These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The 'Unfairness' of EVE

First post
Author
Maekchu
Doomheim
#21 - 2016-05-23 13:25:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Maekchu
Lan Wang wrote:
even ship spinning is considered pvp, i must remember this when filling out my app to pl

Ship spinning on its own is not really PvP, since it does not involve conflict between you and another player. However, market trading is PvP and can be done while ship spinning. It is just another form of PvP compared to shooting at player ships.

PvP is not a concept that has been broadly discussed in academics. However, on the wiki of "Player versus Player" they take the definition found in a book called "Designing Virtual World" by Richard Bartle. The definition is:

"Player versus Player (PvP). Players are opposed by other players. In a combat situation, this means PCs can fight each other"

And also relevant to EvE would be this snippet on pure PvP worlds.

"In a pure PvP world, there is no consensuality: People can try to mess you about, whether or not you like it; they may run the risk of being attacked by you, your friends, and perhaps the local police force too as a result, but they can still try."

Since most of us have played a ton of multiplayer games and the concept itself is not really hard to grasp, I think we all can agree that this definition is what we all understand by PvP.

So by that definition, suicide ganking and market trading are both PvP, it is just another form of PvP compared to honourable e-bushido.

EDIT: Found a preview of the book and the relevant quotes.
Nitshe Razvedka
#22 - 2016-05-23 13:31:55 UTC
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
Nitshe Razvedka wrote:
Everyone is right



The post-modernism is palpable.



If I followed qualitative and quantitive research methods I would:

survey a sample of the different player groups to define what PvP meant to them,

THEN provide the results in the form of percentages,

and have an explanation of the results.




Its called good science, not pandering to the most entitled group that shouts loudest.Big smile

Thieving pirates discuss INTEGRITY; Anarchist gankers give us LAWS; and Whoring merc's cry then blow off clients with INSULTS.

Up is down and down is up in the C&P Forum.

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#23 - 2016-05-23 13:40:37 UTC
Nitshe Razvedka wrote:
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
Nitshe Razvedka wrote:
Everyone is right



The post-modernism is palpable.



If I followed qualitative and quantitive research methods I would:

survey a sample of the different player groups to define what PvP meant to them,

THEN provide the results in the form of percentages,

and have an explanation of the results.




Its called good science, not pandering to the most entitled group that shouts loudest.Big smile

Its not a subjective thing, its a simple ,straightforward term that covers ganking.
Honestly if you are going to be obtuse , pick something with some ambiguity or intresting talking points.
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#24 - 2016-05-23 13:52:00 UTC
Maekchu wrote:
Ship spinning on its own is not really PvP, since it does not involve conflict between you and another player. However, market trading is PvP and can be done while ship spinning. It is just another form of PvP compared to shooting at player ships.


denying someone a kill can very well be classed as pvp, if i stay docked instead of fighting someone, its pvp?

even miners who skip corps to avoid wardecs, thats a form of pvp too, i mean blueballing and content denial is pvp?

it may be the definition but pvp'ers are classed people who fight other fighters, im not trying to change a definition im merely expressing my opinion that a pvper is considered a fighter and a ganker is just someone who shoots a mostly helpless/non-combat player.

nobody ever answers the question "what is your pvp experience? with....everything in eve is pvp so its very great" they refer to it as combat vs combat. everybody does

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Maekchu
Doomheim
#25 - 2016-05-23 14:07:10 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Maekchu wrote:
Ship spinning on its own is not really PvP, since it does not involve conflict between you and another player. However, market trading is PvP and can be done while ship spinning. It is just another form of PvP compared to shooting at player ships.


denying someone a kill can very well be classed as pvp, if i stay docked instead of fighting someone, its pvp?

even miners who skip corps to avoid wardecs, thats a form of pvp too, i mean blueballing and content denial is pvp?

it may be the definition but pvp'ers are classed people who fight other fighters, im not trying to change a definition im merely expressing my opinion that a pvper is considered a fighter and a ganker is just someone who shoots a mostly helpless/non-combat player.

nobody ever answers the question "what is your pvp experience? with....everything in eve is pvp so its very great" they refer to it as combat vs combat. everybody does

You are actually correct that ship spinning on its own is PvP. Forgot to look at it from that perspective. Which is why most people simply say that EvE just is a PvP game at its core, because most activities in EvE are PvP. And even if you try to avoid direct player confrontations, you are always at the risk of running into someone who wants to shoot you.

