These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Allow Carriers and Capital Indy ships to dock in medium WH Citadels

First post
Author
Wander Prian
Nosferatu Security Foundation
#41 - 2016-06-05 12:18:30 UTC
Every time something new gets added to the game, people rush in to build and destroy them. Eventually citadels will be as common as POS are currently and nobody is going to go out of their way to kill yours unless you've pissed then off enough. CCP are willing to dedicate the time to get citadels right. They are fixing bugs, adding new features and fixing balance-issue all the time.

That doesn't mean that things will be the same though. I think CCP's idea is that if you are using capitals, you need to put something worthy in space to keep them safe.

Wormholer for life.

Terquil
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#42 - 2016-06-05 13:16:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Terquil
Is there a fortizar kill? A fitted One? Haven't found any... so why people assume they are weak?
Hatshepsut IV
Un.Reasonable
#43 - 2016-06-05 19:08:04 UTC
Nox52 wrote:
..I don't think it's unreasonable to want an option that does not make you choose between sitter alts, space coffins or 20 bil+ come **** with me targets in my wormhole.



I'll be the judge of what's Un.reasonable here.

Public Channel | Un.Welcome

Nox52
Pterygopalatine
#44 - 2016-06-05 21:30:43 UTC
Hatshepsut IV wrote:
Nox52 wrote:
..I don't think it's unreasonable to want an option that does not make you choose between sitter alts, space coffins or 20 bil+ come **** with me targets in my wormhole.



I'll be the judge of what's Un.reasonable here.


That legitimately made me chuckle.
helana Tsero
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#45 - 2016-06-06 00:11:34 UTC  |  Edited by: helana Tsero
Terquil wrote:
Is there a fortizar kill? A fitted One? Haven't found any... so why people assume they are weak?


People/Groups go on the test server.... and ...you know.. run tests like a fully fit fortizar against a subcap fleet. and also test the citadels force multiplier effects with defense fleet. Results have been disappointing for the cost of the citadel.

Fortizars (and all citadels) would improve significantly if they..

- Changed the anchor time. And made it come online fully fitted.
- made the citadels subcap missiles apply the same dps as a large POS (with gunners) does.
- Gave the citadel enough capacitor so it could run its jams / other ewar for prolonged periods


On a positive note.

The clone bay and custom vunerability timers are good.

"...ppl need to get out of caves and they will see something new.... thats where eve is placed... not in cave."  | zoonr-Korsairs |

Meanwhile Citadel release issues: "tried to bug report this and the bug report is bugged as well" | Rafeau |

Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#46 - 2016-06-06 00:37:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Jack Miton
omg ffs, you dont like citadels, WE GET IT!
no one cares, move on with your life and let it go.

I dare you to name a SINGLE other major change that was rolled out as smoothly as citadels or that worked as well.
I way THE most skeptical person you'll find anywhere when they announced introducing 'mooring' and docking while removing the force field but citadels work. they really do.

did you even stop and think about why there are only 3 available atm? and why they start at medium?
i highly highly doubt that citadels are as fully released as they will be once POSs do eventually go away so calm down, untwist your lace panties and continue using your miserable POS until a citadel comes out that you can afford, or you finally get accepted into a not poor corp.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

Bleedingthrough
#47 - 2016-06-06 05:51:51 UTC
Hatshepsut IV wrote:
In the age of daily free sp and purchasable sp I challenge you to give me one real reason why making a sitter is beyond your reach.

Your assumptions are wrong. A sitter won’t cut it for practical reasons.

Imagine the switching procedure during an escalating fight. I would not want to extract two accounts from a fight in a critical moment to do a tedious switch from a sitter to a character that can actually fly a cap. No, you need to use a fully trained character as sitter if you plan to use capitals for anything else but killing sleepers. That is a significant difference.
Som Boty
Super Mother Fan Club
#48 - 2016-06-06 06:28:45 UTC
Wander Prian wrote:
Nox52 wrote:
Hatshepsut IV wrote:
Nox52 wrote:
[quote=Hatshepsut IV]

Doesn't mean you can't do it but just because you can do it doesn't mean that should be the only option.


You don't want other options, you want YOUR, because your a special ******* snowflake and don't want to adapt.

