These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Empire or Honour?

Author
Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#121 - 2016-06-11 20:51:08 UTC
Stitcher wrote:
Samira Kernher wrote:
Why is there the concern about free people arguing about slaves? Because from the perspective of a slave it is yet one more person trying to use us. The free people who engage in these discussions have a tendency to treat slaves as a cause for their own benefit, using the emancipation or support or comparison to them as a way to prove to others of their own "noble character" (or ignoble, as in the case of those who talk about killing slaves to make themselves seem so evil and ruthless), or as a subject on whom or through to push their own ideological beliefs ("everyone is a slave, really!" or "freedom!" or, yes, "amarr victor"). You see that here, with this thread, someone making a big showing about their releasing of their slaves in the hopes of convincing people (or even convincing himself) of the rightness of his new beliefs. Slaves are pawns. When a free person is speaking to or about us, we expect that it is because they want something from us, because they have a need of us. Actually helping us for our own benefit? Really caring? That is what is hard to believe. Other slaves, then, become the only ones we feel can speak with a level of real empathy and understanding. Of course that is also not entirely true, as slaves use each other as much as free people do..


Thank you for raising my consciousness on this.

I would just put here a note that the discussion is actually not about slavery, but about a man, who dishonored himself by a treason and only used this slavery business as a puny excuse.

In questions of honor and treason slavery is insignificant topic.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#122 - 2016-06-11 20:57:44 UTC
Deitra Vess wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:
Sinti Vailatti wrote:

2. The MIO is not a police force. It's an inquisition. But really, go talk to them yourself sometime.

Unlike you, I actually did (I even have been working for them briefly), and when I said that Amarr Empire enslaves only criminals and prisoners of war, I was telling you THEIR words.

So instead of shoving yourself deeper into that garbage hole you are putting your head in, you'd better go talk with them yourself. They will tell you the same thing I have been telling you from the start.

Though, if you'd like to revel in ignorance and incompetence, please do continue. That's your life and your reputation, not mine.

I guess we can ignore Gallante prison camps then since they only imprison criminals and POWs ...... They just as much as the amarr and the caldari and even the Republic commit atrocities, know who you really fight for... Only a fool fights for their government, fight to inspire your people or your accomplishing nothing.

If you would ignore them, you will just show and iyammarok-grade stupidity.

I have seen both these camps myself. And I myself worked with MIO.

MIO agents didn't tell me just go there and kill target, even if that was enough for me as a soldier. They have explained in detail what enslaving operations are legal and which are illegal. I didn't need these explanations, but they provided me with them anyways. And I myself was killing illegal slavers for MIO.

But can you find any of gallentean agents who will tell you to go and kill federal jailmasters, who torture Caldari POWs, because it is illegal?... I doubt gallente even consider it illegal.

So, until you find such example...

SHUT UP, VESS.

I don't have time for delusions of amateurs like you who knows no crap.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Claudia Osyn
Non-Hostile Target
Wild Geese.
#123 - 2016-06-11 22:05:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Claudia Osyn
Vess knows crap...

A little trust goes a long way. The less you use, the further you'll go.

Slayer Liberator
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#124 - 2016-06-11 22:24:35 UTC
Diana Kim wrote:
Deitra Vess wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:
Sinti Vailatti wrote:

2. The MIO is not a police force. It's an inquisition. But really, go talk to them yourself sometime.

Unlike you, I actually did (I even have been working for them briefly), and when I said that Amarr Empire enslaves only criminals and prisoners of war, I was telling you THEIR words.

So instead of shoving yourself deeper into that garbage hole you are putting your head in, you'd better go talk with them yourself. They will tell you the same thing I have been telling you from the start.

Though, if you'd like to revel in ignorance and incompetence, please do continue. That's your life and your reputation, not mine.

I guess we can ignore Gallante prison camps then since they only imprison criminals and POWs ...... They just as much as the amarr and the caldari and even the Republic commit atrocities, know who you really fight for... Only a fool fights for their government, fight to inspire your people or your accomplishing nothing.

If you would ignore them, you will just show and iyammarok-grade stupidity.

I have seen both these camps myself. And I myself worked with MIO.

MIO agents didn't tell me just go there and kill target, even if that was enough for me as a soldier. They have explained in detail what enslaving operations are legal and which are illegal. I didn't need these explanations, but they provided me with them anyways. And I myself was killing illegal slavers for MIO.

But can you find any of gallentean agents who will tell you to go and kill federal jailmasters, who torture Caldari POWs, because it is illegal?... I doubt gallente even consider it illegal.

So, until you find such example...

SHUT UP, VESS.

I don't have time for delusions of amateurs like you who knows no crap.

And Caldari treat Gallente POWs so much better?
Deitra Vess
Non-Hostile Target
Wild Geese.
#125 - 2016-06-11 22:40:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Deitra Vess
Diana Kim wrote:
Deitra Vess wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:
Sinti Vailatti wrote:

2. The MIO is not a police force. It's an inquisition. But really, go talk to them yourself sometime.

Unlike you, I actually did (I even have been working for them briefly), and when I said that Amarr Empire enslaves only criminals and prisoners of war, I was telling you THEIR words.

So instead of shoving yourself deeper into that garbage hole you are putting your head in, you'd better go talk with them yourself. They will tell you the same thing I have been telling you from the start.

Though, if you'd like to revel in ignorance and incompetence, please do continue. That's your life and your reputation, not mine.

I guess we can ignore Gallante prison camps then since they only imprison criminals and POWs ...... They just as much as the amarr and the caldari and even the Republic commit atrocities, know who you really fight for... Only a fool fights for their government, fight to inspire your people or your accomplishing nothing.

If you would ignore them, you will just show and iyammarok-grade stupidity.

I have seen both these camps myself. And I myself worked with MIO.

MIO agents didn't tell me just go there and kill target, even if that was enough for me as a soldier. They have explained in detail what enslaving operations are legal and which are illegal. I didn't need these explanations, but they provided me with them anyways. And I myself was killing illegal slavers for MIO.

But can you find any of gallentean agents who will tell you to go and kill federal jailmasters, who torture Caldari POWs, because it is illegal?... I doubt gallente even consider it illegal.

So, until you find such example...

SHUT UP, VESS.

I don't have time for delusions of amateurs like you who knows no crap.


Hows this for a dillusion? The imperial dog tags I have sitting in Eram exist. Know where I got them? (No, not from killing in the TLF, those ones are in Amamake, Egghelende and Bosborgor) From destroying quite a few imperial navy ships over many occasions where I ambushed slaver convoys. In Metropolis. A Matari region. Explain to me what your completely not dillusion based conversation with MIO agents had to say about that? You know, in that oh so professional organization that gives unlimited information clearances to contractors* because "who needs op security anyways?"

*Hint: contractors can be soldiers, you weren't in the MIO but accepted contracts to do work for them upon the completion of your terms you were not associated with them. What does that make you?
Aurum Exodus
Trauma Inflicting
NO NEED LOOSE FACE
#126 - 2016-06-16 00:19:39 UTC
This whole thread is off topic. I made the broadcast because I want people to discuss how evil slavery is and how dishonorable it is that the Amarr Empire allows slavery. So, who will join me in freeing themselves from the Empire and join in the fight to end slavery?
Anataine Deva
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#127 - 2016-06-16 07:00:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Anataine Deva
Aurum Exodus wrote:
This whole thread is off topic. I made the broadcast because I want people to discuss how evil slavery is and how dishonorable it is that the Amarr Empire allows slavery. So, who will join me in freeing themselves from the Empire and join in the fight to end slavery?
Fortunately I was reborn in the Federation so I have that privilege to be already free. As a free capsuleer I won't join any violent actions against the Amarr. Destroying their fleets, or bombing their cities won't persuade them to end their inhumane way of life.

But what I can offer is support for the cause in form of resources, money and influence.

My fleet of fast warp trading ships is ready to transport refugees out of the empire. I can convert some transport container into "enjoyable" habitats so they can stay for a while in my storage facilities without getting noticed, until a new home is found. Furthermore I can deliver food, clothes and everything else to start a new life. I also may be able to persuade some of my former teachers of the UoC to give some of them a proper education.

Jason Galente wrote:
...Pillow Fortizar...
^^

I can't provide a home for many but am willing to support those who can. Since more than a year I pay into a charity fund for capsuleers in need. Here I can divert some money for this cause if needed.

Give The BIG Lottery a try (it's conform with the EULA) and me your Fedos!

Nicoletta Mithra
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#128 - 2016-06-16 09:06:32 UTC
Slaves, as many have pointed out already, differ quite widely amongst themselves. Amongst others, there are the usual criminals - people that would be imprisoned in other nations, possibly forced to labour, too - that are sentenced to slavery.

Does the child molester deserve the "virtue" of choosing freely what he wants to do as well? I don't see how this is kind of choice can be seen as "a universal virtue, which is about the most objective a virtue can get". Virtue is not about being able to choose: It's about making the right choices.

People who repeatedly make bad choices, choices that end in a lot of suffering for others, need to be stripped of (part of) their capacity to choose freely: That much is consensus amongst all civilized nations, else there wouldn't be prisons and laws (the latter always restrict free choice in one way or the other through deterrance, the former make sure you don't do it again, if you fail to be deterred).

All that I can add to this discussion is that the OP made sure to see those of his former slaves, that are convicted criminals - the child molester, the murderer and those types, won't run free.
Sinjin Mokk
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#129 - 2016-06-16 17:00:31 UTC
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
Slaves, as many have pointed out already, differ quite widely amongst themselves. Amongst others, there are the usual criminals - people that would be imprisoned in other nations, possibly forced to labour, too - that are sentenced to slavery.

Does the child molester deserve the "virtue" of choosing freely what he wants to do as well? I don't see how this is kind of choice can be seen as "a universal virtue, which is about the most objective a virtue can get". Virtue is not about being able to choose: It's about making the right choices.

People who repeatedly make bad choices, choices that end in a lot of suffering for others, need to be stripped of (part of) their capacity to choose freely: That much is consensus amongst all civilized nations, else there wouldn't be prisons and laws (the latter always restrict free choice in one way or the other through deterrance, the former make sure you don't do it again, if you fail to be deterred).

All that I can add to this discussion is that the OP made sure to see those of his former slaves, that are convicted criminals - the child molester, the murderer and those types, won't run free.




You're of course living in a bygone era.

Slavery isn't needed. Shocking for me to say, I know. The criminal, the molester, the prisoner of war, they can be repaired. The use of TCMCs or other behavioral adaptations can be used to rehabilitate. On the outside, they could simply be executed or incarcerated.

The only reason a slaver operates is because he can. Because there is profit in the action. Scripture gives one license. Law gives one permission. But it's a choice. And it's actually an easy choice. Rehabilitation or incarceration takes time and effort. Those options and execution are a waste of a potential resource. Slavery is the easy, ofttimes cost-effective way of dealing with an undesirable. And for other organizations outside the Empire, slavery is quick ISK.

In Amarr, this a positive moral choice. It's in the Scriptures. All Amarr are slaves under God. And all Amarr support the system of slavery. So if you're against slavery on moral grounds, I hope none of you are under the impression that your Amarrian friends are anything more than slavers. But if you like slavery, then revel in it. Stop apologizing and recognize that your rights as a slaver far outweigh the slaves' rights to self-determination.

God makes no excuses.

"Angels live, they never die, Apart from us, behind the sky. They're fading souls who've turned to ice, So ashen white in paradise."

Nicoletta Mithra
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#130 - 2016-06-16 19:08:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicoletta Mithra
Mr. Mokk,

you sound like you aim to emulate the bygone heretic Nauplius.

First, your use of language reveals a lot of how you think about people. "The criminal, the molester, the prisoner of war, they can be repaired.", you say. But they aren't machines: They are humans. You can't repair them: You can educate, treat, maybe heal them. But that's quite different from repair.

