going to be optional like most of the camera features?

You failed to target nothing! ≡v≡ online ... (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
MidnightWyvern
Fukamichi Corporation
SAYR Galactic
#2 - 2016-06-21 02:56:23 UTC
Kalpel wrote:
I just watched a video on youtube of the "New Docking/Undocking Transition" and immediately thought to myself I hope this is an optional feature

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLTdqifvLLQ

So is this going to be optional like most of the camera features?

It's a simple animation that has no effect on window funcionality. Your gameplay experience will not at all be change by this update.

There is literally no logical explanation for wanting to disable it.

Rattati Senpai noticed us! See you in the next FPS!

Alts: Saray Wyvern, Mobius Wyvern (Dust 514)
Kalpel
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#3 - 2016-06-21 03:51:23 UTC
MidnightWyvern wrote:
Kalpel wrote:
I just watched a video on youtube of the "New Docking/Undocking Transition" and immediately thought to myself I hope this is an optional feature

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLTdqifvLLQ

So is this going to be optional like most of the camera features?

It's a simple animation that has no effect on window funcionality. Your gameplay experience will not at all be change by this update.

There is literally no logical explanation for wanting to disable it.


In the video the ship is facing backwards once docked with the front of the ship facing the back of the station,This in and of itself warrants an optional check box imo

You failed to target nothing! ≡v≡ online ... (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#4 - 2016-06-21 06:12:03 UTC
Kalpel wrote:
MidnightWyvern wrote:
Kalpel wrote:
I just watched a video on youtube of the "New Docking/Undocking Transition" and immediately thought to myself I hope this is an optional feature

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLTdqifvLLQ

So is this going to be optional like most of the camera features?

It's a simple animation that has no effect on window funcionality. Your gameplay experience will not at all be change by this update.

There is literally no logical explanation for wanting to disable it.


In the video the ship is facing backwards once docked with the front of the ship facing the back of the station,This in and of itself warrants an optional check box imo



logically thats how you would dock, straight in. then when you undock the platform would rotate and you;d go the other way. i don't see a problem. most people park there car head first, so... what exactly is your issue? it would be weird for a ship going into the station head first to dock backwards.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.
Nana Skalski
Taisaanat Kotei
EDENCOM DEFENSIVE INITIATIVE
#5 - 2016-06-21 07:47:58 UTC
Demica Diaz
SE-1
#6 - 2016-06-21 10:10:40 UTC
Looks good apart from probably bug that camera shows briefly docking platform then turns towards incoming ship. Too bad we cant get rid of that short black screen when moving from space to station.

I also do not see any point making it optional as you can clearly use all interface while camera is showing your ship flying in.

Also CCP, make tiny pod fly out of the ship when moving to CQ section. Bear

... ooh and also CCP, make little ships or drones/cranes unloading your ship when you moving stuff from ship to station. Lol
Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2016-06-21 10:12:24 UTC
the new docking and directional lights look pretty damn awesome imo, well done Big smile

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#8 - 2016-06-21 11:20:36 UTC
Looks good to me.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp
Charley Varrick
State War Academy
Caldari State
#9 - 2016-06-21 12:09:23 UTC
Before-
Player clicks undock.......Ship undocks.

Now-
Player clicks undock.......Ship undocks and slowly zooms out. Roll

Meanwhile, things like custom tracking position, un-even camera scrolling speed and wacky zooming issues go ignored.

Priorities....
Scath Bererund
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2016-06-21 12:15:02 UTC
cant work out how that is gonna work with tall ships like the Nag and FAX machines...
Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2016-06-21 12:18:09 UTC
Scath Bererund wrote:
cant work out how that is gonna work with tall ships like the Nag and FAX machines...


lets just get small ships working properly then we can revisit that at a future date

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*
Blade Darth
Room for Improvement
Good Sax
#12 - 2016-06-21 14:06:04 UTC
...... why not.

Maybe in 2047 we get full immersive docking w/o teleporting into hangar, who knows.

Omen Navy Issue Tutorial
MidnightWyvern
Fukamichi Corporation
SAYR Galactic
#13 - 2016-06-21 14:16:43 UTC
Blade Darth wrote:
...... why not.

Maybe in 2047 we get full immersive docking w/o teleporting into hangar, who knows.

That'd be impossible without making every station the size of an entire planet. At this point the amount of assets we have crammed inside of stations is just silly compared to what CCP was probably expecting back in 2003.

As an example, I can't remember the other pipe up from Misaba to Amarr (not Mista), but I once saw the reds who hang out there undock several dozen carriers, and even 2 of them looked too big for the inside of that station.Lol

Rattati Senpai noticed us! See you in the next FPS!

Alts: Saray Wyvern, Mobius Wyvern (Dust 514)
Gadget Helmsdottir
Gadget's Workshop
#14 - 2016-06-21 17:53:24 UTC
MidnightWyvern wrote:
Blade Darth wrote:
...... why not.

Maybe in 2047 we get full immersive docking w/o teleporting into hangar, who knows.

That'd be impossible without making every station the size of an entire planet. At this point the amount of assets we have crammed inside of stations is just silly compared to what CCP was probably expecting back in 2003.

As an example, I can't remember the other pipe up from Misaba to Amarr (not Mista), but I once saw the reds who hang out there undock several dozen carriers, and even 2 of them looked too big for the inside of that station.Lol


That's because stations are bigger on the inside. Cool

/cue Dr. Who music

--Gadget

Work smarter, not harder. --Scrooge McDuck, an eminent old-Earth economist

Given an hour to save New Eden, how would respected scientist, Albertus Eisenstein compose his thoughts? "Fifty-five minutes to define the problem; save the galaxy in five."
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#15 - 2016-06-21 19:09:28 UTC
Dockikng game players and suspect baiters will assume this slows them down and demand to shut it off.

Predictable.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Pandora Carrollon
Provi Rapid Response
#16 - 2016-06-21 19:19:56 UTC
They're up against a state change lag, so rather than do the boring bit they currently are, they are putting in the animations. As long as my changed state stays the same amount of time, I could not care less about what is happening on the screen.

8 Golden Rules of EVE • EVE is entirely PvP
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#17 - 2016-06-21 19:21:40 UTC
Gadget Helmsdottir wrote:
MidnightWyvern wrote:
Blade Darth wrote:
...... why not.

Maybe in 2047 we get full immersive docking w/o teleporting into hangar, who knows.

That'd be impossible without making every station the size of an entire planet. At this point the amount of assets we have crammed inside of stations is just silly compared to what CCP was probably expecting back in 2003.

As an example, I can't remember the other pipe up from Misaba to Amarr (not Mista), but I once saw the reds who hang out there undock several dozen carriers, and even 2 of them looked too big for the inside of that station.Lol


That's because stations are bigger on the inside. Cool

/cue Dr. Who music

--Gadget




A station is just a huge Bag of Holding.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Yourmoney Mywallet
Doomheim
#18 - 2016-06-21 19:22:08 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Scath Bererund wrote:
cant work out how that is gonna work with tall ships like the Nag and FAX machines...


lets just get small ships working properly then we can revisit that at a future date

Spoken like a true CCP dev.
Blade Darth
Room for Improvement
Good Sax
#19 - 2016-06-21 20:54:17 UTC
The nag will fly in horizontally, doing a 360* with all guns blazing and spreading rust all over the hangar.

Omen Navy Issue Tutorial
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#20 - 2016-06-21 21:14:16 UTC
CCP, can my musical instruments dock yet?



...no?





Better implement them first before applying any fancy frosting to the game

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log
12Next page