These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

AFK Cloaking™: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals

First post First post
Author
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#5921 - 2016-04-29 22:29:47 UTC
Daniel Ornulf wrote:
yeah giving it a name suddenly makes it perfectly OK. damn, we should've given a name to dropping cans around a stargate, then it wouldn't have been considered an exploit...


It is not an exploit so long as it is not causing lag.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Daniel Ornulf
Grae Universe Enterprise
#5922 - 2016-04-29 22:31:18 UTC
Quote:
Sooo....let me make sure I get this right. You want to be in NS and not have to be paying attention? Would like CCP to add a feature where you can turn off the gates?


this is called a "straw-man argument". you quote something the other guy never said and attack this weakened statement.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#5923 - 2016-04-29 22:37:12 UTC
Daniel Ornulf wrote:
Quote:
Sooo....let me make sure I get this right. You want to be in NS and not have to be paying attention? Would like CCP to add a feature where you can turn off the gates?


this is called a "straw-man argument". you quote something the other guy never said and attack this weakened statement.


No, it's called a question with a heavy dose of sarcasm.

Yes, if you are going to be in NS ratting, mining, etc. you should be on your toes. Ready for things to go sideways. And one response is to change your behavior to shift things to your advantage. Ratting as a group would accomplish this. Let me be very specific:

1. If the guy is truly AFK...no problem. He won't be lighting a cyno. Ever. Nobody AFK has ever lit a cyno.

2. If he is not AFK then your group is much less likely to be attacked when you are in a group. Granted you might have 10 guys and they have 20, but hey...nobody said the game was supposed to be safe. Further, if he is ATK and you are in a group and it is too much for his buddies he will do one of the following:

A. Log off in system--yay, go do what you want.
B. Leave system--yay go do what you want.
C. Go AFK in system--yay he can't light a cyno, keep ratting.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Mark Letuse
Darkside Inc.
#5924 - 2016-04-29 22:42:26 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
Daniel Ornulf wrote:
Quote:
Sooo....let me make sure I get this right. You want to be in NS and not have to be paying attention? Would like CCP to add a feature where you can turn off the gates?


this is called a "straw-man argument". you quote something the other guy never said and attack this weakened statement.


No, it's called a question with a heavy dose of sarcasm.

Yes, if you are going to be in NS ratting, mining, etc. you should be on your toes. Ready for things to go sideways. And one response is to change your behavior to shift things to your advantage. Ratting as a group would accomplish this. Let me be very specific:

1. If the guy is truly AFK...no problem. He won't be lighting a cyno. Ever. Nobody AFK has ever lit a cyno.

2. If he is not AFK then your group is much less likely to be attacked when you are in a group. Granted you might have 10 guys and they have 20, but hey...nobody said the game was supposed to be safe. Further, if he is ATK and you are in a group and it is too much for his buddies he will do one of the following:

A. Log off in system--yay, go do what you want.
B. Leave system--yay go do what you want.
C. Go AFK in system--yay he can't light a cyno, keep ratting.




and what if the AFK camper -dude is in the next 20-30 systems, also cloaked 24/7=? every day, week after week?
Daniel Ornulf
Grae Universe Enterprise
#5925 - 2016-04-29 23:33:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Daniel Ornulf
okay so why do you think people leave their cloaked char online for the entire day, knowing they'll only play for a small amount?
he obviously can't kill anyone while he's afk, so why leave the PC running all day long?

it's an honest question
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#5926 - 2016-04-30 00:00:59 UTC
Daniel Ornulf wrote:
okay so why do you think people leave their cloaked char online for the entire day, knowing they'll only play for a small amount?
he obviously can't kill anyone while he's afk, so why leave the PC running all day long?

it's an honest question


Because alot of people just dock up and don't try other strategies. It does work.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#5927 - 2016-04-30 00:01:53 UTC
Mark Letuse wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Daniel Ornulf wrote:
Quote:
Sooo....let me make sure I get this right. You want to be in NS and not have to be paying attention? Would like CCP to add a feature where you can turn off the gates?


this is called a "straw-man argument". you quote something the other guy never said and attack this weakened statement.


No, it's called a question with a heavy dose of sarcasm.

Yes, if you are going to be in NS ratting, mining, etc. you should be on your toes. Ready for things to go sideways. And one response is to change your behavior to shift things to your advantage. Ratting as a group would accomplish this. Let me be very specific:

1. If the guy is truly AFK...no problem. He won't be lighting a cyno. Ever. Nobody AFK has ever lit a cyno.

2. If he is not AFK then your group is much less likely to be attacked when you are in a group. Granted you might have 10 guys and they have 20, but hey...nobody said the game was supposed to be safe. Further, if he is ATK and you are in a group and it is too much for his buddies he will do one of the following:

A. Log off in system--yay, go do what you want.
B. Leave system--yay go do what you want.
C. Go AFK in system--yay he can't light a cyno, keep ratting.




and what if the AFK camper -dude is in the next 20-30 systems, also cloaked 24/7=? every day, week after week?


Keep fleeting up and doing your ratting that way.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Daniel Ornulf
Grae Universe Enterprise
#5928 - 2016-04-30 00:02:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Daniel Ornulf
his goal is to make people dock up? I don't understand, how does he hope to kill them if they're docked up?

-his goal is to kill people
-he can't kill ppl while he's afk (as you explained)

so why stay logged in 24/7?

please explain

what's the name for annoying someone while not gaining anything from it? can't remember the term
Moonacre Parmala
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5929 - 2016-04-30 04:24:19 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:


Sheesh. Do you need me to tell you how to make a PB&J next? P

Please Big smile

We brits don't understand why you call jam jelly Ugh

Law Number III: There are no lazy veteran lion hunters.

Law Number VI: A hungry dog hunts best. A hungrier dog hunts even better.

Law Number XXXVIII: The early bird gets the worm. The early worm....gets eaten.

If in doubt , SHOOT !

Wander Prian
Nosferatu Security Foundation
#5930 - 2016-04-30 10:58:21 UTC
Daniel Ornulf wrote:
his goal is to make people dock up? I don't understand, how does he hope to kill them if they're docked up?

-his goal is to kill people
-he can't kill ppl while he's afk (as you explained)

so why stay logged in 24/7?

please explain

what's the name for annoying someone while not gaining anything from it? can't remember the term


Because you put so much value on local telling you is it safe or not and the amount of whining you so when you are docked up and someone is in system. Hell, I've been accused of being a AFK-cloaker after 5 minutes of entering system, just because I was checking the system out.

The amount of tears and whining is what keeps them doing it. This thread keeps people doing it.

Stop treating the situation as a binary safe/unsafe and come up with new tactics. Fleet up, have a plan, check the guys stats from killboards. As long as you keep treating local as a binary security setting, you will have people cloaking up in your system.

Wormholer for life.

Daniel Ornulf
Grae Universe Enterprise
#5931 - 2016-04-30 11:45:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Daniel Ornulf
I know this will come as a shock to truesec players but many nullsec areas are kinda poor and don't have enough active content to sustain a ratting fleet that can counter a drop. reinforce and vulnerability windows exist because eve CCP agrees that "owning" a system isn't about maintaining your full power 24/7 and gluing people to the chair.

anyway, my goal was to get CCP-s opinion not that of people faking ignorance to make their statement.

keep telling yourself you're hardcore for afking. you guys rock!

o7
Wander Prian
Nosferatu Security Foundation
#5932 - 2016-04-30 13:05:26 UTC
I'm not here to defend the AFK-part. Just the cloaking. As a wormhole-pilot, I use cloaks daily to scout the chains and to hunt people. I disagree that the fix for AFK-cloaking is in nerfing cloaks, as they are used everywhere, but the only place where people cry about someone AFK-cloaking is on sov-null. That tells me that cloaks are fine.

Wormholer for life.

Isaac Armer
The Soup Kitchen
#5933 - 2016-04-30 13:24:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Isaac Armer
Daniel Ornulf wrote:
that explains why you have no clue what it's like to be in a standing fleet or what it exactly takes to counter a drop (and why it's not viable against campers).

sorry to burst your bubble, but the scenarios you make up in your head don't work in reality. it's OK, we all do it, it's nothing to be ashamed of, and when you try playing the game yourself you'll realize this.

have a great day!


/sigh. It sounds like you need to join a more competent group. Let me explain it to you. Join a fleet as soon as you log in. Fit a point to your ishtar/snake/etc when ratting, switch to a procurer/skiff when mining, fit a point to that as well. When you are dropped, say in comms (you are on comms, right?) "hey, I need help in xxx system". Your sabre/flycatcher/etc that's on standby (you have one on standby, right? you are in null after all) takes the 20 seconds to get to your system and bubble the blob. 20 seconds later the rest of your standing fleet lands and counters.

Don't claim "it doesn't work in reality" as an excuse for not being organized.

Daniel Ornulf wrote:
I know this will come as a shock to truesec players but many nullsec areas are kinda poor and don't have enough active content to sustain a ratting fleet that can counter a drop. reinforce and vulnerability windows exist because eve CCP agrees that "owning" a system isn't about maintaining your full power 24/7 and gluing people to the chair.

anyway, my goal was to get CCP-s opinion not that of people faking ignorance to make their statement.

keep telling yourself you're hardcore for afking. you guys rock!

o7


You do know what raising your index in null means, yeah?

Doesn't "not enough active content" from a null group just mean they didn't put in the effort to develop their pocket?
Dornier Pfeil
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#5934 - 2016-04-30 16:00:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Dornier Pfeil
Daniel Ornulf wrote:
Quote:
That's the general idea! Exciting, isn't it?


oh yeah! let's add a mechanic so the camper has to be on his toes nonstop as well! exciting!

Quote:
Seriously, all this whining about not being able to engage in casual almost careless play because of guys who are careful and putting for not inconsiderable effort is amazing.



LOL effort, casual. we're talking about people who play 10 minutes a day and force a dozen others to glue their eyes on the screen 24/7. are you kidding right now?


Is it possible that Teckos Pech's point is: those hours and days (24/7) you have your eyes glued to local don't have to be unproductive ones? Owning a system means multitasking; slurping up your system's resources while being ready to defend it at the same time? If you don't care to be engaged in resource acquisition (whatever form that takes) and you don't care to defend your system, why don't you just log off? Two can play the AFK game, can't they?

Please note, all of the above are questions, not sarcastic statements. I am genuinely curious to know the answers.

P.S. Moonacre Parmala,
I call jellies, jellies and jams(or preserves) jams based on whether there is solid fruit involved. How exactly do you delineate them?

edited for clarity
Moonacre Parmala
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5935 - 2016-05-01 05:03:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Moonacre Parmala
Dornier Pfeil wrote:
Daniel Ornulf wrote:
Quote:
That's the general idea! Exciting, isn't it?


oh yeah! let's add a mechanic so the camper has to be on his toes nonstop as well! exciting!

Quote:
Seriously, all this whining about not being able to engage in casual almost careless play because of guys who are careful and putting for not inconsiderable effort is amazing.



LOL effort, casual. we're talking about people who play 10 minutes a day and force a dozen others to glue their eyes on the screen 24/7. are you kidding right now?


Is it possible that Teckos Pech's point is: those hours and days (24/7) you have your eyes glued to local don't have to be unproductive ones? Owning a system means multitasking; slurping up your system's resources while being ready to defend it at the same time? If you don't care to be engaged in resource acquisition (whatever form that takes) and you don't care to defend your system, why don't you just log off? Two can play the AFK game, can't they?

Please note, all of the above are questions, not sarcastic statements. I am genuinely curious to know the answers.

P.S. Moonacre Parmala,
I call jellies, jellies and jams(or preserves) jams based on whether there is solid fruit involved. How exactly do you delineate them?

edited for clarity


Ahh we've just got jams and preserves......something to do with fruit content, We've weird rules on fruit content.... not truly sure I want to know them all to be honest, just that jams and preserves depend upon how much fruit is involved. Although ADSA (part of the WALMART family)* do/did do a striped PB and jam in one jar.

(*other retailers are available.)

And back on subject..........(Finally)

I just want there to be a mechanism where an AFK cloaker can be hunted down and routed out. If it takes a while then so be it, It's not like he's going anywhere :P.

