These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Plea for more than 3 minutes to kill a freighter

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#141 - 2016-06-17 23:02:37 UTC
Ahahahaha LOOOL Lol

DEAL WITH IT.

You don't need 3 minutes. You need 28 bombers and 25 seconds.
Get gud or get out.
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#142 - 2016-06-17 23:05:35 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in?



The one you are desperately projecting on people you hate for no reason.

Whatever happened to you IRL, I'm glad it didn't happen to me.


So you're officially copping-out of the argument now because I've cornered you?

No attempt to justify your nonsense?



Please stop making things up and splerging them all over EVE -O, there are literally dozens of people on this forum you could be misinforming.


where do you and all your friends live?


Tulsa, Oklahoma?

If you're ever in town drop me a line and we'll have a pint m8! :D

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#143 - 2016-06-17 23:27:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Herzog Wolfhammer
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in?



The one you are desperately projecting on people you hate for no reason.

Whatever happened to you IRL, I'm glad it didn't happen to me.


So you're officially copping-out of the argument now because I've cornered you?

No attempt to justify your nonsense?



Please stop making things up and splerging them all over EVE -O, there are literally dozens of people on this forum you could be misinforming.



You feel cornered and now will make the charge of me being cornered. I already proved you wrong. See how you project? CODE. is one big projection. You are in highsec for the same reason your prey is. Only you are the butthurt one.

Sorry your feelings got hurt there. But you need to learn how to deal with that.


I see you guys are already moving to bombers and citadel jump offs. But don't be in the forums in a month after the change saying "SEE we adapted CODE wins again! HURF BLURF". We predicted the same day this change was announced but I'm sure you'll project something regardless.


EDIT: Tulsa. LOL. No wonder.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#144 - 2016-06-18 01:05:58 UTC
Lol I love how in carebear world "Liek Darz said it, so it must be true."

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#145 - 2016-06-18 02:42:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Galaxy Pig
Now that I've completely schooled Herzog in front of everyone, so much so that he abandoned his fallacious, blatantly false claims in favor of ad-hominim style attacks against me, I claim this as YET ANOTHER victory for the New Order, and take my leave with 1000 likes.

*Drops microphone*

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#146 - 2016-06-18 04:38:09 UTC
I concur. You are most certainly keeping us entertained. The Order emerges victorious once again, providing much needed content for the mindless hordes of forumbears!
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#147 - 2016-06-18 07:35:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
I sure hope Liek was talking about bumping in that out of context chatlog you posted, because if not, then he, like yourself, are completely 100% incorrect.

I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.

GM Banana helped James 315 create the mining permit to justify BUMPING. NOT GANKING.

I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.

I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.

Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in? Why don't you file a petition and ask a GM if this subject if so difficult for you? Are you afraid of what they're going to tell you? [Spoiler Alert] it's going to be: "You do not have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game."


No, he agreed that to make sure that your ganking and bumping and tear gathering could not be defined as simple griefing and petitioned by your victims. I have no attitude whether it be right or wrong, it just is and I fight it in game which for me is fun.


Ganking can never be "defined as simple griefing" because a killmail counts as an in-game reward or benefit. That's what I keep trying to tell you forum-dwellers but you just just can't seem to comprehend it.


No, he agreed that to make sure that your campaign of ganking and bumping and tear gathering could not be defined as simple griefing and petitioned by your victims.

Just to repeat the sentence with the addition of "campaign of" ro make it clearer, which is obviously not about just ganking is it? One could say that the focus of your website on individual players and their upset reaction is griefing, but those players have an option to join the AG movement and do something about it in game, rather than get all upset with eve mails and idle threats.

EDIT: As for forum warriors lol, Herzog blew up lots of wrecks before CCP changed the wreck EHP and yesterday I was next to a bumped Obelisk with two Guardians and another player in an Augorer and the gank fleet came in and then left as they knew they could not break our logi. I did not see them gank for quite a few hours after that, forum warriors lol...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#148 - 2016-06-18 08:27:02 UTC
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Now that I've completely schooled Herzog in front of everyone, so much so that he abandoned his fallacious, blatantly false claims in favor of ad-hominim style attacks against me, I claim this as YET ANOTHER victory for the New Order, and take my leave with 1000 likes.

*Drops microphone*


You didnt answer my question, where is this james 315 that you all worship

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*
eddie valvetino
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#149 - 2016-06-18 12:40:45 UTC
Galaxy Pig wrote:
I realize that CCP aims to nerf highsec freighter ganking, but do they intend to end it all-together?

