These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Hey, money grubbing ccp here's a few idea's

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Iu Buu
99 Ronin
#1 - 2016-06-04 10:00:01 UTC
I know these idea's aren't going help get more people to loose their ship's so they buy more plex's but these will help the game be more enjoyable.

-Battle ships need reworked, there is a reason why you never see them in pve or pvp. People may say well they are expensive thats why. No, Tech 3 cruisers cost just as much and people use them for pvp and pve ALOT more then battle ships. In real life a frigate wouldn't stand a chance vs a battle ship, this should be true with eve. It would be nice if battle ships were able to fit 6-8 Large turrents, 6-8 medium turrets, and 6-8 small turrents. This would help balance this Bs class cause as of right now its broke as $hit.


Actually this post was going to be about Eve online game play idea's, but I think it should be about ccp its self. This game would evolve and be more enjoyable with alot more players ccp was focused on game play and players. NOT how to kill a certain number of players so they buy plex's. Most of the major up dates you guys come out with is how better for players to spend and loose isk.

I'm sure this post will be taken down, but just know some dude who monitor's forums that knows player idea's count for $hit.

When eve falls, Im gonna have a toast for that
Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
#2 - 2016-06-04 10:08:26 UTC
So. You posted an idea in ships and mods when there's a forum called features and ideas, then you turned it into a rant, and then you complained about how it's going to be locked?

Good job.
Celthric Kanerian
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2016-06-04 10:54:07 UTC
Iu Buu wrote:
This would help balance this Bs class cause as of right now its broke as $hit.


Plenty of Youtube videoes exist that proves you wrong.
Moustache Cuir
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#4 - 2016-06-04 11:13:25 UTC
Whenever I undock my carrier to rat, I see plenty of battleships that are undocking to do exactly the same thing... Saw a few ratting dreads, saw a few carriers, saw TONS of battleship, saw a few T2 and faction drone-cruisers, saw NO t3 ... Yeah... you're wrong.

And by your definition dreads should have small, medium, large, XL and rapid XL turrets :3... All at once .... Once anchored I'd say the DPS would be somewhere between 500 and 700 trillion DPS... If ccp agrees on that please give me a few months to stock up on dreads, I'll be drowning in munny post-patch :p
Iu Buu
99 Ronin
#5 - 2016-06-04 11:35:36 UTC
Celthric Kanerian wrote:
Iu Buu wrote:
This would help balance this Bs class cause as of right now its broke as $hit.


Plenty of Youtube videoes exist that proves you wrong.


there's plenty of ship video's tanking and having dps like ishtar and tech 3's, which I am sure there are alot more video's then battle ships.

A dread having all lower weapons would not have 70 trillion dps, just shows how much thought is put into the forums. If ccp is getting input from input like you its no wonder eve is the shape it is in. even if you had top dps for a turret class, it would only add 2300 dps, 250 for small turrets, 750 mediums, 1300 for large turrets. If you didn't already know dreads do 20k dps, so with all those turrets it would come to 22k dps. Which wouldn't matter when it faces 20-200 players,
Iu Buu
99 Ronin
#6 - 2016-06-04 11:58:20 UTC
CCP turned into money grubbers back in 2008, Incarna was supposed to be A Major expansion. Right after they announced it they turned into money grubbers. Thats why was saw the AUR, If it wasn't for eve players getting into a up roar there would have been ships exclusive to people who bought AUR. Yea there has been some graphical updates, some new ships. but over the course of the 6 1/2 years of I have played its peanuts. All of the major updates have been for players to spend and loose isk, like sansha incursions. Everyone that I know including me lost a ship just trying to pass through a system that had a incursion. Now deplorable stations that are worth 150 bil that go inactive for 23 hours...... If you look back to when we got gecko's there were certain criteria we had to meet to get them. And one of those was to loose 75 billion in isk in pvp. Showing they monitor that and they shouldn't care about that at all. They know though If the average eve player loose so much assets a certain % of players will buy plex's. And it should not be like that all the especially while the BS is broke as fuc.
Castor II
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2016-06-04 12:27:25 UTC
Iu Buu wrote:
CCP turned into money grubbers back in 2008, Incarna was supposed to be A Major expansion. Right after they announced it they turned into money grubbers. Thats why was saw the AUR, If it wasn't for eve players getting into a up roar there would have been ships exclusive to people who bought AUR. Yea there has been some graphical updates, some new ships. but over the course of the 6 1/2 years of I have played its peanuts. All of the major updates have been for players to spend and loose isk, like sansha incursions. Everyone that I know including me lost a ship just trying to pass through a system that had a incursion. Now deplorable stations that are worth 150 bil that go inactive for 23 hours...... If you look back to when we got gecko's there were certain criteria we had to meet to get them. And one of those was to loose 75 billion in isk in pvp. Showing they monitor that and they shouldn't care about that at all. They know though If the average eve player loose so much assets a certain % of players will buy plex's. And it should not be like that all the especially while the BS is broke as fuc.