And if the person is is actually scouting and hunting or gathering intel, They'll already be on their toes so will be easily able to avoid probes or warp around or get into position away from the danger.

It just seems like there is to much protection for people to Log in then hide and do Fluff all else except keep local on their toes needlessly.

I use cloaks and I do hunt ( mostly NPC's and exploration) I do see the point of recon and cryo bubbles, it's the going AFK in a system for days on end. I do see the point of standing up for fleets and remaining on Comms. BUT.....

If you're willing to sit in pod in a cloaked ship and use said ship then do so.

KNOWINGLY agitating areas of space without risk to yourself by causing increased levels of fleet activity for SOMEONE WHO IS POSING A THREAT BY THEIR POTENTIAL ACTIONS, when they are actually AFK (and by AFK i mean totally AFK and not coming back anytime soon, not just nipped off for a RL break for a few minutes) then you should be able to hunt the b*gg*r down and teach them the ways of watching local, spamming D-scan and stop thinking going AFK and causing problems for others is acceptable.

I don't mean that they suddenly appear gift wrapped with a crate of Quafe in front of your battle ready fleet with big targets painted on their sides. I want to actively work at hunting the git....erm i mean AFK cloaker......(they maybe really nice people........maybe)......... but to undock in EVE is risky, to gate jump and just live in EVE is risky.

To annoy inhabitants of systems whilst cloaked and then to LEAVE said character whilst you watch TV, scratch itchy parts of anatomy and ignore said character because you're AFK for protracted periods of time........IS NOT RISKY. And you should then expect to have a fleet appearing and then sweeping an area looking for you.

Sorry to rant on, well no actually i'm not.
Play fair is all I ask.
Hunting people is fair because it's counter able.
Baiting is fair because pirates need to know fear as well.
Bumping miners is questionable at best but can be countered by a fleet bumping them back!
AFK Cloaking is neither counterable nor is it ethical. IT should have consequences.
Everything else in EVE does.......................

Law Number III: There are no lazy veteran lion hunters.

Law Number VI: A hungry dog hunts best. A hungrier dog hunts even better.

Law Number XXXVIII: The early bird gets the worm. The early worm....gets eaten.

If in doubt , SHOOT !

Moonacre Parmala
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5936 - 2016-05-01 05:16:27 UTC
Oh and I believe nearly 300 pages is pretty ranttastic on such a small matter of "AFK Cloaking™: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals"

Law Number III: There are no lazy veteran lion hunters.

Law Number VI: A hungry dog hunts best. A hungrier dog hunts even better.

Law Number XXXVIII: The early bird gets the worm. The early worm....gets eaten.

If in doubt , SHOOT !

Mark Letuse
Darkside Inc.
#5937 - 2016-05-01 09:01:13 UTC
Moonacre Parmala wrote:
Oh and I believe nearly 300 pages is pretty ranttastic on such a small matter of "AFK Cloaking™: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals"



Its weird that CCP does not have any comment on this issue yet.
Moonacre Parmala
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5938 - 2016-05-01 09:28:23 UTC
I don't believe it's a quick fix. Cloaking is a damned useful tool, and personally I don't want to see it nerfed. It's the way it's used that's the pain in the butt, that and how to police the way it's used.

Law Number III: There are no lazy veteran lion hunters.

Law Number VI: A hungry dog hunts best. A hungrier dog hunts even better.

Law Number XXXVIII: The early bird gets the worm. The early worm....gets eaten.

If in doubt , SHOOT !

Mark Letuse
Darkside Inc.
#5939 - 2016-05-01 09:32:50 UTC
Seems CCP will possibliy dedicate a Observatory Arrays and Gates for that purpose...


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=414191&find=unread
Moonacre Parmala
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5940 - 2016-05-01 13:47:45 UTC
Mark Letuse wrote:
Seems CCP will possibliy dedicate a Observatory Arrays and Gates for that purpose...


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=414191&find=unread



I had forgotten about those Big smile

my concerns had already been answered.......

+1 like coming your way

Law Number III: There are no lazy veteran lion hunters.

Law Number VI: A hungry dog hunts best. A hungrier dog hunts even better.

Law Number XXXVIII: The early bird gets the worm. The early worm....gets eaten.

If in doubt , SHOOT !