These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What we grrrrgoons going to do?

First post
Author
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#501 - 2016-04-20 11:45:08 UTC
Bliss tells me that he was offered 500b to drop init from the coalition.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#502 - 2016-04-20 12:01:10 UTC
How does INIT fit into the Imperium anyway? For one, they're actually good PvP'ers. And secondly, they only moved north to shoot stuff; it's not like they live there or anything.

Could you please explain this odd behaviour to an outsider? Are you guys like the Iron Fist of the imperium or what? Because as far as I can tell, you operate as an entirely separate entity, much like section 8.

Care to fill in the part I'm missing?
Hawke Frost
#503 - 2016-04-20 12:15:54 UTC
INIT has always been an outsider like that, in a good way. But joining Imperium did raise an eyebrow, just like how it did when ETNY joined GS.
Isaac Armer
The Soup Kitchen
#504 - 2016-04-20 14:33:08 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
This is what happens when only one side has to play by the game mechanics and the other is free to use a third party application instead.


Playing the meta game is valid game mechanics. Goons tried to start a gambling site and failed. Accept that IWI beat them at that particular part of the very valid way of earning ISK and move on.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#505 - 2016-04-20 15:28:25 UTC
Isaac Armer wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
This is what happens when only one side has to play by the game mechanics and the other is free to use a third party application instead.


Playing the meta game is valid game mechanics. Goons tried to start a gambling site and failed. Accept that IWI beat them at that particular part of the very valid way of earning ISK and move on.
But that's not "playing the meta game". That's like saying hitting the server with A DDOS is metagaming, it's ridiculous. It's just cheating, plain and simple. And IWI beat everyone. How can you move on knowing that one group of players have free reign to pick and choose who else gets to play because they use third party software to give them an uncounterable edge. I know you're too blinded by bias to get it, but consider that what they are doing is only good for you because it's goons they are hitting. They could very well do the same to any alliance and there'd equally be no way to stop them.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Isaac Armer
The Soup Kitchen
#506 - 2016-04-20 16:30:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Isaac Armer
Lucas Kell wrote:
But that's not "playing the meta game". That's like saying hitting the server with A DDOS is metagaming, it's ridiculous. It's just cheating, plain and simple. And IWI beat everyone. How can you move on knowing that one group of players have free reign to pick and choose who else gets to play because they use third party software to give them an uncounterable edge. I know you're too blinded by bias to get it, but consider that what they are doing is only good for you because it's goons they are hitting. They could very well do the same to any alliance and there'd equally be no way to stop them.


And now we're back to "anything that Lucas doesn't like/can't do with EVE is cheating"

Grow up. EVE literally wouldn't exist without third party software.

Why do you think I'm biased? I'm not on either side of this war. I couldn't care less what the outcome is. I am 100% neutral, whereas you were forced to leave CFC because of this. Between the two of us you are the only one with any personal biases here.
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#507 - 2016-04-20 17:14:01 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
How can you move on knowing that one group of players have free reign to pick and choose who else gets to play because they use third party software to give them an uncounterable edge. I know you're too blinded by bias to get it, but consider that what they are doing is only good for you because it's goons they are hitting. They could very well do the same to any alliance and there'd equally be no way to stop them.


Now we're getting somewhere. You do realise this is how many of us saw Goons too, right? (or any other big bloc for that matter -- the only thing keeping big blocs in check is the presence of other big blocs).

Once we saw nobody could stand up to The Goon, we trod very carefully knowing that one group of players had free reign - and we moved on.

The same problem will arise when all of a sudden, "PL can't be stopped!" ... except there is no entity that cannot be stopped. This war happening has greatly improved my faith in EvE, not diminished it. This IS moving on. Have faith that everything and everyone can be challenged.
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#508 - 2016-04-20 20:38:49 UTC
Just saw this on Polygon and not posted anywhere so far. Interesting read:

http://www.polygon.com/2016/4/20/11467726/meet-the-gambling-kingpin-funding-eve-onlines-biggest-war

Much better article than that disaster piece posted a few days ago.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."

Chewytowel Haklar
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#509 - 2016-04-20 20:49:38 UTC
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
Just saw this on Polygon and not posted anywhere so far. Interesting read:

http://www.polygon.com/2016/4/20/11467726/meet-the-gambling-kingpin-funding-eve-onlines-biggest-war

Much better article than that disaster piece posted a few days ago.


"I would love to see the old Goonswarm come back," Joe says. "The 2007, 2008 version of them. Back then, they were obnoxious and uncouth, but they weren’t malicious. They were funny. They were goofy. But they were also kind of scary, because they had astronomical amounts of people. ... I want them to go back to their roots, go back to where they were."