The TCMCs aren't repairing, they are simply limiting the freedom of someone in a way that also prevents him form learning. Exectution is another form of preventing someone from acting freely - a quite radical way, if I may say so. And incarceration, just as imprisonment is a form of taking freedom from someone and making them obey certain rules.

The kind of slaver you are is operating because he can. It's a kind of slavery that has to be opposed, because might doesn't make right. It's the hallmark of the entirely uncivilized to claim that they are right because they can do it.

Both Scripture and Law (which isn't that different in the Empire, as you should know) license and permit slavery only if certain conditions are met. There is no blanket license to keep slaves in the Empire. There are conditions in regard to who may keep slaves, how slaves are to be kept, and conditions at what one might aim with keeping slaves . Merely aiming for profit is insuficcient for someone to legally keep slaves in the Empire. Slavery is only permissible if it aims at re-education and eventually rehabilitation and manumission or keeping someone in check who's unfit to be a free member of civilized society (such as certain criminals). There is some leeway in whether the first criterion is taken as something that has to be aimed at for the individual or in a multi-generational context: None the less this leads to duties naturally corresponding to the rights involved in slave-keeping.

License and permission, the right to keep slaves come - naturally and as decreed by God, which is reflected within imperial law - with the duty to care properly for the slave: materially as well as spiritually and mentally. And that proper care isn't cheap. Slavery - in the Empire - isn't as cheap and cost-effective a source of labour as you make it sound. Automatization would be in many task where slaves are employed much more cost effective, as has been shown by several economic analyses by Caldari and Galentean institutions. The only economic hurdle there would be the investment cost - which would be quickly recovered, though.

A Holder furthermore has a duty to engage in the Reclamation effort. Part of this is done through slavery. So, no it's not that much of a choice. A holder not participating in slave-keeping will be viewed with as much suspicion as one unwilling to pull his weight in defending his liege-lords domains or shirks any of his other duties. Of course that can be compensated by focusing on one of those other duties and excelling in it. But that's compensating for not engaging in what is your duty, too.

So, yes, the rights of a slave-keeper outweigh the slaves' rights to self-determination. Just as the right to keep a criminal encarcerated of a prison outweigh the prisoner's rights of self-determination. That doesn't negate the duties which are implied by those rights. In the Empire, the corresponding duties aim to balance the rights.

As I said: Civilized societies agree, generally speaking, that people who repeatedly make bad choices, choices that end in a lot of suffering for others, need to be stripped of (part of) their capacity to choose freely.

I don't have to make any excuses. Neither has God. But you have to make amends to Him eventually, be assured, as you shirk from the duties that come with certain rights and take rights as yours when you don't fulfill the conditions to have them as a person. God specified both duties and conditions. And he won't accept your feeble excuses to ignore both.
Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#131 - 2016-06-16 19:29:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
I wouldn't say the aim is re-education and rehabilitation. While that's certainly an expected responsibility for the Holder, Holders do not keep slaves for the benefit of the slaves. It's the opposite. Slaves work for the benefit of the Holders, and receive a second chance at finding God's favor through that service. Slaves are servants first, students second--and only if their Holder upholds his or her religious obligations.

Merely aiming to profit is certainly not enough on its own to keep slaves, no. You have to have a title. That's the only really necessary thing.
Sinti Vailatti
Angelis Exploration
#132 - 2016-06-16 19:41:24 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:
I wouldn't say the aim is re-education and rehabilitation. While that's certainly an expected responsibility for the Holder, Holders do not keep slaves for the benefit of the slaves. It's the opposite. Slaves work for the benefit of the Holders, and receive a second chance at finding God's favor through that service. Slaves are servants first, students second--and only if their Holder upholds his or her religious obligations.

Merely aiming to profit is certainly not enough on its own to keep slaves, no. You have to have a title. That's the only really necessary thing.



As you are, I was. As I am, you will be.

“Where must we go...we who wander this wasteland, in search of our better selves?”

Jason Galente
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#133 - 2016-06-17 04:53:27 UTC
The amount of bullshit and naivety about slavery in this thread is mind-numbing.

