These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

C'mon Mittens. Seriously?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Morganta
The Greater Goon
#21 - 2012-01-14 21:59:53 UTC
chill out and watch a movie bro
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057193/
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#22 - 2012-01-14 22:00:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
met worst wrote:
And you Sir, after more of the "I know where the quote button is" and "here's another inane question" are just pointless.

Bite me Tippia.

No thanks. Whatever you have might be contagious.

At any rate, since you can't answer such a simple question, it's quite obvious that there is nothing to actually fix, and that's good to know.

Vote Mittens.
Quote:
Mittens has used words like "manipulate" as he bounces cap heavy 0.0 tenants out of there homes after "manipulating" the CSM and CCP. What needs to be interpreted?
How has he manipulated the CSM and CCP?
How is focusing on core gameplay not good for the game?
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2012-01-14 22:01:15 UTC
I'm running as the National Anti-Butthurt Zealot party's representative for CSM next time...

I hope.

Dodixie > Hek
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#24 - 2012-01-14 22:01:36 UTC
met worst wrote:
Andski wrote:
Feel free to interpret it as you wish!

Interpret?

Mittens has used words like "manipulate" as he bounces cap heavy 0.0 tenants out of there homes after "manipulating" the CSM and CCP. What needs to be interpreted?

"For the good of the game".

Bullshit. Never was.


Unseating deeply rooted alliances from their space is bad for the game?

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#25 - 2012-01-14 22:03:15 UTC
met worst wrote:
Tippia wrote:
met worst wrote:
You need to ask? You're an idiot.
So you have no answer?
You are a pointless whiner.

And you Sir, after more of the "I know where the quote button is" and "here's another inane question" are just pointless.

Bite me Tippia.


With all of your pent up hate and intolerance you cannot be a fan of ponies. However I am so I will love and tolerate you while also pointing out you havent said what needs to be fixed.
met worst
Doomheim
#26 - 2012-01-14 22:04:29 UTC
Andski wrote:
met worst wrote:
Andski wrote:
Feel free to interpret it as you wish!

Interpret?

Mittens has used words like "manipulate" as he bounces cap heavy 0.0 tenants out of there homes after "manipulating" the CSM and CCP. What needs to be interpreted?

"For the good of the game".

Bullshit. Never was.

Unseating deeply rooted alliances from their space is bad for the game?


In Australia, "rooted" means something else. So yeah, they are "deeply rooted".

And c'mon - how long were WN in Branch? Lemme see, when did GSF chicken out on the NC and go cry to CCP to get caps nerfed?

'bout then wasn't it?
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#27 - 2012-01-14 22:05:22 UTC
Andski wrote:
met worst wrote:
Andski wrote:
Feel free to interpret it as you wish!

Interpret?

Mittens has used words like "manipulate" as he bounces cap heavy 0.0 tenants out of there homes after "manipulating" the CSM and CCP. What needs to be interpreted?

"For the good of the game".

Bullshit. Never was.


Unseating deeply rooted alliances from their space is bad for the game?


The only thing deeply rooted were all of the stations and POS they abandoned in their headlong flight to venalStraight
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#28 - 2012-01-14 22:06:56 UTC
met worst wrote:
Andski wrote:
met worst wrote:
Andski wrote:
Feel free to interpret it as you wish!

Interpret?

Mittens has used words like "manipulate" as he bounces cap heavy 0.0 tenants out of there homes after "manipulating" the CSM and CCP. What needs to be interpreted?

"For the good of the game".

Bullshit. Never was.

Unseating deeply rooted alliances from their space is bad for the game?


In Australia, "rooted" means something else. So yeah, they are "deeply rooted".

And c'mon - how long were WN in Branch? Lemme see, when did GSF chicken out on the NC and go cry to CCP to get caps nerfed?

'bout then wasn't it?


You're avoiding the question. How is unseating a super-alliance from their space bad for the game?

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
met worst
Doomheim
#29 - 2012-01-14 22:10:45 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
met worst wrote:
Tippia wrote:
met worst wrote:
You need to ask? You're an idiot.
So you have no answer?
You are a pointless whiner.

And you Sir, after more of the "I know where the quote button is" and "here's another inane question" are just pointless.

Bite me Tippia.


With all of your pent up hate and intolerance you cannot be a fan of ponies. However I am so I will love and tolerate you while also pointing out you havent said what needs to be fixed.

No hate, lot's of intolerance.

(and c'mon baltec, Tippia is just playing his/her little game so she can quote lyrically for 19 pages. It's got nothing to do with the topic, just her chance to talk **** and then log with her alt and like each of her posts. The more she makes in one topic, the less work it needs. Stop feeding the "I Like Me" machine!)

As for what needs to be fixed.

In English and simple form for you Goon.

1) If Mittens is trolling then he is making a mockery of the CSM and should be thrown out.
2) If he's not trolling then he oughta be thrown the **** out for being so ******* dimwitted.

End o' story.
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#30 - 2012-01-14 22:11:12 UTC
Andski wrote:
met worst wrote:
Andski wrote:
met worst wrote:
Andski wrote:
Feel free to interpret it as you wish!

Interpret?

Mittens has used words like "manipulate" as he bounces cap heavy 0.0 tenants out of there homes after "manipulating" the CSM and CCP. What needs to be interpreted?

"For the good of the game".

Bullshit. Never was.

Unseating deeply rooted alliances from their space is bad for the game?


In Australia, "rooted" means something else. So yeah, they are "deeply rooted".

And c'mon - how long were WN in Branch? Lemme see, when did GSF chicken out on the NC and go cry to CCP to get caps nerfed?

'bout then wasn't it?


You're avoiding the question. How is unseating a super-alliance from their space bad for the game?


it is irrelevant in the large scheme..
unseating super-alliance, hail new super-alliance.
met worst
Doomheim
#31 - 2012-01-14 22:12:00 UTC
Andski wrote:
met worst wrote:
Andski wrote:
met worst wrote:
Andski wrote:
Feel free to interpret it as you wish!

Interpret?

Mittens has used words like "manipulate" as he bounces cap heavy 0.0 tenants out of there homes after "manipulating" the CSM and CCP. What needs to be interpreted?

"For the good of the game".

Bullshit. Never was.

Unseating deeply rooted alliances from their space is bad for the game?


In Australia, "rooted" means something else. So yeah, they are "deeply rooted".

And c'mon - how long were WN in Branch? Lemme see, when did GSF chicken out on the NC and go cry to CCP to get caps nerfed?

'bout then wasn't it?


You're avoiding the question. How is unseating a super-alliance from their space bad for the game?

Andski - the question is not WHAT is happening - it's HOW it's been done.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#32 - 2012-01-14 22:12:49 UTC
met worst wrote:
Lemme see, when did GSF chicken out on the NC and go cry to CCP to get caps nerfed?

'bout then wasn't it?


I knew it, You're a bitter ex NC scrub. I wonder, did you join WN and fail to show up to defend branch again?
Alara IonStorm
#33 - 2012-01-14 22:15:15 UTC
The Mitanni convinced CCP to put in CQ's then rallied the Players against Incarna to stop further development of Stations.

He is using his access at CCP to destroy the part of the game that lets you undock while pushing for POS improvements. The end is 80% of his enemies trapped in their Outposts while him and the Goons take over null.

CQ's are Mitanni sponsored Internment Camps! You all think I am CraZy but I see the truth. I have scratched it all over the Walls so his Goons can not destroy it!

He is watching everything through Cameras in our Eyes that he made us pay for.

EVERYONE IS SHEEPLE!!!1
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#34 - 2012-01-14 22:18:47 UTC
Alara IonStorm wrote:
The Mitanni convinced CCP to put in CQ's then rallied the Players against Incarna to stop further development of Stations.

He is using his access at CCP to destroy the part of the game that lets you undock while pushing for POS improvements. The end is 80% of his enemies trapped in their Outposts while him and the Goons take over null.

CQ's are Mitanni sponsored Internment Camps! You all think I am CraZy but I see the truth. I have scratched it all over the Walls so his Goons can not destroy it!

He is watching everything through Cameras in our Eyes that he made us pay for.

EVERYONE IS SHEEPLE!!!1


Confirming you are a goon spy.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#35 - 2012-01-14 22:19:44 UTC
met worst wrote:
Andski - the question is not WHAT is happening - it's HOW it's been done.


Do you want to elaborate, moron?

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Jita Alt666
#36 - 2012-01-14 22:19:56 UTC
Morganta wrote:
chill out and watch a movie bro
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057193/


Nice but I think the following is more suited to our OP:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0157016/

The correlation between the Op's posting and the soliloquies in that masterpiece are more than coincidentally similar.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#37 - 2012-01-14 22:21:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
met worst wrote:
Tippia is just playing his/her little game so she can quote lyrically for 19 pages. It's got nothing to do with the topic
So my asking you what the topic is, what the problem is, and what it is you're proposing has nothing to do with the topic (which is you saying that there is a problem that needs to be solved)? Right. Roll
Quote:
1) If Mittens is trolling then he is making a mockery of the CSM and should be thrown out.
2) If he's not trolling then he oughta be thrown the **** out for being so ******* dimwitted.
What does this supposed trolling consist of?
Quote:
the question is not WHAT is happening - it's HOW it's been done.
…and what (and how) is that, exactly?

In other words: fix what?
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#38 - 2012-01-14 22:21:38 UTC
Andski wrote:
met worst wrote:
Andski - the question is not WHAT is happening - it's HOW it's been done.


Do you want to elaborate, moron?


I want, but i dont have that great internal knowledge.
Basically it was not an cap nerf, it was an anom. nerf. which rendered whole north un-usable apart of five systems Big smile
For the regular scrub as you call them..
met worst
Doomheim
#39 - 2012-01-14 22:22:48 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
met worst wrote:
Lemme see, when did GSF chicken out on the NC and go cry to CCP to get caps nerfed?

'bout then wasn't it?


I knew it, You're a bitter ex NC scrub. I wonder, did you join WN and fail to show up to defend branch again?

Take a breather baltec. Go back a bit. We've had this discussion already.

I want 0.0 "de-blobbed". It's my ONLY motivation. What's happened and is happening is a total and absolute farce and will only make 0.0 worse.

The question NOT being answered is WHY is it happening and HOW has it been allowed to happen.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#40 - 2012-01-14 22:25:41 UTC
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:
Andski wrote:
met worst wrote:
Andski - the question is not WHAT is happening - it's HOW it's been done.


Do you want to elaborate, moron?


I want, but i dont have that great internal knowledge.
Basically it was not an cap nerf, it was an anom. nerf. which rendered whole north un-usable apart of five systems Big smile
For the regular scrub as you call them..


You have no idea how wrong you are...I mean...yea, my poor wallet...