POS are going away, get used to it and stop looking for CCP to handhold you cause 'think of the small/poors/reasons'


Oh I'd love other options, I don't think that dropping twenty billion on a fortizar (unfitted) for a small corporation is a viable option and neither is investing into holding alts for carriers/faxes/dreads.

Do you not see that the change that is allowing supers/titans to not necessarily have to have holding alts in k space is pushing small corps into just the same issues and may be just a tiny bit pants on head ********?


Dropping 20 billion to protect the 10-15 billion you have in capitals is too much? Ookay....



Dropping 20b to protect 10-15b is by definition too much.
Hatshepsut IV
Un.Reasonable
#49 - 2016-06-06 06:37:37 UTC
So you'd rather spend 2 bill then lose your capitals when people start popping your astrahaus because you decided to store diamonds in the space equivalent of an outhouse.

Public Channel | Un.Welcome

Terquil
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#50 - 2016-06-06 10:51:39 UTC
helana Tsero wrote:
Terquil wrote:
Is there a fortizar kill? A fitted One? Haven't found any... so why people assume they are weak?


People/Groups go on the test server.... and ...you know.. run tests like a fully fit fortizar against a subcap fleet. and also test the citadels force multiplier effects with defense fleet. Results have been disappointing for the cost of the citadel..


So you telling me that people kill fortizars on Sisi with little to no effort and like a bazillion times, but no one yet managed to kill one on tranq? You serious?

I did those tests too but I came to other conclusions (obviously) than most whiners....erm...players here.
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#51 - 2016-06-06 11:15:19 UTC
Terquil wrote:
helana Tsero wrote:
Terquil wrote:
Is there a fortizar kill? A fitted One? Haven't found any... so why people assume they are weak?


People/Groups go on the test server.... and ...you know.. run tests like a fully fit fortizar against a subcap fleet. and also test the citadels force multiplier effects with defense fleet. Results have been disappointing for the cost of the citadel..


So you telling me that people kill fortizars on Sisi with little to no effort and like a bazillion times, but no one yet managed to kill one on tranq? You serious?

Couldn't it be that only big and strong organizations put Fortizars on Tranq so those citadels just get never attacked?

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#52 - 2016-06-06 11:26:38 UTC
Bleedingthrough wrote:
Hatshepsut IV wrote:
In the age of daily free sp and purchasable sp I challenge you to give me one real reason why making a sitter is beyond your reach.

Your assumptions are wrong. A sitter won’t cut it for practical reasons.

Imagine the switching procedure during an escalating fight. I would not want to extract two accounts from a fight in a critical moment to do a tedious switch from a sitter to a character that can actually fly a cap. No, you need to use a fully trained character as sitter if you plan to use capitals for anything else but killing sleepers. That is a significant difference.

How is that remotely different than if your cap is docked???

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

Nox52
Pterygopalatine
#53 - 2016-06-06 11:32:27 UTC
Hatshepsut IV wrote:
So you'd rather spend 2 bill then lose your capitals when people start popping your astrahaus because you decided to store diamonds in the space equivalent of an outhouse.



**** yes, punish me for being ******** enough to store my caps in the outhouse. Here I'll even bend over for you. Just don't make me ******* train sitter alts cause that stupid gameplay.
Tsukino Stareine
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#54 - 2016-06-06 11:40:46 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
Terquil wrote:
helana Tsero wrote:
Terquil wrote:
Is there a fortizar kill? A fitted One? Haven't found any... so why people assume they are weak?


People/Groups go on the test server.... and ...you know.. run tests like a fully fit fortizar against a subcap fleet. and also test the citadels force multiplier effects with defense fleet. Results have been disappointing for the cost of the citadel..


So you telling me that people kill fortizars on Sisi with little to no effort and like a bazillion times, but no one yet managed to kill one on tranq? You serious?

Couldn't it be that only big and strong organizations put Fortizars on Tranq so those citadels just get never attacked?


Exactly, it's a force multiplier.

You want to face a T3 fleet with cap support AND a big motherfucking citadel that can destroy any capital you field?

No ty
Bleedingthrough
#55 - 2016-06-06 15:33:15 UTC
Jack Miton wrote:

How is that remotely different than if your cap is docked???

Example

You are dual boxing two guardians on your two accounts in a brutal battle on an incoming K162. Your opponent starts to log in more and more accounts and your FC requests that you bring a FAX so you don’t get overwhelmed.