When the nerf to Awoxing was on the horizon, a desperate plea was made by the players and CCP had the good judgement to implement the toggle-switch, thus saving awoxing from total death.

Now, a nerf to freighter suicide ganking comes in the form of a 3-minute warp timer, and we need to try and reason with CCP to allow us more than just 3 measly minutes.

Just making it 5 minutes would make a world of difference.

I implore you, noble Devs, reconsider the practicality of recently proposed mechanics changes to bumping/warping.

Thank you.


Perhaps if you weren't playing Eve PvP on easy mode, you would have more friends and there for more ships and more dps..

just saying

Also, if you are no grid for longer than 3 mins... why can you not fit scrams?

Perhaps your base level of "PvP" as yet to come across this most basic of offensive mods
Rogwar Toralen
AZLE FUN STUFF
#150 - 2016-06-18 17:12:47 UTC
Have they implemented that 3 minute thing yet?
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#151 - 2016-06-18 17:33:34 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
I sure hope Liek was talking about bumping in that out of context chatlog you posted, because if not, then he, like yourself, are completely 100% incorrect.

I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.

GM Banana helped James 315 create the mining permit to justify BUMPING. NOT GANKING.

I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.

I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.

Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in? Why don't you file a petition and ask a GM if this subject if so difficult for you? Are you afraid of what they're going to tell you? [Spoiler Alert] it's going to be: "You do not have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game."


No, he agreed that to make sure that your ganking and bumping and tear gathering could not be defined as simple griefing and petitioned by your victims. I have no attitude whether it be right or wrong, it just is and I fight it in game which for me is fun.


Ganking can never be "defined as simple griefing" because a killmail counts as an in-game reward or benefit. That's what I keep trying to tell you forum-dwellers but you just just can't seem to comprehend it.


No, he agreed that to make sure that your campaign of ganking and bumping and tear gathering could not be defined as simple griefing and petitioned by your victims.

Just to repeat the sentence with the addition of "campaign of" ro make it clearer, which is obviously not about just ganking is it? One could say that the focus of your website on individual players and their upset reaction is griefing, but those players have an option to join the AG movement and do something about it in game, rather than get all upset with eve mails and idle threats.

EDIT: As for forum warriors lol, Herzog blew up lots of wrecks before CCP changed the wreck EHP and yesterday I was next to a bumped Obelisk with two Guardians and another player in an Augorer and the gank fleet came in and then left as they knew they could not break our logi. I did not see them gank for quite a few hours after that, forum warriors lol...


Our campaign of 100% completely allowed in-game activities? Oh okay, big difference. I mean, killing a retriever once is fine, but if you make a CAMPAIGN out of it, then you're a griefer unless you justify it some way with the help of GM Banana. Got it. Roll


WHERE DO YOU GET THIS STUFF?!?


Also, I never said forum warriors, train reading to level 3 before you post.

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#152 - 2016-06-18 17:36:36 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Now that I've completely schooled Herzog in front of everyone, so much so that he abandoned his fallacious, blatantly false claims in favor of ad-hominim style attacks against me, I claim this as YET ANOTHER victory for the New Order, and take my leave with 1000 likes.

*Drops microphone*


You didnt answer my question, where is this james 315 that you all worship



Right now, I'd imagine he's gently helping a kitten out of a tree, or other Savior business.

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#153 - 2016-06-18 17:37:29 UTC
eddie valvetino wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
I realize that CCP aims to nerf highsec freighter ganking, but do they intend to end it all-together?

When the nerf to Awoxing was on the horizon, a desperate plea was made by the players and CCP had the good judgement to implement the toggle-switch, thus saving awoxing from total death.

Now, a nerf to freighter suicide ganking comes in the form of a 3-minute warp timer, and we need to try and reason with CCP to allow us more than just 3 measly minutes.

Just making it 5 minutes would make a world of difference.

I implore you, noble Devs, reconsider the practicality of recently proposed mechanics changes to bumping/warping.

Thank you.


Perhaps if you weren't playing Eve PvP on easy mode, you would have more friends and there for more ships and more dps..

just saying

Also, if you are no grid for longer than 3 mins... why can you not fit scrams?

Perhaps your base level of "PvP" as yet to come across this most basic of offensive mods


So much lack of understanding of the issue displayed here I just can't even begin to...

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#154 - 2016-06-18 19:44:37 UTC
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Now that I've completely schooled Herzog in front of everyone, so much so that he abandoned his fallacious, blatantly false claims in favor of ad-hominim style attacks against me, I claim this as YET ANOTHER victory for the New Order, and take my leave with 1000 likes.

*Drops microphone*



I was out all night. Why are you making a parody of yourself?

Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#155 - 2016-06-18 20:53:06 UTC
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
I sure hope Liek was talking about bumping in that out of context chatlog you posted, because if not, then he, like yourself, are completely 100% incorrect.

I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.

GM Banana helped James 315 create the mining permit to justify BUMPING. NOT GANKING.

I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.

I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.

Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in? Why don't you file a petition and ask a GM if this subject if so difficult for you? Are you afraid of what they're going to tell you? [Spoiler Alert] it's going to be: "You do not have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game."


No, he agreed that to make sure that your ganking and bumping and tear gathering could not be defined as simple griefing and petitioned by your victims. I have no attitude whether it be right or wrong, it just is and I fight it in game which for me is fun.


Ganking can never be "defined as simple griefing" because a killmail counts as an in-game reward or benefit. That's what I keep trying to tell you forum-dwellers but you just just can't seem to comprehend it.


No, he agreed that to make sure that your campaign of ganking and bumping and tear gathering could not be defined as simple griefing and petitioned by your victims.

Just to repeat the sentence with the addition of "campaign of" ro make it clearer, which is obviously not about just ganking is it? One could say that the focus of your website on individual players and their upset reaction is griefing, but those players have an option to join the AG movement and do something about it in game, rather than get all upset with eve mails and idle threats.

EDIT: As for forum warriors lol, Herzog blew up lots of wrecks before CCP changed the wreck EHP and yesterday I was next to a bumped Obelisk with two Guardians and another player in an Augorer and the gank fleet came in and then left as they knew they could not break our logi. I did not see them gank for quite a few hours after that, forum warriors lol...


Our campaign of 100% completely allowed in-game activities? Oh okay, big difference. I mean, killing a retriever once is fine, but if you make a CAMPAIGN out of it, then you're a griefer unless you justify it some way with the help of GM Banana. Got it. Roll


WHERE DO YOU GET THIS STUFF?!?


Also, I never said forum warriors, train reading to level 3 before you post.


You are trying too hard, first of all you do a whine thread and then you try to come over edgy and smart with stupid comments, CODE is definately going downhill fast..., keep posting mate its golden Evil

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#156 - 2016-06-18 20:54:46 UTC
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Bananas
WHERE DO YOU GET THIS STUFF?!?

AG has a very extensive Intel network composed of Lucas Kell who makes the stuff up, Dracvlad who adds the word tears to the end of every sentence and Herzog who just repeats it and gets upset about it.

Let's just say, our schedules are save.

Evil RatKid
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#157 - 2016-06-18 22:04:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Galaxy Pig
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Now that I've completely schooled Herzog in front of everyone, so much so that he abandoned his fallacious, blatantly false claims in favor of ad-hominim style attacks against me, I claim this as YET ANOTHER victory for the New Order, and take my leave with 1000 likes.

*Drops microphone*



I was out all night. Why are you making a parody of yourself?



Well everyone is still waiting for you to back up that big steaming pile of BS you plopped all over the thread.

Have you filed that petition?

Why are you afraid to just file a petition and ask a GM?

You clearly need help understanding this game but refuse to ask the people who are the authority on these matters. Being Ignorant is excusable, but refusing to educate yourself is known as stupidity.

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#158 - 2016-06-18 23:58:45 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
CODE is definately going downhill fast...,

said every miner and whiny carebear since 2012

I think I got a bingo boys Lol

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#159 - 2016-06-19 07:56:07 UTC
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
CODE is definately going downhill fast...,

said every miner and whiny carebear since 2012

I think I got a bingo boys Lol


He was the one whining, go look at the first post in this thread, it is basically please CCP don't make it harder for me, please please please, pathetic...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#160 - 2016-06-19 07:58:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Bananas
WHERE DO YOU GET THIS STUFF?!?

AG has a very extensive Intel network composed of Lucas Kell who makes the stuff up, Dracvlad who adds the word tears to the end of every sentence and Herzog who just repeats it and gets upset about it.

Let's just say, our schedules are save.


Safe not save. Roll

EDIT: I am not using tears in terms of the OP, but I am suggesting correctly that he is whining about having a challenge, so he wants to water down the bumping changes so it is not (gasp!) a bit more of a challenge, actually with his name perhaps the word squealing would be more apt... Big smileShocked

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp