These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Recurring opportunities will be deployed on May 24th

Author
Geronimo McVain
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#361 - 2016-06-08 08:15:25 UTC
Cara Forelli wrote:
Teckos wrote:

Then move out of the class 6 wormhole. If it is that much of a PITA, then leave. Problem solved.

Yeah...let me just change my entire playstyle to accommodate this poorly executed feature.

Eh, what are you doing all the time in a class 6 Wormhole? Twiddling thumps? If you can stay in a class 6 you can get some buddies together to have a quick hunt = good loot + SP.
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#362 - 2016-06-08 12:46:36 UTC
Caleb Seremshur wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
"They couldn't just suicide gank just for giggles: there had to be something to gain.".

Lies.

Please stop propagating this nonsense.

We are allowed to shoot each other for whatever reason we see fit. Ask a GM, he/she will tell you the same thing.

For crying out loud, where do people get this stuff?

CCP created the mining permit to justify bumping

I say again: BUMPING


Kaybella, why do you feel the need to make things up?


CCP created the mining permit? Really?


Yup. Little known fact.

A joint effort between GM Banana and the Saviour of Highsec.

See: http://www.minerbumping.com/2013/06/the-secret-origins-of-new-order.html?m=1

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com

Anataine Deva
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#363 - 2016-06-08 13:17:40 UTC
Oh I nearly forgot to express my gratitude for this feature and the 150,000 "free" skill points I got so far. Not to mention all the fun an social interactions I had because of it.

Why does it look like that during the last weeks the amount of active player went slightly down? Shouldn't be the opposite the case?

Give The BIG Lottery a try (it's conform with the EULA) and me your Fedos!

March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#364 - 2016-06-08 14:03:06 UTC
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Caleb Seremshur wrote:
CCP created the mining permit? Really?
Yup. Little known fact.

A joint effort between GM Banana and the Saviour of Highsec.

See: http://www.minerbumping.com/2013/06/the-secret-origins-of-new-order.html?m=1

Do you have any credible source?

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Isaac Armer
The Soup Kitchen
#365 - 2016-06-08 14:20:07 UTC
Why are we talking about CODE? I didn't realize they were still relevant
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#366 - 2016-06-08 14:21:12 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Caleb Seremshur wrote:
CCP created the mining permit? Really?
Yup. Little known fact.

A joint effort between GM Banana and the Saviour of Highsec.

See: http://www.minerbumping.com/2013/06/the-secret-origins-of-new-order.html?m=1

Do you have any credible source?


There isn't because they just translate "CCP said it would be ok" to "CCP created this for our purpose". It's a way to look more legitimate but it's only really useful to try to make people not petition the case.

Anytime you want to do something that might be viewed by someone as griefing, no matter how legitimate the griefing claim is or not, your best bet is to try to prevent said petition of ever existing in the first place. Whatever you say or link to the player in telling him it's useless to petition can be completely false as long as you succeed in preventing the petition of ever existing.
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#367 - 2016-06-08 18:26:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Galaxy Pig
Frostys Virpio wrote:
March rabbit wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Caleb Seremshur wrote:
CCP created the mining permit? Really?
Yup. Little known fact.

A joint effort between GM Banana and the Saviour of Highsec.

See: http://www.minerbumping.com/2013/06/the-secret-origins-of-new-order.html?m=1

Do you have any credible source?


There isn't because they just translate "CCP said it would be ok" to "CCP created this for our purpose". It's a way to look more legitimate but it's only really useful to try to make people not petition the case.

Anytime you want to do something that might be viewed by someone as griefing, no matter how legitimate the griefing claim is or not, your best bet is to try to prevent said petition of ever existing in the first place. Whatever you say or link to the player in telling him it's useless to petition can be completely false as long as you succeed in preventing the petition of ever existing.



Lol if frivolous petitions could stop us, we would have been shut down years ago. We're not that worried about carebears filing petitions, they're going to whine no matter what we say.


More or less this happened:

GM Banana> You can't just bump people, you have to be trying to get something out of them.

James 315> You mean like a 10 mil mining permit?

GM Banana> Yeah, yeah I'm pretty sure that would work!


Call that what you will, but since the entire engagement that produced the mining permit was in fact instigated by the GM staff, I'm gonna go ahead and call it "CCP inadvertently creating the biggest source of petitions since lag."

Which is pretty hilarious if you think about it.

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com

Isaac Armer
The Soup Kitchen
#368 - 2016-06-08 19:02:16 UTC
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Lol if frivolous petitions could stop us, we would have been shut down years ago. We're not that worried about carebears file petitions, they're going to whine no matter what we say.


More or less this happened:

GM Banana> You can't just bump people, you have to be trying to get something out of them.

James 315> You mean like a 10 mil mining permit?

GM Banana> Yeah, yeah I'm pretty sure that would work!


Call that what you will, but since the entire engagement that produced the mining permit was in fact instigated by the GM staff, I'm gonna go ahead and call it "CCP inadvertently creating the biggest source of petitions since lag."

Which is pretty hilarious if you think about it.


If mental gymnastics was an olympic event, you'd win the gold.
Tisiphone Dira
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#369 - 2016-06-08 19:13:00 UTC
Course he would, code always wins, haven't you heard?

There once was a ganker named tisi

A stunningly beautiful missy

To gank a gross miner

There is nothing finer, cept when they get all pissy

Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#370 - 2016-06-08 19:26:11 UTC
Had the GM staff stayed out of it, there would be no mining permit today.

Interpret that as you like.



I'd like to take a moment to thank the GMs for the more than 1 billion ISK I've made selling permits.

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com

Isaac Armer
The Soup Kitchen
#371 - 2016-06-08 20:21:17 UTC
Tisiphone Dira wrote:
Course he would, code always wins, haven't you heard?


https://i.imgur.com/RdGTA.gif