These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

FC Headshot per Fan-Fest

Author
Iain Cariaba
#21 - 2016-05-09 07:42:29 UTC
Glitch Online wrote:
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Glitch Online wrote:
If you are willing to pay...

So you want a mechanic that automatically provides a very large advantage to those with the money to pay for it?


How is this any different than paying for 5, 10, 15 accounts, putting them on Logi ships and keeping your one character repped while he tackles others and kills them?

Because you have to actively control the 5, 10, 15 logi ships, something that is absent from your suggestion. Your suggestion is nothing more than a buff to those with deeper pockets.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#22 - 2016-05-09 09:53:27 UTC
you still havent explained why you think it is good that the FC that has to deal with less incoming damge also gets more tank
FT Diomedes
The Graduates
#23 - 2016-05-09 11:28:14 UTC
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
you still havent explained why you think it is good that the FC that has to deal with less incoming damge also gets more tank


They still haven't explained why headshotting the enemy FC is a problem.

CCP should add more NPC 0.0 space to open it up and liven things up: the Stepping Stones project.

Lugh Crow-Slave
#24 - 2016-05-09 11:46:00 UTC
FT Diomedes wrote:
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
you still havent explained why you think it is good that the FC that has to deal with less incoming damge also gets more tank


They still haven't explained why headshotting the enemy FC is a problem.


it's not

it's a good thing
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#25 - 2016-05-09 13:30:58 UTC
Glitch Online wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
But i could still do it in low sec, null or wh and force enemy gangs to cycle through fodder whilst the fleet leadership use glass cannons that suddenly aren't so fragile.


Yes, you definitely can. If you are willing to pay for that many accounts OR force your Fleet Members to tug their alts around, of course. But again, the smarter thing to do would be to ask them to bring 2 combat ships and use them while you are Safe with your bonus Resist.

That or try to actually pvp against a group around your size and have fun.


When my friends are already paying for that many accounts and already bringing alts to fleets, whats a few more alts? Its not like they dont benefit from the fc being invulnerable. I'm not doing them a great disservice by asking them to bring alts. Even though I'd be the one getting the resists, im helping them defend their homes and make more money.

I remember reading about a group of Russians multi boxing six accounts each during a sov war. Any and all tactics that can be used will be used. Any mechanic that can be exploited will be. Because when it comes to a sandbox, some fights are about survival. Kill or be killed. We don't play fair, we dont play nice. And that's how we like it.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#26 - 2016-05-09 13:48:28 UTC
The whole "don't shoot the leader" thin we do in real life is a ridiculous practice. It was a rule invented by kings to keep kings alive. If we would get rid of this rule - there would be a lot less war on the planet. Assholeleaders would be kept to a minimum.

In eve - war is good. Longer wars are better than shorter wars. Taking out the FC is a great practice. It should stay. How beHere's my basis:

1. Being an FC isn't all that... really it isn't. Taking out an FC isn't pivotal in large eve engagements. (this is where I tell you mega rock star FC types to just get over yourselves - It's a relatively simple game and many folks can do your job just as well as you can)

2. Unlike real life you have the option to have as many characters as you like. Roll up an unknown, mix in w/ the gang and do your FC thing incognito. It's not that difficult to get lost in the crowd w/ larger numbers. (Again you just have to put ego aside and not let folks know which character you're playing from - difficult for megalomaniac types such as Donald, Hillary and that sort).

3. But SPAIS.... If you're as awesome as you think you are, you should be able to get around a few spais. Learn to OPSEC and you'll be fine.




In conclusion... you don't need some special ship to prove you're special. Be good (opsec) and be special w/out a special ship. This whole idea is just mind-numbingly mind-numbing.

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#27 - 2016-05-10 05:46:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Herzog Wolfhammer
Decoy drones.

The mechanic is already in place to "skin" ships and make one ship look like another. Remember that Scope video where a ship was captured in total disguise?


Were it up to me™

- decoy drones using skin mechanics could be skinned to look like anything you wanted (you have to buy the "drone skin" like you would say buy a script for a module)
- they would appear "as skinned" on D-scan and overview.
- only a ship scanner would reveal their true nature. (yeah, someone will have to fit one).
- the "pilot name" attachment on the overview would be a duplicate of who whoever launched the decoy drone. So you would have say 5 maelstroms piloted by Captain Bob but... which one is the one? (And by the time you figure it out, the fight is on.. unless you are really lucky or have the ability to primary six ships at once).
- respective drone size for respective size of that which they are deployed to imitate. Large drones for large ships, medium for BC and cruisers, small for dessies and frigates, etc. Capital decoys? Hey wouldn't that be interesting.
- expectedly a decoy drone is not going to take much damage, or attack, or anything of that nature.
- "hit" effects on a decoy will look different from the real thing (meaning: pay attention beyond "F1 Monkey")

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2016-05-10 09:41:36 UTC
nerf all things tactical and strategic

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Amyclas Amatin
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#29 - 2016-05-10 11:10:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Amyclas Amatin
As someone who leads fleets of that kind of size:

I shoot fcs and I get headshotted myself. We deal with it by having backup fcs, or even fcing from alts in fleet. We just find a way to handle it. FCs don't need special love, we're usually some of the most resourceful people in the game. Some FCs are capable of single-handedly equipping their entire fleets.

Your average strategic fleet is flown by an FC in an overtanked ship. Cruiser fleets in gsf are fced by nano battlecruisers or overtanked cruisers. Hac fleets and above are FCed by overtanked tech 3 cruisers or command ships. The most important part of an fc ship is not just the tank: it's his expanded probe launcher that takes 220 cpu just to fit. If I FC frigates, I gimp-fit just to squeeze the probe launcher in. T3Ds with that bonus to probe launcher fitting also help a lot.

Fcs usually expect to be headshotted going in. So you prepare your tanky ships and your remote reps properly. If that doesn't work, your backups take over. I've also nominated veterans to takeover fleets on the fly.

No one gives a flying **** about the actual squad and wing positions beyond setting up boosts because they aren't really used that way. If I need to split my forces, I would usually be fielding 2 fleets using 2 fcs in 2 separate channels that can talk to each other while sending their own instructions to their respective fleets. But hardly anyone outside the major coalitions have that kind of IT infrastructure to set up communications that way. But also, if I needed 5 small gangs on the field, I would use 5 fleets. Not 5 wings, or 5 squads. And if I could field that many boosters, each fleet would have each own SET of boosting ships to allow them to be in different systems.

If you really want CCP to design a ship just for fcs, maybe they could iterate on command ships to make them even tankier and with better probing capabilities. Otherwise everything is mostly working as intended.

For more information on the New Order of High-Sec, please visit: http://www.minerbumping.com/

Remember that whenever you have a bad day in EVE, the correct reponse is "Thank you CCP, may I please have another?"

Amyclas Amatin
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#30 - 2016-05-10 12:54:56 UTC
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
I think this whole idea is a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. Besides some ones FC getting head-shot is one of the ways new FCs are born


The first time I got to drive a shiny fleet was when Asher Elias got headshotted sometime in 2014 in the middle of Teneferis.

For more information on the New Order of High-Sec, please visit: http://www.minerbumping.com/

Remember that whenever you have a bad day in EVE, the correct reponse is "Thank you CCP, may I please have another?"

Glitch Online
License To Steal
#31 - 2016-05-10 22:16:24 UTC
Serendipity Lost wrote:
The whole "don't shoot the leader" thin we do in real life is a ridiculous practice. It was a rule invented by kings to keep kings alive. If we would get rid of this rule - there would be a lot less war on the planet. Assholeleaders would be kept to a minimum.
...
In conclusion... you don't need some special ship to prove you're special. Be good (opsec) and be special w/out a special ship. This whole idea is just mind-numbingly mind-numbing.



and again, I agree. But if CCP is going to introduce a Solution to the 'Problem' then i'd prefer if it didn't come in the form of a "New Ship". Fleet size will make it so small gangs won't have to worry about the 'special ship that never dies' and as the battle wears on it will make the FC as vulnerable as the next guy.

.. And yes, you can pay for 100 accounts to fly shuttles...Roll
Lugh Crow-Slave
#32 - 2016-05-11 01:39:55 UTC
see but that new ship would be unable to effect the battlefield. your god tanked titan on the other hand....
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#33 - 2016-05-11 01:46:58 UTC
I don't think he gets it...

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#34 - 2016-05-11 02:38:27 UTC
FT Diomedes wrote:

They still haven't explained why headshotting the enemy FC is a problem.

Because it puts all the advantage on the meta-game. Meaning the advantage rests with the old rich players who have all the Meta-game stuff already set up to be able to spy on newer groups.
Which isn't good for the game, the metagame will always exist, but it shouldn't be the primary requirement to get anywhere. Actually playing in the game should be the best thing.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#35 - 2016-05-11 03:16:58 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
FT Diomedes wrote:

They still haven't explained why headshotting the enemy FC is a problem.

Because it puts all the advantage on the meta-game. Meaning the advantage rests with the old rich players who have all the Meta-game stuff already set up to be able to spy on newer groups.
Which isn't good for the game, the metagame will always exist, but it shouldn't be the primary requirement to get anywhere. Actually playing in the game should be the best thing.


EvE is all meta game. fights are generally won and lost before the two fleets are on grid and what makes eve so much better than other games is i don't need to log in to play it



anyway knowing the FC has nothing to do with being old or rich you can generally tell who the FC is after a few engagements or a bit of snooping. In fact newer groups will have a much better time hiding their FCs.


but either way killing the officer is a perfectly just tactic and any well organized force knows enough to train others to take his job if he falls
Lucy Callagan
Goryn Clade
#36 - 2016-05-11 08:25:35 UTC
nice n+1 blob mechanic

-1
Glitch Online
License To Steal
#37 - 2016-05-12 00:21:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Glitch Online
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
see but that new ship would be unable to effect the battlefield. your god tanked titan on the other hand....


Right you are, my god Titan would not be vulnerable to the Capital Blobs of eve. The enemy would actually have to put some effort into killing the Sub-Cap escort first... or.. my 100 shuttles.. assuming i was dumb enough to do that.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#38 - 2016-05-12 05:24:53 UTC
no it would still be vulnerable N would just have to be bigger
Glitch Online
License To Steal
#39 - 2016-05-12 16:10:05 UTC
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
no it would still be vulnerable N would just have to be bigger


Right again, this wouldn't be eve if you couldn't. You've also proven a point, even with the bonus resistance you still can bring down an FC, its just a choice. Focus on FC or his vulnerable fleet OR bring in all your blue friends to help you take down this ONE dude because you fail at defeating his fleet. All viable options.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#40 - 2016-05-12 16:13:13 UTC
or how about the FC is just a man like anyone else and is just as easy to pop as anyone else