These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Fozzie sov

Author
Tian Toralen
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1 - 2016-03-30 21:01:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Tian Toralen
It encourages trolling. First - a single ship is needed to troll, if it works it's cool, if not - who cares.

Then come the command nodes. The command node system was designed for 2 opponents who want the system and fight over it. Bad idea. It allows the attacker to troll keeping his fleet in one piece and going from node to node. The defender has to run after him forever. If the defender splits his fleet, he cannot win. If he keeps it in once piece he gets trolled.

Also the attacker can attack in 100 points at once, without needing 100 real fleets, like in the good old days.
The defender needs to be everywhere, while the attacker is content if he wins in 1-2 places. Then the defender has to deal with command node trolling, this requires a fleet, all the while the attacker trolls another 100 systems just for fun. Did anyone think about this?
Anhenka
The New Federation
Sigma Grindset
#2 - 2016-03-30 21:42:59 UTC
Oh god.

A Goon. Complaining about being on the wrong end of a sov war.

Of being unable to defend against an enemy that outnumbers them across a wide area.

Of the mechanics not favoring them.


******* PRICELESS!
Tian Toralen
State War Academy
Caldari State
#3 - 2016-03-30 21:50:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Tian Toralen
I am new in "goons". Your hate is strong, but I hope you get to defend fozziesov someday.
Soon the only people holding sov will be those new to the game, and everyone else will laugh and troll them.
Anhenka
The New Federation
Sigma Grindset
#4 - 2016-03-30 22:04:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Anhenka
Tian Toralen wrote:
I am new in "goons". Your hate is strong, but I hope you get to defend fozziesov someday.
Soon the only people holding sov will be those new to the game, and everyone else will laugh and troll them.


I have had to defend, and mostly lost, space in probably half the regions in the game, under every single iteration of sov that we have tried since we stopped using POS's to determine who owned space. Including Fozziesov. And most of it to CFC fleets.

Of all of those systems, Fozziesov is both the most fun and the easiest to defend with an active defense. No longer is the optimal win condition to turtle 300 capitals under a cynoajmmer and make it impossible for an enemy to fight you without killing all those caps with subcaps. Especially since the defender gets to set the times when the timers are vulnerable, and when they come out of reinforced.

A smart defender can massively frustrate an attacker by simply jamming the entosis pilot, requiring the pilot to finish his current cycle, then restart and finish and entire warmup cycle, before they can continue making progress. Or blowing it up from long range. Or damping the lock range down below the distance to the node.

But see, to do this you actually have to go out and defend your space. Simply holding it doesn't make it unassailable without an enemy bringing everything and the kitchen sink to try and take it. Not that the old system would help you much since in the current war, your side is being outnumbered 2:1 or more in most major fights.

If an enemy can entosis 100 system and you can only defend one, you control far more space than you can defend, and should not whine when you cant hold it.
Morrigan LeSante
Perkone
Caldari State
#5 - 2016-03-31 07:25:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Morrigan LeSante
C02 managed to almost hold onto a timer outnumbered more than 3:1.

You think that would have been possible in the old ways? They'd have been crushed in 20 minutes.

As it was it created a 5-6 hour dynamic, moving battle with many moving parts where even small units would be very valuable. Imo is was actually a lot closer than the post fight results and propaganda suggest, that was a close contest for quite a while. They were being massacred on field, but winning the timers for a few hours.


Finally people aren't trolling you, it's not a kid ringing your doorbell and running; it is a very angry mob on your lawn out for a lynching.
Adeline Rais
Rais Industries and Research Incorporated
#6 - 2016-03-31 08:39:35 UTC
Morrigan LeSante wrote:
it is a very angry hired mob on your lawn out for a lynching.


Fixed
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#7 - 2016-03-31 08:41:07 UTC
What has "hired" to do with Fozzie Sov?

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Morrigan LeSante
Perkone
Caldari State
#8 - 2016-03-31 08:57:37 UTC
The motivations of the man with the hammer are really not relevant when he's hitting you with it.
Donnachadh
United Allegiance of Undesirables
#9 - 2016-03-31 13:10:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Donnachadh
OP, for the most part Fozzie Sov is doing what it was supposed to do. Yes it does need some tweaks and even CCP admits that, but then you have to remember that it still has not been fully implemented so how it will all work out in the long term is still unknown. And then there are the upcoming changes to cap ships and the addition of Citadels that will affect it as well.

But even going with your own complaints here it seems like Fozzie Sov is working as intended.
Fozzie Sov was intended to make it harder for groups to control territory because they would have to actually be there and actively defend that territory. And here you come complaining that it is hard to defend territory because you have to actually be there to defend it. The problem here is not Fozzie Sov the problem is your understanding of what is was intended to do. Or your problem is a lack of knowledge or understanding of the problem that Fozzie Sov was intended to eliminate.

Considering the age of the character you posted with and allowing that it is your first and only character you have ever had in EvE I can understand why you are confused by the hatred for the Goons or why it runs so deep in the EvE community. To cure that and so you have a deeper understanding of the group you have allied yourself with and why the hate I suggest you spend some time online and study what they Goons have done throughout time.
elitatwo
Zansha Expansion
#10 - 2016-03-31 14:50:55 UTC
Donnachadh wrote:
...just shortened for reading...

Considering the age of the character you posted with and allowing that it is your first and only character you have ever had in EvE I can understand why you are confused by the hatred for the Goons or why it runs so deep in the EvE community. To cure that and so you have a deeper understanding of the group you have allied yourself with and why the hate I suggest you spend some time online and study what they Goons have done throughout time.


...and why I sometime refer to them as Band of Developers. You have to read in the old forums archive to get that.

Eve Minions is recruiting.

This is the law of ship progression!

Aura sound-clips: Aura forever

Vic Jefferson
Stimulus
Rote Kapelle
#11 - 2016-03-31 15:55:36 UTC
Your disdain for AegisSov comes from a reluctance to abandon the coalition mindset, whether that has been instilled in you by goons or not. Have you tried AegisSov outside of a a mega coalition? In every one of these threads about how bad the system is, its almost invariably someone who hasn't left behind coalitions and embraced what you can actually do in AegisSov. Whole regions hum with activity that would have been lifeless before, as would challenging one of the two major powers so openly.

Coalitions are a terrible and outdated construct which minimized conflict and made it meaningless. CFC outright decried that AegisSov would be the end of all major wars in EvE and that it was the worst thing ever because of this.

We are now in the midst of the biggest war the cluster has seen in a while, with multiple engagement theaters, thousands of pilots, and objectives 24/7. None of this would even be remotely possible without AegisSov/Phoebe.

We are back to where a small strong alliance can stake a claim and run with it, determining their own destiny. That is amazing! Now if they just made space actually valuable, and hard to statically control, we'd really have something!

Vote Vic Jefferson for CSM X.....XI.....XII?

Tian Toralen
State War Academy
Caldari State
#12 - 2016-04-05 23:54:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Tian Toralen
Yes sure, let's not live in coalitions anymore. Then we'll surely be able to own sov and not be trolled by the rest of EVE that does not even bother to own sov - but "fozziesov is awesome!"

Fozziesov has basically given every single player, even those a week old - the firepower of a capital fleet. Not the EHP of a capital fleet. Yes they are glass cannons, but this amazing cheap firepower gives the attacker the possibility to troll, and attack everywhere as I said. The defender not only needs to form a fleet if the attacker rate of success is 1/100 and something is RFed, but during that time - something else is also RFed, because it's so cheap to do it.

Do you suggest that Fozziesov will make players live in small alliances owning just a few systems? What stops low sec people to form big alliances and troll them - or farm them for content? No big investment needed to provoke a timer, and a certain response. The new "capital fleets" are cheap. Relax in the wastelands of low-sec, and if you want a fight, troll the null neighbours a little. You don't want their space, you are not stupid. With all these advantages to the attacker, soon anyone trying to live in null-sec will be the laughing stock of all EVE while everyone else attacks them from places that cannot be RFed. It's already happening and of course "fozziesov is awesome" for those not living in it.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#13 - 2016-04-06 00:32:17 UTC
If you dont turn up to defend your stuff, then you can lose it to a week old char. Condense your space to an area your alliance can reliably turn up to defend. Yep, that's the idea.

The details of the idea can be tweaked, but the concept serves its purpose and i very much doubt its going away. The war should provide good data to work with and CCP can see if they need to give defenders more time to respond. They can also see if they need to give more incentive to living in sov null. Sov null is like CCP's golden goose, so i doubt they'd be happy with everyone doing PL's thing.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Anhenka
The New Federation
Sigma Grindset
#14 - 2016-04-06 00:59:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Anhenka
Tian Toralen wrote:
Yes sure, let's not live in coalitions anymore. Then we'll surely be able to own sov and not be trolled by the rest of EVE that does not even bother to own sov - but "fozziesov is awesome!"

Do you suggest that Fozziesov will make players live in small alliances owning just a few systems? What stops low sec people to form big alliances and troll them - or farm them for content?


On 1: Yeah basically. A ton of the map is currently occupied by small groups each owning a small handful of systems.

As for #2, that's typically avoided by not being a grade A ******* to everyone you ever interacted with. Sorry, you're boned in that department.

In my region, (Fountain), there's at least 6 individual smaller factions, several of which are comprised of groups of smaller alliances.

There's "Space Texas" of Violence of Action + Cede Nullis, The Culture + their friends Chaos Theory, LowSechnaya Sholupen, Free Gates Coalition, The Old Guard, and Fountain Core.

Of course, most control one or two constellations, and actively live in and defend that space. Rarely is any of our systems more than a JB and 3-4 jumps away from the stagings system. It's easy to defend that way. While some of your space is literally regions away.

Hold what you need, and hold what you can control. Just as an example, GSF holds 119 systems with (exactly) 17,500 members. That's 145, lets call it 150 people per system. But since GSF doesn't routinely purge inactives, nor do they have any sort of required metric for PvP, you have an abysmal number of active PvP players as a ratio to the number of characters in alliance.

Between your long time strategy of weaponized boredom, and all the ill will your alliance has generated, you have too many enemies, too few PvP pilots, too few FC's, and far too much space for the forces you can muster.

P.S. You realize your alliances has basically been rolling over smaller groups and farming them for content and trolling them for years, right? You know, your whole Eurogoons, Reavers, and Miniluv squads? This isn't even the pot calling the kettle black.This is the BP oil spill calling a single aerosol can bad for the environment, and expecting sympathy.


TLDR: What you have done for years is being aptly done to you. Get wrecked, go homeless.
FT Diomedes
The Graduates
#15 - 2016-04-06 01:10:41 UTC
Anhenka wrote:
Oh god.

A Goon. Complaining about being on the wrong end of a sov war.

Of being unable to defend against an enemy that outnumbers them across a wide area.

Of the mechanics not favoring them.


******* PRICELESS!


I also find this priceless.

CCP should add more NPC 0.0 space to open it up and liven things up: the Stepping Stones project.

FT Diomedes
The Graduates
#16 - 2016-04-06 02:30:37 UTC
Tian Toralen wrote:
It encourages trolling. First - a single ship is needed to troll, if it works it's cool, if not - who cares.

Then come the command nodes. The command node system was designed for 2 opponents who want the system and fight over it. Bad idea. It allows the attacker to troll keeping his fleet in one piece and going from node to node. The defender has to run after him forever. If the defender splits his fleet, he cannot win. If he keeps it in once piece he gets trolled.

Also the attacker can attack in 100 points at once, without needing 100 real fleets, like in the good old days.
The defender needs to be everywhere, while the attacker is content if he wins in 1-2 places. Then the defender has to deal with command node trolling, this requires a fleet, all the while the attacker trolls another 100 systems just for fun. Did anyone think about this?


Tian, you keep making a fool of yourself whining about Aegis Sov. The simple fact of the matter is that it doesn't matter what sovereignty system you have when you are overextended and outnumbered 3 or 4:1. The Imperium is rightly reaping what we sowed for so many years. It will come out on the other side of this war a leaner and more efficient organization. And that is undeniably a good thing.

CCP should add more NPC 0.0 space to open it up and liven things up: the Stepping Stones project.

Fat Buddah
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2016-04-06 04:55:45 UTC
I thought the mechanic was designed so to encourage ppl to hold sov over systems they actually live in, no?
Kenrailae
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2016-04-06 05:47:24 UTC
Anhenka wrote:
Oh god.

A Goon. Complaining about being on the wrong end of a sov war.

Of being unable to defend against an enemy that outnumbers them across a wide area.

Of the mechanics not favoring them.


******* PRICELESS!




*cou.... this .....gh*


At least new Sov creates a 'wider spread' conflict area instead of a single grid like the old system. Helps disperse numbers and tidi.

The Law is a point of View

The NPE IS a big deal

Tian Toralen
State War Academy
Caldari State
#19 - 2016-04-06 09:56:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Tian Toralen
Overextended and outnumbered?
Maybe there is a correct number of systems for a certain number of people - for making people prefer living in null-sec without feeling some hackers are always trolling and all they can do all day is chase trolls around, then respond with fleets if they fail once.

Null sec should give more rewards for living there because of this constant work that people live in null have to do - and it is constant and never ending, given how little investment it takes to attack. Attacking is too cheap to not do it. Assymetric warfare at it's best.

Also look at the sov indices, the strategic index. It still takes 1 month to recover for a JB to be installed, as it did before fozziesov
Yes I am a "goon" now, since 1 month ago I think, was in BNI before that, then I took a break from the game and then joined KF. With the intention of getting revenge on PL. And I'll stay in KF even if we get to low-sec, and fozziesov people win. Good luck defending the space then. Or, it will become like I said in the post above, troll-sec.
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#20 - 2016-04-06 10:11:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Rivr Luzade
Dissolve your coalition, get smaller and you will see how quickly "trolling" stops.

That aside, no one is trolling in Deklein by the looks. And if someone tried (in the past), Deklein residents either laughed at it (like they do with ratting carrier kills of low-class members) or formed a fleet to destroy the attackers (like with ratting carriers of higher ups). Other regions of CFC space were less populated and less defended and people in the past probably attacked the sov there to provoke fights without risking instant master blobs on their heels. Now, however, no one is trolling CFC space and the remaining 40% of Null sec population are all out attacking CFC space. No trolls anywhere. Thus, I do not see what you are talking about.
And when it comes to the time after large parts of the MBC left the area, it is only natural that no small alliance or small coalition can stand against 30k people (or even just the CONDI's 12k (sans their renters, although they should be counted as their line members regardless of status). If such a big group has nothing better to do than to troll smaller groups, you give MBC all the reasons they need to stay longer in the area and give you a hard time for a longer period.

And even that aside, if you do not undock from Saranen and fight the fleets presented to you on the silver platter, you can hardly accuse serious sov attackers as trolling. Instead, you are trolling yourself with your own incompetence and absence from your space.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

12Next page