Ok
eddie valvetino
Victory or Whatever
Nourv Gate Security Commission
#8 - 2016-06-04 12:33:20 UTC
And the award for the worst idea ever goes too.....
Iu Buu
99 Ronin
#9 - 2016-06-04 13:34:33 UTC
eddie valvetino wrote:
And the award for the worst idea ever goes too.....



The battle ship idea?
Moustache Cuir
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#10 - 2016-06-04 14:09:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Moustache Cuir
Can I haz doomsdays (all of them, at once) on my shuttle too please? :3
Whenever I use one in 0.0 I go down in smoke and pretty 'splosions, I should be able to fight back FIXIT SEESEEPEE!
Paranoid Loyd
#11 - 2016-06-04 14:56:03 UTC
Money grubbing? You can run three accounts for less than $1 /day, name one other thing that provides as much content for that price. Anything you spend on this game is your choice no one if forcing you to do it, if you don't think its worth what it costs, then dont play.

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!
RavenPaine
RaVeN Alliance
#12 - 2016-06-04 15:49:52 UTC
Iu Buu wrote:
CCP turned into A Major expansion. Right after they turned into eve players. Yea there has been some graphical updates, some new ships. All of the major updates have been for players. Everyone that I know including me lost a ship And one of those was 75 billion The average eve player is broke as fuc.


I edited a few lines. This feels like a more realistic post.
I liked the part about 'deplorable' stations, couldn't work that in...

I have played for 10 years with 3 accounts, and I still haven't lost 75 billion. I got Geckos though... I think you're wrong about that one.
Plex is one of the best deals in the game. A guy can work at McDonalds for half a day, and buy 3 plex. He couldn't generate that much ISK in months doing missions or ratting in game.

As for making money. If companies don't make money, they go out of business. Making money is not an optional choice, it is mandatory!
Iu Buu
99 Ronin
#13 - 2016-06-04 20:01:49 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Money grubbing? You can run three accounts for less than $1 /day, name one other thing that provides as much content for that price. Anything you spend on this game is your choice no one if forcing you to do it, if you don't think its worth what it costs, then dont play.

Iu Buu
99 Ronin
#14 - 2016-06-04 20:02:38 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Money grubbing? You can run three accounts for less than $1 /day, name one other thing that provides as much content for that price. Anything you spend on this game is your choice no one if forcing you to do it, if you don't think its worth what it costs, then dont play.



Warframe has done as much content in 1 year then what ccp has done in 6. So much intellect going on here Im blown away..... I really expected more from eve players then "you stick, no you stick and ugly".
Iu Buu
99 Ronin
#15 - 2016-06-04 20:12:48 UTC
RavenPaine wrote:
Iu Buu wrote:
CCP turned into A Major expansion. Right after they turned into eve players. Yea there has been some graphical updates, some new ships. All of the major updates have been for players. Everyone that I know including me lost a ship And one of those was 75 billion The average eve player is broke as fuc.


