These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What we grrrrgoons going to do?

First post
Author
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#321 - 2016-04-13 07:39:45 UTC
Khergit Deserters wrote:
I have to give The Mittani his due, he does come up with some great b.s. humor. Not "World War Bee, the "Casino War."
I think that one was Nosy actually.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Jacques d'Orleans
#322 - 2016-04-13 12:37:54 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Khergit Deserters wrote:
I have to give The Mittani his due, he does come up with some great b.s. humor. Not "World War Bee, the "Casino War."
I think that one was Nosy actually.


Yes, you're right, it was Nosy who came up with Casino War.
Tbh, Casino War sounds way better than Mittens "War of Sovless aggression".
Neuntausend
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#323 - 2016-04-13 13:19:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Neuntausend
Only that SMA is out, and the "Casino" stated that they only paid mercs against SMA. Will it still be a Casino War?

What will likely be true throughout the whole war is, that the aggressor for the most part doesn't give a **** about sov.
Geronimo McVain
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#324 - 2016-04-13 13:31:55 UTC
Neuntausend wrote:
Only that SMA is out, and the "Casino" stated that they only paid mercs against SMA. Will it still be a Casino War?

What will likely be true throughout the whole war is, that the aggressor for the most part doesn't give a **** about sov.

Who fights for the hide while the bear is still alive?

Starrakatt
Empire Assault Corp
Dead Terrorists
#325 - 2016-04-13 14:00:50 UTC
Neuntausend wrote:
Only that SMA is out, and the "Casino" stated that they only paid mercs against SMA. Will it still be a Casino War?

Yes.

IWI stated that it is now paying for total war against the Goons, courtesy of Mittens trying to get an angle on IWI out of game.

You can read the article here.
Il Reverendo
Forty Two
#326 - 2016-04-13 14:07:39 UTC
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Khergit Deserters wrote:
I have to give The Mittani his due, he does come up with some great b.s. humor. Not "World War Bee, the "Casino War."
I think that one was Nosy actually.


Yes, you're right, it was Nosy who came up with Casino War.
Tbh, Casino War sounds way better than Mittens "War of Sovless aggression".


I think 'War of aggressionless sov' is far more appropriate considering mbc is taking and defending sov and those bee guys rolled over into inties (or just plain left - the space and/or the coalition) and gave up just as things actually began in earnest.

But really we all know it's World War Bee.

(incidentally far fewer people are being paid than the kool-aid would lead you to believe and most of the actually important factions doing the heavy lifting are doing it for their own very obvious reasons that really have nothing to do with isk whether they receive any tiny drops in their respective oceans or not)
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#327 - 2016-04-13 14:09:59 UTC
Starrakatt wrote:
Neuntausend wrote:
Only that SMA is out, and the "Casino" stated that they only paid mercs against SMA. Will it still be a Casino War?

Yes.

IWI stated that it is now paying for total war against the Goons, courtesy of Mittens trying to get an angle on IWI out of game.

You can read the article here.

Yea... That was funny writeup:
- we are out of game organization (IWI)
- they (Mittany) cannot attack us in game
- we (IWI) can attack them in the game
- they (Mittani) used out of game means to fight us!
= Shocked

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Il Reverendo
Forty Two
#328 - 2016-04-13 14:40:59 UTC
March rabbit wrote:

- they (Mittani) used out of game means to fight us!
= Shocked


Which would be what exactly?


Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#329 - 2016-04-13 16:27:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Herzog Wolfhammer
Starrakatt wrote:
Neuntausend wrote:
Only that SMA is out, and the "Casino" stated that they only paid mercs against SMA. Will it still be a Casino War?

Yes.

IWI stated that it is now paying for total war against the Goons, courtesy of Mittens trying to get an angle on IWI out of game.

You can read the article here.



And this is why MBC fights (as the saying goes).

Salt indeed.... Seeing goons deploy SJW-like tactics lends a certain sperging element to all this that makes me wonder if this is a going to become a meta-demographic war. What "kind of people" are these goons? We'll find out. I don't expect the results to be the kind that raises faith in humanity.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#330 - 2016-04-13 17:56:03 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Starrakatt wrote:
Neuntausend wrote:
Only that SMA is out, and the "Casino" stated that they only paid mercs against SMA. Will it still be a Casino War?

Yes.

IWI stated that it is now paying for total war against the Goons, courtesy of Mittens trying to get an angle on IWI out of game.

You can read the article here.



And this is why MBC fights (as the saying goes).

Salt indeed.... Seeing goons deploy SJW-like tactics lends a certain sperging element to all this that makes me wonder if this is a going to become a meta-demographic war. What "kind of people" are these goons? We'll find out. I don't expect the results to be the kind that raises faith in humanity.


Case in point: https://twitter.com/TheMittani/status/720287584144887812

I was meh when told I'd be leaving my ratting space to go invade the north. Now every night at work I can't wait to get home to shoot at space bees lol.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#331 - 2016-04-13 18:28:00 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Starrakatt wrote:
Neuntausend wrote:
Only that SMA is out, and the "Casino" stated that they only paid mercs against SMA. Will it still be a Casino War?

Yes.

IWI stated that it is now paying for total war against the Goons, courtesy of Mittens trying to get an angle on IWI out of game.

You can read the article here.



And this is why MBC fights (as the saying goes).

Salt indeed.... Seeing goons deploy SJW-like tactics lends a certain sperging element to all this that makes me wonder if this is a going to become a meta-demographic war. What "kind of people" are these goons? We'll find out. I don't expect the results to be the kind that raises faith in humanity.


Case in point: https://twitter.com/TheMittani/status/720287584144887812

I was meh when told I'd be leaving my ratting space to go invade the north. Now every night at work I can't wait to get home to shoot at space bees lol.



Some funny replies to that tweet though. "Flustered Cucks Coalition". LOL.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Chewytowel Haklar
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#332 - 2016-04-13 19:16:08 UTC
This is the end, I have foreseen it in a vision.
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#333 - 2016-04-13 19:42:07 UTC
welp can't argue with a bona fide prophecy rip imperium

unless the prophecy has been misinterpreted... or has it? the twist is at the start of act iii probably
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#334 - 2016-04-13 20:36:23 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
Starrakatt wrote:
Neuntausend wrote:
Only that SMA is out, and the "Casino" stated that they only paid mercs against SMA. Will it still be a Casino War?

Yes.

IWI stated that it is now paying for total war against the Goons, courtesy of Mittens trying to get an angle on IWI out of game.

You can read the article here.

Yea... That was funny writeup:
- we are out of game organization (IWI)
- they (Mittany) cannot attack us in game
- we (IWI) can attack them in the game
- they (Mittani) used out of game means to fight us!
= Shocked
TBH, if there ever were a concrete argument for why sites like IWI simply shouldn't be allowed (beside allowing untraceable RMT), he's given it right there. They are an out of game entity that can't be touched in the game but can use their out of game isk generation methods to attack in game players. Botting is banned because it supports RMT and conveys an unfair advantage to users, so why would this not be exactly the same?

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#335 - 2016-04-13 21:15:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Zappity
Lucas Kell wrote:
March rabbit wrote:

Yea... That was funny writeup:
- we are out of game organization (IWI)
- they (Mittany) cannot attack us in game
- we (IWI) can attack them in the game
- they (Mittani) used out of game means to fight us!
= Shocked
TBH, if there ever were a concrete argument for why sites like IWI simply shouldn't be allowed (beside allowing untraceable RMT), he's given it right there. They are an out of game entity that can't be touched in the game but can use their out of game isk generation methods to attack in game players. Botting is banned because it supports RMT and conveys an unfair advantage to users, so why would this not be exactly the same?

I have a lot of sympathy with this position. It must be immensely frustrating to face an enemy that you cannot actually attack in game. It is funny at the moment because it is goons but honestly, the position it leaves us all in is an unhealthy one.

But to address it you would really have to severely curtail gambling in EVE and CCP is demonstrably unwilling to do so.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#336 - 2016-04-13 21:19:39 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Starrakatt wrote:
Neuntausend wrote:
Only that SMA is out, and the "Casino" stated that they only paid mercs against SMA. Will it still be a Casino War?

Yes.

IWI stated that it is now paying for total war against the Goons, courtesy of Mittens trying to get an angle on IWI out of game.

You can read the article here.



And this is why MBC fights (as the saying goes).

Salt indeed.... Seeing goons deploy SJW-like tactics lends a certain sperging element to all this that makes me wonder if this is a going to become a meta-demographic war. What "kind of people" are these goons? We'll find out. I don't expect the results to be the kind that raises faith in humanity.


Case in point: https://twitter.com/TheMittani/status/720287584144887812

I was meh when told I'd be leaving my ratting space to go invade the north. Now every night at work I can't wait to get home to shoot at space bees lol.