I'm quite happy to know that at least these freemen are now long out of the clutches of that system of oppression and those that support it with any sort of justifications or qualifications they can attempt to make to rationalize it.

Only the liberty of the individual assures the prosperity of the whole. And this foundation must be defended.

At any cost

Aurum Exodus
Trauma Inflicting
NO NEED LOOSE FACE
#134 - 2016-06-17 05:50:41 UTC
So I am still looking for an open and honest debate about slavery. This entire thread has turned away from that. Prisons are not slavery, prisons are for people who commited crimes and lost their freedom because they cannot be trusted in the general population due to their criminal habits. People who are "slaves" to things such an religion, ideology, country, etc are not the slaves I am talking about. The mantra in this thread is "everyone is a slave in some way" is not what I am looking for. What I am trying to get rid of and have a conversation about is Amarrian style slavery where the ones who were born lucky get to get rich off of the ones who were born unlucky. Sure some of the Amarrian slaves are criminals, most of them were just born unlucky. This is what I am addressing. How in this era can we continue to let the Amarrians do this? I mean so many people here are proud of Amarr and fight for it, but what you fighting for? Your fighting to proliferate slavery, tyrrany, religious fanaticism. The caldari who like to defend the amarr and there ways just care about money, thats all they fight for. My Minmatar and Gallente freinds on the other hand are fighting for freedom and individuality. Now lets discuss, whats the better cause to fight for?
Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#135 - 2016-06-17 08:16:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
Jason Galente wrote:
The amount of bullshit and naivety about slavery in this thread is mind-numbing.


Yes, it is.


Aurum Exodus wrote:
Sure some of the Amarrian slaves are criminals, most of them were just born unlucky.


Unlucky in that we were born descended from criminals, certainly.

Quote:
I mean so many people here are proud of Amarr and fight for it, but what you fighting for? Your fighting to proliferate slavery, tyrrany, religious fanaticism.


We fight for God. To uphold His plans for us. We are a civilization that has lasted for four thousand years, that has seen trillions of trillions of scholars, priests, scientists, and other wisemen live and die seeking out the why's of our existence. We don't fight for slavery, we fight to discover the meaning of life, to fulfill our purpose.

But if you want to know the thing Amarr really fights for, with all of the religious rhetoric divorced from it? Unity. Amarr fights for the unification of all humanity, all creation even, into one, single whole. The Empire of God. That's the Reclaiming, the Destiny of Faith. It is what we believe to be our purpose, and it is a complete quest on its own. Thoughts and actions must be brought in order, the natural laws of the universe must be uncovered so that we know how to best adhere to them, territory must be expanded, and people must be brought into the whole. Amarr's fight will not be over until our Empire stretches across the whole universe, all people one under God and our eyes open to the fullness of His creation, and the Books of Scripture at last closed because there is no more left to add.

Slavery has been part of our culture for so long because it was a means by which to integrate conquered people into our society in a way in which their previous values could not spread to erode the unity we are seeking to build. As I would hope a former Holder would know, in Amarr you are not a citizen if you are not a member of the faith. Conquered peoples are, for the most part, not members of the faith. There are two responses that can be taken to that, in a society in which simply casting them out is contrary to our goals. You can demand they all convert, and execute those who refuse or give only lip service (which would lead to an extremely high death toll), or you can isolate them in their own communities until they integrate, or their descendants have. But those communities can not be kept funded on charity. There has to be a reason to spend so much money on feeding, clothing, and housing these groups of foreigners. So, a reason was given: Put them to work. If they are useful, then resources can be spent to keep them alive and healthy. Slavery was not created for the benefit of the slaves, certainly; it was created for benefit of the land holders and governors who were going to be burdened with a bunch of resentful people that didn't follow the same religion, didn't speak the same language, and didn't have any money, but did have skills and the ability to perform labor. Slavery was an answer to the question, "What do you do with a conquered people?"

Whether you believe in the religious incentive is irrelevant. For the goals we seek, slavery was deemed beneficial. It had a use for our society. Of course, the needs of society is something that is often considered irrelevant by people who argue only on behalf of individual freedom.

Is slavery still necessary today? Well, that's a much more complicated question. Certainly its current form is dated, and today the greatest threat of foreign influence comes not from conquered peoples in our midst but from the outside, from the holonet network, open trade markets, and interstellar integration. It's no longer possible to simply cordon away subversive elements, because subversive elements are all around us and we don't have the power to defeat them in the way we could before. And slaves represent the single biggest vulnerability to those foreign ideas, because we're already in a place of uncertainty; we're already people whose lives are spent being built into what others wish of us.

Amarr don't fight "for slavery". We fight for unification, for the Reclaiming. It's possible that we'll eventually eliminate slavery on our own someday because it is becoming increasingly less relevant in the modern age, but it did have a purpose in our society. It wouldn't have lasted four thousand years if it hadn't.

Quote:
My Minmatar and Gallente freinds on the other hand are fighting for freedom and individuality.


It's not a very good argument that presents a case without explaining why that case is the right one. A lot of people in this thread are very intent on arguing that something is good "just because".
Kolodi Ramal
Sanxing Yi
#136 - 2016-06-17 11:41:10 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:
But if you want to know the thing Amarr really fights for, with all of the religious rhetoric divorced from it? Unity. Amarr fights for the unification of all humanity, all creation even, into one, single whole. The Empire of God. That's the Reclaiming, the Destiny of Faith. It is what we believe to be our purpose, and it is a complete quest on its own. Thoughts and actions must be brought in order, the natural laws of the universe must be uncovered so that we know how to best adhere to them, territory must be expanded, and people must be brought into the whole. Amarr's fight will not be over until our Empire stretches across the whole universe, all people one under God and our eyes open to the fullness of His creation, and the Books of Scripture at last closed because there is no more left to add.

Loyalists of the State who want the Caldari peoples to be unoppressed, who also support the State's alliance with the Empire, should think about this more.

Having said that, though... I don't agree with you on most of the ethical topics that have been brought up here, Samira Kernher, but I thank you for your informative posts and your shared thoughts. There's a lot of honesty in them.
Aurum Exodus
Trauma Inflicting
NO NEED LOOSE FACE
#137 - 2016-06-17 15:52:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Aurum Exodus
Quote:
My Minmatar and Gallente friends on the other hand are fighting for freedom and individuality.


It's not a very good argument that presents a case without explaining why that case is the right one. A lot of people in this thread are very intent on arguing that something is good "just because".[/quote]

That explains why it is better, Freedom just simply is better than tyranny. In the empire you have to follow god's word 100% or you are in trouble. Here, my breathren do not care what religion I follow nor do they care if I follow none at all. This latter concept is simply better. So lets do a side by side comparison of 2 philosophy options.

Option 1-There is 1 god you must worship and obey, or else.
Option 2- You can worship or not worship whatever god you feel like.

So.........in option 1 you get 1 religion to choose from, in option 2 you get a multitude .

How is the 2nd not better? It just is, there does not need to be an explanation why the 2nd option is better, it just is.
Mizhara Del'thul
Kyn'aldrnari
#138 - 2016-06-17 16:45:48 UTC
As someone fervently opposed to the Empire and the way it uses the faith, I frankly wince at the incredibly poor showing by those trying to argue against it. Please just stop. You're embarrassing us all. Dread Kin here is trouncing you badly and you can't even recognize it.
Nick Bete
Highsec Haulers Inc.
#139 - 2016-06-17 17:03:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Nick Bete
That being the case Ms. Del'thul why don't you step up to the challenge? Join the dialogue rather than just criticizing from the sidelines.
Mizhara Del'thul
Kyn'aldrnari
#140 - 2016-06-17 17:14:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Mizhara Del'thul
Been there. Done that. Topic has been covered to the point where it can no longer be detected under the fetid layers of bullsh*t. When something that hasn't actually been repeated ad nauseum comes up, I'll chime in. Until then, I'll just be the aging grandma muttering about the kids these days.

Far more entertaining for me, and has about as much impact as this rambling nonce who looks like he's 800 and writes like he's 8.