I edited a few lines. This feels like a more realistic post.
I liked the part about 'deplorable' stations, couldn't work that in...

I have played for 10 years with 3 accounts, and I still haven't lost 75 billion. I got Geckos though... I think you're wrong about that one.
Plex is one of the best deals in the game. A guy can work at McDonalds for half a day, and buy 3 plex. He couldn't generate that much ISK in months doing missions or ratting in game.

As for making money. If companies don't make money, they go out of business. Making money is not an optional choice, it is mandatory!



Dude you can look up the event, Im not wrong. And theres a reason why he cant make that much isk in 3 months. And yes, they do need to make money, but they get to a certain point and they become money grubben bastereds. Look up the AUR and what they had planned. My point was(after the battle ship) Making money has been their goal for the past 6 years instead of concentrating on how to make a good game. I don't see how no one else see's this especially after incarna, AUR and Deploy able* stations.
Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
#16 - 2016-06-05 04:52:34 UTC
Iu Buu wrote:
If you look back to when we got gecko's there were certain criteria we had to meet to get them. And one of those was to loose 75 billion in isk in pvp. Showing they monitor that and they shouldn't care about that at all. They know though If the average eve player loose so much assets a certain % of players will buy plex's. And it should not be like that all the especially while the BS is broke as fuc.


You do mean this event, right? Because that shows you're pulling numbers completely out of your own ass.

And of course they track those numbers. How would they not?
Iu Buu
99 Ronin
#17 - 2016-06-05 06:03:25 UTC
Zhilia Mann wrote:
Iu Buu wrote:
If you look back to when we got gecko's there were certain criteria we had to meet to get them. And one of those was to loose 75 billion in isk in pvp. Showing they monitor that and they shouldn't care about that at all. They know though If the average eve player loose so much assets a certain % of players will buy plex's. And it should not be like that all the especially while the BS is broke as fuc.


You do mean this event, right? Because that shows you're pulling numbers completely out of your own ass.

And of course they track those numbers. How would they not?



Clearly I was talking about the gecko event, and what numbers did I pull out of my ass o wise one.
Iu Buu
99 Ronin
#18 - 2016-06-05 06:10:36 UTC
Zhilia Mann wrote:
Iu Buu wrote:
If you look back to when we got gecko's there were certain criteria we had to meet to get them. And one of those was to loose 75 billion in isk in pvp. Showing they monitor that and they shouldn't care about that at all. They know though If the average eve player loose so much assets a certain % of players will buy plex's. And it should not be like that all the especially while the BS is broke as fuc.


You do mean this event, right? Because that shows you're pulling numbers completely out of your own ass.

And of course they track those numbers. How would they not?




You are right, it wasn't 75 billion. It was 5.34 TRILLION, If you cant comprehend what I am saying and don't bother to do a little research before you complain go to another forum post please.
Elijah Sool
Kessel Run Industries
#19 - 2016-06-05 08:51:18 UTC
Ah you mean like in the game Rebel Galaxy where battleships dominate everything and when you press spacebar you fire?
Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
#20 - 2016-06-05 10:28:25 UTC
Iu Buu wrote:
You are right, it wasn't 75 billion. It was 5.34 TRILLION, If you cant comprehend what I am saying and don't bother to do a little research before you complain go to another forum post please.


Dude, I did your research for you. Did you not see that?

And yes, CCP encouraged, among three other things, ship destruction. Because it's part of the game. Only encouraging mining, PvE kills, and industrial jobs installed would have cut out a huge segment of people from the event. You know, the people who play for PvP and ship destruction. So yes, that was included.

I don't see what your issue is here. I plex two accounts without much effort each month. The game has gotten better over time. Incarna was a horrible idea and was scrapped. So what's the complaint?
12Next page