Interesting....hmmm

Oh and 4 trillion cash, 8-9 trillion in assets and spending about a trillion a week... quick easy math suggests a few more months of this but I doubt he'd blow it all right?
Prt Scr
569th Freelancers
#510 - 2016-04-20 21:30:27 UTC
Chewytowel Haklar wrote:
[quote=Shae Tadaruwa

Oh and 4 trillion cash, 8-9 trillion in assets and spending about a trillion a week... quick easy math suggests a few more months of this but I doubt he'd blow it all right?



He could stop paying today and it would make no difference, the blood is in the water, the feeding frenzy has started. When goons have lost all sov. there maybe a reduction in action and numbers against them, but if they want to go back to what they where a month ago....it just wont happen. As long as Mittens is in game as a hate figure they are truly screwed.

No one wants to ruin the game....just his game Lol

uɐıssnɹ pɐǝɹ ʇ,uɐɔ ı ʇnq ʎɹɹos ɯ,ı

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#511 - 2016-04-20 22:16:21 UTC
Isaac Armer wrote:
And now we're back to "anything that Lucas doesn't like/can't do with EVE is cheating"
No, we're not, we're back to you saying it's fine that someone can earn trillions of isk with a third party program which they would not be able to earn without it.

Isaac Armer wrote:
Grow up. EVE literally wouldn't exist without third party software.
Sure, but then it wouldn't exist if bots were able to run rampant either because they give an unfair advantage to the user.

Isaac Armer wrote:
Why do you think I'm biased? I'm not on either side of this war. I couldn't care less what the outcome is. I am 100% neutral, whereas you were forced to leave CFC because of this. Between the two of us you are the only one with any personal biases here.
Because it's impossible for me to see a third party application which gives an advantage this great as fair, so for you to see it that way, it screams bias. Plus let's face it, your comments have hardly been without a hint of bias. There's also the whole "I must call then CFC" thing which pretty much guarantees it.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#512 - 2016-04-20 22:20:07 UTC
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:
Now we're getting somewhere. You do realise this is how many of us saw Goons too, right? (or any other big bloc for that matter -- the only thing keeping big blocs in check is the presence of other big blocs).

Once we saw nobody could stand up to The Goon, we trod very carefully knowing that one group of players had free reign - and we moved on.

The same problem will arise when all of a sudden, "PL can't be stopped!" ... except there is no entity that cannot be stopped. This war happening has greatly improved my faith in EvE, not diminished it. This IS moving on. Have faith that everything and everyone can be challenged.
But that was only ever in-game mechanics. You chose not to attack because you thought the enemy too powerful. In the case of IWI, there is no way to fight it, since it's not in game. It's a third party application.

Prt Scr wrote:
He could stop paying today and it would make no difference, the blood is in the water, the feeding frenzy has started. When goons have lost all sov. there maybe a reduction in action and numbers against them, but if they want to go back to what they where a month ago....it just wont happen. As long as Mittens is in game as a hate figure they are truly screwed.
It won't make a difference here but it certainly will for whatever target he chooses to remove from the game next. IWI have won EVE, so everyone else may as well not be here. It's not like any other players can actually be competitive against that.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Trudeaux Margaret
University of Caille
#513 - 2016-04-20 22:37:09 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Isaac Armer wrote:
And now we're back to "anything that Lucas doesn't like/can't do with EVE is cheating"
No, we're not, we're back to you saying it's fine that someone can earn trillions of isk with a third party program which they would not be able to earn without it.


You know what, Lucas? It is fine. Why is it fine? It's fine because CCP allows it. When they decide it isn't fine, then it isn't fine. Until then, all your whining about it is just that, whining.

Cripes.

> anyone willing to give me like a 5 min politics crash course?

> grr goons, lowsec is full of elitist sh*s, all roads lead to the bittervet pl

Isaac Armer
The Soup Kitchen
#514 - 2016-04-20 22:38:24 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
No, we're not, we're back to you saying it's fine that someone can earn trillions of isk with a third party program which they would not be able to earn without it.


Literally no major alliance could earn the trillions of ISK they do without out of game third party tools to manage their organizations. Your cherry picking is ridiculous.

Quote:
Sure, but then it wouldn't exist if bots were able to run rampant either because they give an unfair advantage to the user


We aren't talking about bots. Stay on topic.

Quote:
Because it's impossible for me to see a third party application which gives an advantage this great as fair, so for you to see it that way, it screams bias. Plus let's face it, your comments have hardly been without a hint of bias. There's also the whole "I must call then CFC" thing which pretty much guarantees it.


So anyone who disagrees with your personal opinion is biased? Come on man. You can do better than that. I am 100% in favor of CFC/Imperium/goons/whatever name you want to use using 3rd party apps to build, maintain and run their empire for years and make trillions upon trillions of ISK because of it. I am also 100% in favor of IWI using a website to show the results of in-game donations given to real players in real time using valid in-game mechanics to make trillions of ISK.

Good for both organizations for finding a way to make bank and be successful in game. No bias there chief.

I eagerly await your next reply, telling me how wrong I am b/c I don't agree with your personal opinion.
Jason Galente
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#515 - 2016-04-20 23:13:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Jason Galente
Trudeaux Margaret wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:


Trudeaux Margaret wrote:
DBRB taking out a few "sword fleets" on his Twitch stream hardly counts as seriously trying to defend, Lucas.
And those aren't the only fleets that went out. That may be the case now because there's no point in sending out anything else.

Noone sane throws away ships into a fight they can't possible win and can't even draw. There's simply no point in the Imperium fielding fleets at this point. That you guys seem to think that preserving their ships is against whatever e-honour bullshit you've made up is irrelevant.



They are fielding fleets, though. Not fleets to defend Deklein. Fleets to do something or other to Pandemic Horde in O1Y. It seems pretty pointless to me since they're not getting anywhere but that's what Mittani seems to think is important.



They're mainly just trying to kill ratters in Catalysts, maybe a few frigates off the station with bombers, and newbies with mining frigates in belts. What a great war strategy. Meanwhile, we are blitzkrieging constellations, because when we form up in fleets, they can't do **** about it.

Also, it's not much of a fighting man's fleet when the ships are named "RUN!!! FAST!!! QUICK!!" and they're in interceptors.

We've had really no problem countering them with cormorants, thrashers and T3Ds

Them going after horde, mainly our newbeans, stragglers and ratters is a sign of weakness. They get ROFLstomped when they go against anyone else, and they still get ROFLstomped when we form up fleets to oppose them. I think they think they're increasing morale trading purifiers for Merlins.

If you need more proof of how badly the goons are cascade-failing, last saturday, dabigredboat said he'd have 01Y captured within 48 hours.

top kek.

Only the liberty of the individual assures the prosperity of the whole. And this foundation must be defended.

At any cost

Trudeaux Margaret
University of Caille
#516 - 2016-04-20 23:46:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Trudeaux Margaret
Jason Galente wrote:
Trudeaux Margaret wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:


Trudeaux Margaret wrote:
DBRB taking out a few "sword fleets" on his Twitch stream hardly counts as seriously trying to defend, Lucas.
And those aren't the only fleets that went out. That may be the case now because there's no point in sending out anything else.

Noone sane throws away ships into a fight they can't possible win and can't even draw. There's simply no point in the Imperium fielding fleets at this point. That you guys seem to think that preserving their ships is against whatever e-honour bullshit you've made up is irrelevant.



They are fielding fleets, though. Not fleets to defend Deklein. Fleets to do something or other to Pandemic Horde in O1Y. It seems pretty pointless to me since they're not getting anywhere but that's what Mittani seems to think is important.



They're mainly just trying to kill ratters in Catalysts, maybe a few frigates off the station with bombers, and newbies with mining frigates in belts. What a great war strategy. Meanwhile, we are blitzkrieging constellations, because when we form up in fleets, they can't do **** about it.

Also, it's not much of a fighting man's fleet when the ships are named "RUN!!! FAST!!! QUICK!!" and they're in interceptors.

We've had really no problem countering them with cormorants, thrashers and T3Ds

Them going after horde, mainly our newbeans, stragglers and ratters is a sign of weakness. They get ROFLstomped when they go against anyone else, and they still get ROFLstomped when we form up fleets to oppose them. I think they think they're increasing morale trading purifiers for Merlins.

If you need more proof of how badly the goons are cascade-failing, last saturday, dabigredboat said he'd have 01Y captured within 48 hours.

top kek.


Yeah, mostly just teasing Lucas, who appears utterly clueless about what is really happening.

Goons won't even be able to do what they're doing now once Horde mops up their staging towers

> anyone willing to give me like a 5 min politics crash course?

> grr goons, lowsec is full of elitist sh*s, all roads lead to the bittervet pl

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#517 - 2016-04-21 00:28:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucas Kell
Trudeaux Margaret wrote:
You know what, Lucas? It is fine. Why is it fine? It's fine because CCP allows it. When they decide it isn't fine, then it isn't fine. Until then, all your whining about it is just that, whining.
Roll And why do you think it is CCP makes decisions? Because players give feedback. I get it, I have an opinion that differs to yours, therefore you feel I should not be allowed to express that. I disagree.

Isaac Armer wrote:
Literally no major alliance could earn the trillions of ISK they do without out of game third party tools to manage their organizations. Your cherry picking is ridiculous
Except it's not cherry picking, as previously detailed, it's simply prioritising. I'd happily be rid of all third party software, but I consider an application like IWI which allows a select group of people to make trillions of isk in a short space of time a considerable more unfair advantage than people using jabber for example. You seem to consider them equal which is fine. Ridiculous, but fine.

Isaac Armer wrote:
We aren't talking about bots. Stay on topic.
No, we're talking about a different piece of third party software that has a similar - and in fact considerably more pronounced - effect of distorting the economic balance of players within the game.

Isaac Armer wrote:
So anyone who disagrees with your personal opinion is biased?
That's not even remotely what I said, but feel free to keep smacking that strawman if it makes you feel better.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Trudeaux Margaret
University of Caille
#518 - 2016-04-21 00:55:46 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Trudeaux Margaret wrote:
You know what, Lucas? It is fine. Why is it fine? It's fine because CCP allows it. When they decide it isn't fine, then it isn't fine. Until then, all your whining about it is just that, whining.
Roll And why do you think it is CCP makes decisions? Because players give feedback.


Feedback. Not an endless feedback loop. You're like the Jimi Hendrix of anti-IWI feedback, except terrible.


> anyone willing to give me like a 5 min politics crash course?

> grr goons, lowsec is full of elitist sh*s, all roads lead to the bittervet pl

Bleedingthrough
#519 - 2016-04-21 02:57:13 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
And IWI beat everyone. How can you move on knowing that one group of players have free reign to pick and choose who else gets to play because they use third party software to give them an uncounterable edge. I know you're too blinded by bias to get it, but consider that what they are doing is only good for you because it's goons they are hitting. They could very well do the same to any alliance and there'd equally be no way to stop them.


You overrate the importance of ISK. Here is why you are wrong:

1. You can have all ISK in the game but you won’t win anything unless you actually have motivated warriors to win a war. On paper The Imperium has both numbers and ISK. Does it make a difference? No, because motivation is the key.

2. Eep eep could surely hire some mercs to bring down other sov holding alliances but it would not gain the momentum it has against grrrGoons. ISK is not everything and I doubt you would find any decent merc group that would accept contracts against opponents that will not provide kill mails or prestige. Warriors want to fight for the fun of it and not grind uncontested sov. Good leaders understand this and keep the people that matter happy.

3. It is 2016 and the important/deciding people are filthy rich. These people that ask themselves “should I get a rev or a titan on my 3rd account” don’t do anything for ISK if it didn’t coincide with their own goals. IWI is merely sponsoring what they want to do anyways.

4. We EvE players are social beings. Friendship, respect and reputation outweigh any ISK incentives by a long shot. These are the only real currencies in EvE that matter. Gevlons ISK can’t buy me content, this currency can and sometimes it is earned by providing content by being a good enemy - a foreign concept to The Mittani. Good enemies come to the fanfest with their sov intact; the worst possible enemy alienated all of his allies and probably lost more supers in a Fabian strategy than in B-R without providing content for his lads.

5. The reasons why the injection of ISK kickstarted the fall of The Imperium are very unique. The Imperium is politically isolated and made a lot of enemies in the past. They lost the propaganda war when they lost to smallish lowsec groups. This was a PR disaster for them and it became plain obvious how weak the goons are and that it is possible to defeat them. There was nothing going on in Nullsec for a long time and a lot of groups are eager for content. The Imperium is a good target (prestige and supers) and the people involved write EvE history. This is the first and only real war with this sov mechanic, old capitals and without citadels.


Geronimo McVain
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#520 - 2016-04-21 06:23:29 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
t won't make a difference here but it certainly will for whatever target he chooses to remove from the game next. IWI have won EVE, so everyone else may as well not be here. It's not like any other players can actually be competitive against that.

Not everyone is a evil goon. Twisted
Lets face it: Most people are in because they want to hurt goons and the money is a nice extra. Second: I would bet that goons can match this amount of money, they had huge Sov, and renters etc for many years. So either Mitten spend it all for weed or the goons should easily match this money plus a lot more if you take a look at the personal warchest of goonmembers. Most senior goons should have multi billions on their own and you have a lot of these. You where saying yourself that you needed to do a lot of ratting to hold you Sov so where is all that money?

Most people where willing to go for the goons even before it all started and that's not true for anyone else. They just thought they wouldn't stand no chance against goons but when they saw a chance they jumped for it. Do you really think that PL and the others need the money so badly that they will start quaking when he says frog?

You are reminding me of some German soccers teams: When they win they are the best, when they loose it's the referees fault not their own short coming or that the other team was simply better. So please stop whinning about IWI, grab a ship, cash out you assets and even the odds: ingame! Even the former leader of Goon is leaving and will you accuse him to be afraid of IWIs Isk?