Exactly. Everything he has said over the last couple of weeks has just strengthened the resolve of his opponents. At first the MBC seemed (broadly speaking) to be content with purging the north. Now I wouldn't be surprised to see ongoing persecution in lowsec, or wherever goons choose to go next.

I understand that it was all meant for his own audience. But the lack of action to back up the extraordinary rhetoric just sounds increasingly hollow. At this point, his "hellwar" would merely equal continued feeding on the Saranen undock.

They should have defended the buffer regions. I think they were (again) playing the meta game in terms of wanting to attrition to result in incorporation of their allies' stronger corps into GSF. But it got out of hand and they now have no way of stopping the momentum.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Pandora Carrollon
Provi Rapid Response
#337 - 2016-04-13 23:17:46 UTC
Zappity wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
March rabbit wrote:

Yea... That was funny writeup:
- we are out of game organization (IWI)
- they (Mittany) cannot attack us in game
- we (IWI) can attack them in the game
- they (Mittani) used out of game means to fight us!
= Shocked
TBH, if there ever were a concrete argument for why sites like IWI simply shouldn't be allowed (beside allowing untraceable RMT), he's given it right there. They are an out of game entity that can't be touched in the game but can use their out of game isk generation methods to attack in game players. Botting is banned because it supports RMT and conveys an unfair advantage to users, so why would this not be exactly the same?

I have a lot of sympathy with this position. It mus be immensely frustrating to face an enemy that you cannot actually attack in game. It is funny at the moment because it is goons but honestly, the position it leaves us all in is an unhealthy one.

But to address it you would really have to severely curtail gambling in EVE and CCP is demonstrably unwilling to do so.


There is ALWAYS an avenue to attack. A function running outside of the game would be starved by cutting off it's in-game funds. What 'The Mittani' was trying to do was trying to rules lawyer an attack up but it seems to have fallen flat with CCP. So, now 'The Mittani' is trying to bad mouth and bad PR the IWI out of their ISK stream. The issue I see is that he has an unpopularity problem. If the IWI CEO is not making up that their constant stream of players have doubled, the I think 'The Mittani' has an even bigger unpopularity problem on his hands than many have speculated.

I'll make a small change and see how the same conditions might play out.

A vastly popular player who runs a massive alliance,
is selfless,
is always helping everyone become better at the game,
constantly improving the game even at the cost of his own accomplishments not being noticed,
elevates his corporation mates/alliance member corps,
mitgates with fairness all the squabbles and problems that arise,
surrounds himself with people that do the same,
is essentially beloved by all... has a on-line bank declare war on his alliance.

He graciously accepts the war, and since he's kept his forces trained, sharp and ready to go, even outnumbered they are a tough fight.

Now, the attackers would be seen as trying to dig into an alliance that was well respected for only (as the IWI CEO put it 'the fun of it') they likely would be in it for as long as the fun was actually fun. But if serious gains were made against the popular alliance and that alliance kept up the good fight, eventually EVE public opinion would turn and say "Okay, fun is fun, content is content but this has about run its course." and that probably would suck the life out of the attack. The bank and the Alliance leader would smoke the peace pipe, laugh over it, hand out some awards for stellar performances, and peace breaks out.

In essence, as the IWI CEO somewhat pointed out, if 'The Mittani' had been well liked in EVE or even stayed within the game, the attack would've been dead by now because even the IWI CEO wouldn't want to spend more ISK on it and EVE would've gone back to normal. Instead it seems to have gotten personal, which is easy to happen, but it probably will drag this war out. By doing what he did, 'The Mittani', actually opened up a second front for the war. That rarely works out well unless you have an extreme upper hand or fanatically loyal followers....

The reason a bank isn't really a problem as an agressor is that they don't have any real assets other than to hire mercs as agressors. It's why you can't attack them, but it's also their Achilles Heel. They are a non-entity. If nobody played their 'out of game...game' or opted to work for them, they are nothing. The MBC could fall apart tomorrow even if the ISK stream was strong. The only galvanizing force for the MBC here seems to be a genuine dislike of a single person.

I'm not saying it's founded or unfounded, I'm just stating what I'm seeing going on here. My guess would be if 'The Mittani' acted differently and made up for whatever his percieved failures were, or left the game... the war would peter out to nothing in the matter of a couple of weeks.

Just a guess though.

