These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What we grrrrgoons going to do?

First post
Author
Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
#461 - 2016-04-19 00:37:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Khergit Deserters
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Rank and file goons are not the problem.

The problem is mittens and his ego.

Seems to be the root of things. Complacency, moving from a base of everybody's a soldier-citizen to where there are professionals and unknown but coddled grunts. Online societies are like bands, clans, and up to tribes. All volunteers, and all log-ins based 100% on feeling like logging in tonight. The leap from super-tribe warchief to Monarchy/Emperor/Dictator is huge. Possibly impossible, on a long term basis. People are ADD, and also democratically hard-headed, at some point. The balance between lulz sheep who will follow, and lulz posters who will shite-bandwagon post you unto oblivion.... There lies the rub.
Chewytowel Haklar
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#462 - 2016-04-19 07:16:56 UTC
Mr Mieyli wrote:
Loyalty makes people do such strange things doesn't it? Quite a few imperium members seem to be incapable of thinking that goons may be at an end, meanwhile the rest of eve is ripping their sov from them.

If I were goons and wanted to win, I'd use my spy network to smash a few enemies and show not to mess with goons. Find out about super movements or whatever and hit back, not all of your opponents are non-sov holders. Your whole mantra has been "blueball or decimate, aim to win" but it seems you have lost that will, sitting in saranen isn't going to win you anything.


Not sure if any of you know this, but they aren't still sitting in Saranen, those are mostly just alts and what not messing around.
Trudeaux Margaret
University of Caille
#463 - 2016-04-19 09:55:09 UTC
Chewytowel Haklar wrote:
Mr Mieyli wrote:
Loyalty makes people do such strange things doesn't it? Quite a few imperium members seem to be incapable of thinking that goons may be at an end, meanwhile the rest of eve is ripping their sov from them.

If I were goons and wanted to win, I'd use my spy network to smash a few enemies and show not to mess with goons. Find out about super movements or whatever and hit back, not all of your opponents are non-sov holders. Your whole mantra has been "blueball or decimate, aim to win" but it seems you have lost that will, sitting in saranen isn't going to win you anything.


Not sure if any of you know this, but they aren't still sitting in Saranen, those are mostly just alts and what not messing around.


Didn't want those carriers anyway

> anyone willing to give me like a 5 min politics crash course?

> grr goons, lowsec is full of elitist sh*s, all roads lead to the bittervet pl

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#464 - 2016-04-19 12:21:44 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Rank and file goons are not the problem.

The problem is mittens and his ego.


The truth is I was way more "pro-Goon" before this war. I liked their "Devil may care" attitude, I remember fondly the skill with which they killed (IT Alliance) or ejected (NCDot) the groups I was in at the time. I thought a great deal of the 'grr goons' stuff was impotent whining by people who mostly never shot at goons (and in the main I still believe that). I thought about joining them or (rejoining) their coalition a few times (ie I could have gone back to INIT).

But this war has left a real bad taste in my mouth. It seems like they turned into the standard "I I can't be sure of a win i won't even try" types of players EVE has always had, rather than the bold Rifter flying "screw it, it's a game, CHARGE" types they used to be. And any other reputable group would have kicked their leadership to curb by now and got new leaders who still think of this as a game to be enjoyed by brash as hell Goons rather than something to be monitized into a multi-dollar empire (I still chuckle at that term btw).
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#465 - 2016-04-19 14:37:15 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
But this war has left a real bad taste in my mouth. It seems like they turned into the standard "I I can't be sure of a win i won't even try" types of players EVE has always had, rather than the bold Rifter flying "screw it, it's a game, CHARGE" types they used to be.
But it's not they cant be sure of a win, they can be sure of a loss if engaging in direct combat. The enemy has more players, more supers and an infinite unbreakable warchest. It's the same thing that any other group would do in their position, hell, it's what PL did when they fell back after B-R instead of pushing forwards. As much as you may think it's just the leadership, rank and file goons don't want to lose all their SRP and their own assets fighting a futile war either.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Seven Koskanaiken
Shadow Legions.
Insidious.
#466 - 2016-04-19 15:29:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Seven Koskanaiken
Lucas Kell wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
But this war has left a real bad taste in my mouth. It seems like they turned into the standard "I I can't be sure of a win i won't even try" types of players EVE has always had, rather than the bold Rifter flying "screw it, it's a game, CHARGE" types they used to be.
But it's not they cant be sure of a win, they can be sure of a loss if engaging in direct combat. The enemy has more players, more supers and an infinite unbreakable warchest. It's the same thing that any other group would do in their position, hell, it's what PL did when they fell back after B-R instead of pushing forwards. As much as you may think it's just the leadership, rank and file goons don't want to lose all their SRP and their own assets fighting a futile war either.



Marginally more players. MBC fleet numbers peaked at ~3000. The Imperium was 40k strong at the start so for matching numbers of 3000 would require of 7.5% participation across the coalition. That's it. An entirely achievable number considering it was a fight in your home space for the survival of that space.

So for years goons et al sit around telling everybody they are not in EVE for small gang and skirmishes but for the huge narrative driven wars, and here one is, on their doorstep, and.....they can't be bothered to log in for it.

Supers have negligible use in Fozziesov and as for warchests, where has 6-7 years of ratting taxes, rental income, r64, technetium bubble, FW exploit and market manipulations ISK gone?

BRAVE knew they weren't going to win the war but they still killed Hurley's titan, won a station with a t1 cruiser having final shot against a super fleet, and formed 1000 to defend their home station on the eve of defeat. TEST drove fleet after fleet of battleships into dreadnoughts in 6VDT, reshipping three, four, five times in the night and made gaming history. WALLTREIPERS held out in a one single system while massively outnumbered, dropping supers on SBUs right under everyone's nose. All those stories they can take away and will last forever because they realised it was only a game they were playing.

The only thing Imperium will be remembered for is being basic bitches who gave up and ran away, or were too scurred over their imaginary pixels to even take part in the first place.
Hawke Frost
#467 - 2016-04-19 15:52:24 UTC
micdrop.jpg
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#468 - 2016-04-19 16:06:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucas Kell
Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
Marginally more players. MBC fleet numbers peaked at ~3000. The Imperium was 40k strong at the start so for matching numbers of 3000 would require of 7.5% participation across the coalition. That's it. An entirely achievable number considering it was a fight in your home space for the survival of that space.
Not when you consider how many of the Imperium numbers are alts. Remember that holding sov now requires mandatory ratting and mining, meaning that numbers are bulked up by our non-combat alts so we can achieve that in a reasonable time frame. Then there's all the cyno alts needed for travelling about. Not to mention that some of the alliances don't do purges, such as goonswarm meaning their numbers are inflated with inactives. MBC on the other hand grew primarily from active players as its people jumping in specifically to go to war, so to expect a smaller coalition of inactives and alts to stand a chance against a large PvP driven coalition with infinite funding is pretty silly.

Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
Supers have negligible use in Fozziesov and as for warchests, where has 6-7 years of ratting taxes, rental income, r64, technetium bubble, FW exploit and market manipulations ISK gone?
Supers still help decide the larger battles. Imperium warchests are vast but not infinite, and can be destroyed. Up against effectively infinite funding coming from a third party application that can't be affected in-game, there's no chance. A war of that size would come down to funding and infinite funding beats out finite funding any day of the week.

Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
BRAVE knew they weren't going to win the war but they still killed Hurley's titan, won a station with a t1 cruiser having final shot against a super fleet, and formed 1000 to defend their home station on the eve of defeat. TEST drove fleet after fleet of battleships into dreadnoughts in 6VDT, reshipping three, four, five times in the night and made gaming history. WALLTREIPERS held out in a one single system while massively outnumbered, dropping supers on SBUs right under everyone's nose. All those stories they can take away and will last forever because they realised it was only a game they were playing.
Sure, and in all of those cases there came a time when they had to call it a day rather than continuing to throw everything at it. That time just came earlier for the Imperium due to the damage done by CO2 leaving and handing out information of active super builds. Even without counting the builds in progress and restricting fleets, the Imperium has lost several trillion isk. I know you want them to run headlong into a meat grinder, but they'd be stupid to do so. It's pretty amusing that you think they are playing wrong because they aren't willing to take everything they've built up in years of playing this game and throw it in the bin over some e-honor bullshit. Doubly so when you consider most of MBC is only doing it because they are being funded while for years they've been unwilling to throw up this war with their own isk.

Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
The only thing Imperium will be remembered for is being basic bitches who gave up and ran away, or were too scurred over their imaginary pixels to even take part in the first place.
Seriously doubt that.

Hawke Frost wrote:

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#469 - 2016-04-19 16:09:44 UTC
Seven Koskanaiken wrote:


Marginally more players. MBC fleet numbers peaked at ~3000. The Imperium was 40k strong at the start so for matching numbers of 3000 would require of 7.5% participation across the coalition. That's it. An entirely achievable number considering it was a fight in your home space for the survival of that space.

So for years goons et al sit around telling everybody they are not in EVE for small gang and skirmishes but for the huge narrative driven wars, and here one is, on their doorstep, and.....they can't be bothered to log in for it.

Supers have negligible use in Fozziesov and as for warchests, where has 6-7 years of ratting taxes, rental income, r64, technetium bubble, FW exploit and market manipulations ISK gone?

BRAVE knew they weren't going to win the war but they still killed Hurley's titan, won a station with a t1 cruiser having final shot against a super fleet, and formed 1000 to defend their home station on the eve of defeat. TEST drove fleet after fleet of battleships into dreadnoughts in 6VDT, reshipping three, four, five times in the night and made gaming history. WALLTREIPERS held out in a one single system while massively outnumbered, dropping supers on SBUs right under everyone's nose. All those stories they can take away and will last forever because they realised it was only a game they were playing.

The only thing Imperium will be remembered for is being basic bitches who gave up and ran away, or were too scurred over their imaginary pixels to even take part in the first place.



Perfect. +1
Pandora Carrollon
Provi Rapid Response
#470 - 2016-04-19 16:40:13 UTC
ADD THIS:

Lucas Kell wrote:
But it's not they cant be sure of a win, they can be sure of a loss if engaging in direct combat. (excuse removed) As much as you may think it's just the leadership, rank and file goons don't want to lose all their SRP and their own assets fighting a futile war either.


TO THIS:

Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
All those stories they can take away and will last forever because they realised it was only a game they were playing.


And you pretty much have a summed up version of why the Goons behaved like they did.

As to it being a game, yes, it is, however people are pretty risk averse. We discussed this in a different thread. Even the gung ho PvP ship to ship folks don't really like a fair fight. They also don't really want to risk it all because 'all' represents history in the game for them. However, EVE Rule #1, don't fly what you can't afford. By extension, don't join corps or alliances that you aren't ready to lose it all with if you join them all the way. Also, you can't actually lose everything, your SP's don't go away (well, you can lose some flying a T3 ship).

You could be a 30 mill + SP toon, lose everything you have and still end up with a FREE rookie ship and go have fun with it and rebuild your empire from scratch.

I strongly suggest you not keep all your eggs in one basket. Have an alt in an NPC corp acting as your rainy day fund, with ISK and ships and all kinds of backup stuff. If your main boat goes down with your corp buddies and your alliance, your alt comes over in the dinghy, picks you up, and gets you back on your feet in a heartbeat. All the while, your main looks awesome for going down and losing a bunch with everyone else.

It also lets you go 100% at your foes. They have no idea about your rainy day fund. You can hit them full tilt and know you have a parachute.
Seven Koskanaiken
Shadow Legions.
Insidious.
#471 - 2016-04-19 16:56:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Seven Koskanaiken
Those would all be good points, if the Imperium were the innocent victim minding its own business and suddenly found itself being invaded. and had to survive.

Except, it was the Imperium itself who claimed they were going to make everyone "bend the knee and enjoy the benefits of The Imperium, or be evicted and replaced with someone who will" and, on top of viceroying the whole of nullsec, somehow thought they would make incursion into lowsec to take their moons as well just for laughs. So effectively they were planning to take on all that makes up the MBC today.

Obviously, at that time, they didn't consider themselves a coalition of "inactives or alts" or otherwise they would never have tried such a thing.

Never in the history of this game have I seen the self-perception of a group, the delusions of grandeur, and the nonstop chest beating just soooooooooo far removed from the actual reality of things.
Prt Scr
569th Freelancers
#472 - 2016-04-19 17:05:29 UTC
A reddit copy and paste


i just realized that there will be an epic culling of goon cap ships over time after the new game upgrade. All the ships offline will need refitting and rearming when they actually log into the game, those in stations will be ok if the market is not deliberately unseeded, but all the supers are basically going to be screwed (even more then they already are )

uɐıssnɹ pɐǝɹ ʇ,uɐɔ ı ʇnq ʎɹɹos ɯ,ı

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#473 - 2016-04-19 17:14:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucas Kell
Pandora Carrollon wrote:
Also, you can't actually lose everything, your SP's don't go away (well, you can lose some flying a T3 ship).

You could be a 30 mill + SP toon, lose everything you have and still end up with a FREE rookie ship and go have fun with it and rebuild your empire from scratch.
Not being funny mate, but not many people in EVE that have managed to build up to anything of value would be up for building it all from scratch again. Most people will simply do what most people have done, opt to either join the winning side of the war or out of it completely. It's a sandbox, we build it up the way we want to play it and most people will protect that over some vague notion of e-honour.

Pandora Carrollon wrote:
I strongly suggest you not keep all your eggs in one basket. Have an alt in an NPC corp acting as your rainy day fund, with ISK and ships and all kinds of backup stuff. If your main boat goes down with your corp buddies and your alliance, your alt comes over in the dinghy, picks you up, and gets you back on your feet in a heartbeat. All the while, your main looks awesome for going down and losing a bunch with everyone else.

It also lets you go 100% at your foes. They have no idea about your rainy day fund. You can hit them full tilt and know you have a parachute.
But by having a rainy day fund, you aren't going 100% at your foes. And if you are going to cut your losses before you lose everything, why not cut them as soon as you know you can't win?

Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
Those would all be good points, if the Imperium were the innocent victim minding its own business and suddenly found itself being invaded. and had to survive.

Except, it was the Imperium itself who claimed they were going to make everyone "bend the knee and enjoy the benefits of The Imperium, or be evicted and replaced with someone who will" and, on top of viceroying the whole of nullsec, somehow thought they would make incursion into lowsec to take their moons as well just for laughs. So effectively they were planning to take on all that makes up the MBC today.

Obviously, at that time, they didn't consider themselves a coalition of "inactives or alts" or otherwise they would never have tried such a thing.

Never in the history of this game have I seen the self-perception of a group, the delusions of grandeur, and the nonstop chest beating just soooooooooo far removed from the actual reality of things.
Lol, they are good points regardless of the various motivations for the war. You are saying that they are playing wrong because they aren't throwing themselves onto your swords and feeding you easy kills, and that they are obligated to do so because they chose to start a fight in the first place? So they picked a war with some groups, loads of other groups (including one of the Imperium alliances) and an infinitely rich funder join in leaving them no chance of success, but because thy started it they are wrong for protecting themselves and should instead be willing participants in their own slaughter just to provide you with content?

Ed: Let's put this another way. You keep saying "it's just a game" and you're right, so since games are designed for entertainment, what entertainment value is there in throwing ISK away on a sure loss? And why do your own fleets disengage when they meet overwhelming numbers since welping fleets is supposedly so fun?

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Seven Koskanaiken
Shadow Legions.
Insidious.
#474 - 2016-04-19 17:36:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Seven Koskanaiken
Lucas Kell wrote:
Let's put this another way. You keep saying "it's just a game" and you're right, so since games are designed for entertainment, what entertainment value is there in throwing ISK away on a sure loss? And why do your own fleets disengage when they meet overwhelming numbers since welping fleets is supposedly so fun?


You keep saying "sure loss", I guess if you've already talked yourself into it, then it becomes true.

FYI: every Deklein timer I have entosed has been in a half fit sabre. I actually think "I'm a sitting duck here, if anyone bothers to come I'm pretty much dead".

Last night Ya0 passively regen'd back to secure because literally no one bothered to show at all.

These would be "sure wins", if anyone cared enough to try, except they don't.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#475 - 2016-04-19 17:56:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucas Kell
Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
You keep saying "sure loss", I guess if you've already talked yourself into it, then it becomes true.
It's true because it's what have been evidenced to happen and things have only got more in favour on MBC since then P You can't honestly suggest that the Imperium stands even a remote chance in all out combat in this war. Then even if they manage to break even, they are paying out of a finite wallet with diminishing sources of income while your pockets are infinite and untouchable. The common sense approach is to let you dudes do what you're doing then look at rebuilding when they're in a less precarious position.

Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
FYI: every Deklein timer I have entosed has been in a half fit sabre. I actually think "I'm a sitting duck here, if anyone bothers to come I'm pretty much dead".
Well yeah, everyone takes out cheap throwaway ships to sling on a node. I'd pretty much hit orbit then go play PS4. That you undoubtedly get SRP for it makes it even less of an issue.

Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
Last night Ya0 passively regen'd back to secure because literally no one bothered to show at all.

These would be "sure wins", if anyone cared enough to try, except they don't.
No they wouldn't, the moment an Imperium fleet shows up to do anything about it, everyone would dogpile into the system and obliterate them. This is what has happened every time they've put up a defense fleet this war, which is why I don't understand why you're so shocked and appalled that they've stopped doing that.

Ed: At the end of the day you've done well, you guys have set up a war you are sure to win and should be justifiably proud. But don't be surprised if the enemy chooses not to willingly feed you kills.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#476 - 2016-04-19 19:21:17 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
You keep saying "sure loss", I guess if you've already talked yourself into it, then it becomes true.
It's true because it's what have been evidenced to happen and things have only got more in favour on MBC since then P You can't honestly suggest that the Imperium stands even a remote chance in all out combat in this war. Then even if they manage to break even, they are paying out of a finite wallet with diminishing sources of income while your pockets are infinite and untouchable. The common sense approach is to let you dudes do what you're doing then look at rebuilding when they're in a less precarious position.

Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
FYI: every Deklein timer I have entosed has been in a half fit sabre. I actually think "I'm a sitting duck here, if anyone bothers to come I'm pretty much dead".
Well yeah, everyone takes out cheap throwaway ships to sling on a node. I'd pretty much hit orbit then go play PS4. That you undoubtedly get SRP for it makes it even less of an issue.

Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
Last night Ya0 passively regen'd back to secure because literally no one bothered to show at all.

These would be "sure wins", if anyone cared enough to try, except they don't.
No they wouldn't, the moment an Imperium fleet shows up to do anything about it, everyone would dogpile into the system and obliterate them. This is what has happened every time they've put up a defense fleet this war, which is why I don't understand why you're so shocked and appalled that they've stopped doing that.

Ed: At the end of the day you've done well, you guys have set up a war you are sure to win and should be justifiably proud. But don't be surprised if the enemy chooses not to willingly feed you kills.



Do you know what you sound like right now?

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#477 - 2016-04-19 20:07:56 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
You can't honestly suggest that the Imperium stands even a remote chance in all out combat in this war.


That's not what I heard in this thread. In fact, please allow me to quote some highlights:

Lucas Kell wrote:

This is no different, people shouldn't have to sit around defending timers every day for people who commit nothing to setting them up and have no interest in actually contesing sov.

...

"but they do provide fights and contents so it suits that need as well"
Hardly, there's small scraps between tiny ships from time to time but most of the fights are happening either in the same way the used to from grudges like MoA vs Imperium or over moons.

...

Nat, would you not agree that anyone too lazy and incompetent to defend their space would lose their space? And that's not happening, so obviously laziness and incompetence is not the problem. Oh, look out, your obvious bias is showing.

...

According to you we aren't defending our space, therefore if the people attacking it were actually committed to taking it from us we would not have it. And yes, what we are seeing is just an entosis troll brigade, which is why the timers are only being taken if completely uncontested. Just because there's people reddit posting like their lives depended on it doesn't mean anything's actually being committed.

...

We obviously can handle it, that doesn't make it fun to do, but then it's fairly obvious you have no interest in the actual game mechanics being entertaining - probably because you're too busy RMTing to consider the entertainment value of games.

...

But the negative effect isn't coming from the mechanic, they aren't taking sov, the negative effect is coming from the fact that the game is terrible. I'd have absolutely no problem if we were to simply lose all of our space because someone is capable of taking it, but sitting through incredibly boring and badly designed mechanics just makes me wonder what CCP did with their game designers.

...

As for shark infested, it would be better if that were the case as they would be less likely to run away when people show up for fights. We have basically no chance of losing sov, since whether someone with isk was pissed off or not, to take sov the attacker have to see the timers through. They don't which is basically the whole problem. Attackers spend nothing half contesting the sov then running away. They don't actually want sov since they are just fighting for the e-honor of a guaranteed RMTer anyway, so they don't have to commit to the fight. Defenders on the other had have to commit every time

...

But we already don't struggle, hence us not losing our space. The problem once again is that the act of doing so is boring, meaning the best way to deal with sov is to simply not hold it. I'm really not sure what it is about basic English you are failing to grasp.

...

But they can't actually attack, they can just annoy. If they want to take and hold sov they still have to fight the same numbers.

...

It's been said multiple times over, but the fact hat we are still holding our space against a significantly larger number of enemies shows that we aren't overextended, but that still doesn't mean the mechanics we're all forced to deal with don't suck.

...

Your definition of "on fire" differs from the normal definition.

...

Cry more. The only reason our leadership has pissed people off is because they've managed to accomplish something you guys would have no hope of. The fact that you guys are so delusional that you are acting like you've already won makes it all the more amusing.

...

Stop being terrible.

...

If we were overextended we wouldn't be able to defend against even a balanced attack, which clearly we were able to do. It's pretty simple to understand, if you have 1000 people in a single system and a 2000 man fleet flies in and roflstomps you, you didn't lose because you were overextended.

...

I'd say it's a bit early to be calling it losing. Most of BoB did their abandoning of sov before they started because they knew what was coming up. We're dealing with the war from fresh and with the whole CO2 thing so we're taking a bit of a hit but I have no doubt that once we find our footing we'll hammer our way though and BoB will realise how shockingly overconfident they are being.

...

I don't think you know what crying is. Those are simply the facts, but by all means point out what parts of my post are dishonest. Or is constructive conversation beyond your reach?


Your use of the terms "honest" and "dishonest" confuses me. Nobody thought it was going to be easy, and You of all people were quite smug about the whole invasion thing being but a nuissance. We actually believed you DID stand a chance, with ADMs sky high and practically even funding and numbers - one side organized, well-stocked and equipped with jump bridge infrastructure whereas the other nothing but a rag-tag band of rascals deploying from anywhere between Alaska and Nebraska.

If only you'd fought.
Trudeaux Margaret
University of Caille
#478 - 2016-04-19 20:16:21 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
Last night Ya0 passively regen'd back to secure because literally no one bothered to show at all.

These would be "sure wins", if anyone cared enough to try, except they don't.
No they wouldn't, the moment an Imperium fleet shows up to do anything about it, everyone would dogpile into the system and obliterate them. This is what has happened every time they've put up a defense fleet this war, which is why I don't understand why you're so shocked and appalled that they've stopped doing that.


DBRB taking out a few "sword fleets" on his Twitch stream hardly counts as seriously trying to defend, Lucas.

> anyone willing to give me like a 5 min politics crash course?

> grr goons, lowsec is full of elitist sh*s, all roads lead to the bittervet pl

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#479 - 2016-04-19 21:12:55 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Do you know what you sound like right now?
An EVE player?

Brokk Witgenstein wrote:
That's not what I heard in this thread. In fact, please allow me to quote some highlights:
All that shows is that times change. Early on in the war the opinions were different but as it became rapidly apparent that it was a completely futile attempt the stance changed. Are you seriously suggesting because early on I had faith in our ability to push through that my opinion is never allowed to change no matter what the circumstance?

Trudeaux Margaret wrote:
DBRB taking out a few "sword fleets" on his Twitch stream hardly counts as seriously trying to defend, Lucas.
And those aren't the only fleets that went out. That may be the case now because there's no point in sending out anything else.

Noone sane throws away ships into a fight they can't possible win and can't even draw. There's simply no point in the Imperium fielding fleets at this point. That you guys seem to think that preserving their ships is against whatever e-honour bullshit you've made up is irrelevant.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Mithandra
B.O.P Supplication For Glorious
Dracarys.
#480 - 2016-04-19 21:49:23 UTC
Win lose draw, its content

Eve is the dark haired, totally hot emo gothchild of the gaming community