Blueballing or avoiding getting killed is still a useful skill. But not so sure this is what PL looks for in their recruits :P

It is true that we usually refer to player shooting at each other, when asking the question "Do you PvP?". But that doesn't change the definition of PvP, and therefore you cannot just say ganking is not PvP since it suits your current perception of PvP. Ganking is by definition PvP whether you like it or not.

You cannot change definitions. You are basically saying that if I perceive a banana to not be what is defined as a banana, I can just call it something else. From now on, I do not acknowledge the definition of bananas. I believe strawberries are closer to my understanding of bananas and and henceforth, I will call strawberries "bananas" and bananas are to be called "disgusting yellow goo".
Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#26 - 2016-05-23 14:16:48 UTC
By the standards of some what I do is not considered PVP despite the very low success rate for getting engagements and the moderately high success rate for getting kills when I do get an engagement.
I bait mission runners.
We all know this... but sometimes they shoot. They all have guns, so that meets most people's qualifications, but really lets face it, the game is rigged in my favor. It's the fit. My targets generally do not have neuts or webs fitted because of reasons.

Sometimes they do.

This makes it exciting for me, as I don't scan their fits and with skill injectors I now have NO idea just how much mojo their character sheet is packing. I simply do what I do and bet on stupid.

However, because my targets are not PVP players necessarily engaged in PVP activities you could easily argue that I am a bad person for taking advantage of an ill-prepared opponent in order to score an 'easy kill' (FYI, some of those 'easy kills' are insanely rough, leaving my ship on fire for most of the fight). Some of these 'easy kills' have sent my pod scampering off to the nearest planet post haste in order to prevent the subsequent loss of implants due to me underestimating the awesomeness of my foe.

Then there are the miners. Everyone says 'helpless mining vessel'... I say 'Have you f*cking SEEN a Skiff?' I have had an enyo run screaming on fire from a pair of these monsters before. Procurers are pretty bad too... unless it's a war target you can single out and kill without repercussions, a mining fleet poses some serious risks for your average nogoodnik.

Okay, I'm rambling. I guess my point is that whenever you and another player have conflicting desires for the outcome of a situation and both of you have an influence on said outcome it is PVP. If your objective is to live and you do, then you have won at pvp on your end. If your objective is to kill and you do then you have achieved your objective. This applies no matter what your objective is. Sometimes it's something weird like 'I don't care what you're doing, but you need to do that somewhere else.'

Did I sense make?

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Nitshe Razvedka
#27 - 2016-05-23 14:22:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Nitshe Razvedka
Ralph King-Griffin
' Its not a subjective thing, its a simple ,straightforward term that covers ganking."



I say the majority ( *not researched*) of the Eve community says otherwise. Are you or the majority correct?

Definitions ( the same as language) vary within communities, also language changes over time.

"A lowsec PvPer " congers a totally different image to "Hisec ganker" from most perspectives. With a simplistic definition of PvP you could classify them as the same.



Ralph I respect your experience as a Merc within Eve, but I don't agree with you on this issue.

Thieving pirates discuss INTEGRITY; Anarchist gankers give us LAWS; and Whoring merc's cry then blow off clients with INSULTS.

Up is down and down is up in the C&P Forum.

Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#28 - 2016-05-23 15:06:59 UTC
PvP is player versus player... no matter the type of engagement.
Be it ships blowing up ships (legitimately or illegitimately), or market .01 isking, of just mining more than your competitor, it all is pvp.

Ganking is just a non-consensual pvp type, just like gate camps...

But it the end PvP is and always be player versus player.

PvP

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist

Nitshe Razvedka
#29 - 2016-05-23 15:13:28 UTC
Dom Arkaral wrote:
PvP is player versus player... no matter the type of engagement.
Be it ships blowing up ships (legitimately or illegitimately), or market .01 isking, of just mining more than your competitor, it all is pvp.

Ganking is just a non-consensual pvp type, just like gate camps...

But it the end PvP is and always be player versus player.

PvP




Dom, by merely appearing in this thread you have screeewed any progress Vimsy and Ralph ever had.......

Thieving pirates discuss INTEGRITY; Anarchist gankers give us LAWS; and Whoring merc's cry then blow off clients with INSULTS.

Up is down and down is up in the C&P Forum.

Tyyler DURden
Mordechai and Sons Distribution Co.
#30 - 2016-05-23 15:15:47 UTC
Kind of like turning your guns on and blowing up someones pod, right Dom?
Thats considered pvp too right?

Tyyler DURden says "use soap"

Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#31 - 2016-05-23 15:17:24 UTC
Tyyler DURden wrote:
Kind of like turning your guns on and blowing up someones pod, right Dom?
Thats considered pvp too right?

does it involve more than one toon?
there's your answer

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist

Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#32 - 2016-05-23 15:38:19 UTC
even pve is pvp Shocked

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#33 - 2016-05-23 15:40:10 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
even pve is pvp Shocked

gotta sell that dank loot
or
gotta kill the overseer before that other dood
or
gotta kill that other dood because he tried to steal my lootz

:D

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist

Revis Owen
Krigmakt Elite
Safety.
#34 - 2016-05-23 15:46:10 UTC
Sasha Nemtsov wrote:
But seriously Lan, all that's happening here is that your own definition of PvP is a tad narrower than that promulgated by CCP, and others.


It's worse. Lan's definition of PvP is contradicted by the very definitions of "player" and "versus".

Agent of the New Order http://www.minerbumping.com/p/the-code.html If you do not have a current Mining Permit, please contact me for issuance.

Tyyler DURden
Mordechai and Sons Distribution Co.
#35 - 2016-05-23 15:51:54 UTC
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Tyyler DURden wrote:
Kind of like turning your guns on and blowing up someones pod, right Dom?
Thats considered pvp too right?

does it involve more than one toon?
there's your answer

I just find it a bit humorous that you cant keep your B.S. straight from one thread to the next.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6452359#post6452359

Tyyler DURden says "use soap"

Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#36 - 2016-05-23 16:04:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Dom Arkaral
Tyyler DURden wrote:
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Tyyler DURden wrote:
Kind of like turning your guns on and blowing up someones pod, right Dom?
Thats considered pvp too right?

does it involve more than one toon?
there's your answer

I just find it a bit humorous that you cant keep your B.S. straight from one thread to the next.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6452359#post6452359

damnit 1 sec

edit: is that the best you got?
Cry me a river :D
Everyone is entitled an opinion, and opinions change.
People don't though, that's why you'll always come crying when I post, wherever I post :D

Praise James and great soundcloud yet again Sasha :D

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist

Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#37 - 2016-05-23 16:14:31 UTC
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Tyyler DURden wrote:
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Tyyler DURden wrote:
Kind of like turning your guns on and blowing up someones pod, right Dom?
Thats considered pvp too right?

does it involve more than one toon?
there's your answer

I just find it a bit humorous that you cant keep your B.S. straight from one thread to the next.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6452359#post6452359

damnit 1 sec

edit: is that the best you got?
Cry me a river :D
Everyone is entitled an opinion, and opinions change.
People don't though, that's why you'll always come crying when I post, wherever I post :D

Praise James and great soundcloud yet again Sasha :D


Gotta admit that was pretty good lol

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Sasha Nemtsov
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2016-05-23 17:02:14 UTC
Revis Owen wrote:
Sasha Nemtsov wrote:
But seriously Lan, all that's happening here is that your own definition of PvP is a tad narrower than that promulgated by CCP, and others.


It's worse. Lan's definition of PvP is contradicted by the very definitions of "player" and "versus".


Hi Revis, I was feeling charitable when I wrote that. It does happen, occasionally.

Your amplification is correct, and welcome.

The point is not what we, the players, think should be the definition of PvP. The point is what CCP hf has determined it shall be. All aspects of the game design are conceived and executed in light of their decision in that regard.




Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#39 - 2016-05-23 17:24:24 UTC
Sasha Nemtsov wrote:
Revis Owen wrote:
Sasha Nemtsov wrote:
But seriously Lan, all that's happening here is that your own definition of PvP is a tad narrower than that promulgated by CCP, and others.


It's worse. Lan's definition of PvP is contradicted by the very definitions of "player" and "versus".


Hi Revis, I was feeling charitable when I wrote that. It does happen, occasionally.

Your amplification is correct, and welcome.

The point is not what we, the players, think should be the definition of PvP. The point is what CCP hf has determined it shall be. All aspects of the game design are conceived and executed in light of their decision in that regard.






everyone is a pvp'er, i got it now, sorry guys i was wrong Lol

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Maekchu
Doomheim
#40 - 2016-05-23 17:38:04 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
everyone is a pvp'er, i got it now, sorry guys i was wrong Lol

You might do only PvE activities (like only shooting rats), but the EvE server is a pure PvP server. So you are not operating within a vacuum. When someone decides to shoot you, or deny you freedom to farm by being in the same system and you consciously docking up to deny him a kill, you are engaged in PvP even though you only do PvE content.

It's not that hard to understand.