P.S. Using 'quotes' on 'The Mittani' to allow for all of the various perceptions of him and the moniker to be appropriate. He's appears to have a multi-operable entitiy on the term and I don't want to offend any of the possible ways to use his entity-ness.
Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
#338 - 2016-04-14 00:22:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Khergit Deserters
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Starrakatt wrote:
Neuntausend wrote:
Only that SMA is out, and the "Casino" stated that they only paid mercs against SMA. Will it still be a Casino War?

Yes.

IWI stated that it is now paying for total war against the Goons, courtesy of Mittens trying to get an angle on IWI out of game.

You can read the article here.



And this is why MBC fights (as the saying goes).

Salt indeed.... Seeing goons deploy SJW-like tactics lends a certain sperging element to all this that makes me wonder if this is a going to become a meta-demographic war. What "kind of people" are these goons? We'll find out. I don't expect the results to be the kind that raises faith in humanity.

True that. The illegal in Florida gambling article was pretty desperate. The I'm a Just a Regular Ingame Gamer Fellow Having a Go at Some Fun rebuttal was about as credible. (::Aside:: Had an EVEmail dialogue with IWI when they were building up, not trillionaires yet. Asked if wanted to donate anything at all for a winners of a community event. Shite, it was like haggling with a fishwife about what they were going to get out of it, where are your stats about publicity/number of hits, blah blah. Meh, was just for fun, throw something into the Salvation Army bin or don't. Gave up, never invited again).

Anyway, as was printed on an old Talking Heads t-shirt (with pictures of Benito, Francisco, Josef, Idi, etc., "Who's your favorite dictator?"
Pryce Caesar
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#339 - 2016-04-14 01:31:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Pryce Caesar
I left EVE for the time being because I am busy with exams. Now it seems like MBC may burn down Goonswarm before I'm done exams on the 19th (and before EVEFest).

Which makes me wonder how exactly things will unfold at the EVE Fanfest. A lot of people will be there, and I'd bet dollars to diamonds that The Mittani will be there as well to try to promote himself or something else. If things turn out worse than they did at Fanfest 2012 (that event is immortalized on Cracked.com), he might wind up getting himself ejected from EVE altogether.

One way ticket back to reality. No call backs. No re-funds. No chance to create a new character (possibly). The name "The Mittani" will be inflicted with "Damnatio Memoriae".

No one will even know his name.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#340 - 2016-04-14 01:35:01 UTC
My prediction (got my Great Karnak on):

Goons will be routed to Saranen, their alliances broken apart, their dear leader screaming from his bunker like a certain Adolph fellow (cue future Downfall meme video) at goon FCs who will be more busy moving their stuff to safety than leading doomed fleets, while in these forums "Bagdad Bob" style talking points about all going well and how the alliance is doomed will continues until people start posting killmails so fast the ISD has a heart attack. And then the goons will be farmed until such time occurs that everybody gets bored with them and becomes busy with Fozzie SOV.

All those massive ranks of goons, sold on going to nullsec to farm (sold by the same goons that pointed at highsec and projected their hatred of having to sell carebearing on "highsec carebears") will be absorbed by other organizations if they even stay in the game. Or they will stay dormant.


Rainbows and frikkin' unicorns....

But the goons will be down and not out. Going with their roots of "ruining YOUR game", expect to see them in highsec a lot, ruining that game in particular. Expect to see the return of Hulkageddon, more "Burn Amarr/Jita" (which will be routed to Niarja and Uedama by anti-gankers but they won't admit it they'll just say they wanted to) and more highsec "Aggro fu" tactics seeking to turn the sandbox into a litterbox all out of spite. The best at this will rise up, create blogs pointing at laughing at some hapless noob who showed "tears" from time to time, and all that. It will be called "content", said in the same sneering tone used by Smaug whenever referring to, well, anything nice.


Maybe we'll see some feats from the past, like "1000 rifter fleets" and other stuff of legend? You see goons were not always like this. I was told once, by a well known goon, that goons "sold out to R64". That goons were once fun, the atmosphere and culture, the things they did. But no more. I have not seen that goon, who I love to drop bombs on in VFK on occasion, in a very long time.

If there is anybody left among the goons who remember the core spirit and concept of "goon", those who did not see what Mittens was turning their organization into long ago and left, they might reconsider their own leadership at this point.

If this game is still around in 10 years (and I suspect it will be) and noobs should ask me questions along the line of "who was this Mittani person?" I would best describe him as "the mouth that launched ten thousand spaceships".


Bring back DEEEEP Space!