In the simple case (docking) you warp the guardian (which is also the FAX toon) to your citadel, maybe wait for aggression timer, dock, grab one of these corp FAXes and warp back to battle. Done.

The same maneuver (get a cap on the field) looks like this if you use a sitter: Now you need to extract both of your guardians from the battle. In any small scale fight, this will get your fleet murdered. Your guardian pilot that can fly the FAX warps to a citadel, drops the guardian and gets to the log-in spot of the cap sitter. The second guardian (the sitter account) also needs to dock in a citadel and log off. You cannot simply log him off in space with timers. You log him off and log in the sitter. Once the sitter has landed on the log-in spot he ejects. The character that can actually fly the FAX takes the seat and onlines the T2 triage module and other stuff the sitter could not use and then warps back to the battle.

As I said before and explained again here a sitter is not a “solution” and I don’t think we need to discuss this any further. Agree?

For a lot of the older people getting a fully trained cap pilot as a sitter is no problem but five years ago this would have been a huge problem for my corp. We are not discussing 1st world problems here, Jack. This is about entry barriers and I don’t think we need them. Caps never been more awesome and we would be hypocrites if we asked for an environment that made it any harder to field them.




Andrew Jester
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#56 - 2016-06-06 18:17:27 UTC
sounds like you should invest in a cit that allows caps to dock then

If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy

Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#57 - 2016-06-06 23:07:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Jack Miton
Bleedingthrough wrote:
I don’t think we need to discuss this any further. Agree?

well, that I can certainly agree with...

if you cant figure out how to correctly juggle a whole TWO accounts... then i guess I can't really help you. here's a pro tip though, try NOT dual boxing guardians.

realistically it's irrelevant in your scenario anyway since if you're warping 2 guardians out of a fight youre losing and need a fax to get you out of, your fleet will be dead before it gets there anyway because you didnt have it on standby correctly and your fleet now has no reps. good work.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

Bleedingthrough
#58 - 2016-06-07 12:54:00 UTC
Jack Miton wrote:

realistically it's irrelevant in your scenario anyway since if you're warping 2 guardians out of a fight youre losing and need a fax to get you out of, your fleet will be dead before it gets there anyway because you didnt have it on standby correctly and your fleet now has no reps. good work.


Exactly! It is not possible to do so. This was the whole point of my example. I am so happy we finally understand each other, Jack.

And the correct way to have caps on standby is…

O HTFU and don’t fly with these poor scrubs you call friends.
O Build a 25 bil ISK garage!
O Arrange fights and plan ahead! Never jump into a fight like a headless chicken.
O Join the WH CFC.
O Sit in your capital with your main and never log in again. Win EvE!
O Join TISU and welp your caps and supers. No capital, no cry.

I don’t like any of these options.
Andrew Jester
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#59 - 2016-06-07 13:22:27 UTC
Bleedingthrough wrote:
Jack Miton wrote:

realistically it's irrelevant in your scenario anyway since if you're warping 2 guardians out of a fight youre losing and need a fax to get you out of, your fleet will be dead before it gets there anyway because you didnt have it on standby correctly and your fleet now has no reps. good work.


Exactly! It is not possible to do so. This was the whole point of my example. I am so happy we finally understand each other, Jack.

And the correct way to have caps on standby is…

O HTFU and don’t fly with these poor scrubs you call friends.
O Build a 25 bil ISK garage!
O Arrange fights and plan ahead! Never jump into a fight like a headless chicken.
O Join the WH CFC.
O Sit in your capital with your main and never log in again. Win EvE!
O Join TISU and welp your caps and supers. No capital, no cry.

I don’t like any of these options.

you should probably unsub then

If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy

Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#60 - 2016-06-07 23:19:54 UTC
Bleedingthrough wrote:
Jack Miton wrote:

realistically it's irrelevant in your scenario anyway since if you're warping 2 guardians out of a fight youre losing and need a fax to get you out of, your fleet will be dead before it gets there anyway because you didnt have it on standby correctly and your fleet now has no reps. good work.

Exactly! It is not possible to do so. This was the whole point of my example. I am so happy we finally understand each other, Jack.

yes, because if the fax is docked instead, pulling your logi out of a losing fight will be much less of a problem.
honestly man, how DO you manage to turn your computer on in the morning?

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout