These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What we grrrrgoons going to do?

First post
Author
Digits Kho
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#241 - 2016-04-08 17:02:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Digits Kho
Cos a bunch of low sec space barbarians and homeless space mercs, backed by some sort of generous space magnat, will SURELY destroy de gewn and chase dem gewns outa their space. Surely, right?
Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
#242 - 2016-04-08 17:07:19 UTC
Digits Kho wrote:
Cos a bunch of low sec space barbarians and homeless space mercs, backed by some sort of generous space magnat, will SURELY destroy de gewn and chase dem gewns outa their space. Surely, right?

You're a few weeks out of date...Goons HAVE been chased out of their space. The homeless ones living out of lowsec are now SMA/RZR/TNT/INIT/LAWN...

but what would I know, I'm just a salvager

Aiwha
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#243 - 2016-04-08 17:17:40 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Aineko Macx wrote:
You misunderstood. Even if CFC (or what is left of it) win the war, they will never hold as much space again as they did at their peak.
We never would have anyway, since we already downsized for fozziesov. Take 5 minutes of your life to stop reading reddit propaganda and look these things up for yourself and you'll see what already threw away loads of space to compact down our borders. I imagine if we win the war, our characters:system ratio will return to roughly what it was pre-war, we'll just have a better idea of what space will be scrapped in the event of a large scale war.

Aineko Macx wrote:
If the CFC lose the war and move to low sec, the CFC also dies, because goons weaker, dependent buffer alliances will crumble without holding space to rat in. In the end probably only Goons and RZR survive to restart anew.
You overestimate how much those "dependent" alliances depend on the Imperium, and how important ratting is to be honest. Personally I don't rat so I'm now making more since we've been at war as I build and trade a lot of the goods both sides are using. Amusingly it seems that 1ronbank may have just made one of my alt corps stinkin rich for when I get home as well.

Aineko Macx wrote:
I agree that ad hoc coalitions might continue to form for aggression purposes, but the large static, defensive blocs like the old NC or CFC are a thing of the past because they are ineffective under the new mechanics.
Except they're not, just their methods of defense are different. If anything it's now more important to have more players for defense, as you have to keep ADMs up as well as fight the front lines. This is why I'm convinced you are playing a completely different game. Smaller alliances are dead the moment a larger alliance or coalition chooses to kill them. Their continued existence is at the whim of the larger alliances around them.




Pretty ironic speech coming from a CFC pilot. Back in the day, the CFC pretty much rolled over anybody they didn't like.

Sanity is fun leaving the body.

Aineko Macx
#244 - 2016-04-08 17:28:35 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
You overestimate how much those "dependent" alliances depend on the Imperium, and how important ratting is to be honest.

A reality check is in order.

Quote:
Aineko Macx wrote:
I agree that ad hoc coalitions might continue to form for aggression purposes, but the large static, defensive blocs like the old NC or CFC are a thing of the past because they are ineffective under the new mechanics.
Except they're not, just their methods of defense are different. If anything it's now more important to have more players for defense, as you have to keep ADMs up as well as fight the front lines.

It only becomes easier to defend if you have more people concentrated in the same space. This goes contrary to the entities desire to hold more space for more profit.
How would you explain the lack of support from most of your allies in the defense of your region?

Quote:
Smaller alliances are dead the moment a larger alliance or coalition chooses to kill them.

You mean evict. An alliance dies when it's members leave.

Quote:
Their continued existence is at the whim of the larger alliances around them.

You're describing SMAs relationship with the CFC.

Even if smaller entities can't hold sov for long the fact that sov is more fluid now is very positive and will provide heaps of content.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#245 - 2016-04-08 17:41:19 UTC
Aiwha wrote:
Pretty ironic speech coming from a CFC pilot. Back in the day, the CFC pretty much rolled over anybody they didn't like.
Not really seeing the irony. What I'm saying is that either we will continue rolling over anyone, or the new superpower will.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Prt Scr
569th Freelancers
#246 - 2016-04-08 17:41:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Prt Scr
Just to throw more wood on the fire, the CCP data dump of isk lost does not inclued POS losses, or the passive income from those POS.

uɐıssnɹ pɐǝɹ ʇ,uɐɔ ı ʇnq ʎɹɹos ɯ,ı

Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
#247 - 2016-04-08 17:43:26 UTC
Prt Scr wrote:
Just to throw more wood on the fire, the CCP data dump of isk lost does not inclued POS losses, or the passive income from those POS.

no baby titans?

Are ihubs (and upgrades) on there?

but what would I know, I'm just a salvager

Prt Scr
569th Freelancers
#248 - 2016-04-08 17:47:47 UTC
its only ships lost in space...and i think pods, but not 100% sure

uɐıssnɹ pɐǝɹ ʇ,uɐɔ ı ʇnq ʎɹɹos ɯ,ı

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#249 - 2016-04-08 17:48:07 UTC
Aineko Macx wrote:
A reality check is in order.
But you weren't talking about dependent on them to survive an assault from a large coalition, you were talking about general dependence. Outside of wartime or against alliances in our weight range we have very little reliance on the rest of the Imperium.

Aineko Macx wrote:
It only becomes easier to defend if you have more people concentrated in the same space. This goes contrary to the entities desire to hold more space for more profit.
Except it doesn't, it simply means you need more people too. No matter how few systems you cram your people into, a bigger, stronger alliance will steamroll you.

Aineko Macx wrote:
How would you explain the lack of support from most of your allies in the defense of your region?
Like I say, the amount of space able to be defended from light attacks at peace is higher than the amount while at full war. We can't actively defend that much space hit in that many places all at once, so compacting down while at war is a necessity. After the war expansion can continue.

Aineko Macx wrote:
You mean evict. An alliance dies when it's members leave.
Sure.

Aineko Macx wrote:
You're describing SMAs relationship with the CFC.

Even if smaller entities can't hold sov for long the fact that sov is more fluid now is very positive and will provide heaps of content.
Indeed I am. We've just chosen the route of being an active participant in our defense as a group and get the rewards of the same unlike a small unaffiliated alliance who gain no benefits from the larger group yet can still be crushed at any moment the larger group chooses.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Mario Putzo
#250 - 2016-04-08 17:49:56 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Aiwha wrote:
Pretty ironic speech coming from a CFC pilot. Back in the day, the CFC pretty much rolled over anybody they didn't like.
Not really seeing the irony. What I'm saying is that either we will continue rolling over anyone, or the new superpower will.


We are far removed from the days of a new super power. You don't honestly think guys like NC. or PL are going to remain part of a 50K sea of "soft" blues do you? Or the ~10K pilots made up by the 5 Low Sec groups forming Voltron? Horde won't be part of a new super power, they pick fights for PL to escalate too, same with Waffles.

TEST might make a home in the North perhaps with TRI being a neighbor and Blue, but the majority of these groups already have homes, or don't partake in NullSec.

Fact is MBC is an impossibility for long term "dominance".

CFC is the only fat group in the game that tries to be like old BoB and demand homage from smaller entities, the Russians are split like Bosheviks and Mensheviks, keeping each other in check...as they always have.

Certainly another group will become dominant at some point, but that is a turn around many wars away yet. After the CFC there is not a single entity with the allies or organizational structure to do it. Its going to take a couple years for any group to become the steamroller.

Then again, CFC was pretty much a paper tiger....really good at running over smaller alliances in their space...fractures into a glorious pile of leaks and malcontent the first time people start shitting on their door step...maybe the CFC wasn't as omnipotent as we all thought after all.


Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#251 - 2016-04-08 18:07:43 UTC
Mario Putzo wrote:
We are far removed from the days of a new super power. You don't honestly think guys like NC. or PL are going to remain part of a 50K sea of "soft" blues do you? Or the ~10K pilots made up by the 5 Low Sec groups forming Voltron? Horde won't be part of a new super power, they pick fights for PL to escalate too, same with Waffles.
I don't expect them to stay together, but I fully expect several limited engagement pacts to be made between them (the old gudfites deals), and standout groups like PL/PH to be 10-15k players (and they are pretty much there). I don't know why you think PH would suddenly not be blue with PL, and I certainly can't see many of these groups ever going to all out war against each other.

Mario Putzo wrote:
Certainly another group will become dominant at some point, but that is a turn around many wars away yet. After the CFC there is not a single entity with the allies or organizational structure to do it. Its going to take a couple years for any group to become the steamroller.
If there isn't another on then it will be the Imperium. This is what you don't seem to get. Even if Imperium lose the war (and we are a long way from that) the coalition will only be relocated, not destroyed, so the moment the BoB coalition breaks up they'll get attacked and be forced to reform.

See the problem is you seem to think that what has been accomplished so far is it, now you just need to go ping some timers and the Imperium is dead and you can all dance around in circles. It's just not that simple. I doubt you even have the longevity to see it through to the end.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
#252 - 2016-04-08 18:12:57 UTC
Not going to war and being blue are very different things.

Can you imagine if CFC alliances had just had NIP's with each other instead of having their safe ratting space? It's a completely alien concept for you.

but what would I know, I'm just a salvager

March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#253 - 2016-04-08 18:17:25 UTC
Mario Putzo wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Aiwha wrote:
Pretty ironic speech coming from a CFC pilot. Back in the day, the CFC pretty much rolled over anybody they didn't like.
Not really seeing the irony. What I'm saying is that either we will continue rolling over anyone, or the new superpower will.


We are far removed from the days of a new super power. You don't honestly think guys like NC. or PL are going to remain part of a 50K sea of "soft" blues do you? Or the ~10K pilots made up by the 5 Low Sec groups forming Voltron? Horde won't be part of a new super power, they pick fights for PL to escalate too, same with Waffles.


Usually every revolution on the Earth finishes this way: old 'democrats' taken over power forget their principles... People say: after killing the dragon you become new dragon.

Let's just wait and see. But in EveO we usually see peoples in nature....

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#254 - 2016-04-08 18:19:31 UTC
Mario Putzo wrote:
Then again, CFC was pretty much a paper tiger....really good at running over smaller alliances in their space...fractures into a glorious pile of leaks and malcontent the first time people start shitting on their door step...maybe the CFC wasn't as omnipotent as we all thought after all.


I don't know about the Imperium but the CFC would've trounced these fools weeks ago

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
#255 - 2016-04-08 18:22:24 UTC
Fair point. The cfc will be remembered as powerful, the imperium will be remembered for failed invasions of provi and lowsec and then the fastest collapse in history.

but what would I know, I'm just a salvager

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#256 - 2016-04-08 18:23:05 UTC
Eli Apol wrote:
Not going to war and being blue are very different things.

Can you imagine if CFC alliances had just had NIP's with each other instead of having their safe ratting space? It's a completely alien concept for you.
Except that's what we had with non-Imperium alliances and that's where all the complaints of the blue doughnut came from. When people said "blue doughnut" they didn't just mean "Imperium".

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Mario Putzo
#257 - 2016-04-08 18:34:31 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Mario Putzo wrote:
We are far removed from the days of a new super power. You don't honestly think guys like NC. or PL are going to remain part of a 50K sea of "soft" blues do you? Or the ~10K pilots made up by the 5 Low Sec groups forming Voltron? Horde won't be part of a new super power, they pick fights for PL to escalate too, same with Waffles.
I don't expect them to stay together, but I fully expect several limited engagement pacts to be made between them (the old gudfites deals), and standout groups like PL/PH to be 10-15k players (and they are pretty much there). I don't know why you think PH would suddenly not be blue with PL, and I certainly can't see many of these groups ever going to all out war against each other.


See the problem is you seem to think that what has been accomplished so far is it, now you just need to go ping some timers and the Imperium is dead and you can all dance around in circles. It's just not that simple. I doubt you even have the longevity to see it through to the end.


Whats wrong with having good fight deals? It literally has been successful in every location in the game that it is in effect. Russians have played that way since day 1, fight each other, but band together if someone tries to **** on us. What is wrong with that. Just because you might help your neighbor in a war, doesn't mean you can't fight them during "peace" time.

CFC lost this and being essentially cut out of the content (partly by their own policy, and rest of EVE essentially ignoring them) they have become fat, and incapable of filling fleets. GSF can only get 1% of its playerbase into a coalition Fleet? FCON and CO2 were both hovering around 10%. I assume Razor is at 100% contribution for their WH fleet since no one has seen them in 2 months...or TNT and EXE who combined can get 50 dudes.

I mean look at your own Alliance, when Content Ring was a thing, you guys were putting decent fleets out on your own, building members and numbers because there was **** to do, people to fight...you know the fun stuff people like to do. When CFC came to "help" and cleared out content ring, SMA started going sideways, and it became a game of make them break for ruining content ring...and of course the IWI thing on the back of that.

In regards to "seeing it through" it is through. The CFC is dead, now its all about fraggin Goons. You think that MBC cares what or where SMA goes, or FCON, its not about you guys, its called World War Bee for a reason. Mittens and Sion put a target on their backs, and now that their meatshields are scattered and beat up thats it. Ive watched 4 Space Empires die, your story is no different, your empire is dead...some groups might come out of it, but they won't be the same, and the coalition will never be the same. Its done. Beaten down. Over. Even if MBC left right now, for whatever reason. CFC will never be what it was before.
Aineko Macx
#258 - 2016-04-08 18:35:28 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Mario Putzo wrote:
Certainly another group will become dominant at some point, but that is a turn around many wars away yet. After the CFC there is not a single entity with the allies or organizational structure to do it. Its going to take a couple years for any group to become the steamroller.
If there isn't another on then it will be the Imperium. This is what you don't seem to get. Even if Imperium lose the war (and we are a long way from that) the coalition will only be relocated, not destroyed, so the moment the BoB coalition breaks up they'll get attacked and be forced to reform.

What makes you think the CFC is different from the old NC that would allow it to survive a sovless period? I know CFC members don't like the comparison, but the differences aren't huge. And don't forget that back then building and keeping a large bloc was easier than it is today.
Aineko Macx
#259 - 2016-04-08 18:41:45 UTC
Andski wrote:
I don't know about the Imperium but the CFC would've trounced these fools weeks ago

Since the coalition was exactly the same before and after the rebrand, are you saying the new name is a bad one?
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#260 - 2016-04-08 18:44:50 UTC
Aineko Macx wrote:
Andski wrote:
I don't know about the Imperium but the CFC would've trounced these fools weeks ago

Since the coalition was exactly the same before and after the rebrand, are you saying the new name is a bad one?


It wasn't just the name that changed.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar